CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07829094SupAIRUpdated Sep 18, 2026

Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Use of Supraglottic Airway Devices and Neuromuscular Blockade

An interventional study of Airway management strategy and Initiation of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) in Postoperative Pulmonary Complications, sponsored by University Hospital Ulm. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-18.

Sponsored by University Hospital Ulm · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6,800
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

SupAIR is an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial investigating whether airway management and neuromuscular blockade during general anesthesia influence postoperative pulmonary complications.

Approximately 6,800 adults undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery will be randomized to one of five treatment arms: tracheal intubation with moderate neuromuscular blockade, tracheal intubation with deep neuromuscular blockade, supraglottic airway with moderate neuromuscular blockade, supraglottic airway with deep neuromuscular blockade, or supraglottic airway without neuromuscular blockade.

The primary outcome is the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications during the hospital stay. Secondary outcomes include perioperative complications, surgical conditions, recovery, and functional health. Participants will be followed during hospitalization and again approximately six months after surgery.

Read the detailed description

SupAIR is an international, multicenter, randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial evaluating the effects of airway management and neuromuscular blockade (NMB) on postoperative pulmonary complications after general anesthesia.

A total of 6,800 adults undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery will be randomized to one of five treatment arms:

  1. Tracheal tube with moderate NMB
  2. Tracheal tube with deep NMB
  3. Supraglottic airway device with moderate NMB
  4. Supraglottic airway device with deep NMB
  5. Supraglottic airway device without NMB

The five treatment arms result from an initial allocation to tracheal tube with NMB, supraglottic airway device with NMB, or supraglottic airway device without NMB. Participants assigned to NMB are additionally randomized to moderate or deep neuromuscular blockade.

The study addresses two primary hypotheses. First, among participants receiving NMB, use of a supraglottic airway device is hypothesized to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications compared with tracheal intubation. Second, among participants managed with a supraglottic airway device, the use of NMB is hypothesized not to increase postoperative pulmonary complications compared with no NMB. Finally, among participants receiving NMB depth of neuromuscular blockade will be used as secondary exposure.

The randomized intervention determines airway management and the use and depth of neuromuscular blockade. Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is used in participants receiving NMB, and recovery from neuromuscular blockade is managed according to applicable clinical guidelines. All other aspects of perioperative anesthetic management are performed according to local clinical practice.

The primary outcome is the occurrence of at least one postoperative pulmonary complication from postoperative day 1 until hospital discharge or postoperative day 28, whichever occurs first. The composite includes respiratory failure, suspected pulmonary infection, pulmonary infiltrates, atelectasis, aspiration pneumonitis, bronchospasm, and pulmonary oedema.

Postoperative outcomes are assessed by blinded study personnel during the hospital stay. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative and postoperative complications, respiratory events in the post-anesthesia care unit, surgical conditions, quality of recovery, functional health, length of stay, intensive care treatment, and mortality. Participants are additionally followed by telephone approximately six months after surgery.

An interim analysis is planned after approximately 1,000 participants to assess assumptions relevant to sample-size planning. Interim results will be reviewed by the independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board, and the total sample size may be adjusted in accordance with the prespecified analysis plan.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pulmonary Complications

Keywords

  • Postoperative Complications
  • Laryngeal Masks
  • Intubation
  • Endotracheal Tube
  • Neuromuscular Blockade
  • Surgical conditions
  • Postoperative pulmonary complications
  • PPC
  • Anesthesia
  • Supraglottic airway
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with an ASA physical status ≤ 3 scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia whose airway can be secured via tracheal tube or SGA.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Contraindications for using supraglottic devices, tracheal tube, or neuromuscular blocking agents (and reversal drugs); surgery in prone positioning; surgical procedures scheduled outside the operating room; ambulatory surgery; pregnancy; patients planned for consecutive anaesthetic/surgical procedures in the following 14 days or within the past 14 days.

04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
6,800 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Tracheal Tube with moderate Neuromuscular Blockade (TT/moderate NMB)

    General anesthesia with tracheal tube management and moderate neuromuscular blockade.

    Procedure: Airway management strategy · Other: Deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade (NMB)

  • Experimental
    Supraglottic Airway Device with deep Neuromuscular Blockade (SGA/deep NMB)

    General anesthesia with supraglottic airway device management and deep neuromuscular blockade.

    Procedure: Airway management strategy · Procedure: Initiation of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) · Other: Deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade (NMB)

  • Active comparator
    Supraglottic Airway Device without Neuromuscular Blockade (SGA/no NMB)

    General anaesthesia with supraglottic airway device management without neuromuscular blockade.

    Procedure: Initiation of neuromuscular blockade (NMB)

  • Active comparator
    Tracheal Tube with deep Neuromuscular Blockade (TT/deep NMB)

    General anesthesia with tracheal tube management and deep neuromuscular blockade.

    Procedure: Airway management strategy · Other: Deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade (NMB)

  • Experimental
    Supraglottic Airway Device with moderate Neuromuscular Blockade (SGA/moderate NMB)

    General anesthesia with supraglottic airway device management and moderate neuromuscular blockade.

    Procedure: Airway management strategy · Procedure: Initiation of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) · Other: Deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade (NMB)

Interventions

  • ProcedureAirway management strategy

    For the superiority hypothesis the placement of the supraglottic airway device compared to the endotracheal tube is investigated.

  • ProcedureInitiation of neuromuscular blockade (NMB)

    For the non-inferiority hypothesis the initiation of neuromuscular blockade in patients receiving a supraglottic airway is investigated.

  • OtherDeep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade (NMB)

    Deep or moderate NMB. Muscle relaxants are administered according to group allocation. Repetitive doses of half the ED95s are administered at Train-of-Four (TOF) count ≥ 2 in the moderate group and at post-tetanic count (PTC) ≥ 2 in the deep blockade group.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of at least one postoperative pulmonary complication

    The primary outcome is a composite endpoint of postoperative pulmonary complications. It is met if a participant experiences at least one predefined postoperative pulmonary complication and their severity is graded according to the Clavien-Dindo-Classification

    Time frame: Postoperative day one until hospital discharge or postoperative day 28, whichever occurs earlier

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intraoperative complications

    The classification of intraoperative adverse events (ClassIntra), ranging from grade 0 to grade V. It is used to assess intraoperative anaesthesia- and surgery-related complications.

    Time frame: During the surgery

  2. Critical respiratory events in the recovery room

    The outcome is met if at least one predefined critical respiratory event occurs. Events include upper airway obstruction requiring intervention, hypoxaemia not responding to active interventions, signs of respiratory distress or impending ventilatory failure, inability to breathe deeply, symptoms of respiratory or upper-airway muscle weakness, suspected pulmonary aspiration, or reintubation.

    Time frame: During post-anesthesia care before admission to the normal ward

  3. Any postoperative in-hospital complication

    Postoperative complications are recorded during the hospital stay during predefined visits in accordance with the postoperative morbidity survey including pulmonary, infectious, renal, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, neurological, hematological, wound and pain). If a complication occurs each complication is categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

    Time frame: Patients are visited on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, 8, 15 and on the day of discharge from hospital or day 28 (whatever occurs first) to document complications between the current and the last visit.

  4. Surgical conditions

    Surgical conditions will be assessed in a single-blinded manner via the Leiden Surgical Rating Scale which ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating extremely poor surgical conditions and 5 indicating optimal surgical conditions considering visibility, surgical space, muscle contractions, handling tactics and patient movement.

    Time frame: During surgery, assessed every 15 minutes

  5. Quality of Recovery questionnaire

    The Quality of Recovery 15 questionnaire will be assessed and consists of 15 items to determine subjective recovery after surgery on an 11-point Likert scale (0-10).

    Time frame: On postoperative day 1, day of discharge or on day 28 whatever occurs first and on postoperative day 180

  6. Functional Health

    The WHODAS-2 (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0) scale will be used to quantify the level of disability.

    Time frame: On the day of admission and 180 days after surgery

  7. Further Outcomes

    Length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit stay and 180-day mortality.

    Time frame: Retrieved from Chart Review or at the 180 day follow-up

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Canet J, Hardman J, Sabate S, Langeron O, Abreu MG, Gallart L, Belda J, Markstaller K, Pelosi P, Mazo V. PERISCOPE study: predicting post-operative pulmonary complications in Europe. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;28(6):459-61. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328344be2d. No abstract available. PubMed 21544025 ↗
  • Abbott TEF, Fowler AJ, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M, Moller AM, Canet J, Creagh-Brown B, Mythen M, Gin T, Lalu MM, Futier E, Grocott MP, Schultz MJ, Pearse RM; StEP-COMPAC Group. A systematic review and consensus definitions for standardised end-points in perioperative medicine: pulmonary complications. Br J Anaesth. 2018 May;120(5):1066-1079. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Mar 27. PubMed 29661384 ↗
  • Hammer M, Santer P, Schaefer MS, Althoff FC, Wongtangman K, Frey UH, Xu X, Eikermann M, Fassbender P. Supraglottic airway device versus tracheal intubation and the risk of emergent postoperative intubation after general anaesthesia in adults: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;126(3):738-745. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.040. Epub 2020 Dec 17. PubMed 33341223 ↗
  • Abdi W, Amathieu R, Adhoum A, Poncelet C, Slavov V, Kamoun W, Combes X, Dhonneur G. Sparing the larynx during gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized trial comparing the LMA Supreme and the ETT. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Feb;54(2):141-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02095.x. Epub 2009 Aug 13. PubMed 19681772 ↗
  • Mencke T, Echternach M, Kleinschmidt S, Lux P, Barth V, Plinkert PK, Fuchs-Buder T. Laryngeal morbidity and quality of tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2003 May;98(5):1049-56. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00005. PubMed 12717124 ↗
  • Xu R, Lian Y, Li WX. Airway Complications during and after General Anesthesia: A Comparison, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Using Flexible Laryngeal Mask Airways and Endotracheal Tubes. PLoS One. 2016 Jul 14;11(7):e0158137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158137. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27414807 ↗
  • Kirmeier E, Eriksson LI, Lewald H, Jonsson Fagerlund M, Hoeft A, Hollmann M, Meistelman C, Hunter JM, Ulm K, Blobner M; POPULAR Contributors. Post-anaesthesia pulmonary complications after use of muscle relaxants (POPULAR): a multicentre, prospective observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Feb;7(2):129-140. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30294-7. Epub 2018 Sep 14. PubMed 30224322 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07829094
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Ulm
Collaborators
Medical University of Vienna, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Klinikum Oldenburg gGmbH, University Hospital, Zürich, St. Josef Hospital Bochum
Responsible party
Manfred Blobner (Principal Investigator, Professor of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ulm) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 18, 2026
Start date
Oct 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2026

Study contacts

Béla-Simon Paschold, M.D. Coordinating Investigator
Contact
bela-simon.paschold@uni-ulm.de
+49 731 50060390
Clinical Research Physician
Contact
+49 731 50054306
Manfred Blobner, Professor M.D.
principal investigator · Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion