ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06769672dual-task tDCSUpdated Oct 14, 2026

Dual-task Training Combined With tDCS on Cognitive-motor Performance and Brain Activity in Stroke Patients

An interventional study of active tDCS with dual-task training and sham tDCS with dual-task training in Stroke and Cortical Excitability, sponsored by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Recruiting at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-14.

Sponsored by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 10 months later.
Updated Oct 14, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 73 studies in Stroke by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University — 32 open to participants now, 34 under way, none of them phase 3. Stroke · The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

Planned enrollment
26th of 70
72 · median 60
Started
2025
with 7 others
No phase
70 of 73
30 open now
Primary completion
2027-04
later than 16 of 33 live
Registered
53rd of 73
by date

Among the 73 studies in Stroke by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, this one is the 26th largest by planned enrollment of the 70 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 8 that started in 2025, is one of 70 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 16 of the 33 other live ones, and was the 53rd registered.

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

Browse Stroke studies →

Open to participants now

32 of the 73 studies in Stroke by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University are open now, in 3 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

26 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 32 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 1,415 Stroke studies recruiting now, 697 (49%) set no upper age limit and 280 (20%) stop at 75 or younger; 77 take children under 18; 196 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 50 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 73 studies in Stroke by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the effects of tDCS combined with cognitive-motor training on dual-task interference during walking and foot pedaling, alongside corresponding alterations in brain activity assessed via fNIRS. Additionally, an fMRI component was conducted as a nested sub-study for deep mechanistic exploration.

Read the detailed description

In China, the prevalence of stroke increased by 106.0% (93.7-118.8) between 1990 and 2019, highlighting the persistent and substantial burden of this condition. Post-stroke recovery, particularly the ability to achieve community ambulation, plays a critical role in improving health-related quality of life. Effective community ambulation in daily life requires the ability to dual-task-namely, to perform concurrent tasks requiring attentional resources while maintaining walking function and balance. Emerging evidence suggests that stroke survivors face greater challenges in walking function and dual-task balance compared to their age-matched, able-bodied counterparts. For instance, when tasked with recalling a shopping list while walking, stroke patients exhibit a more pronounced decline in both walking speed and cognitive performance relative to control groups. Given the necessity for stroke survivors to reintegrate into the community, it is imperative to thoroughly investigate this phenomenon of cognitive-motor interference.

03

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Cortical Excitability

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dual-task training
  • Cognitive-motor interference
  • tDCS
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • a diagnosis of stroke, stroke onset of more than 6 months,
  • aged 50 or more,
  • capable of following verbal and visual instructions,
  • having a score ≥ 22,
  • able to walk for 10 meters with/without a mobility aid,
  • community-dwelling, unilateral stroke

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • neurological disorders, gait-precluding pain or comorbidity,
  • receiving any formal rehabilitation training,
  • to exercise (e.g., unstable angina),
  • contraindications to fNIRS, MRI, and tDCS (e.g., brain skin injury, pacemaker, metal implants in the brain),
  • history of seizure or epilepsy,
  • color blindness.
  • unable to walk with/without a mobility aid while responsing stimulus by the remote control
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
72 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    active tDCS combined with dual-task group

    patients receive three active tDCS and three dual motor-cognitive exercise training per week for four weeks.

    Other: active tDCS with dual-task training

  • Active comparator
    sham tDCS combined with dual-task group

    Patients receive three sham tDCS and three dual cognitive-motor exercise training per week for four weeks.

    Other: sham tDCS with dual-task training

Interventions

  • Otheractive tDCS with dual-task training

    participants receive three 20-minute active tDCS treatment and three 60-minute COGMOTION dual-task exercise sessions per week for four consecutive weeks.

  • Othersham tDCS with dual-task training

    participants receive three 20-minute sham tDCS treatment and three 60-minute COGMOTION dual-task exercise sessions per week for four consecutive weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dual-task self-paced walking--gait speed

    Gait speed under dual-task walking condition will be recorded

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Dual-task self-paced walking--cognitive performance

    Number of correct responses will be measured during dual-task conditions

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dual-task self-paced walking--gait performance 1

    Gait cadence will be measured during dual-task walking

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Dual-task self-paced walking--gait performance 2

    Stride length will be measured during dual-task walking

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Dual-task self-paced walking--gait performance 3

    Dor-Plantar Range under dual-task walking will be recorded

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Dual-task self-paced walking--cognitive performance 1

    Correct reaction time under dual-task walking will be recorded

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. Oxyhemoglobin concentration changes of the brain

    Oxyhemoglobin concentration changes will be measured using functional near infra-red spectroscopy during dual-task walking

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  6. Dual-task pedaling--cadence

    cadence under dual-task foot pedaling will be recorded

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  7. Dual-task pedaling--cognitive performance 1

    Number of correct responses under dual-task foot pedaling will be recorded

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  8. Blood oxygenation level changes of the brain

    Blood oxygenation level changes will be measured using Magnetic Resonance Imaging during dual-task foot pedaling

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  9. tDCS adverse event

    number of patients who report an adverse event will be recorded.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Other outcomes

  1. Dual-task pedaling--peak angular velocity

    Peak angular (dorsi-plantar flexion) velocity under dual-task foot pedaling will be recorded

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Dual-task pedaling--Dorsi and Plantar range

    Dorsi and Plantar range during dual-task foot pedaling will be recorded

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Dual-task walking--truning mobility

    number of steps in turn will be recorded during dual-task walking

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Single-task walking speed

    10-meter walking test will be used to assess single-task walking speed in meters per second

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. Balance 1

    Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test will be used to assess postural control, with total points from 0-28. Higher points indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  6. Balance 2

    Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale will be used to assess confidence of functional balance performance, with total points from 0-100. Higher points indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  7. Cognitive performance

    Stroop color word test will be used to assess executive function

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  8. Cognitive performance 1

    Montreal Cognitive Assessment will be used to assess global cognition, with total points from 0-30. Higher points indicate better performance.

    Time frame: before the initiation of training

  9. Cognitive performance 2

    Trail Making Test will be used to assess executive function

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  10. Fall incidence

    Monthly telephone interviews for recording fall incidence

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of a year

  11. dual-task maximal walking--gait performance

    Walking time under dual-task walking at maximal speed will be recorded

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  12. dual-task maximal walking--cognitive performance

    Accuracy under dual-task walking at maximal speed will be recorded

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 27 months after the start.

Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 27 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 14, 2026: primary completion Dec 2026 → Apr 2027 and completion Dec 2026 → Apr 2027.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 6, 2025
First posted
Jan 10, 2025
StartActual
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Apr 30, 2027was Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Apr 30, 2027was Dec 2026
Last update
Oct 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026→Apr 30, 2027
Oct 14, 2026
Study completion
Dec 31, 2026→Apr 30, 2027
Oct 14, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 14, 2026
    Primary completion Dec 31, 2026→Apr 30, 2027
    Study completion Dec 31, 2026→Apr 30, 2027

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06769672
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 10, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 14, 2026

Study contacts

Prof. Marco PANG
Contact
Marco.Pang@polyu.edu.hk
+852 2766 7156

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion