ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07110454DETECT LTFUUpdated Oct 22, 2026

Diagnosing Epilepsy To EffeCT Change Long-Term Follow-Up

An observational study in Epilepsy and Epilepsy (Treatment Refractory), sponsored by Epiminder America, Inc.. Recruiting at 21 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.

Sponsored by Epiminder America, Inc. · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 10 months later.
Updated Oct 22, 20263 sites addedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
210
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research is to address the challenges of correctly monitoring, managing, and diagnosing epilepsy in participants whose seizures are not well captured by standard electroencephalography (EEG) tests and who cannot use or are not able to use more standard monitoring techniques. This research is being done to understand how the Minder System helps physicians make decisions about participant's epilepsy treatment after an actionable event. The Minder System was granted De Novo classification by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and is not investigational.

Participants that have completed the DETECT study and received the Minder System previously will consent to join this long-term follow-up observational study. The study will collect information about general wellbeing, use of healthcare services, and experience using the Minder data over time to support long-term epilepsy care.

All participants will continue to be followed by their treating physician and undergo assessments and visits every six (6) months until two (2) years after receiving the Minder device.

02

Conditions studied

  • Epilepsy
  • Epilepsy (Treatment Refractory)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Minder System
  • Sub-scalp EEG monitoring device
03

In context

Epilepsy

1,848 studies on the registry are indexed under Epilepsy; 422 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 210 is above the median of 112 across 540 observational studies indexed under Epilepsy.

Browse Epilepsy studies →

Lead sponsor

Epiminder America, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants previously implanted with the Minder device

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant met all inclusion criteria, was enrolled in the DETECT study, and received the Minder device
  • Participant completed the DETECT study by receiving an actionable event or by completing the 6-month follow-up visit
  • Participant continues to have the Minder device implanted
  • Participant must continue to meet relevant DETECT study inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant meets any relevant DETECT study exclusion criteria including needing treatments or assessments that are not indicated with the Minder System like Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
210 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Observational

    Minder System

    Device: Previous receipt of the Minder System (implantable continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring (iCEM) system)

Interventions

  • DevicePrevious receipt of the Minder System (implantable continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring (iCEM) system)

    The Minder System consists of an implanted device containing an electrode lead and telemetry unit. The electrode lead contains four electrodes that are placed under the patient's scalp to record electrical activity (EEGs) from both sides of the brain. The electrode lead is connected to the telemetry until that continuously transmits these signals to the external Minder devices to remotely show EEGs for clinician review.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the Minder System to aid in treatment following an actionable event by comparing change using the Patient Global Impression scale (PGIC) from baseline to follow-up.

    Time frame: 2 years

Other outcomes

  1. To evaluate the Minder System to aid in treatment following an actionable event by comparing change using Clinician Global Impression scale (CGIC) from baseline to follow-up.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. To evaluate the Minder System to aid in treatment following an actionable event by comparing quality of life using the EQ-5D from baseline to follow-up.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. To evaluate the Minder System to aid in treatment following an actionable event by comparing healthcare utilization by number of surgeries or procedures.

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. To evaluate the Minder System to aid in treatment following an actionable event by comparing healthcare utilization by medication usage.

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. To evaluate the Minder System to aid in treatment following an actionable event by comparing healthcare utilization by the number of hospital visits.

    Time frame: 2 years

  6. To evaluate the Minder System to aid in treatment following an actionable event by comparing participant wellbeing using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) for symptoms associated with anxiety from baseline to follow-up.

    Time frame: 2 years

  7. To evaluate the Minder System to aid in treatment following an actionable event by comparing participant wellbeing using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) for symptoms associated with depression from baseline to follow-up.

    Time frame: 2 years

  8. To evaluate the Minder System to aid in treatment following an actionable event by comparing quality of life using the Quality of life in epilepsy-31 (QOLIE-31) from baseline to follow-up.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

21 of 21 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Halliday AJ, Gillinder L, Lai A, Seneviratne U, Fontenot H, Cameron T, McLean K, Niemiec A, Raghupathi R, Ganguly TM, Ellis C, Conrad EC, Briggs R, Bulluss K, Kwan P, Perucca P, O'Brien TJ, McGonigal A, Gutman M, Papacostas J, Fong MWK, Lee A, Crompton DE, Laing J, Wijayath M, Morokoff AP, Murphy M, D'Souza WJ, Cook MJ. The UMPIRE study: A first-in-human multicenter trial of bilateral subscalp monitoring for epileptic seizure detection. Epilepsia. 2025 Sep;66(9):3426-3439. doi: 10.1111/epi.18458. Epub 2025 May 30. PubMed 40445205 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

3 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2029, 37 months after the start.

Of 37 industry-sponsored observational studies under Epilepsy, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 59. This study's planned 37 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 230 studies reached it within 59 months; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 119.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 24, 2025
First posted
Aug 7, 2025
StartActual
Dec 23, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2029
CompletionEst.
Jan 2029
Last update
Oct 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Sites
3 sites added
Show 3 added (3 United States)
  • Michigan Medicine · Ann Arbor, United States
  • University of Minnesota · Minneapolis, United States
  • UC San Diego Health · San Diego, United States
across 3 updates, Oct 13, 2026 – Oct 22, 2026
Show all 3 updates
  1. Oct 22, 2026
    1 site added
    Show site
    • UC San Diego Health · San Diego, United States
  2. Oct 15, 2026
    1 site added
    Show site
    • University of Minnesota · Minneapolis, United States
  3. Oct 13, 2026
    1 site added
    Show site
    • Michigan Medicine · Ann Arbor, United States
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07110454
Lead sponsor
Epiminder America, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 7, 2025
Start date
Dec 23, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 22, 2026

Study contacts

Epiminder, Director of Clinical Trials
Contact
clinical@epiminder.com
800-717-3185

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion