An interventional study of tSCS and tVNS in Chronic Stroke, sponsored by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Recruiting at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-20.
Sponsored by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Upper limb impairment is present in more than 85% of people with stroke, which greatly affect the quality of life, social participation, and performance of daily activities of people with stroke. Previous study also revealed that 53.4% of people after stroke experienced cognitive impairment. Different cognitive domains might be affected following stroke, such as attention, memory, language, and orientation, and the problems with memory are often prominent. Yet, there is no effective treatment for the post-stroke cognitive impairment.
Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) are simple and non-invasive treatment to improve upper limb motor function and cognitive function. However, no existing studies have explored on the effects of tSCS and tVNS on cognitive function in people with stroke. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on improving upper limb function and cognitive function in people with chronic stroke.
This study aims to investigate the effects of three intervention protocols in people with stroke. The participants in Group A will receive tSCS on C6 and T5 level of the spine with upper limb exercises. The participants in Group B will receive tVNS on the cymba conchae of left outer ear with upper limb exercises. The participants in Group C will receive placebo stimulation with upper limb exercises.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University is the lead sponsor of 659 studies on the registry; 250 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
The participants will be received eighteen 45-minute sessions of intervention, 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks.
Device: tSCS
The participants will be received eighteen 45-minute sessions of intervention, 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks.
Device: tVNS
The participants will be received eighteen 45-minute sessions of intervention, 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks.
Device: Control
The participants in Group A will receive tSCS (Burst mode, 9 pulses per burst, pulse frequency = 160 Hz, burst frequency = 2 Hz) with upper limb exercises. The electrical stimulation will be generated by the neurostimulator (MH8000P; MEDIHIGHTEC MEDICAL CO., LTD., Taiwan). Two 7.5 × 12.6 cm electrodes will be attached between C6 and T5 level on each side of spinal column and with 2 cm from the spine. Intensity of TENS will be individually selected by the participants according to tolerance levels.
The participants in Group B will receive tVNS (pulse frequency = 25Hz, pulse duration = 0.3 ms) on the cymba conchae of left outer ear with upper limb exercises.The electrical stimulation will be generated by the neurostimulator (MH8000P; MEDIHIGHTEC MEDICAL CO., LTD., Taiwan). Intensity of tVNS will be individually selected by the participants according to tolerance levels. Previous studies showed that it was effective to improve the upper limb motor function in people with stroke and cognitive function in people with mild cognitive function.
The participants in Group C will receive placebo tSCS and tVNS with upper limb exercises, where the stimulation will be delivered by placebo-TENS device with disconnected electrical circuit.
Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) assesses the motor control, which included the reflex, synergistic and isolated movements and coordination of the upper extremity. It is a 3-point ordinal scale with 33 items and the total score ranges from 0 to 66. In this scale, "0" represents "cannot perform", "1" represents "performs partially" and "2" represents "performs fully". The higher score indicates better motor control of the upper extremity. The FMA-UE has an excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.98) in people with stroke.
Time frame: Baseline (0 week)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) assesses the motor control, which included the reflex, synergistic and isolated movements and coordination of the upper extremity. It is a 3-point ordinal scale with 33 items and the total score ranges from 0 to 66. In this scale, "0" represents "cannot perform", "1" represents "performs partially" and "2" represents "performs fully". The higher score indicates better motor control of the upper extremity. The FMA-UE has an excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.98) in people with stroke.
Time frame: Mid-intervention (3 week)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) assesses the motor control, which included the reflex, synergistic and isolated movements and coordination of the upper extremity. It is a 3-point ordinal scale with 33 items and the total score ranges from 0 to 66. In this scale, "0" represents "cannot perform", "1" represents "performs partially" and "2" represents "performs fully". The higher score indicates better motor control of the upper extremity. The FMA-UE has an excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.98) in people with stroke.
Time frame: Post-intervention (6 week)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) assesses the motor control, which included the reflex, synergistic and isolated movements and coordination of the upper extremity. It is a 3-point ordinal scale with 33 items and the total score ranges from 0 to 66. In this scale, "0" represents "cannot perform", "1" represents "performs partially" and "2" represents "performs fully". The higher score indicates better motor control of the upper extremity. The FMA-UE has an excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.98) in people with stroke.
Time frame: 1-month follow-up (10 week)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a screening tool to detect cognitive impairment of an individual with a total score of 30. The MoCA assesses different cognitive domains, including executive functioning, immediate and delayed memory, visuospatial abilities, attention, working memory, language, and orientation to time and place. It can identify dementia from controls with a sensitivity of 92.3% and specificity of 91.8% with a cut-off score of 22.
Time frame: Baseline (0 week)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a screening tool to detect cognitive impairment of an individual with a total score of 30. The MoCA assesses different cognitive domains, including executive functioning, immediate and delayed memory, visuospatial abilities, attention, working memory, language, and orientation to time and place. It can identify dementia from controls with a sensitivity of 92.3% and specificity of 91.8% with a cut-off score of 22.
Time frame: Mid-intervention (3 week)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a screening tool to detect cognitive impairment of an individual with a total score of 30. The MoCA assesses different cognitive domains, including executive functioning, immediate and delayed memory, visuospatial abilities, attention, working memory, language, and orientation to time and place. It can identify dementia from controls with a sensitivity of 92.3% and specificity of 91.8% with a cut-off score of 22.
Time frame: Post-intervention (6 week)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a screening tool to detect cognitive impairment of an individual with a total score of 30. The MoCA assesses different cognitive domains, including executive functioning, immediate and delayed memory, visuospatial abilities, attention, working memory, language, and orientation to time and place. It can identify dementia from controls with a sensitivity of 92.3% and specificity of 91.8% with a cut-off score of 22.
Time frame: 1-month follow-up (10 week)
Wolf Motor Function Test
The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) evaluates the motor ability of upper extremity through timed and functional tasks. It consists of 17 tasks which is rated by 6-point scale which ranges from 0 (no attempt made to use the more affected upper extremity) to 5 (movement appears to be normal). The time for completing each functional task is also recorded, with a maximum of 120 seconds allow for each task. The higher score represents the better functioning level of upper extremity, Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.92 - 0.99) has been demonstrated in people with stroke.
Time frame: Baseline (0 week)
Wolf Motor Function Test
The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) evaluates the motor ability of upper extremity through timed and functional tasks. It consists of 17 tasks which is rated by 6-point scale which ranges from 0 (no attempt made to use the more affected upper extremity) to 5 (movement appears to be normal). The time for completing each functional task is also recorded, with a maximum of 120 seconds allow for each task. The higher score represents the better functioning level of upper extremity, Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.92 - 0.99) has been demonstrated in people with stroke.
Time frame: Mid-intervention (3 week)
Wolf Motor Function Test
The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) evaluates the motor ability of upper extremity through timed and functional tasks. It consists of 17 tasks which is rated by 6-point scale which ranges from 0 (no attempt made to use the more affected upper extremity) to 5 (movement appears to be normal). The time for completing each functional task is also recorded, with a maximum of 120 seconds allow for each task. The higher score represents the better functioning level of upper extremity, Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.92 - 0.99) has been demonstrated in people with stroke.
Time frame: Post-intervention (6 week)
Wolf Motor Function Test
The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) evaluates the motor ability of upper extremity through timed and functional tasks. It consists of 17 tasks which is rated by 6-point scale which ranges from 0 (no attempt made to use the more affected upper extremity) to 5 (movement appears to be normal). The time for completing each functional task is also recorded, with a maximum of 120 seconds allow for each task. The higher score represents the better functioning level of upper extremity, Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.92 - 0.99) has been demonstrated in people with stroke.
Time frame: 1-month follow-up (10 week)
Muscle strength
A hand-held dynamometer (Model 01165; Lafayette Instrument, Indiana, USA) will be used to measure the muscle force generated by biceps brachii and triceps brachii muscles of affected and unaffected sides. The participant will be instructed to perform isometric contraction and resistance will be applied by the examiner to avoid movement of the arm during the measurement. Two trials will be performed for each muscle group and the mean force of two trials will be recorded.
Time frame: Baseline (0 week)
Digit Span Test
The Digit Span Test (DST) consists of two parts to measure the verbal short-term memory and working memory of an individual, which are digit span forwards and digit span backwards. The participants are presented with a series of numbers. In the digit span forward (DSF), they are required to repeat the numbers in forward order. In the digit span backward (DSB), they are asked to repeat the numbers in reverse order. The length of digits in each string increases from 3 to 9 in DSF and from 2 to 8 in DSB. Two trials are presented at each length. The test is interrupted when participant failed to either trial at equal digit length. If the participants correctly recall the sequence in either first and second trial, 1 point will be scored. The total score of DSF and DSB are 16 and 14 respectively. The intra-rater reliability of DSF and DSB are 0.891 and 0.598 respectively in older adults with neurocognitive disorder.
Time frame: 1-month follow-up (10 week)
Digit Span Test
The Digit Span Test (DST) consists of two parts to measure the verbal short-term memory and working memory of an individual, which are digit span forwards and digit span backwards. The participants are presented with a series of numbers. In the digit span forward (DSF), they are required to repeat the numbers in forward order. In the digit span backward (DSB), they are asked to repeat the numbers in reverse order. The length of digits in each string increases from 3 to 9 in DSF and from 2 to 8 in DSB. Two trials are presented at each length. The test is interrupted when participant failed to either trial at equal digit length. If the participants correctly recall the sequence in either first and second trial, 1 point will be scored. The total score of DSF and DSB are 16 and 14 respectively. The intra-rater reliability of DSF and DSB are 0.891 and 0.598 respectively in older adults with neurocognitive disorder.
Time frame: Post-intervention (6 week)
Digit Span Test
The Digit Span Test (DST) consists of two parts to measure the verbal short-term memory and working memory of an individual, which are digit span forwards and digit span backwards. The participants are presented with a series of numbers. In the digit span forward (DSF), they are required to repeat the numbers in forward order. In the digit span backward (DSB), they are asked to repeat the numbers in reverse order. The length of digits in each string increases from 3 to 9 in DSF and from 2 to 8 in DSB. Two trials are presented at each length. The test is interrupted when participant failed to either trial at equal digit length. If the participants correctly recall the sequence in either first and second trial, 1 point will be scored. The total score of DSF and DSB are 16 and 14 respectively. The intra-rater reliability of DSF and DSB are 0.891 and 0.598 respectively in older adults with neurocognitive disorder.
Time frame: Mid-intervention (3 week)
Digit Span Test
The Digit Span Test (DST) consists of two parts to measure the verbal short-term memory and working memory of an individual, which are digit span forwards and digit span backwards. The participants are presented with a series of numbers. In the digit span forward (DSF), they are required to repeat the numbers in forward order. In the digit span backward (DSB), they are asked to repeat the numbers in reverse order. The length of digits in each string increases from 3 to 9 in DSF and from 2 to 8 in DSB. Two trials are presented at each length. The test is interrupted when participant failed to either trial at equal digit length. If the participants correctly recall the sequence in either first and second trial, 1 point will be scored. The total score of DSF and DSB are 16 and 14 respectively. The intra-rater reliability of DSF and DSB are 0.891 and 0.598 respectively in older adults with neurocognitive disorder.
Time frame: Baseline (0 week)
Arm Activity Measure
The Arm Activity Measure (ArmA) is a 20-item questionnaire to assess the difficulties in passive and active upper limb tasks, where section A evaluates the passive function and section B evaluates the active function. It uses a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no difficulty) to 4 (unable to do the task). The total score of section A and B are 32 and 52 respectively \[59\]. The higher score in ArmA indicates more difficulties experienced in activities when using upper limb. Good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85 - 0.96) has been shown in people with upper limb paresis.
Time frame: 1-month follow-up (10 week)
Arm Activity Measure
The Arm Activity Measure (ArmA) is a 20-item questionnaire to assess the difficulties in passive and active upper limb tasks, where section A evaluates the passive function and section B evaluates the active function. It uses a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no difficulty) to 4 (unable to do the task). The total score of section A and B are 32 and 52 respectively \[59\]. The higher score in ArmA indicates more difficulties experienced in activities when using upper limb. Good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85 - 0.96) has been shown in people with upper limb paresis.
Time frame: Post-intervention (6 week)
Arm Activity Measure
The Arm Activity Measure (ArmA) is a 20-item questionnaire to assess the difficulties in passive and active upper limb tasks, where section A evaluates the passive function and section B evaluates the active function. It uses a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no difficulty) to 4 (unable to do the task). The total score of section A and B are 32 and 52 respectively \[59\]. The higher score in ArmA indicates more difficulties experienced in activities when using upper limb. Good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85 - 0.96) has been shown in people with upper limb paresis.
Time frame: Mid-intervention (3 week)
Arm Activity Measure
The Arm Activity Measure (ArmA) is a 20-item questionnaire to assess the difficulties in passive and active upper limb tasks, where section A evaluates the passive function and section B evaluates the active function. It uses a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no difficulty) to 4 (unable to do the task). The total score of section A and B are 32 and 52 respectively \[59\]. The higher score in ArmA indicates more difficulties experienced in activities when using upper limb. Good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85 - 0.96) has been shown in people with upper limb paresis.
Time frame: Baseline (0 week)
12-item Short-Form Survey (second version)
The 12-item Short-Form Survey (second version) (SF-12v2) will be used to measure the health-related quality of life of individuals. This instrument contains eight domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. It has good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.48 - 0.81) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.67 - 0.82) in healthy adults.
Time frame: 1-month follow-up (10 week)
12-item Short-Form Survey (second version)
The 12-item Short-Form Survey (second version) (SF-12v2) will be used to measure the health-related quality of life of individuals. This instrument contains eight domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. It has good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.48 - 0.81) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.67 - 0.82) in healthy adults.
Time frame: Post-intervention (6 week)
12-item Short-Form Survey (second version)
The 12-item Short-Form Survey (second version) (SF-12v2) will be used to measure the health-related quality of life of individuals. This instrument contains eight domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. It has good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.48 - 0.81) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.67 - 0.82) in healthy adults.
Time frame: Mid-intervention (3 week)
12-item Short-Form Survey (second version)
The 12-item Short-Form Survey (second version) (SF-12v2) will be used to measure the health-related quality of life of individuals. This instrument contains eight domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. It has good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.48 - 0.81) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.67 - 0.82) in healthy adults.
Time frame: Baseline (0 week)
Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire
The 23-item Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire (Ox-PAQ) evaluates participation and activity levels based on the three domains of routine activities, social engagement, and emotional well-being. Each item is measured on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never; 1 = rarely; 2 = sometimes; 3 = often; 4 = always). The higher scores represent greater difficulties with participation and activities. Good to excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.81 - 0.96) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.83 - 0.96) have been shown for this instrument in people with motor neuron disease, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease.
Time frame: 1-month follow-up (10 week)
Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire
The 23-item Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire (Ox-PAQ) evaluates participation and activity levels based on the three domains of routine activities, social engagement, and emotional well-being. Each item is measured on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never; 1 = rarely; 2 = sometimes; 3 = often; 4 = always). The higher scores represent greater difficulties with participation and activities. Good to excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.81 - 0.96) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.83 - 0.96) have been shown for this instrument in people with motor neuron disease, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease.
Time frame: Post-intervention (6 week)
Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire
The 23-item Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire (Ox-PAQ) evaluates participation and activity levels based on the three domains of routine activities, social engagement, and emotional well-being. Each item is measured on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never; 1 = rarely; 2 = sometimes; 3 = often; 4 = always). The higher scores represent greater difficulties with participation and activities. Good to excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.81 - 0.96) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.83 - 0.96) have been shown for this instrument in people with motor neuron disease, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease.
Time frame: Mid-intervention (3 week)
Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire
The 23-item Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire (Ox-PAQ) evaluates participation and activity levels based on the three domains of routine activities, social engagement, and emotional well-being. Each item is measured on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never; 1 = rarely; 2 = sometimes; 3 = often; 4 = always). The higher scores represent greater difficulties with participation and activities. Good to excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.81 - 0.96) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.83 - 0.96) have been shown for this instrument in people with motor neuron disease, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease.
Time frame: Baseline (0 week)
Trail Making Test
Trail Making Test (TMT) can assess the attention and cognitive flexibility of individuals. The test is divided into part A and part B. In part A, the circle is numbered (i.e., 1 to 25). The subjects should draw lines in numeric order of the listed circle. In part B, the circles include both numbers (i.e., 1 to 13) and words (i.e., A to L). The subjects should draw the lines in a specific sequence between number and word (i.e., 1 to A to 2 to B etc.). A shorter time recorded in the test indicated the better performance. The test-retest reliability has been tested in people with stroke (ICC = 0.94 and 0.86 for Part A and Part B, respectively).
Time frame: 1-month follow-up (10 week)
Trail Making Test
Trail Making Test (TMT) can assess the attention and cognitive flexibility of individuals. The test is divided into part A and part B. In part A, the circle is numbered (i.e., 1 to 25). The subjects should draw lines in numeric order of the listed circle. In part B, the circles include both numbers (i.e., 1 to 13) and words (i.e., A to L). The subjects should draw the lines in a specific sequence between number and word (i.e., 1 to A to 2 to B etc.). A shorter time recorded in the test indicated the better performance. The test-retest reliability has been tested in people with stroke (ICC = 0.94 and 0.86 for Part A and Part B, respectively).
Time frame: Post-intervention (6 week)
Trail Making Test
Trail Making Test (TMT) can assess the attention and cognitive flexibility of individuals. The test is divided into part A and part B. In part A, the circle is numbered (i.e., 1 to 25). The subjects should draw lines in numeric order of the listed circle. In part B, the circles include both numbers (i.e., 1 to 13) and words (i.e., A to L). The subjects should draw the lines in a specific sequence between number and word (i.e., 1 to A to 2 to B etc.). A shorter time recorded in the test indicated the better performance. The test-retest reliability has been tested in people with stroke (ICC = 0.94 and 0.86 for Part A and Part B, respectively).
Time frame: Mid-intervention (3 week)
Trail Making Test
Trail Making Test (TMT) can assess the attention and cognitive flexibility of individuals. The test is divided into part A and part B. In part A, the circle is numbered (i.e., 1 to 25). The subjects should draw lines in numeric order of the listed circle. In part B, the circles include both numbers (i.e., 1 to 13) and words (i.e., A to L). The subjects should draw the lines in a specific sequence between number and word (i.e., 1 to A to 2 to B etc.). A shorter time recorded in the test indicated the better performance. The test-retest reliability has been tested in people with stroke (ICC = 0.94 and 0.86 for Part A and Part B, respectively).
Time frame: Baseline (0 week)
Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test - Third edition
The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test - Third edition (RBMT-3) examines the everyday memory function with 14 subtests, including the assessment for visual, verbal, recall, recognition, immediate, and delayed memory. The scaled score of each subtest and total scaled score will be computed by converting raw scores based on different age group using the conversion table of original RBMT-3. The minimum and maximum values of scaled scores for every subsets are 1 and 19, respectively. Higher scaled score indicates better memory function. The RBMT-3 has demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.997) and intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.924) and good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.643 - 0.832) in people with dementia, mild cognitive impairment and healthy older adults.
Time frame: Mid-intervention (3 week)
Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test - Third edition
The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test - Third edition (RBMT-3) examines the everyday memory function with 14 subtests, including the assessment for visual, verbal, recall, recognition, immediate, and delayed memory. The scaled score of each subtest and total scaled score will be computed by converting raw scores based on different age group using the conversion table of original RBMT-3. The minimum and maximum values of scaled scores for every subsets are 1 and 19, respectively. Higher scaled score indicates better memory function. The RBMT-3 has demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.997) and intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.924) and good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.643 - 0.832) in people with dementia, mild cognitive impairment and healthy older adults.
Time frame: Baseline (0 week)
Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test - Third edition
The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test - Third edition (RBMT-3) examines the everyday memory function with 14 subtests, including the assessment for visual, verbal, recall, recognition, immediate, and delayed memory. The scaled score of each subtest and total scaled score will be computed by converting raw scores based on different age group using the conversion table of original RBMT-3. The minimum and maximum values of scaled scores for every subsets are 1 and 19, respectively. Higher scaled score indicates better memory function. The RBMT-3 has demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.997) and intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.924) and good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.643 - 0.832) in people with dementia, mild cognitive impairment and healthy older adults.
Time frame: Post-intervention (6 week)
Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test - Third edition
The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test - Third edition (RBMT-3) examines the everyday memory function with 14 subtests, including the assessment for visual, verbal, recall, recognition, immediate, and delayed memory. The scaled score of each subtest and total scaled score will be computed by converting raw scores based on different age group using the conversion table of original RBMT-3. The minimum and maximum values of scaled scores for every subsets are 1 and 19, respectively. Higher scaled score indicates better memory function. The RBMT-3 has demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.997) and intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.924) and good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.643 - 0.832) in people with dementia, mild cognitive impairment and healthy older adults.
Time frame: 1-month follow-up (10 week)
Muscle stiffness
The muscle stiffness of biceps brachii and triceps brachii muscles will be quantified by MyotonPRO device (Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia). The MyotonPRO device will be placed perpendicularly to the skin surface and apply mechanical impulses on the muscles to generate damped oscillations of the underlying tissue. The biceps brachii measurements will be performed at the long head of the muscle in the middle of the arm. The triceps brachii measurements will be performed at the medial head of the muscle in the middle of the arm. Muscle stiffness will be described as newton-meter (N/m), where the higher value indicates the higher stiffness of the tissue.
Time frame: 1-month follow-up (10 week)
Muscle stiffness
The muscle stiffness of biceps brachii and triceps brachii muscles will be quantified by MyotonPRO device (Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia). The MyotonPRO device will be placed perpendicularly to the skin surface and apply mechanical impulses on the muscles to generate damped oscillations of the underlying tissue. The biceps brachii measurements will be performed at the long head of the muscle in the middle of the arm. The triceps brachii measurements will be performed at the medial head of the muscle in the middle of the arm. Muscle stiffness will be described as newton-meter (N/m), where the higher value indicates the higher stiffness of the tissue.
Time frame: Post-intervention (6 week)
Muscle stiffness
The muscle stiffness of biceps brachii and triceps brachii muscles will be quantified by MyotonPRO device (Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia). The MyotonPRO device will be placed perpendicularly to the skin surface and apply mechanical impulses on the muscles to generate damped oscillations of the underlying tissue. The biceps brachii measurements will be performed at the long head of the muscle in the middle of the arm. The triceps brachii measurements will be performed at the medial head of the muscle in the middle of the arm. Muscle stiffness will be described as newton-meter (N/m), where the higher value indicates the higher stiffness of the tissue.
Time frame: Mid-intervention (3 week)
Muscle stiffness
The muscle stiffness of biceps brachii and triceps brachii muscles will be quantified by MyotonPRO device (Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia). The MyotonPRO device will be placed perpendicularly to the skin surface and apply mechanical impulses on the muscles to generate damped oscillations of the underlying tissue. The biceps brachii measurements will be performed at the long head of the muscle in the middle of the arm. The triceps brachii measurements will be performed at the medial head of the muscle in the middle of the arm. Muscle stiffness will be described as newton-meter (N/m), where the higher value indicates the higher stiffness of the tissue.
Time frame: Baseline (0 week)
Muscle strength
A hand-held dynamometer (Model 01165; Lafayette Instrument, Indiana, USA) will be used to measure the muscle force generated by biceps brachii and triceps brachii muscles of affected and unaffected sides. The participant will be instructed to perform isometric contraction and resistance will be applied by the examiner to avoid movement of the arm during the measurement. Two trials will be performed for each muscle group and the mean force of two trials will be recorded.
Time frame: 1-month follow-up (10 week)
Muscle strength
A hand-held dynamometer (Model 01165; Lafayette Instrument, Indiana, USA) will be used to measure the muscle force generated by biceps brachii and triceps brachii muscles of affected and unaffected sides. The participant will be instructed to perform isometric contraction and resistance will be applied by the examiner to avoid movement of the arm during the measurement. Two trials will be performed for each muscle group and the mean force of two trials will be recorded.
Time frame: Post-intervention (6 week)
Muscle strength
A hand-held dynamometer (Model 01165; Lafayette Instrument, Indiana, USA) will be used to measure the muscle force generated by biceps brachii and triceps brachii muscles of affected and unaffected sides. The participant will be instructed to perform isometric contraction and resistance will be applied by the examiner to avoid movement of the arm during the measurement. Two trials will be performed for each muscle group and the mean force of two trials will be recorded.
Time frame: Mid-intervention (3 week)
Plan to share: Yes — IPD that underlie the results reported in a publication, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University