ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07896629TIMESUpdated Nov 6, 2026

Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke

An interventional study of Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation (tTIs) and Sham Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation (Sham tTIs) in Acute Ischemic Stroke, sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 27, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to test whether transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIs) can improve upper limb motor function in patients in the early subacute stage after acute ischemic stroke. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either active tTIs treatment or sham stimulation. All subjects will receive routine rehabilitation. The treatment will be given once daily for 20 consecutive days. Researchers will assess upper limb motor function before treatment, during the intervention and after the treatment course to compare the effect between the two groups. Safety will also be monitored throughout the study.

Read the detailed description

This prospective, two-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, exploratory pilot randomized controlled trial will enroll 60 right-handed patients with first-ever unilateral anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke in the early subacute phase (7 days to 3 months after stroke onset). All participants will have received reperfusion therapy and exhibit upper-limb motor impairment, defined as a Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score of ≤42. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the active tTIS group or the sham-stimulation group.All participants will receive standard rehabilitation therapy once daily for 20 consecutive days. In addition to routine rehabilitation, participants in the active tTIS group will receive active stimulation targeting the cerebellar dentate nucleus. Participants in the sham group will undergo an identical setup, including EEG cap placement, but will receive sham stimulation without effective amplitude-modulated output. Each stimulation session will last 20 minutes. Participants and outcome assessors will be blinded to group allocation, whereas the treatment operator will remain unblinded. Blinding will be maintained until the database is locked.

Assessments will be conducted at baseline, immediately before and after the first intervention session, on days 7 and 14, after completion of the 20-session intervention, and at the 3-month follow-up. Clinical assessments, multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electroencephalography (EEG), and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) examinations will be performed at prespecified time points to characterize changes in motor function, brain structural and functional connectivity, and cortical excitability. Adverse events will be systematically recorded and monitored throughout the trial.

This study aims to investigate the safety and feasibility of cerebellar dentate nucleus-targeted tTIS as an adjunct to routine rehabilitation and to obtain preliminary evidence of its efficacy in improving upper-limb motor function in patients with acute ischemic stroke during the early subacute phase. In addition, multimodal neuroimaging and neurophysiological assessments will be used to explore the potential neural mechanisms underlying tTIS-induced motor recovery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Acute ischemic stroke
  • Transcranial temporal interference stimulation
  • Upper-limb motor recovery
  • Cerebellar dentate nucleus
  • Randomized controlled trial
03

In context

Ischemic Stroke

2,612 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 971 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 120 across 1,776 interventional studies indexed under Ischemic Stroke.

Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing is the lead sponsor of 363 studies on the registry; 230 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. First-ever ischemic stroke occurring 7 days to 3 months before enrollment.
  2. Unilateral anterior-circulation ischemic stroke confirmed by CT or MRI.
  3. Receipt of reperfusion therapy.
  4. Age 18-80 years.
  5. Upper-limb motor impairment, defined as an FMA-UE score of ≤42.
  6. Right-handedness, as determined by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory.
  7. Ability to understand and communicate adequately, willingness to participate, and provision of written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous history of stroke, either ischemic or hemorrhagic.
  2. Severe cognitive impairment or psychiatric symptoms.
  3. Bilateral brain lesions or other neurological disorders, including Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, or brain tumors.
  4. Severe cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, or other major organ dysfunction.
  5. Skull defects.
  6. Increased intracranial pressure.
  7. to MRI, including incompatible intracranial or external metal objects or implanted devices such as pacemakers or infusion pumps.
  8. Current participation in another clinical trial.
  9. Inability to complete the treatment or follow-up procedures, poor adherence, or adverse reactions to electrical stimulation that prevent continued participation.
  10. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active tTIs Group

    Participants will receive individualized active transcranial temporal interference stimulation targeting the cerebellar dentate nucleus contralateral to the cerebral lesion, 20 minutes per session, once daily for 20 consecutive days, combined with routine rehabilitation therapy.

    Device: Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation (tTIs)

  • Sham comparator
    Sham tTIs Group

    Participants will receive sham transcranial temporal interference stimulation followed by the same standardized routine rehabilitation therapy. The sham procedure will use the same device, electrode montage, session duration, and ramp sensations as active stimulation but will not deliver sustained active stimulation.

    Device: Sham Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation (Sham tTIs)

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscranial Temporal Interference Stimulation (tTIs)

    Individualized active stimulation will be administered via the NervioX-1000 temporal interference stimulation system. The cerebellar dentate nucleus contralateral to the cerebral lesion is targeted using an electrode montage and current ratio optimized based on each participant's structural magnetic resonance imaging and finite-element electric field modeling. Stimulation parameters are kept constant throughout the intervention. Each session lasts 20 minutes, including 30-second ramp-up and ramp-down periods, with treatment administered once daily for 20 consecutive days.

  • DeviceSham Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation (Sham tTIs)

    Sham stimulation will be delivered using the same device, individualized electrode montage, positioning procedures, and session schedule as active stimulation. The device will reproduce the initial ramp-up and brief stimulation sensations and will then ramp down without delivering sustained active stimulation. A brief terminal ramp will reproduce end-of-session sensations. Each sham session lasts 20 minutes, including 30-second ramp-up and ramp-down periods, administered once daily for 20 consecutive days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)

    Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity score, range 0-66; higher score indicates better upper limb motor function.

    Time frame: 20 days after the start of intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)

    The Action Research Arm Test scale is used to assess upper limb activity and functional ability. Total possible scores range from 0 to 57. Higher scores indicate better upper limb functional performance.

    Time frame: 20 days after the start of intervention

  2. Global disability: Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

    The Modified Rankin Scale is an ordinal scale used to assess functional disability and dependence in activities of daily living after stroke. Scores range from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate worse functional outcome, with a score of 6 representing death.

    Time frame: 20 days after the start of intervention

  3. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)

    The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale is used to quantify neurological deficit after stroke. Total possible scores range from 0 to 42. Higher scores indicate more severe neurological impairment (worse outcome).

    Time frame: 20 days after the start of intervention

  4. Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

    Multimodal MRI, including functional MRI (fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and three-dimensional T1-weighted imaging, is acquired to assess structural-functional coupling of the dentato-thalamo-cortical (DTC) pathway. Structural-functional connectivity (SFC) is calculated as the coupling index between DTI-derived structural connectivity and resting-state fMRI functional connectivity along the DTC pathway. Higher SFC values indicate stronger structural-functional coupling of this pathway.

    Time frame: Assessments were performed at 1 and 20 days after the initiation of the intervention

  5. Electroencephalography (EEG)

    EEG is recorded synchronously during temporal interference (TI) stimulation. Inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC) is computed to quantify the consistency of phase-locked cortical responses across trials, ranging from 0 to 1. Higher ITPC indicates more reliable phase-locked cortical activation.

    Time frame: Assessments were performed at 1 and 20 days after the initiation of the intervention

  6. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)-Induced Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP)

    Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is delivered over the primary motor cortex. Surface electromyography records motor evoked potentials from the target muscle. Peak-to-peak MEP amplitude is measured in microvolts (μV). Larger amplitude indicates higher corticospinal excitability.

    Time frame: Assessments were performed at 1 and 20 days after the initiation of the intervention

Other outcomes

  1. adverse events

    The incidence and severity of adverse events, including adverse events related to the intervention, assessed throughout the intervention period.

    Time frame: 20 days after the start of intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gopalakrishnan R, Cunningham DA, Hogue O, Schroedel M, Campbell BA, Plow EB, Baker KB, Machado AG. Cortico-Cerebellar Connectivity Underlying Motor Control in Chronic Poststroke Individuals. J Neurosci. 2022 Jun 29;42(26):5186-5197. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2443-21.2022. PubMed 35610051 ↗
  • Wathen CA, Frizon LA, Maiti TK, Baker KB, Machado AG. Deep brain stimulation of the cerebellum for poststroke motor rehabilitation: from laboratory to clinical trial. Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Aug;45(2):E13. doi: 10.3171/2018.5.FOCUS18164. PubMed 30064319 ↗
  • Machado A, Baker KB. Upside down crossed cerebellar diaschisis: proposing chronic stimulation of the dentatothalamocortical pathway for post-stroke motor recovery. Front Integr Neurosci. 2012 May 21;6:20. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00020. eCollection 2012. PubMed 22661933 ↗
  • Baker KB, Plow EB, Nagel S, Rosenfeldt AB, Gopalakrishnan R, Clark C, Wyant A, Schroedel M, Ozinga J 4th, Davidson S, Hogue O, Floden D, Chen J, Ford PJ, Sankary L, Huang X, Cunningham DA, DiFilippo FP, Hu B, Jones SE, Bethoux F, Wolf SL, Chae J, Machado AG. Cerebellar deep brain stimulation for chronic post-stroke motor rehabilitation: a phase I trial. Nat Med. 2023 Sep;29(9):2366-2374. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02507-0. Epub 2023 Aug 14. PubMed 37580534 ↗
  • He L, Wei Y, Gao C, Qiu S, Liu T, Gao Q. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Temporal Interference Stimulation of the Cerebellar Fastigial Nucleus in Stroke Patients for Balance. J Vis Exp. 2026 May 15;(231). doi: 10.3791/70982. PubMed 42224112 ↗
  • Bonni S, Motta C, Pellicciari MC, Casula EP, Cinnera AM, Maiella M, Picazio S, Tramontano M, Sallustio F, Koch G. Intermittent Cerebellar Theta Burst Stimulation Improves Visuo-motor Learning in Stroke Patients: a Pilot Study. Cerebellum. 2020 Oct;19(5):739-743. doi: 10.1007/s12311-020-01146-2. PubMed 32462496 ↗
  • Liao LY, Zhu Y, Peng QY, Gao Q, Liu L, Wang QH, Gao SH, Tao Y, Huang H, Xu PD, Gao CY. Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation for Stroke: Primary Motor Cortex Versus Cerebellar Stimulation: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial. Stroke. 2024 Jan;55(1):156-165. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.044892. Epub 2023 Nov 30. PubMed 38037225 ↗
  • Li X, Baker KB, O'Laughlin K, Chen J, Hogue O, Machado AG, Plow EB. Paired DBS and TMS Reveals Dentato-Cortical Facilitation Underlying Upper Extremity Movement in Chronic Stroke Survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2024 Feb;38(2):109-121. doi: 10.1177/15459683231219265. Epub 2023 Dec 29. PubMed 38156644 ↗
  • Machado AG, Baker KB, Schuster D, Butler RS, Rezai A. Chronic electrical stimulation of the contralesional lateral cerebellar nucleus enhances recovery of motor function after cerebral ischemia in rats. Brain Res. 2009 Jul 14;1280:107-16. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.007. Epub 2009 May 12. PubMed 19445910 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. The data involves sensitive personal health information of participants, and there is no plan to release the individual-level raw data to other researchers due to privacy and data security considerations.

09

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: responsible party
  2. Oct 27, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07896629
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 27, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Study contacts

Cong Fu
Contact
fucong666@yeah.net
010-83199060

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion