ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07838324Updated Sep 24, 2026

A Pilot Investigation of Pain Reprocessing Therapy for Functional Dyspepsia

An interventional study of Pain Reprocessing Therapy in Functional Dyspepsia, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research is to test whether pain processing therapy, a novel psychological intervention that emphasizes exposure-based techniques, can reduce digestive symptom severity and improve functioning in people with functional dyspepsia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Functional Dyspepsia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Functional Dyspepsia
03

In context

Dyspepsia

372 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyspepsia; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 15 is below the median of 89 across 302 interventional studies indexed under Dyspepsia.

Browse Dyspepsia studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,269 studies on the registry; 672 are open to participants now.

Of its 452 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 321 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Fulfilled Rome V diagnostic criteria for functional dyspepsia postprandial distress syndrome subtype, with or without epigastric pain syndrome.
  • A total score of at least 3 on the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) indicating symptom severity to be moderate or higher.
  • Normal gastric emptying as confirmed by standard gastric emptying testing (if such a testing was clinically done).
  • Upper endoscopy negative to rule out structural or organic etiologies for GI symptoms (within last 1 year).
  • Fluent in English language.
  • Able to provide and comply with study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of organic gastrointestinal disease or surgical history that could explain participant symptoms (e.g., peptic ulcer disease, celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, eosinophilic gastritis or eosinophilic esophagitis, ).
  • Current or recent (within the past 12 months) eating disorder such as anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa. Historical eating disorder diagnosis may also be exclusionary if residual disordered eating patterns, fear of weight gain, or food-related body image concerns are judged by the investigator to potentially confound symptom interpretation or participation.
  • Underweight (\<17 kg/m²) or evidence of unintentional weight loss (>25% body weight in 6 months).
  • Current use of enteral or parenteral nutrition for >50% of caloric needs and/or participant unwillingness to reduce use of enteral or parenteral nutrition at the time of study enrollment.
  • History of developmental or intellectual disability, current cognitive impairment that would preclude participation, or other neurological illness impairing cognitive functioning.
  • Active suicidal ideation, suicide attempt within the past 12 months, severe psychiatric illness, severe depressive symptomatology, acute distress, or other symptomatology that, in the investigator's judgment, would necessitate a different level of psychiatric care and/or prevent full engagement in psychological intervention sessions or adherence to study procedures.
  • Medical disability or any unstable systemic illness (e.g., decompensated hepatic, cardiac, renal, or neurological disease) that could interfere with participation, comprehension, or safety in psychological intervention sessions.
  • Current daily cannabis use (inhaled, edible, or medical). Other substance use or misuse of prescription medications may also be exclusionary if substance use patterns are judged by the investigator to potentially confound symptom interpretation or participation.
  • Current pregnancy or lactation.
  • Inability or unwillingness of individual to give .
  • Non-fluent in English, or any condition that would limit compliance or follow-up.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pain Reprocessing Therapy

    Participants will receive eight weekly pain reprocessing therapy sessions. Session 1 will occur at Week 0, and sessions will continue weekly through Session 8 at Week 7. The first and last sessions will be delivered in person when possible to coordinate with baseline and post-treatment physiologic testing, and interim sessions will be completed via telehealth.

    Behavioral: Pain Reprocessing Therapy

Interventions

  • BehavioralPain Reprocessing Therapy

    Pain reprocessing therapy is a psychological intervention designed to help patients reconceptualize chronic symptoms in functional dyspepsia as related to changes in brain-gut communication. Treatment includes education about the neuroscience of chronic symptoms, development of a personalized understanding of symptom mechanisms, interoceptive exposure using mindfulness and safety reappraisal, approaches to reduce symptom-related fear and avoidance, techniques for addressing psychosocial threat factors, and strategies to increase positive emotional experiences.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Average Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index Score

    Change in average Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index score from the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptoms Questionnaire will be assessed. The Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index assesses upper gastrointestinal symptom severity; higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Maximum Tolerated Volume During Nutrient Drink Test

    Change in maximum tolerated volume consumed during the nutrient drink test will be assessed. Maximum tolerated volume is the total volume of nutrient drink consumed before the participant reaches the protocol-defined stopping point.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

  2. Change in Symptom Ratings During Nutrient Drink Test

    Change in standardized symptom ratings collected during the nutrient drink test will be assessed. Symptoms may include fullness, nausea, bloating, and abdominal pain, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

  3. Change in Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Quality of Life Score

    Change in Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders-Quality of Life score will be assessed. The questionnaire measures disease-specific quality of life in participants with upper gastrointestinal disorders; higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Gastrointestinal Unhelpful Thinking Scale Pain Catastrophizing Subscale Score

    Gastrointestinal-specific pain catastrophizing will be assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing subscale of the Gastrointestinal Unhelpful Thinking Scale. Mean scores will be calculated at baseline and following completion of treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in gastrointestinal-specific pain catastrophizing.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

  5. Mean Change From Baseline in Visceral Sensitivity Index Score

    Gastrointestinal-specific anxiety will be assessed using the Visceral Sensitivity Index. Mean scores will be calculated at baseline and following completion of treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in gastrointestinal-specific anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in Fear of Food Questionnaire Score

    Food-related fear and avoidance will be assessed using the Fear of Food Questionnaire. Mean scores will be calculated at baseline and following completion of treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in food-related fear and avoidance.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

  7. Mean Change From Baseline in Nine Item ARFID Screen Fear Subscale Score

    Restrictive eating behaviors related to fear of aversive consequences will be assessed using the fear subscale of the Nine Item ARFID Screen. Mean scores will be calculated at baseline and following completion of treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in fear-related restrictive eating behaviors.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

  8. Mean Change From Baseline in PROMIS Physical Function Score

    General physical function will be assessed using the PROMIS Physical Function scale. Mean scores will be calculated at baseline and following completion of treatment. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in physical function.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

  9. Mean Change From Baseline in PROMIS Anxiety Score

    Anxiety will be assessed using the PROMIS Anxiety scale. Mean scores will be calculated at baseline and following completion of treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

  10. Mean Change From Baseline in PROMIS Depression Score

    Depression will be assessed using the PROMIS Depression scale. Mean scores will be calculated at baseline and following completion of treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in depression.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

  11. Mean Change From Baseline in PROMIS Fatigue Score

    Fatigue will be assessed using the PROMIS Fatigue scale. Mean scores will be calculated at baseline and following completion of treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in fatigue.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

  12. Mean Change From Baseline in PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Score

    Sleep disturbance will be assessed using the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance scale. Mean scores will be calculated at baseline and following completion of treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in sleep disturbance.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

  13. Mean Change From Baseline in PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities Score

    Ability to participate in social roles and activities will be assessed using the PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities scale. Mean scores will be calculated at baseline and following completion of treatment. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in social participation.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

  14. Mean Change From Baseline in PROMIS Pain Interference Score

    Pain interference will be assessed using the PROMIS Pain Interference scale. Mean scores will be calculated at baseline and following completion of treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in pain interference.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

  15. Mean Change From Baseline in PROMIS Pain Intensity Score

    Pain intensity will be assessed using the PROMIS Pain Intensity numerical rating scale. Mean scores will be calculated at baseline and following completion of treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in pain intensity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

  16. Mean Change From Baseline in PROMIS Anger Score

    Anger will be assessed using the PROMIS Anger scale. Mean scores will be calculated at baseline and following completion of treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in anger.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

  17. Percentage of Participants Who Complete the Pain Reprocessing Therapy Intervention

    The percentage of enrolled participants who complete all 8 planned pain reprocessing therapy sessions will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 7

  18. Percentage of Participants Who Report Satisfaction With Pain Reprocessing Therapy

    The percentage of participants who rate satisfaction with services as "mostly satisfied" or "very satisfied" on the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-4 will be reported.

    Time frame: Week 7

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07838324
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Megan Petrik (Principal Investigator, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 24, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 3, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 3, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Study contacts

Jonah Pedelty
Contact
Pedelty.Jonah@mayo.edu
507-538-7774
Megan Petrick, PhD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion