ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07728734PRO-ICHUpdated Jul 28, 2026

Prediction of Functional Recovery in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage

An observational study in Intracranial Hemorrhage, Spontaneous, sponsored by Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-28.

Sponsored by Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,688
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Currently, we lack sufficiently reliable tools to accurately predict, in the first few hours, the vital prognosis, functional status, and quality of life of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). With new neurosurgical techniques and improvements in neurocritical care, it is essential to adapt therapeutic decisions to the wishes of patients and their families. Doing so based on a reliable functional prognosis will reduce arbitrariness in treatments and help avoid situations of unwanted dependency and high social and healthcare costs.

This project aims to validate, in several hospitals in Spain and in real-world clinical practice, a new, easy-to-implement predictive scale that estimates the probability of functional recovery in patients with ICH in the short and long term. It will also analyze new prognostic blood biomarkers that could enhance the scale's accuracy.

Read the detailed description
  1. OBJECTIVES:

    1.1. Primary objective: To prospectively validate, in a multicenter, real-world clinical practice setting, the predictive value of a novel, simple, and easy-to-apply prognostic scale for determining functional recovery at 90 days, assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage who received maximal treatment.

    1.2. Secondary objectives:

    1.2.1. To prospectively validate, in a multicenter, real-world clinical practice setting, the predictive value of a simple and easy-to-apply prognostic scale for determining long-term functional recovery (at 6 months and 1 year), assessed using the mRS, in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage who received maximal treatment.

    1.2.2. To prospectively validate, in a multicenter, real-world clinical practice setting, the predictive value of a simple and easy-to-apply prognostic scale for determining mortality and "mortality or severe disability" (defined as mRS 5 or 6) at 90 days, 6 months, and 1 year in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage who received maximal treatment.

    1.2.3. To assess the performance of the scale in predicting quality of life at 90 days, 6 months, and 1 year in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage who received maximal treatment.

    1.2.4. To compare the prognostic performance of the new scale with that of the oICH and Max-ICH prognostic scales at 90 days.

    1.2.5. To determine whether baseline serum concentrations of novel biomarkers or the increase in peripheral transferrin saturation are associated with functional outcome at 90 days, assessed using the mRS, in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage who received maximal treatment, and to evaluate whether they improve the predictive value of the clinical scale.

  2. TYPE OF STUDY: The study aims to validate a prognostic clinical scale for ICH designed by researchers from the Department of Neurology at the Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital, which, as a novelty, offers easy applicability and will be validated not only in the short term (3 months) but also in the long term (6 and 12 months) - an important aspect in a condition as devastating as Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH). In addition, new serum biomarkers will be analyzed that may potentially improve the scale's predictive capacity for both mortality and the probability of functional recovery among affected patients.
  3. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, observational study of consecutive patients diagnosed with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, admitted to 11 reference stroke hospitals within the national health system and forming part of RICORS (Redes de Investigación Cooperativa Orientadas a Resultados en Salud [Results-Oriented Cooperative Research Networks]) in Cerebrovascular Diseases.
  4. VARIABLE COLLECTION:

1) Baseline clinical, laboratory, and radiological variables: age, sex, vascular risk factors, comorbidities, use of antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents, time from onset to emergency department arrival, time from emergency department to brain CT, NIHSS, Glasgow Coma Scale, capillary glycemia, blood glucose, blood pressure, urea, CRP, white blood cell count, platelet count, baseline hematoma volume, ICH location and laterality. PRO-ICH scale score, oICH, and Max-ICH.

2) Follow-up variables: Site of admission (emergency department, general ward, Stroke Unit, Critical Care Unit). Treatments: anticoagulation reversal treatment, advanced neurosurgical treatments (intracranial pressure monitor, external ventricular drain, hematoma evacuation, minimally invasive surgery, decompressive craniectomy, embolization). Therapeutic limits: adequacy of therapeutic measures (ATM) within the first 24 or 72 hours, previously established advance directives. Medical or neurological complications. Etiology. Discharge destination, length of hospital stay, NIHSS at discharge, mRS at discharge, in-hospital death, cause of death.

5) STUDY EVALUATIONS: Patients admitted to the study will follow the usual clinical and therapeutic management protocol for ICH patients, based on current clinical guidelines. On admission, patients will undergo systemic and neurological evaluation, blood samples will be drawn according to standard practice, and the pre-established neuroimaging protocol will be performed (plain cranial CT +/- CT angiography). Additionally, for the study, two 10 ml blood tubes will be drawn - one at baseline and one at 1h ± 15 minutes after baseline - which will be processed and stored for biomarker analysis. Decisions on adequacy of therapeutic measures, standard treatment, and the indication of specific treatments (orotracheal intubation, treatment of complications, neurosurgical treatments) will be made by the treating physician, independently of the subject's participation in the study, and taking into account only the recommendations of clinical guidelines as well as the wishes of the patient and family. The variables necessary to calculate the scale under study (PRO-ICH) and the oICH and max-ICH scales will be collected. All data collected form part of routine clinical practice. At 90 days, 6 months, and 1 year, a centralized assessment of functional status (mRS) will be carried out through a structured telephone interview conducted by expert assessors blinded to the clinical situation, treatments received, and complications. The EuroQoL-5D health questionnaire will also be administered at the same time points.

6) SAMPLE SIZE: According to Riley et al. (BMJ. 2024; 384:e074821; Stat Med. 2021; 40:4230), the external validation of a binary predictive model requires a sample large enough to assess discrimination - via the area under the ROC curve (AUC) - and calibration (observed/expected [O/E] ratio and slope). Adequate calibration is assumed (O/E = 1, slope = 1) and AUC = 0.835, based on data from the HIC-CAT registry (Catalonia), with 40% of patients having mRS ≤ 3. A 95% confidence interval (CI) width of 0.2 is assumed for O/E, and a skewed normal distribution with mean = -1.2, standard deviation = 1.5, skewness = -0.5, and kurtosis = 2.3 for the values of the model's linear predictor on the log-odds scale, used to estimate the calibration slope. For the AUC, the 95% CI must be ≤ 0.1. Thus, the minimum sample size required to accurately estimate the discrimination and calibration of the scale in this external validation study is 1,688 patients, with at least 676 events.

7) STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A descriptive analysis of the sample characteristics will be performed: categorical variables as absolute and relative frequencies; continuous variables as mean, standard deviation, median, interquartile range, minimum, and maximum. Validation of the scale will be carried out through discrimination and calibration analysis at the predefined follow-up time points (3, 6, and 12 months). Discrimination will be assessed using the AUC and the concordance statistic. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value will be calculated. Calibration will be analyzed using the calibration curve, comparing expected and observed risk, the calibration slope, and the Brier score. Baseline concentrations of eight biomarkers on admission will be determined, and their association with 3-month prognosis (mRS 0-3 as good prognosis) will be assessed. For transferrin saturation, its variation between the baseline value and the value determined one hour after admission will also be analyzed. The inferential analysis will include multivariate logistic models to assess the impact of the biomarkers on functional prognosis. Those with significant effects (p\<0.05) will be considered for inclusion in the scale. The predictive performance of the original scale versus the optimized scale will be compared using the DeLong test for AUC and the net reclassification improvement test. In addition, the influence of these biomarkers on model calibration will be explored using the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic and the calibration slope. A sensitivity analysis will be performed to assess the robustness of the findings, including stratified analyses and adjustment for potential confounding factors.

8) DATA SOURCE, MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL: This study is an observational, multicenter, prospective study of patients with ICH. As part of the study, personal data (age, sex), health data (medical history, information on the current condition), biometric data (vital signs), and neuroimaging data (hemorrhage volume) will be collected from participants. This data will be obtained directly from participants after obtaining informed consent, in accordance with the provisions of Articles 6.1(a) and 9.2(a) of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In addition, biological serum samples will be obtained. Data will be handled in coded form, such that each patient will be assigned a code upon inclusion in the study, which will also be used to identify their biological samples. The form linking these codes to personal information (medical record number) will be stored at each site, separate from the study database, and kept by the principal investigator of each site, so that only investigators at each site will have access to their patients' personal data.

The project database containing the remaining data, without personal data, will be hosted on the REDCap platform (Research Electronic Data Capture, https.//www.project-redcap.org), for which the IGTP has controlled user access. IGTP's REDCap meets the following security requirements. Data access to REDCap is controlled through robust permissions management, data encryption, access auditing, and secure authentication; periodic security updates are performed, and it complies with data privacy and security regulations such as HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) in the United States and the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) in the European Union. A backup and restoration system is in place, with a daily backup of the database, allowing administrators to restore data in the event of loss or corruption. Thus, users participating in the study will only be able to enter data through REDCap access managed by the IGTP. Investigators from other sites will sign a confidentiality agreement provided by the IGTP, with restricted access to the data of patients from their own site.

9) ETHICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS: The principal investigator undertakes to submit the study for evaluation by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee (CEIC) of the Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital, and to comply with the fundamental ethical principles set out in the Declaration of Helsinki (Helsinki, October 2024). Furthermore, in accordance with Law 14/2007 on Biomedical Research and Royal Decree 1716/2011 regulating Biobanks, samples will be collected directly from the data subject. Samples will be kept at each site until the end of the study, when they will be sent to the Neuroscience Laboratory of the Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute for analysis. After the study, any remaining samples will be stored as part of the collection (B.0000643) registered in the ISCIII National Biobank Registry. They will only be retained if specific consent is obtained, for a maximum of 15 years; otherwise, at the end of the study, any remaining biological samples will be destroyed. Study procedures will not begin until the study has been approved by the ethics committee of each participating site. The Ethics Committee and the Legal Department of the Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute will review the relevant documentation at the start of the project, as well as any relevant amendments. They will act as advisory bodies on data protection matters.

Benefit-risk assessment for research subjects: Although patients with ICH who receive maximal treatment within the first 24 hours will be included, investigatorscannot rule out that the bias of adequacy of therapeutic measures, or self-fulfilling prophecy, will not be fully corrected, since, although therapeutic decisions will not be based on the new scale, the prognostic factors (age, NIHSS, volume, and time since onset) will nonetheless be known to the treating physician. Therefore, even though decisions are not made based on the scale score, they could be influenced by these factors, which are components of the scale, as occurs in routine clinical practice. Patients participating in this study should not expect any health benefit from their participation, but they may help improve care for future patients with cerebral hemorrhage.

Information to subjects and informed consent: The principal investigator and collaborating investigators undertake to inform patients and/or their legal representatives about the specifics of the study and to obtain their informed consent.

Confidentiality and data protection: The study will comply with Spanish and European data protection regulations: Organic Law 3/2018, of December 5, on the Protection of Personal Data and the Guarantee of Digital Rights, and Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Data will be obtained directly from participants after obtaining informed consent, in accordance with the provisions of Articles 6.1(a) and 9.2(a) of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Data will be handled in coded form, such that each patient will be assigned a code upon inclusion in the study, which will also be used to identify their biological samples. The form linking these codes to personal information (medical record number) will be stored at each site, separate from the study database, and kept by the principal investigator of each site, so that only investigators at each site will have access to their patients' personal data.

The project database containing the remaining data, without personal data, will be hosted on the REDCap platform (Research Electronic Data Capture, https.//www.project-redcap.org), for which the IGTP has controlled user access. IGTP's REDCap meets the following security requirements. Data access to REDCap is controlled through robust permissions management, data encryption, access auditing, and secure authentication; periodic security updates are performed, and it complies with data privacy and security regulations such as HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) in the United States and the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) in the European Union. A backup and restoration system is in place, with a daily backup of the database, allowing administrators to restore data in the event of loss or corruption. Thus, users participating in the study will only be able to enter data through REDCap access managed by the IGTP. Investigators from other sites will sign a confidentiality agreement provided by the IGTP, with restricted access to the data of patients from their own site.

The Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital, the Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), and the study sponsor (the principal investigator) will act as data controllers within the framework of this observational study. No international data transfers are anticipated. The Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital belongs to the Catalan Health Institute (Institut Català de la Salut), which will be the final data controller.

10) OBTAINING AND MANAGING BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES: following diagnosis of cerebral hemorrhage, two 10 ml blood tubes will be drawn from the patient - one at baseline and another at 1h ± 15 minutes after baseline - which will be processed and stored for biomarker analysis. The IGTP Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory will determine the concentrations of biomarkers related to iron metabolism: transferrin saturation (TSAT) by TBE-Urea gel electrophoresis (Thermo Fisher Scientific) followed by western blotting and detection of the bands corresponding to its isoforms using a specific antibody against human transferrin; ferritin by ELISA (Meso Scale Discovery); free iron by a colorimetric assay (Abcam); soluble transferrin receptor by ELISA (Meso Scale Discovery); and hepcidin by ELISA (R\&D Systems), as well as IL-6 by ELISA (Thermo Fisher Scientific), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) by ELISA (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and copeptin by ELISA (RayBiotech). In accordance with Law 14/2007 on Biomedical Research and Royal Decree 1716/2011 regulating Biobanks, samples will be collected directly from the data subject. Samples will be kept at each site until the end of the study, when they will be sent to the Neuroscience Laboratory of the Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute for analysis. After the study, any remaining samples will be stored as part of the collection (B.0000643) registered in the ISCIII National Biobank Registry, in the -80°C ultra-freezer of the Department of Neuroscience located at the Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital. They will only be retained if specific consent is obtained, for a maximum of 15 years; otherwise, at the end of the study, any remaining biological samples will be destroyed. Study procedures will not begin until the study has been approved by the ethics committee of each participating site.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intracranial Hemorrhage, Spontaneous

Keywords

  • INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE
  • FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME
  • PREDICTION
  • PROGNOSIS
  • BIOMARKERS
03

In context

Intracranial Hemorrhages

211 studies on the registry are indexed under Intracranial Hemorrhages; 62 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,688 is above the median of 250 across 85 observational studies indexed under Intracranial Hemorrhages.

Browse Intracranial Hemorrhages studies →

Lead sponsor

Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital is the lead sponsor of 89 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Consecutive patients with spontaneous intracraneal hemorrhage admitted in several Comprehensive Stroke Center of different regions of Spain

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients ≥ 18 years diagnosed with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) by CT scan and treated maximally within the first 24 hours.
  2. Prior functional independence defined as modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤ 3.
  3. Time from symptom onset or last known seen well ≤ 24 hours.
  4. Signed by the patient or their representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age \< 18 years
  2. Intracranial hemorrhage secondary to trauma, ischemic stroke, or fibrinolytic or endovascular treatment.
  3. Spontaneous ICH with limitation of therapeutic effort (LTE) within the first 24 hours. LTE is defined as the withholding or withdrawal of potentially life-sustaining treatment and/or the initiation of comfort care measures with the expectation that the patient may die as a result. Potentially life-sustaining treatments include: orotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and neurosurgical treatments (intracranial pressure monitoring, external ventricular drainage, hematoma evacuation, decompressive craniectomy). LTE is not considered to apply if only a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order was established, without limitation of any other treatment.
  4. Prior functional dependence, defined as mRS > 3
  5. Time from symptom onset or last known seen well >24 hours
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,688 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Adult consecutive patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage admitted in CSC

    Other: CLINICAL SCORE TO PREDICT FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME · Other: Variables necessary for calculating the score under study (PRO-ICH) will be collected, as well as baseline and 60-120 minutes after baseline of serum blood samples

Interventions

  • OtherCLINICAL SCORE TO PREDICT FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME

    No other interventions

  • OtherVariables necessary for calculating the score under study (PRO-ICH) will be collected, as well as baseline and 60-120 minutes after baseline of serum blood samples

    No other interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. GOOD OUTCOME: A MODIFIED RANKIN SCORE (mRS) OF 0-3

    Functional outcome at 3 months assessed using the mRS scale by a blinded evaluator in a validated structured interview. mRS ranges from 0 to 6 (0: No symptoms; 1: Mild symptoms, but can perform all normal work and daily activities; 2: Mild disability; does not do everything as before, but can care for themselves without assistance; 3: Moderate disability; needs some assistance with certain tasks, but can walk independently; 4: Moderately severe disability; cannot walk independently or manage basic needs without assistance; 5: Severe disability; is bedridden or wheelchair-bound and requires full-time assistance; 6: The person has died.

    Time frame: 90 DAYS +/-14 DAYS

Secondary outcomes

  1. GOOD OUTCOME: A MODIFIED RANKIN SCORE (mRS) OF 0-3

    Functional outcome at 6 months and 12 months (+/- 14 days) was assessed using the mRS scale by a blinded evaluator in a validated structured interview. mRS ranges from 0 to 6 (0: No symptoms; 1: Mild symptoms, but can perform all normal work and daily activities; 2: Mild disability; does not do everything as before, but can care for themselves without assistance; 3: Moderate disability; needs some assistance with certain tasks, but can walk independently; 4: Moderately severe disability; cannot walk independently or manage basic needs without assistance; 5: Severe disability; is bedridden or wheelchair-bound and requires full-time assistance; 6: The person has died.

    Time frame: 6 MONTHS AND 12 MONTHS (+/- 14 DAYS)

  2. MORTALITY OR COMBINED MORTALITY+SEVERE DEPENDENCY: A MODIFIED RANKIN SCALES (mRS) OF 6 OR 5+6

    Mortality or the combination of mortality or severe disability assessed as mRS 6 or the combination of 5 + 6 by a blinded evaluator in a validated structured interview. mRS ranges from 0 to 6 (0: No symptoms; 1: Mild symptoms, but can perform all normal work and daily activities; 2: Mild disability; does not do everything as before, but can care for themselves without assistance; 3: Moderate disability; needs some assistance with certain tasks, but can walk independently; 4: Moderately severe disability; cannot walk independently or manage basic needs without assistance; 5: Severe disability; is bedridden or wheelchair-bound and requires full-time assistance; 6: The person has died.

    Time frame: 90 DAYS, 6 MONTHS and 12 MONTHS (+/- 14 DAYS)

  3. HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE

    Quality of life measured by EuroQoL-5d by a blinded evaluator in a validated structured interview.

    Time frame: 90 DAYS, 6 MONTHS and 12 MONTHS (+/- 14 DAYS)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Neurology Department, German Trias I Pujol Hospital.
    Badalona, Barcelona 08916, Spain
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2029, 36 months after the start.

Of 44 non-industry observational studies under Intracranial Hemorrhages, half reached primary completion within 59 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 130. This study's planned 36 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 49 studies reached it within 59 months; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 105.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 22, 2026
First posted
Jul 27, 2026
StartActual
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2029
CompletionEst.
Dec 2029
Last update
Jul 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07728734
Lead sponsor
Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
Responsible party
Monica Millan Torne (NEUROLOGIST, MD, PHD, Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 27, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 28, 2026

Study contacts

MÒNICA MILLÁN, MD
principal investigator · Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion