ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07877558CINUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Home-Based Exercise and Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy

An interventional study of Active non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) and Sham non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) in Chemotherapy-induced Neuropathy, sponsored by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.

Sponsored by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Updated Oct 16, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Studies highlight the potential benefits of home-based exercise for cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced neuropathy (CIN); however, its effectiveness in alleviating CIN-related sensorimotor impairments and symptoms has been inconsistent and generally modest. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) has emerged as a promising adjunct for CIN rehabilitation. Preliminary studies suggest that nVNS can enhance the therapeutic effects of exercise-based rehabilitation, leading to greater improvements in sensorimotor impairments. A recent trial found that nVNS alleviated CIN-related pain and improved mental well-being, but did not significantly enhance physical well-being or clinician-rated CIN severity.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of combining home-based exercise with non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) to alleviate chemotherapy-induced neuropathy (CIN) and improve quality of life in cancer survivors.

Design and Subjects: This phase II randomized controlled trial will enroll 60 cancer survivors with established CIN following treatment with platinum compounds or taxanes. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three groups: exercise with real nVNS (ERS), exercise with sham nVNS (ESS), or usual care.

Interventions: Participants in the experimental groups will engage in a 12-week home-based exercise program, with the ERS group receiving real nVNS and the ESS group receiving sham stimulation.

Study Instruments and Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome, patient-reported CIN, will be assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20-item (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20). Secondary outcomes will include the Total Neuropathy Score-nurse for clinician-reported CIN, the Symptom Distress Scale for general symptoms, functional performance measures (Timed Up and Go Test and 6-Minute Walk Test), and the EORTC QLQ-Core 30-item for quality of life.

Data Analysis and Expected Results: Generalized Estimating Equations will be used for efficacy outcome analysis. It is anticipated that the combined intervention may lead to improvements in CIN, functioning, and quality of life, thereby supporting further research in larger trials.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chemotherapy-induced Neuropathy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy
  • Exercise
  • Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation
  • Cancer survivors
  • Phase II
  • Randomized controlled trial
03

In context

Motor Activity

2,646 studies on the registry are indexed under Motor Activity; 1,205 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 60 across 2,309 interventional studies indexed under Motor Activity.

Browse Motor Activity studies →

Lead sponsor

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University is the lead sponsor of 676 studies on the registry; 254 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Hong Kong residents who can communicate in Cantonese, Mandarin, or English;
  2. Aged 18 years or older;
  3. Cancer survivors with complete disease remission after radical treatment;
  4. Completed a chemotherapy regimen with radical intent that included at least one of the following agents for a minimum of 3 months:

    • Platinum compounds (e.g., cisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin);
    • Taxanes (e.g., paclitaxel, docetaxel);
  5. Have CIN of at least grade 2 assessed by a clinician based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (NCI-CTCAE 5.0), or self-rate ≥ 2 points on at least one item in the 4-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire;
  6. Physically capable of engaging in exercise and assessments, as determined by the ability to complete the 6MWT;
  7. Able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known history of peripheral neuropathy or related symptoms prior to chemotherapy;
  2. History of heart disease;
  3. Bradycardia (heart rate \< 60 beats per minute);
  4. Pregnancy;
  5. Presence of active implants, such as cardiac pacemakers, cochlear implants, and implanted neurostimulators;
  6. Known metastasis to the central or peripheral nervous system;
  7. Any physical or mental handicap;
  8. History of alcohol or illegal drug abuse;
  9. Using a hearing aid device on the left ear;
  10. Receiving other non-pharmacological treatments for CIN within the past 2 months;
  11. Engaging in over 30 minutes of exercise for 2 or more days per week prior to enrollment;
  12. Any wound, infection, skin allergy, or deformity in the left ear;
  13. Any other medical contraindication to exercise and/or nVNS as determined by the treating oncologist.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Exercise with Real nVNS (ERS) group

    Participants will receive active non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) concurrently with a standardized 12-week home-based exercise program after baseline assessment and randomization. The exercise program will include moderate-intensity aerobic walking (30 min daily; initial step goal based on pre-intervention average daily steps; weekly increase of 5-20%) and resistance training, targeting Borg 3-5/10. Active nVNS will be applied to the left cymba concha using tVNS501 at 25 Hz with a pulse width of 250 µs, 30 seconds on and 30 seconds off, and an intensity of 0.25-2.0 mA (maximum tolerable level) during exercise. It will be stopped during rest and after exercise.

    Device: Active non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) · Behavioral: Home-based aerobic and resistance exercise program

  • Sham comparator
    Exercise with Sham nVNS (ESS) group

    The ESS group will receive the same 12-week home-based exercise program as the ERS group following baseline assessment and randomization, including moderate-intensity aerobic walking and resistance training. However, the stimulator will deliver a low frequency of 1 Hz at an intensity that elicits only the minimum perceptible sensation, with the aim of inducing a subtherapeutic placebo effect by mimicking active stimulation. Sham stimulation will be administered by the same research associate during the first face-to-face training session, after which participants will self-administer it concurrently with the home-based exercise program.

    Device: Sham non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) · Behavioral: Home-based aerobic and resistance exercise program

  • No intervention
    Usual Care (UC) group

    The UC group will receive routine follow-up and consultation with doctors and/or nurses, without any supplementary information regarding home-based exercise or nVNS during the study period. However, they will have the opportunity to access the home-based exercise program, including a face-to-face session and an instruction booklet containing information regarding only the home-based exercise program, but not nVNS stimulator operation, after completing the final post-intervention assessment at Week 12.

Interventions

  • DeviceActive non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS)

    nVNS will be applied to the left auricular region during the 12-week home-based exercise program. The ERS group will receive real stimulation at a frequency of 25 Hz, a pulse width of 250 µs, a pulse-train duration of 30 seconds on and 30 seconds off, and an intensity set at the maximum tolerable level for each participant (0.25-2.0 mA). Stimulation will be stopped during rest and after exercise. A portable device (tVNS501; Changzhou Rishena Medical Device Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China) will be used to deliver the stimulation. During the first face-to-face training session, a trained research associate will configure the device parameters and position the electrode on the participant's left cymba concha. Subsequently, participants will be trained to self-administer the stimulation during home-based exercise.

  • DeviceSham non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS)

    The ESS group will undergo sham stimulation using the same device and electrode placement as the ERS group. Sham stimulation will be administered by the same trained research associate during the first face-to-face training session and subsequently self-administered by the participants during the 12-week home-based exercise program. However, the stimulator will be set to deliver a low stimulation frequency of 1 Hz at an intensity that elicits only the minimum perceptible sensation, with the aim of inducing a subtherapeutic placebo effect by mimicking active stimulation. The pulse width will be set to the lowest output of the stimulator, 100 µs, and the pulse-train duration will be 10 seconds on and 50 seconds off, thereby minimizing any potential physiological effects.

  • BehavioralHome-based aerobic and resistance exercise program

    The home-based exercise program includes aerobic and resistance training at moderate intensity (modified Borg 3-5/10). Aerobic: daily walking 30 min, initial step goal based on pre-intervention average daily steps, increased by 5-20% each week for 12 weeks, with self-monitoring of Borg and weekly follow-up guidance. Resistance: upper- and lower-body elastic band exercises (shoulder flexion/extension, horizontal abduction, elbow flexion/extension, heel raises, partial squats), 1-2 sets of 6 repetitions per set, completed within 1 minute, with 1-1.5 minutes of rest between sets, for a total of up to 30 minutes, progressing to a maximum of 15 repetitions per set. Participants receive an instruction booklet, three elastic bands, and a wrist pedometer. A 60-min face-to-face training session is delivered by a trained research associate at a study hospital, a university teaching room, or the participant's home.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient-Reported Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy as Assessed by the Chinese Version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20)

    The Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 will be utilized to assess patient-reported chemotherapy-induced neuropathy. This 20-item questionnaire is an effective tool recommended by the National Cancer Institute for evaluating the CIPN phenotype, which includes sensory, motor, and autonomic symptoms in clinical trials. Both the Chinese and English versions demonstrate good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.78-0.90), test-retest reliability (r = 0.73-0.84), and responsiveness to change (Cohen's d = 0.42-1.42).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at Week 12.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinician-Reported Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy as Assessed by the Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn)

    The TNSn will be used. This tool includes three symptom-related questions that evaluate sensory symptom distribution, motor symptom impact, and autonomic symptom presence, along with assessments of vibration and pinprick sensations. Each symptom and sign is rated on a scale from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more severe conditions. The TNSn has been validated in clinimetric studies, showing a Minimal Clinically Important Difference of 2.79 points.

    Time frame: At baseline (before intervention), Week 6, and Week 12 after randomization.

  2. General Symptoms as Assessed by the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS)

    The SDS will be used to assess general symptoms, including nausea, loss of appetite, insomnia, pain, fatigue, constipation and diarrhea, concentration difficulties, and changes in physical appearance. The scale employs a 5-point Likert-type scoring system, where 1 indicates normal symptom levels and 5 represents the highest degree of distress. Total scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores reflecting greater symptom distress. Previous studies have shown that the SDS has acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach's α values between 0.71 and 0.88.

    Time frame: At baseline (before intervention), Week 6, and Week 12 after randomization.

  3. Timed Up and Go Test

    The TUGT measures dynamic balance and mobility by timing how long it takes a participant to rise from a seated position, walk three meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down. Participants will perform the task twice, and the average time will be recorded.

    Time frame: At baseline (before intervention), Week 6, and Week 12 after randomization.

  4. 6-Minute Walk Test

    The 6MWT evaluates endurance and physical performance by measuring the distance participants can walk at their usual speed for six minutes along a flat corridor, with the total distance recorded in meters. This test quantitatively reflects functional performance and exercise capacity, making it relevant for this population.

    Time frame: At baseline (before intervention), Week 6, and Week 12 after randomization.

  5. Health-Related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Chinese Version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 will be used to assess health-related quality of life. Previous studies indicate moderate to good test-retest reliability (r = 0.54-0.86) and person separation reliability (r = 0.47-0.89) for both the English and Chinese versions.

    Time frame: At baseline (before intervention), Week 6, and Week 12 after randomization.

Other outcomes

  1. Recruitment rate

    Defined as the number of eligible participants who provide informed consent and are randomized, divided by the total number of eligible patients identified, multiplied by 100.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  2. Retention rate

    Defined as the percentage of enrolled patients who complete both the baseline and all follow-up assessments.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  3. Acceptability as Assessed by the Chinese version of the Patients' Global Impression of Change

    The Chinese version of the PGIC is a single-item, 7-point numerical rating scale ranging from 1 to 7 that assesses participants' subjective perceptions of improvement and satisfaction after receiving the study intervention.

    Time frame: At Week 12 (post-intervention)

  4. Adherence to aerobic exercise

    Adherence to the prescribed aerobic exercise, measured by the number of steps taken per day.

    Time frame: Daily during the 12-week intervention period, from randomization through Week 12.

  5. Adherence to resistance exercise

    Adherence to the prescribed resistance exercise, measured as the duration of exercise performed in minutes.

    Time frame: During the 12-week intervention period, from randomization through Week 12.

  6. Adherence to nVNS or sham stimulation

    Adherence to the assigned nVNS or sham stimulation, measured as the duration of completed prescribed stimulation sessions in minutes.

    Time frame: During the 12-week intervention period, from randomization through Week 12.

  7. Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Related Adverse Events, as Assessed Using the NCI-CTCAE Version 5.0

    Participants will be asked to report any adverse effects occurring during their participation in the study. The type, onset, and duration of each adverse effect will be recorded on a standardized form in accordance with the NCI-CTCAE Version 5.0 guidelines.

    Time frame: During the 12-week intervention period, from randomization through Week 12.

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Department of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Department of Surgery, Kwong Wah Hospital
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hurst H, Bolton J. Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Jan;27(1):26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2003.11.003. PubMed 14739871 ↗
  • Shih CL, Chen CH, Sheu CF, Lang HC, Hsieh CL. Validating and improving the reliability of the EORTC qlq-c30 using a multidimensional Rasch model. Value Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(5):848-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jul 17. PubMed 23947980 ↗
  • McCrary JM, Goldstein D, Wyld D, Henderson R, Lewis CR, Park SB. Mobility in survivors with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and utility of the 6-min walk test. J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Aug;13(4):495-502. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00769-7. Epub 2019 Jun 6. PubMed 31172429 ↗
  • Winters-Stone KM, Krasnow SM, Horak FB, Mancini M, Cameron MH, Dieckmann NF, Stoyles SA, Roeland EJ. Identifying trajectories and predictors of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy symptoms, physical functioning, and falls across treatment and recovery in adults treated with neurotoxic chemotherapy: the PATTERN observational study protocol (NCT05790538). BMC Cancer. 2023 Nov 10;23(1):1087. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11546-2. PubMed 37946117 ↗
  • Stapleton SJ, Holden J, Epstein J, Wilkie DJ. A Systematic Review of the Symptom Distress Scale in Advanced Cancer Studies. Cancer Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;39(4):E9-E23. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000292. PubMed 26252436 ↗
  • Alberti P, Bernasconi DP, Cornblath DR, Merkies ISJ, Park SB, Velasco R, Bruna J, Psimaras D, Koeppen S, Pace A, Dorsey SG, Argyriou AA, Kalofonos HP, Briani C, Schenone A, Faber CG, Mazzeo A, Grisold W, Valsecchi M, Cavaletti G; CI-PeriNomS group. Prospective Evaluation of Health Care Provider and Patient Assessments in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity. Neurology. 2021 Aug 17;97(7):e660-e672. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012300. Epub 2021 Jun 2. PubMed 34078718 ↗
  • Cheng HL, Molassiotis A. Longitudinal validation and comparison of the Chinese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer-Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity subscale (FACT/GOG-Ntx). Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb;15(1):56-62. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13000. Epub 2018 Jun 5. PubMed 29873180 ↗
  • Dorsey SG, Kleckner IR, Barton D, Mustian K, O'Mara A, St Germain D, Cavaletti G, Danhauer SC, Hershman DL, Hohmann AG, Hoke A, Hopkins JO, Kelly KP, Loprinzi CL, McLeod HL, Mohile S, Paice J, Rowland JH, Salvemini D, Segal RA, Smith EL, Stevens WM, Janelsins MC. The National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting for Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Jun 1;111(6):531-537. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz011. PubMed 30715378 ↗
  • Cocks K, Torgerson DJ. Sample size calculations for pilot randomized trials: a confidence interval approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;66(2):197-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Nov 27. PubMed 23195919 ↗
  • Pan L, Wang J, Wu W, Wang Y, Zhu Y, Song Y. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation improves working memory in temporal lobe epilepsy: A randomized double-blind study. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024 Feb;30(2):e14395. doi: 10.1111/cns.14395. Epub 2023 Aug 8. PubMed 37553557 ↗
  • Steidel K, Krause K, Menzler K, Strzelczyk A, Immisch I, Fuest S, Gorny I, Mross P, Hakel L, Schmidt L, Timmermann L, Rosenow F, Bauer S, Knake S. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation influences gastric motility: A randomized, double-blind trial in healthy individuals. Brain Stimul. 2021 Sep-Oct;14(5):1126-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.06.006. Epub 2021 Jun 27. PubMed 34187756 ↗
  • Bauer S, Baier H, Baumgartner C, Bohlmann K, Fauser S, Graf W, Hillenbrand B, Hirsch M, Last C, Lerche H, Mayer T, Schulze-Bonhage A, Steinhoff BJ, Weber Y, Hartlep A, Rosenow F, Hamer HM. Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial (cMPsE02). Brain Stimul. 2016 May-Jun;9(3):356-363. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.11.003. Epub 2016 Jan 20. PubMed 27033012 ↗
  • Zhang J, Chen Q, Shen Q, Yan C, Jiang T, Li J, Sayer S, Ai Z, Yu X, Zeng Q, Chen G. Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation on Alleviating Postoperative Pain Following Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Participant- and Assessor-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin J Pain. 2025 Oct 1;41(10):e1315. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001315. PubMed 40775700 ↗
  • Pudkasam S, Feehan J, Talevski J, Vingrys K, Polman R, Chinlumprasert N, Stojanovska L, Apostolopoulos V. Motivational strategies to improve adherence to physical activity in breast cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas. 2021 Oct;152:32-47. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.06.008. Epub 2021 Jun 24. PubMed 34674806 ↗
  • Nishijima TF, Shimokawa M, Hamabe T, Komoda M, Okumura Y, Arimizu K, Morita M, Esaki T, Nyrop KA. Development of a Leg And Walking Self-exercise (LAWS) program for older adults during cancer treatment. Support Care Cancer. 2024 Nov 5;32(12):773. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08965-7. PubMed 39499396 ↗
  • Hoffman AJ, Brintnall RA, Brown JK, Eye Av, Jones LW, Alderink G, Ritz-Holland D, Enter M, Patzelt LH, Vanotteren GM. Too sick not to exercise: using a 6-week, home-based exercise intervention for cancer-related fatigue self-management for postsurgical non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;36(3):175-88. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31826c7763. PubMed 23051872 ↗
  • Torres-Saavedra PA, Winter KA. An Overview of Phase 2 Clinical Trial Designs. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Jan 1;112(1):22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1700. Epub 2021 Aug 4. PubMed 34363901 ↗
  • Thompson SL, O'Leary GH, Austelle CW, Gruber E, Kahn AT, Manett AJ, Short B, Badran BW. A Review of Parameter Settings for Invasive and Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Applied in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. Front Neurosci. 2021 Jul 13;15:709436. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.709436. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34326720 ↗
  • Hilz MJ. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation - A brief introduction and overview. Auton Neurosci. 2022 Dec;243:103038. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2022.103038. Epub 2022 Sep 27. PubMed 36201901 ↗
  • Zhang H, Shan AD, Wan CH, Cao XY, Yuan YS, Ye SY, Gao MX, Gao LZ, Tong Q, Gan CT, Sun HM, Zhang KZ. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation improves anxiety symptoms and cortical activity during verbal fluency task in Parkinson's disease with anxiety. J Affect Disord. 2024 Sep 15;361:556-563. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.083. Epub 2024 Jun 24. PubMed 38925314 ↗
  • Zhang H, Cao XY, Wang LN, Tong Q, Sun HM, Gan CT, Shan AD, Yuan YS, Zhang KZ. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation improves gait and cortical activity in Parkinson's disease: A pilot randomized study. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2023 Dec;29(12):3889-3900. doi: 10.1111/cns.14309. Epub 2023 Jun 13. PubMed 37311693 ↗
  • Duff IT, Likar R, Perruchoud C, Kampusch S, Kostenberger M, Sator S, Stremnitzer C, Wolf A, Neuwersch-Sommeregger S, Abd-Elsayed A. Clinical Efficacy of Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic and Acute Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pain Ther. 2024 Dec;13(6):1407-1427. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00657-8. Epub 2024 Oct 9. PubMed 39382792 ↗
  • Redgrave J, Day D, Leung H, Laud PJ, Ali A, Lindert R, Majid A. Safety and tolerability of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve stimulation in humans; a systematic review. Brain Stimul. 2018 Nov-Dec;11(6):1225-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 23. PubMed 30217648 ↗
  • Su JJ, Winnige P, Chamradova K, Dosbaba F, Batalikova K, Lin R, Antoniou V, Pepera G, Batalik L. Feasibility, safety, and adherence of home-based exercise interventions in people diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Mar 22. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01778-5. Online ahead of print. PubMed 40119984 ↗
  • Baek IS, Choi S, Yoon H, Chung G, Kim SK. Analgesic Effect of Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Oxaliplatin-induced Peripheral Neuropathic Pain in a Rodent Model. Exp Neurobiol. 2024 Jun 30;33(3):129-139. doi: 10.5607/en24012. PubMed 38993080 ↗
  • Ackland GL, Patel ABU, Miller S, Gutierrez Del Arroyo A, Thirugnanasambanthar J, Ravindran JI, Schroth J, Boot J, Caton L, Mein CA, Abbott TEF, Gourine AV. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation and exercise capacity in healthy volunteers: a randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2025 May 2;46(17):1634-1644. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf037. PubMed 39969124 ↗
  • Yang Y, Zhang R, Zhong Z, Li J, Feng Y. Efficacy of transauricular vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy: a randomized controlled exploratory study. Neurol Sci. 2024 May;45(5):2289-2300. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-07229-2. Epub 2023 Dec 8. PubMed 38063922 ↗
  • Aranow C, Atish-Fregoso Y, Lesser M, Mackay M, Anderson E, Chavan S, Zanos TP, Datta-Chaudhuri T, Bouton C, Tracey KJ, Diamond B. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation reduces pain and fatigue in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Feb;80(2):203-208. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217872. Epub 2020 Nov 3. PubMed 33144299 ↗
  • Evancho A, Tyler WJ, McGregor K. A review of combined neuromodulation and physical therapy interventions for enhanced neurorehabilitation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jul 21;17:1151218. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1151218. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37545593 ↗
  • Demircioglu G, Ozden AV, Genc H. Comparison of the efficacy of auricular vagus nerve stimulation and conventional low back rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2024 Aug;56:101862. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101862. Epub 2024 May 28. PubMed 38815433 ↗
  • Redgrave JN, Moore L, Oyekunle T, Ebrahim M, Falidas K, Snowdon N, Ali A, Majid A. Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation with Concurrent Upper Limb Repetitive Task Practice for Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Pilot Study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Jul;27(7):1998-2005. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.02.056. Epub 2018 Mar 23. PubMed 29580658 ↗
  • Baig SS, Falidas K, Laud PJ, Snowdon N, Farooq MU, Ali A, Majid A, Redgrave JN. Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation with Upper Limb Repetitive Task Practice May Improve Sensory Recovery in Chronic Stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Dec;28(12):104348. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104348. Epub 2019 Sep 27. PubMed 31570261 ↗
  • Zuo X, Xu Y, Li S, Jiang J, Wang J, Zhu Y, Pan D, Li H, Chen Y, Chen Y, Rong X, Zheng D, Lu K, Mai H, Chen M, Chen P, Li J, Simone CB, Chua MLK, Li Y, Shen Q, Xiao S, Tang Y. Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation plus pregabalin for radiotherapy-related neuropathic pain in patients with head and neck cancer (RELAX): a phase 2 randomised trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jul 12;86:103345. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103345. eCollection 2025 Aug. PubMed 40697962 ↗
  • Kleckner IR, Manuweera T, Lin PJ, Chung KH, Kleckner AS, Gewandter JS, Culakova E, Tivarus ME, Dunne RF, Loh KP, Mohile NA, Kesler SR, Mustian KM. Pilot trial testing the effects of exercise on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) and the interoceptive brain system. Support Care Cancer. 2024 Sep 21;32(10):677. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08855-y. PubMed 39304604 ↗
  • Kleckner IR, Kamen C, Gewandter JS, Mohile NA, Heckler CE, Culakova E, Fung C, Janelsins MC, Asare M, Lin PJ, Reddy PS, Giguere J, Berenberg J, Kesler SR, Mustian KM. Effects of exercise during chemotherapy on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Apr;26(4):1019-1028. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-4013-0. Epub 2017 Dec 14. PubMed 29243164 ↗
  • Kleckner IR, Kamen C, Cole C, Fung C, Heckler CE, Guido JJ, Culakova E, Onitilo AA, Conlin A, Kuebler JP, Mohile S, Janelsins M, Mustian KM. Effects of exercise on inflammation in patients receiving chemotherapy: a nationwide NCORP randomized clinical trial. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Dec;27(12):4615-4625. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04772-7. Epub 2019 Apr 2. PubMed 30937600 ↗
  • Campbell KL, Winters-Stone KM, Wiskemann J, May AM, Schwartz AL, Courneya KS, Zucker DS, Matthews CE, Ligibel JA, Gerber LH, Morris GS, Patel AV, Hue TF, Perna FM, Schmitz KH. Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus Statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Nov;51(11):2375-2390. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002116. PubMed 31626055 ↗
  • Avancini A, Borsati A, Toniolo L, Ciurnelli C, Belluomini L, Budolfsen T, Lillelund C, Milella M, Quist M, Pilotto S. Physical activity guidelines in oncology: A systematic review of the current recommendations. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2025 Jun;210:104718. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104718. Epub 2025 Apr 5. PubMed 40194715 ↗
  • Borg G: Borg's perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign, IL, US: Human Kinetics; 1998
  • Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulator (t-VNS) [Internet]. Changzhou Rishena Medical Device Co., Ltd. [cited 2026 Sep 11]. Available from: https://www.rishena.com/portal/article/index/id/32.html

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All individual participant data underlying the results reported in the publication will be made available.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years after the publication of results

Access criteria: Upon reasonable request to the Principal Investigator, individual participant data may be shared, provided that the requester submits a proposal describing the planned analyses and signs a data-sharing agreement. Requests and supporting documents should be submitted to the Principal Investigator at robbie-m.wang@polyu.edu.hk

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 16, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 16, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07877558
Collaborators
Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Kwong Wah Hospital, Tuen Mun Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 16, 2026
Start date
Dec 21, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 20, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 16, 2026

Study contacts

Mian Wang, PhD
Contact
robbie-m.wang@polyu.edu.hk
Hong Kong SAR, +852 6879 9254
Fenglin Zhang, MPhil
Contact
reyna.zhang@polyu.edu.hk
Hong Kong SAR, +852 7018 5728
Mian Wang, PhD
principal investigator · The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion