An interventional study of Laparoscopic appendectomy and Open Appendectomy in Acute Appendicitis and Superficial SSI, sponsored by Quaid-e-Azam Medical College. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.
Sponsored by Quaid-e-Azam Medical College · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
his randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the frequency of superficial surgical site infections (SSIs) following laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy in patients undergoing surgical treatment for acute appendicitis. The study was carried out in the Department of Surgery, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, over a period of six months from 24 January 2026 to 23 July 2026. A total of 276 patients were included in the study, with 138 participants allocated to each treatment group. Patients enrolled in the trial were assigned to one of two study groups according to the study protocol. Group A underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, while Group B underwent open appendectomy. The purpose of the comparison was to determine whether the operative approach was associated with a difference in the occurrence of superficial surgical site infection after appendectomy. The study therefore evaluated two established surgical approaches for the same clinical condition while maintaining a randomized comparative design.
The primary outcome of the study was the frequency of superficial surgical site infection after appendectomy. Superficial surgical site infection refers to infection involving the skin and subcutaneous tissue at the surgical incision. The occurrence of this postoperative complication was assessed in participants in both groups using the same outcome definition and follow-up approach specified in the study protocol. The frequency of superficial SSI was then compared between the laparoscopic and open appendectomy groups.
The study was designed as an interventional randomized controlled trial. Participants were assigned to an intervention group on the basis of the study protocol rather than simply being observed according to the treatment they would otherwise have received. The intervention under investigation was the operative approach: laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy. No investigational drug or biologic product was evaluated, and the study was not conducted under a U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational New Drug application. Likewise, the study did not investigate a U.S. FDA-regulated device as the intervention and was not conducted under an Investigational Device Exemption.
The study population consisted of patients undergoing appendectomy at the Department of Surgery, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur. Eligible participants were enrolled according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study protocol. Participants in the laparoscopic group received appendectomy through the laparoscopic approach, whereas participants in the open group received appendectomy through the conventional open approach. Perioperative care and postoperative assessment were conducted according to the institutional surgical protocol and the requirements of the study. Data were collected prospectively during the study period and were used to assess the postoperative outcome of interest. The incidence of superficial surgical site infection was recorded for participants in each treatment group. The results were subsequently compared between the two groups to determine the observed difference in the frequency of superficial SSI following laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. The analysis was based on the predefined study outcome and the randomized allocation of participants.
The trial was conducted in a hospital surgical setting and included a total sample of 276 participants, providing 138 participants in each group. The study was intended to generate comparative clinical evidence regarding superficial wound infection after the two operative approaches. By directly comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy within a randomized controlled trial, the study provides a structured assessment of the postoperative wound-related outcome in the enrolled patient population.
The study was undertaken after institutional ethical oversight and approval in accordance with the applicable requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from participants before enrollment, as specified in the study protocol. Participant information was handled confidentially, and study procedures were conducted in accordance with the approved protocol and institutional requirements.
The trial compares superficial surgical site infection between patients undergoing laparoscopic and open appendectomy at the study center. Its focus is the wound outcome associated with the two surgical approaches
Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies and appendectomy remains one of the most frequently performed emergency abdominal surgical procedures. Open appendectomy has traditionally been used as the standard operative approach, while laparoscopic appendectomy has increasingly been adopted because of its minimally invasive nature and potential postoperative advantages. Surgical site infection is an important postoperative complication of appendectomy because it can cause additional morbidity, delay wound healing and recovery, increase the need for postoperative treatment and follow-up, and potentially prolong healthcare utilization. The frequency of surgical site infection may vary according to the operative approach, patient characteristics, disease severity, operative technique, and perioperative management.
The present randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the frequency of superficial surgical site infections following laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy in patients presenting with acute appendicitis. The study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, over six months, from 24 January 2026 to 23 July 2026. A total of 276 patients were included, with 138 participants allocated to each group.
The study population consisted of patients aged 15 to 60 years of either sex who presented with acute appendicitis and fulfilled the predefined eligibility criteria. Acute appendicitis was diagnosed on the basis of right iliac fossa pain with a visual analogue scale score of 3-10, positive rebound tenderness on clinical examination, and a white blood cell count greater than 10,000/mm³. Patients were eligible if the duration of symptoms was 48 hours or less. Both elective and emergency appendectomies were included.
Patients were excluded if they had generalized peritonitis, perforated appendicitis, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, immunosuppression, previous abdominal surgery, chronic renal failure with serum creatinine above 1.5 mg/dL, or chronic liver disease with serum bilirubin above 2 mg/dL.
After approval of the study synopsis and institutional ethical approval, eligible patients were enrolled after obtaining informed written consent. Baseline demographic and clinical information was recorded using a structured data collection proforma. Variables included age, sex, duration of symptoms, height, weight, body mass index, obesity status, residence, type of surgery, socioeconomic status, diabetes mellitus, and duration of surgery.
A body mass index greater than 27 kg/m² was considered obese and 27 kg/m² or below was considered non-obese. Residence was categorized as urban or rural according to documented residential address. Socioeconomic status was categorized according to monthly household income into poor class (≤20,000 PKR), middle class (21,000-40,000 PKR), and upper class (≥41,000 PKR). Diabetes mellitus was recorded on the basis of a known history of diabetes with ongoing treatment and controlled fasting blood glucose below 126 mg/dL on two consecutive measurements.
Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio using a lottery method. Group A underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, while Group B underwent open appendectomy. All participants received prophylactic antibiotics according to the study protocol, and the duration of postoperative intravenous and outpatient antibiotic therapy was recorded. All operations were performed by the same consultant surgeon with at least five years of post-fellowship experience to maintain consistency in operative technique.
Patients were followed for seven postoperative days. During follow-up, the surgical wound was assessed for superficial surgical site infection and findings were recorded on the structured proforma. The primary outcome was the frequency of superficial surgical site infection within seven postoperative days. Superficial SSI was defined according to the predefined clinical criteria. A patient was considered to have superficial SSI if purulent wound discharge, redness around the wound or stitches, or postoperative fever exceeding 100°F was observed within seven days following surgery. The outcome was recorded as present or absent.
Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded for comparison between groups. These included age, sex, duration of symptoms, BMI and obesity status, residence, type of surgery, socioeconomic status, diabetes mellitus, and duration of surgery. Stratified analysis of superficial SSI was planned according to these characteristics.
The sample size was calculated using a 5% level of significance and 80% power, based on an anticipated superficial surgical site infection rate of 20% following laparoscopic appendectomy and 35% following open appendectomy. A total of 276 participants were included, with 138 in each group. Consecutive sampling was used for participant enrollment, followed by random allocation using the lottery method.
Operative duration was recorded for each participant and categorized into short and long duration according to the predefined study categorization for stratified analysis.
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0. Continuous variables were assessed for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Normally distributed continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, while non-normally distributed variables were presented as median with interquartile range. Categorical variables were summarized using frequencies and percentages. The independent-samples t-test was used for normally distributed continuous variables, while the Mann-Whitney U test was used for non-normally distributed variables. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate.
The primary outcome was compared between the laparoscopic and open appendectomy groups using the Chi-square test. Stratified analyses were performed according to age group, sex, duration of symptoms, BMI category, residence, type of surgery, socioeconomic status, diabetes mellitus, and duration of surgery. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The study specifically focused on superficial SSI occurring during the first seven postoperative days and did not combine superficial infection with deep or organ/space surgical site infection. The study was conducted after institutional ethical approval and approval of the study synopsis. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrollment. Participant demographic and clinical information was recorded using a structured proforma, and postoperative wound findings were documented during the seven-day follow-up period.
419 studies on the registry are indexed under Appendicitis; 67 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 276 is above the median of 111 across 252 interventional studies indexed under Appendicitis.
Browse Appendicitis studies →Quaid-e-Azam Medical College is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.
Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
Immunosuppression
A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.
Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Bilirubin
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants assigned to this arm underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. A total of 138 patients were allocated to this group by 1:1 randomization using the lottery method. The procedure was performed by the same consultant surgeon with at least 5 years of post-fellowship experience. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered according to the study protocol. Participants were followed for 7 postoperative days, and the occurrence of superficial surgical site infection was assessed based on predefined criteria, including purulent wound discharge, redness around the wound or stitches, or postoperative fever above 100°F.
Procedure: Laparoscopic appendectomy
Participants assigned to this arm underwent open appendectomy for acute appendicitis. A total of 138 patients were allocated to this group by 1:1 randomization using the lottery method. The procedure was performed by the same consultant surgeon with at least 5 years of post-fellowship experience. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered according to the study protocol. Participants were followed for 7 postoperative days, and the occurrence of superficial surgical site infection was assessed based on predefined criteria, including purulent wound discharge, redness around the wound or stitches, or postoperative fever above 100°F.
Procedure: Open Appendectomy
Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed for acute appendicitis in 138 randomized participants. The procedure was carried out by the same consultant surgeon with at least 5 years of post-fellowship experience. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered according to the study protocol. Participants were followed for 7 postoperative days to assess superficial surgical site infection.
Open appendectomy was performed for acute appendicitis in 138 randomized participants. The procedure was carried out by the same consultant surgeon with at least 5 years of post-fellowship experience. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered according to the study protocol. Participants were followed for 7 postoperative days to assess superficial surgical site infection.
Frequency of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) following laparoscopic versus open appendectomy
The primary outcome is the occurrence of superficial surgical site infection within 7 postoperative days after appendectomy. SSI will be recorded as present if the patient develops purulent wound discharge, redness around the wound or stitches, or postoperative fever greater than 100°F during the follow-up period. The frequency of superficial SSI will be compared between the laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy groups.
Time frame: Within 7 postoperative days after appendectomy.
Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers because the study data contain participant-level information and will be retained by the research team in accordance with institutional policies and ethical requirements. Only aggregated, anonymized results will be reported.
Ran from Jan 2026 to primary completion in Jul 2026, 5 months.
Of 89 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Appendicitis, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36. This study's 5 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 91 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Quaid-e-Azam Medical College