ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07831655PRESERVE-CSPUpdated Sep 21, 2026

Conduction System Pacing to Prevent Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy

An interventional study of Conduction System Pacing and Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in Atrioventricular Block, Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, sponsored by Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Sponsored by Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 years 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2020, registered Sep 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
116
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this randomized, open-label trial was to determine whether permanent conduction system pacing preserves left ventricular function and reduces the incidence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy compared with conventional right ventricular apical pacing in patients with preserved LVEF who required permanent ventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and were considered at increased risk because of structural heart disease and/or a wide native QRS complex.

Read the detailed description

Eligible participants had an LVEF above 50%, an indication for permanent pacemaker implantation due to atrioventricular block, an anticipated ventricular pacing burden above 85%, and either underlying structural heart disease or a native QRS duration above 120 ms. After written informed consent, participants were randomized to conduction system pacing or right ventricular apical pacing. Clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, functional, quality-of-life, and biomarker assessments were performed at baseline and at 6 months as specified in the protocol. Subsequent routine pacemaker-clinic follow-up was used to ascertain clinical events.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrioventricular Block
  • Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy
  • Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
03

In context

Atrioventricular Block

117 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrioventricular Block; 43 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 116 is close to the median of 127 across 78 interventional studies indexed under Atrioventricular Block.

Browse Atrioventricular Block studies →

Lead sponsor

Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital is the lead sponsor of 89 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • greater than 50% by the Simpson four-chamber method before pacemaker implantation.
  • Indication for permanent pacemaker implantation due to atrioventricular block.
  • Anticipated ventricular pacing burden greater than 85%.
  • At least one of the following high-risk features: structural heart disease or native QRS duration greater than 120 ms.
  • Structural heart disease was defined as previously diagnosed ischemic heart disease, with or without prior myocardial infarction, and/or at least moderate left-sided valvular stenosis or regurgitation, and/or an aortic or mitral valve prosthesis.
  • Provision of written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to meet all inclusion criteria.
  • Refusal or inability to provide written .
  • Dementia or significant cognitive impairment.
  • Underlying systemic disease associated with a of less than 1 year.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
116 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Conduction System Pacing

    Procedure: Conduction System Pacing

  • Active comparator
    Right Ventricular Apical Pacing

    Procedure: Right Ventricular Apical Pacing

Interventions

  • ProcedureConduction System Pacing

    The ventricular lead was implanted at the His bundle or at the left bundle branch region.

  • ProcedureRight Ventricular Apical Pacing

    The ventricular pacing lead was implanted in the right ventricular apical region using conventional technique.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 months

    Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), measured by transthoracic echocardiography using the Simpson method and expressed as a percentage, compared between the conduction system pacing and right ventricular apical pacing groups.

    Time frame: 6 months after pacemaker implantation

  2. Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy at 6 months

    Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy was defined as an absolute decrease in LVEF of more than 10 percentage points from baseline resulting in an LVEF below 50%, in the absence of an alternative cause, compared between study groups.

    Time frame: 6 months after pacemaker implantation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Absolute change in left ventricular ejection fraction, in percentage points

    is the direct arithmetic difference between two percentage measurements of blood pumped out of the heart's main chamber.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

  2. Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score

    ranges from 0 to 105, where a lower score indicates a better quality of life and a higher score represents a worse quality of life

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Six-minute walk distance (meters)

    the total length a person can walk on a flat, hard surface during a period of six minutes

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. NT-proBNP concentration

    N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration in pg/mL

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  5. Heart failure hospitalization

    Any hospitalization due to heart failure decompensation

    Time frame: Through study follow-up (6 months)

  6. All-cause and cardiac mortality

    Mortality

    Time frame: Through study follow-up (6 months)

  7. Failure of conduction system pacing (Safety)

    Any problems with system pacing conduction

    Time frame: Through study follow-up (6 months)

  8. Failure due to ventricular lead dislodgement or an increase in pacing threshold above 2.5 V at 1 ms.

    The protocol specified study interruption if this rate exceeded 10%.

    Time frame: Through study follow-up (6 months)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Department of Cardiology
    Badalona, Barcelona 08916, Spain
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with third parties, in accordance with the study's data protection and privacy policies and applicable data protection regulations.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07831655
Lead sponsor
Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 21, 2026
Start date
Nov 17, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 17, 2024
Completion
Feb 19, 2026
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion