ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07832838Updated Sep 22, 2026

ERAS Versus Conventional Care Following Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery

An interventional study of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol and Conventional Perioperative Care in Gynecologic Disease, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-22.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This prospective randomized comparative study aims to compare Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol versus conventional perioperative care in women undergoing benign gynecological laparoscopic surgery. The primary outcome is quality of recovery assessed by QoR-15 score at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes include hospital stay, pain scores, bowel function, ambulation, analgesic consumption, PONV, complications, readmission, patient satisfaction and hospital cost.

Read the detailed description

Laparoscopic surgery is the standard approach for many benign gynecological conditions due to less tissue trauma, less pain and faster recovery. However perioperative care practices vary significantly and affect recovery.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary evidence-based pathway designed to reduce surgical stress and accelerate recovery. ERAS includes preoperative counseling and avoidance of prolonged fasting with clear fluids up to 2 hours and carbohydrate loading, no routine mechanical bowel preparation, standardized anesthesia with multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, goal-directed fluid therapy, active warming, postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis, avoidance of drains, early oral intake, early mobilization and early urinary catheter removal.

This study will randomize 100 women aged 18 to 60 years with ASA I-III scheduled for benign gynecological laparoscopic surgery into two groups in 1 to 1 ratio using computer-generated randomization. Group A will receive ERAS pathway and Group B will receive conventional care including NPO after midnight, bowel preparation with Prepawest, conventional NSAID analgesia, delayed feeding until bowel sounds return, and catheter retention until discharge.

All patients will be followed for 30 days. Primary outcome is QoR-15 at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes include VAS pain at 6, 12 and 24 hours, time to flatus, bowel movement, oral intake, ambulation, total analgesic consumption, PONV, complications classified by Clavien-Dindo, 30-day readmission, patient satisfaction and total hospital cost.

Data will be analyzed using SPSS with t-test or Mann-Whitney for continuous variables and Chi-square or Fisher exact for categorical variables. P less than 0.05 is considered significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gynecologic Disease

Keywords

  • ERAS
  • Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery
  • QoR-15
  • Perioperative Care
  • Quality of Recovery
03

In context

Genital Diseases, Female

161 studies on the registry are indexed under Genital Diseases, Female; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 78 across 119 interventional studies indexed under Genital Diseases, Female.

Browse Genital Diseases, Female studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 18-60 years
  • Indicated for benign gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery
  • I-III
  • Ability to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Suspected gynecologic
  • Conversion to laparotomy
  • Severe systemic disease preventing ERAS implementation
  • Inability to comply with follow-up
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ERAS Group

    ERAS protocol with counseling avoidance of prolonged fasting carb loading multimodal analgesia early feeding early mobilization early catheter removal

    Other: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Care Group

    Conventional care with NPO after midnight bowel prep with Prepawest conventional NSAIDs delayed feeding catheter until discharge discharge by surgeon discretion

    Other: Conventional Perioperative Care

Interventions

  • OtherEnhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol

    Comprehensive ERAS pathway For Arm: ERAS Group

  • OtherConventional Perioperative Care

    Standard routine care For Arm: Conventional Care Group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of Recovery-15 score at 24 hours

    Quality of Recovery-15 score measured by QoR-15 questionnaire from 0 to 150 higher score means better recovery

    Time frame: At 24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of postoperative hospital stay

    Length of stay measured in hours from end of surgery to discharge

    Time frame: Up to 30 days

  2. Postoperative pain score at 6 hours

    Pain score measured by Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to 10 higher score means worse pain

    Time frame: At 6 hours after surgery

  3. Postoperative pain score at 12 hours

    Pain score measured by Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to 10 higher score means worse pain

    Time frame: At 12 hours after surgery

  4. Postoperative pain score at 24 hours

    Pain score measured by Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to 10 higher score means worse pain

    Time frame: At 24 hours after surgery

  5. Time to first flatus

    Time to first flatus measured in hours from end of surgery

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

  6. Time to first bowel movement

    Time to first bowel movement measured in hours from end of surgery

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

  7. Time to first oral intake

    Time to first oral intake measured in hours from end of surgery

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

  8. Time to first ambulation

    Time to first ambulation measured in hours from end of surgery

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

  9. Total analgesic consumption

    Total analgesic consumption in milligrams within first 24 hours

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery

  10. Number of participants with postoperative nausea and vomiting

    Number of participants who develop postoperative nausea and vomiting

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery

  11. Number of participants with postoperative complications

    Number of participants with postoperative complications classified by Clavien-Dindo classification

    Time frame: Up to 30 days

  12. Number of participants with 30-day readmission

    Number of participants requiring hospital readmission within 30 days

    Time frame: Up to 30 days

  13. Patient satisfaction score

    Patient satisfaction score measured on 0 to 10 scale higher score means greater satisfaction

    Time frame: At 24 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07832838
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Sara Mohamed Farouk (Resident physician, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 22, 2026
Start date
Sep 20, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 20, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 22, 2026

Study contacts

sara M Farouk, resident
Contact
sameha.18313614@med.aun.edu.eg
0 11 59002779
Mahmoud S Mohamed, prof
study chair · obstetrics and gynaecology Department, Assiut University Hospitals, Assiut, Egypt

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion