ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07873255Updated Oct 14, 2026

Artificial Intelligence-assisted Primary Care for Influenza Vaccination Among Chronic Patients in China (AIPC-Flu)

An interventional study of AI-assisted primary care intervention in Influenza Vaccination, sponsored by Fudan University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-14.

Sponsored by Fudan University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Updated Oct 14, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether an AI-assisted primary care intervention can increase influenza vaccination uptake among patients with chronic diseases and to assess the cost-effectiveness and potential for implementing the intervention in routine primary care.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does the AI-assisted primary care intervention increase influenza risk perception, influenza vaccine literacy, vaccine confidence, intention to receive influenza vaccination, and influenza vaccination uptake among patients with chronic diseases?
  2. Is the AI-assisted primary care intervention cost-effective compared with conventional health education?
  3. Is the AI-assisted primary care intervention acceptable, feasible, and potentially sustainable for influenza vaccination promotion?

Researchers will compare patients with chronic diseases who receive the AI-assisted primary care intervention with those who do not receive it to determine whether the intervention improves patients' literacy, confidence, intention, and uptake of influenza vaccination.

Participants will:

  1. Be recruited and randomly assigned to the intervention group or control group. Participants in the intervention group will have access to an AI assistant for influenza vaccine-related information and will receive an influenza vaccination recommendation from primary care physicians, while participants in the control group will receive routine health education.
  2. Complete a survey questionnaire assessing patients' influenza risk perception, influenza vaccine literacy, vaccine confidence, and intention to receive influenza vaccination.
  3. Have their influenza vaccination uptake assessed at the end of the trial.
Read the detailed description

A randomized controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of an AI-assisted primary care intervention to improve influenza vaccination uptake among patients with chronic diseases in China, with additional health economic and feasibility evaluations to assess its cost-effectiveness and potential for scale-up.

The sample size calculation is based on the primary outcome measure (influenza vaccination uptake) and the main analysis method (comparison of rates between two groups). Based on the literature review and survey, the current influenza vaccination uptake among patients with chronic diseases is estimated to be approximately 5%. We assume that the uptake rate could increase to 10% following the intervention. Using the formula for comparing two independent proportions, the minimum required sample size is calculated to be 578 participants in each group, with a significance level (α) of 0.05 and a statistical power (1-β) of 0.90. To account for potential loss to follow-up, assuming a 10% loss to follow-up rate, each group will include 650 participants, with a total sample size of 1,300.

A randomized controlled design will be employed across four representative regions in China, selected to reflect different levels of economic development and geography: a municipality, a provincial capital, an ordinary city, and a rural county. In each region, 2-4 community health centers (CHCs) will be selected, and eligible adults aged 18-64 years with one or more chronic diseases will be recruited in CHCs, where all eligible attendees will be invited to participate. Eligible patients with chronic diseases who provide written informed consent will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group or the control group. The randomization sequence will be generated in advance by a statistician using a computer-generated random number method. At each study site, participants will be allocated sequentially according to their order of enrollment. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding of participants and on-site intervention implementers is not feasible. Local coordinators, outcome assessors, data managers, and statistical analysts will remain blinded to group allocation throughout the study to minimize assessment and analysis bias.

Building on the evaluation of intervention effectiveness, we will conduct a health economic evaluation to assess the economic value of the influenza AI-assisted primary care intervention. Costs will be estimated using a micro-costing approach from both health-system and societal perspectives, covering the costs of developing, deploying, and maintaining the AI assistant as well as the primary care physicians' labor-time costs; incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) will be calculated as the additional cost per additional person vaccinated, per percentage-point increase in vaccination uptake, and per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, complemented by sensitivity and budget-impact analyses. In addition, a feasibility evaluation combining quantitative and qualitative methods will assess the real-world feasibility and scalability of the influenza AI-assisted primary care intervention. Quantitatively, a questionnaire survey will assess chronic-disease patients' experience with and acceptability of the AI assistant and the physician recommendation. Qualitatively, semi-structured interviews will be conducted with CDC staffs, primary care physicians, and patients with chronic diseases to explore the reasons underlying vaccination decisions, the acceptability of the AI-assisted intervention, and the role of primary care physicians in promoting vaccination.

Statistical Analysis

  1. Primary Outcome Analysis An intention-to-treat (ITT) approach will be used as the primary analysis strategy, with all randomly assigned participants analyzed according to their original group allocation. Between-group comparisons will be performed using t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables.

    The primary outcome is influenza vaccination uptake among participants within one and three months after the intervention. A log-binomial regression model will be used to estimate the relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI), with CHCs included as a fixed effect and adjustment for prespecified covariates. If the log-binomial model fails to converge, a modified Poisson regression model will be used instead. The adjusted absolute risk difference and its 95% CI will also be estimated from the regression model to evaluate the public health significance of the intervention. Prespecified covariates will include region, sex, age, type of chronic disease, previous influenza vaccination history, education level, occupation, type of health insurance, and income. Prespecified subgroup analyses will be conducted by including subgroup variables and their interaction terms with the intervention group in the primary analysis model to assess heterogeneity of intervention effects across participant characteristics. Prespecified subgroups will include region, sex, age group (18-54 vs. 55-64 years), type of chronic disease, previous influenza vaccination history, education level, occupation, type of health insurance, and income.

  2. Secondary Outcomes Analysis Secondary outcomes include time to influenza vaccination uptake among participants within three months following the intervention; influenza risk perception; influenza vaccine literacy; vaccine confidence; and intention to receive influenza vaccination. Time-to-event analyses for time to influenza vaccination uptake will be conducted using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between groups with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models will be used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Influenza risk perception, vaccine confidence, and intention to receive influenza vaccination will be analyzed as binary outcomes using the same log-binomial or modified Poisson regression models as for the primary outcome, accounting for CHC effects. Results will be reported as relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs. Influenza vaccine literacy will be analyzed as a continuous outcome using linear regression models, accounting for CHC effects. Intervention effects will be estimated after adjustment for prespecified covariates, with results reported as adjusted mean differences (aMDs) and 95% CIs. Prespecified subgroup analyses will be performed by including subgroup variables and their interaction terms with intervention assignment in the analysis models to assess heterogeneity of intervention effects across participant characteristics. Prespecified subgroups will include region, sex, age group (18-54 vs. 55-64 years), type of chronic disease, previous influenza vaccination history, education level, occupation, type of health insurance, and income.
  3. Sensitivity Analysis A per-protocol (PP) analysis will be conducted as a sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of the primary findings. The PP analysis will include intervention-group participants who complete the prescribed AI-assisted primary care intervention, as well as participants in the control group. In addition, within the intervention group, intervention engagement will be assessed on the basis of AI assistant usage and physician recommendation. Participants will be categorized into high- and low-engagement groups. Differences in intervention effects between these engagement levels will then be compared to assess the association between intervention intensity and influenza vaccination uptake.
02

Conditions studied

  • Influenza Vaccination

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • inlfuenza
  • vaccination uptake
  • patients with chronic diseases
  • randomized controlled trial
  • implementation science
  • AI chatbot
03

In context

Influenza, Human

2,264 studies on the registry are indexed under Influenza, Human; 173 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,300 is above the median of 240 across 1,894 interventional studies indexed under Influenza, Human.

Browse Influenza, Human studies →

Lead sponsor

Fudan University is the lead sponsor of 1,308 studies on the registry; 637 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18-64 years with one or more chronic diseases;
  • Patients who have not received influenza vaccine in the current flu season and have no contraindications to influenza vaccination;
  • Patients who have access to an electronic device capable of scanning QR codes and are able to participate in the study activities;
  • Patients who provide written informed consent and voluntarily agree to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients younger than 18 years or older than 64 years, or without any chronic disease;
  • Patients who have already received influenza vaccine in the current flu season or have contraindications to influenza vaccination;
  • Patients who do not have access to an electronic device capable of scanning QR codes or who are unable to participate in the study activities;
  • Patients who do not provide written informed consent or do not voluntarily agree to participate in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AI-assisted primary care intervention group

    Primary care physicians will provide brief health education to patients with chronic diseases about influenza vaccination, and will recommend the use of the influenza vaccine AI assistant via an educational pamphlet. Participants and their family members will interact with the AI assistant on site for at least 5 minutes. For those who are eligible and express willingness to receive influenza vaccination, primary care physicians will assist with appointment scheduling or guide them to vaccination services. Participants who do not complete vaccination on site will subsequently receive phone reminders to schedule an appointment and complete vaccination. In addition, primary care physicians will establish WeChat groups to deliver intervention reinforcement. Brief educational pamphlet with access links to the AI assistant, accompanied by voice explanations, will be sent to participants on the day of the intervention and at two weeks, one month, and two months thereafter as reminders.

    Behavioral: AI-assisted primary care intervention

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Participants will receive only routine health education without additional intervention. After completion of the study, access to the influenza vaccine AI assistant will be made available to participants in the control group.

Interventions

  • BehavioralAI-assisted primary care intervention

    Primary care physicians will provide brief health education to participants on influenza vaccination and will recommend the use of an AI-powered influenza vaccine chatbot for at least 5 minutes. For those who are eligible and express willingness to receive influenza vaccination, primary care physicians will assist with appointment scheduling and vaccination. The AI-powered influenza vaccine chatbot is designed to provide information and health education about influenza vaccination. It is powered by large language models and is trained on an expert-validated knowledge base derived from authoritative sources such as the National Health Commission and China CDC to ensure accuracy. The chatbot engages users in interactive, conversational dialogue to answer questions and address concerns regarding influenza vaccination. It is delivered via WeChat or a web browser for user access and offers both conversational and navigational interaction modes, supporting text and voice input.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Influenza vaccine uptake

    Whether participants get vaccinated against influenza during the study period, measured by official vaccination records.

    Time frame: Within one and three months after the intervention initiation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to influenza vaccine uptake

    Time from the intervention initiation to influenza vaccine uptake among participants, measured by official vaccination records. Unit of Measure: days.

    Time frame: From date of the intervention initiation until the date of first dose vaccinated, assessed up to three months

  2. Intention to receive influenza vaccine

    Whether participants plan to receive influenza vaccine within the flu season, assessed by questionnaire. It is a binary variable and categorized as intended or unintended.

    Time frame: Day 1, within one day after the on-site intervention completion

  3. Influenza risk perception

    Perceived susceptibility to and severity of influenza, assessed by questionnaire. It is a binary variable and categorized as high or low risk perception.

    Time frame: Day 1, within one day after the on-site intervention completion

  4. Influenza vaccine literacy

    Participants' literacy, assessed by the total number of correct answers on a series of questions about influenza and influenza vaccine.

    Time frame: Day 1, within one day after the on-site intervention completion

  5. Influenza vaccine confidence

    Participants' confidence in the importance, effectiveness, and safety of influenza vaccine, assessed by questionnaire. It is a binary variable and categorized as high or low confidence.

    Time frame: Day 1, within one day after the on-site intervention completion

Other outcomes

  1. Usability of AI-assisted primary care intervention

    The usability of the AIPC intervention will be evaluated using a series of questions on its acceptability, feasibility, and sustainability, including AI chatbot and primary care physician recommendation. The Likert 5-point scale is used, with scores ranging from 1 to 5 on a scale of "completely disagree" to "completely agree". Higher scores indicating greater perceived usability of the AIPC intervention.

    Time frame: Day 1, within one day after the on-site intervention completion

  2. Cost of AI-assisted primary care intervention

    The cost of designing and implementing the influenza vaccine AI assisted primary care interventions. Unit of Measure: Chinese Yuan (CNY).

    Time frame: Within three months after the intervention initiation

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wong CL, Chan DNS, So WKW, Chan CWH, Choi KC, Li H, Garner SL. Effects of a smartphone-based chatbot intervention on influenza and COVID-19 vaccine uptake among South Asians. NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Dec 11;9(1):24. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-02200-1. PubMed 41381754 ↗
  • Wang Z, Chen S, Poon J, Han SC, Ye D, Yu FY, Fang Y, Ni Z, Wong MCS, Mo PKH. A Hybrid Chatbot to Promote Pneumococcal Vaccination Among Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Oct 1;8(10):e2535813. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.35813. PubMed 41060654 ↗
  • Baudouin N, de Rouilhan S, Huillery E, Pasquinelli E, Chevallier C, Mercier H. Interventions to reduce vaccine hesitancy among adolescents: a cluster-randomized trial. Nat Hum Behav. 2026 Jan;10(1):92-100. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02306-2. Epub 2025 Sep 10. PubMed 40931090 ↗
  • Hou Z, Wu Z, Qu Z, Gong L, Peng H, Jit M, Larson HJ, Wu JT, Lin L. A vaccine chatbot intervention for parents to improve HPV vaccination uptake among middle school girls: a cluster randomized trial. Nat Med. 2025 Jun;31(6):1855-1862. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03618-6. Epub 2025 Apr 7. PubMed 40195450 ↗
  • Amith M, Zhu A, Cunningham R, Lin R, Savas L, Shay L, Chen Y, Gong Y, Boom J, Roberts K, Tao C. Early Usability Assessment of a Conversational Agent for HPV Vaccination. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;257:17-23. PubMed 30741166 ↗
  • Tsai WS, Lun D, Carcioppolo N, Chuan CH. Human versus chatbot: Understanding the role of emotion in health marketing communication for vaccines. Psychol Mark. 2021 Dec;38(12):2377-2392. doi: 10.1002/mar.21556. Epub 2021 Jul 27. PubMed 34539051 ↗
  • Almalki M, Azeez F. Health Chatbots for Fighting COVID-19: a Scoping Review. Acta Inform Med. 2020 Dec;28(4):241-247. doi: 10.5455/aim.2020.28.241-247. PubMed 33627924 ↗
  • Weeks R, Sangha P, Cooper L, Sedoc J, White S, Gretz S, Toledo A, Lahav D, Hartner AM, Martin NM, Lee JH, Slonim N, Bar-Zeev N. Usability and Credibility of a COVID-19 Vaccine Chatbot for Young Adults and Health Workers in the United States: Formative Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jan 30;10:e40533. doi: 10.2196/40533. PubMed 36409300 ↗
  • Brand CO, Stafford T. Using dialogues to increase positive attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccines in a vaccine-hesitant UK population. R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Oct 12;9(10):220366. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220366. eCollection 2022 Oct. PubMed 36312562 ↗
  • Altay S, Hacquin AS, Chevallier C, Mercier H. Information delivered by a chatbot has a positive impact on COVID-19 vaccines attitudes and intentions. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2023 Mar;29(1):52-62. doi: 10.1037/xap0000400. Epub 2021 Oct 28. PubMed 34726454 ↗
  • Kobayashi T, Nishina Y, Tomoi H, Harada K, Tanaka K, Matsumoto E, Horimukai K, Ishihara J, Sasaki S, Inaba K, Seguchi K, Takahashi H, Salinas JL, Yamada Y. Corowa-kun: A messenger app chatbot delivers COVID-19 vaccine information, Japan 2021. Vaccine. 2022 Jul 30;40(32):4654-4662. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jun 8. PubMed 35750541 ↗
  • Luk TT, Lui JHT, Wang MP. Efficacy, Usability, and Acceptability of a Chatbot for Promoting COVID-19 Vaccination in Unvaccinated or Booster-Hesitant Young Adults: Pre-Post Pilot Study. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 4;24(10):e39063. doi: 10.2196/39063. PubMed 36179132 ↗
  • Passanante A, Pertwee E, Lin L, Lee KY, Wu JT, Larson HJ. Conversational AI and Vaccine Communication: Systematic Review of the Evidence. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 3;25:e42758. doi: 10.2196/42758. PubMed 37788057 ↗
  • Wilson L, Marasoiu M. The Development and Use of Chatbots in Public Health: Scoping Review. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Oct 5;9(4):e35882. doi: 10.2196/35882. PubMed 36197708 ↗
  • Cosma C, Radi A, Cattano R, Zanobini P, Bonaccorsi G, Lorini C, Del Riccio M. Exploring Chatbot contributions to enhancing vaccine literacy and uptake: A scoping review of the literature. Vaccine. 2025 Jan 12;44:126559. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126559. Epub 2024 Nov 30. PubMed 39615346 ↗
  • Cao Y, Wang Q, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Huo R, Li Q, Yang W, Yi H, Feng L. Healthcare workers' attitudes toward influenza vaccine prescriptions in China. Glob Health Res Policy. 2025 Aug 4;10(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41256-025-00430-0. PubMed 40760695 ↗
  • Kim RH, Day SC, Small DS, Snider CK, Rareshide CAL, Patel MS. Variations in Influenza Vaccination by Clinic Appointment Time and an Active Choice Intervention in the Electronic Health Record to Increase Influenza Vaccination. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e181770. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1770. PubMed 30646151 ↗
  • Lehmann BA, Chapman GB, Franssen FM, Kok G, Ruiter RA. Changing the default to promote influenza vaccination among health care workers. Vaccine. 2016 Mar 8;34(11):1389-92. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.01.046. Epub 2016 Feb 3. PubMed 26851734 ↗
  • Tuckerman J, Harper K, Sullivan TR, Cuthbert AR, Fereday J, Couper J, Smith N, Tai A, Kelly A, Couper R, Friswell M, Flood L, Blyth CC, Danchin M, Marshall HS. Short Message Service Reminder Nudge for Parents and Influenza Vaccination Uptake in Children and Adolescents With Special Risk Medical Conditions: The Flutext-4U Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Apr 1;177(4):337-344. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.6145. PubMed 36806893 ↗
  • Johansen ND, Vaduganathan M, Bhatt AS, Lee SG, Modin D, Claggett BL, Dueger EL, Samson SI, Loiacono MM, Kober L, Solomon SD, Sivapalan P, Jensen JUS, Martel CJ, Valentiner-Branth P, Krause TG, Biering-Sorensen T. Electronic nudges to increase influenza vaccination uptake in Denmark: a nationwide, pragmatic, registry-based, randomised implementation trial. Lancet. 2023 Apr 1;401(10382):1103-1114. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00349-5. Epub 2023 Mar 5. PubMed 36889332 ↗
  • Renosa MDC, Landicho J, Wachinger J, Dalglish SL, Barnighausen K, Barnighausen T, McMahon SA. Nudging toward vaccination: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Sep;6(9):e006237. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006237. PubMed 34593513 ↗
  • MacDonald NE; SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4161-4. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036. Epub 2015 Apr 17. PubMed 25896383 ↗
  • Rathje S, He JK, Roozenbeek J, Van Bavel JJ, van der Linden S. Social media behavior is associated with vaccine hesitancy. PNAS Nexus. 2022 Sep 30;1(4):pgac207. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac207. eCollection 2022 Sep. PubMed 36714849 ↗
  • Du F, Chantler T, Francis MR, Sun FY, Zhang X, Han K, Rodewald L, Yu H, Tu S, Larson H, Hou Z. Access to Vaccination Information and Confidence/Hesitancy Towards Childhood Vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Survey in China. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Feb 28;9(3):201. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9030201. PubMed 33670971 ↗
  • Szilagyi PG, Albertin C, Casillas A, Valderrama R, Duru OK, Ong MK, Vangala S, Tseng CH, Rand CM, Humiston SG, Evans S, Sloyan M, Lerner C. Effect of Patient Portal Reminders Sent by a Health Care System on Influenza Vaccination Rates: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jul 1;180(7):962-970. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1602. PubMed 32421168 ↗
  • Chen H, Li Q, Zhang M, Gu Z, Zhou X, Cao H, Wu F, Liang M, Zheng L, Xian J, Chen Q, Lin Q. Factors associated with influenza vaccination coverage and willingness in the elderly with chronic diseases in Shenzhen, China. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(6):2133912. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2133912. Epub 2022 Oct 21. PubMed 36269145 ↗
  • Jiang L, Zhao J, Jin H. Barriers to influenza vaccination in older adults with chronic diseases: Insights from a COM-B model-based meta-analysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2574732. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2574732. Epub 2025 Oct 23. PubMed 41128133 ↗
  • Fan J, Cong S, Wang N, Bao H, Wang B, Feng Y, Lv X, Zhang Y, Zha Z, Yu L, Yang T, Wang L, Fang L. Influenza vaccination rate and its association with chronic diseases in China: Results of a national cross-sectional study. Vaccine. 2020 Mar 4;38(11):2503-2511. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.093. Epub 2020 Feb 8. PubMed 32046892 ↗
  • Peng ZB, Wang DY, Yang J, Yang P, Zhang YY, Chen J, Chen T, Zheng YM, Zheng JD, Jiang SQ, Xu LL, Kang M, Qin Y, Zhao MJ, Li ZJ, Feng LZ. [Current situation and related policies on the implementation and promotion of influenza vaccination, in China]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Aug 10;39(8):1045-1050. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2018.08.007. Chinese. PubMed 30180426 ↗
  • National Immunization Advisory Committee (NIAC) Technical Working Group (TWG), Influenza Vaccination TWG. [Technical guidelines for seasonal influenza vaccination in China (2023-2024)]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Oct 10;44(10):1507-1530. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20230908-00139. Chinese. PubMed 37875437 ↗
  • Gong H, Shen X, Yan H, Lu WY, Zhong GJ, Dong KG, Yang J, Yu HJ. [Estimating the disease burden of seasonal influenza in China, 2006-2019]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Mar 2;101(8):560-567. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20201210-03323. Chinese. PubMed 33663186 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared due to participant privacy concerns and institutional data protection policies.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 14, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 14, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07873255
Lead sponsor
Fudan University
Responsible party
Zhiyuan Hou (Associate Professor, Fudan University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 14, 2026
Start date
Oct 6, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 14, 2026

Study contacts

Zhiyuan Hou, PhD
Contact
zyhou@fudan.edu.cn
86+21 54231112

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion