ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07838948Updated Sep 24, 2026

Nalbuphine With Remimazolam Versus Nalbuphine With Propofol for Knee Arthroscopy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Nalbuphine and Remimazolam in Knee Injuries, sponsored by Wuhan Fourth Hospital. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by Wuhan Fourth Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2025, registered Sep 2026).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compared two combinations of medicines used for sedation and pain relief in adults undergoing knee arthroscopy for knee joint injuries. One group received nalbuphine with remimazolam, and the other received nalbuphine with propofol. The study examined pain, sedation, cognitive function, and adverse events. A total of 100 adults aged 18 to 65 years were randomly assigned to the two groups, with 50 participants in each group. All participants underwent surgery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Pain, sedation, and cognitive function were assessed immediately after surgery and at 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery.

Read the detailed description

This single-center, randomized, parallel-group study was conducted at Wuhan Fourth Hospital. Participants were assigned using a random-number table. Both groups were managed by the same anesthesia team. Intraoperative assessments included blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, anesthesia induction time, anesthesia duration, and awakening time. Postoperative assessments included the Visual Analog Scale for pain, the Ramsay Sedation Scale, and the Mini-Mental State Examination. Adverse events assessed included hypotension, respiratory depression, bradycardia, postoperative agitation, nausea and vomiting, pruritus, chills, and diplopia. The study was approved by the Wuhan Fourth Hospital ethics committee, and participants provided written informed consent before surgery.

No primary outcome measure was prespecified before the study began. This registration is being prepared after study completion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Knee Injuries

Browse trials for

03

In context

Knee Injuries

267 studies on the registry are indexed under Knee Injuries; 59 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 49 across 178 interventional studies indexed under Knee Injuries.

Browse Knee Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Wuhan Fourth Hospital as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Knee joint injury diagnosed by clinical and imaging examinations, with planned knee arthroscopy.
  • Age 18 to 65 years.
  • (ASA) physical status I or II.
  • Normal preoperative cognitive function, with (MMSE) score >=24.
  • No long-term preoperative use of analgesic, sedative, or antipsychotic medication.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychiatric disorders, including depression, anxiety, or schizophrenia, or neurological disorders, including Parkinson disease, epilepsy, or post-stroke sequelae.
  • Allergy to nalbuphine, remimazolam, or related medications.
  • Severe hepatic or renal impairment, including cirrhosis or chronic renal failure, or uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes mellitus.
  • Considered unsuitable for participation by the investigators.
  • Serious intraoperative complications, including anesthesia accidents or massive intraoperative bleeding, or withdrawal during the study (post-enrollment exclusion or withdrawal criteria).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nalbuphine With Remimazolam

    50 participants received nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg and remimazolam 0.2-0.3 mg/kg intravenously at induction. If body movement occurred during the procedure, an additional intravenous dose of remimazolam 0.05 mg/kg was administered as needed until completion. Knee arthroscopy was performed under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.

    Drug: Nalbuphine · Drug: Remimazolam

  • Active comparator
    Nalbuphine With Propofol

    50 participants received nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg and propofol 1.5-2.0 mg/kg intravenously at induction. If body movement occurred during the procedure, an additional intravenous dose of propofol 0.5 mg/kg was administered as needed until completion. Knee arthroscopy was performed under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.

    Drug: Nalbuphine · Drug: Propofol

Interventions

  • Nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg was administered intravenously at induction in both study groups.

  • Remimazolam 0.2-0.3 mg/kg was administered intravenously at induction in the experimental group. If body movement occurred during the procedure, an additional intravenous dose of 0.05 mg/kg was administered as needed until completion.

  • Propofol 1.5-2.0 mg/kg was administered intravenously at induction in the active comparator group. If body movement occurred during the procedure, an additional intravenous dose of 0.5 mg/kg was administered as needed until completion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain measured by the Visual Analog Scale (retrospectively designated)

    Postoperative pain intensity assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Lower scores indicate less pain. Scores are compared between the two treatment groups at each specified assessment. No primary outcome was prespecified before the study began. This measure is designated as primary for this retrospective registration after study completion; it was not a prospectively specified primary endpoint.

    Time frame: Immediately after surgery and at 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative sedation measured by the Ramsay Sedation Scale

    Sedation assessed with the Ramsay Sedation Scale, ranging from 1 to 6. Higher scores indicate deeper sedation. Scores are compared between the treatment groups at each assessment. Outcome classification is assigned for this retrospective registration; no primary outcome hierarchy was prespecified before study initiation.

    Time frame: Immediately after surgery and at 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery

  2. Postoperative Mini-Mental State Examination score

    Cognitive performance assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate better performance. Scores are compared between the treatment groups at each assessment. Outcome classification is assigned for this retrospective registration; no primary outcome hierarchy was prespecified before study initiation.

    Time frame: Immediately after surgery and at 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery

  3. Incidence of postoperative agitation

    Percentage of participants with postoperative agitation recorded during postoperative observation. The manuscript does not specify a grading scale or severity threshold. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery through 24 hours after surgery

  4. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting

    Percentage of participants with postoperative nausea and vomiting recorded during postoperative observation. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery through 24 hours after surgery

  5. Incidence of intraoperative hypotension

    Percentage of participants with systolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg or a decrease greater than 20% from baseline during surgery. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Time frame: During surgery

  6. Incidence of intraoperative respiratory depression

    Percentage of participants with oxygen saturation below 90% or respiratory rate below 8 breaths per minute during surgery. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Time frame: During surgery

  7. Incidence of bradycardia

    Percentage of participants with heart rate below 50 beats per minute. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Time frame: During the perioperative observation period, through 24 hours after surgery

  8. Incidence of pruritus, chills, and diplopia

    The percentage of participants experiencing each of the following events is assessed separately: pruritus, chills, and diplopia. This is not a composite endpoint. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Time frame: During the perioperative observation period, through 24 hours after surgery

  9. Intraoperative blood pressure

    Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure measured in mmHg during surgery are compared separately between treatment groups. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Time frame: During surgery

  10. Intraoperative heart rate

    Heart rate measured in beats per minute during surgery and compared between treatment groups. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Time frame: During surgery

  11. Intraoperative respiratory rate

    Respiratory rate measured in breaths per minute during surgery and compared between treatment groups. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Time frame: During surgery

  12. Intraoperative oxygen saturation

    Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), expressed as a percentage, recorded during surgery and compared between treatment groups. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Time frame: During surgery

  13. Anesthesia induction time

    Time required for anesthesia induction, recorded in minutes and compared between treatment groups. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Time frame: During anesthesia induction on the day of surgery

  14. Duration of anesthesia

    Duration of anesthesia, recorded in minutes and compared between treatment groups. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Time frame: During anesthesia on the day of surgery

  15. Awakening time

    Time to awakening after anesthesia, recorded in minutes and compared between treatment groups. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Time frame: During recovery from anesthesia on the day of surgery

  16. Postoperative cognitive impairment based on the manuscript MMSE threshold

    Percentage of participants with a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 24 or less, the threshold described in the manuscript as suggesting cognitive dysfunction. MMSE scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better performance. Classification as a secondary outcome is assigned for retrospective registration.

    Time frame: Immediately after surgery and at 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Wuhan Fourth Hospital
    Wuhan, Hubei 430035, China
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Apr 2025 to primary completion in Oct 2025, 5 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 19, 2026
First posted
Sep 24, 2026
StartActual
Apr 10, 2025
Primary completionActual
Oct 2, 2025
CompletionActual
Oct 2, 2025
Last update
Sep 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07838948
Lead sponsor
Wuhan Fourth Hospital
Responsible party
Zhang Zhou (Principal Investigator, Wuhan Fourth Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 24, 2026
Start date
Apr 10, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 2, 2025
Completion
Oct 2, 2025
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Study contacts

Zhang Zhou
principal investigator · Wuhan Fourth Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Remimazolam

Start the discussion