ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07669064ORAL-PROTECT IUpdated Jun 25, 2026

ORAL-PROTECT I: Oral Asepsis Preventing Transmission During Intubation

An interventional study of Preoperative oral decontamination with chlorhexidine in Bacterial Transmission, Intubation Intratracheal and Chlorhexidine, sponsored by University Hospital Ulm. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-25.

Sponsored by University Hospital Ulm · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Postoperative respiratory complications, such as bacterial pneumonia, are common and serious problems after general anesthesia. They can lead to longer hospital stays, more complications, and increased mortality. One possible cause is that bacteria from the mouth and throat enter the lower airways during tracheal intubation.

The mouth and throat naturally contain many bacteria, including potentially harmful microorganisms. During general anesthesia, coughing and swallowing reflexes are reduced or absent. When a tracheal tube is inserted, secretions from the mouth and throat may be carried into the trachea. The tube may also support the movement of contaminated fluid into the lower airways.

ORAL-PROTECT I is a prospective, randomized, controlled study. It investigates whether simple oral hygiene before surgery can reduce the transfer of bacteria into the trachea during airway management under general anesthesia.

The study includes patients aged 60 years or older undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. Participants are randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group performs oral hygiene immediately before anesthesia. This includes brushing the teeth and tongue for about 3 minutes, followed by rinsing and gargling for about 1 minute with a chlorhexidine antiseptic solution. The control group receives standard care without additional oral hygiene.

Oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal swabs will be collected at predefined time points. The primary outcome is based on the perioperative tracheal bacterial load, sampled every 30 minutes and assessed at two hours after induction of anesthesia. The co-primary outcome is based on the oral bacterial load immediately before endotracheal intubation.

Secondary outcomes include changes in oral and tracheal bacterial load over time and identification of the microorganisms detected. The study aims to clarify early bacterial transfer during airway management and to evaluate whether a simple preoperative oral hygiene measure can reduce this process.

Read the detailed description

ORAL-PROTECT I is a prospective, randomized, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial investigating whether preoperative oral hygiene can reduce early bacterial transmission from the mouth and throat into the trachea during airway management under general anesthesia.

Postoperative respiratory complications, including bacterial pneumonia, are common and clinically relevant adverse events after general anesthesia. They can contribute to increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and mortality. One possible mechanism is the transmission of bacteria from the oral cavity and pharynx into the lower airways during tracheal intubation. The oral cavity and pharynx naturally contain a broad bacterial flora, including potentially pathogenic microorganisms. During general anesthesia, protective swallowing and coughing reflexes are reduced or absent. During tracheal intubation, bacteria-contaminated secretions from the mouth and throat may enter the trachea and lower airways.

The study includes patients aged 60 years or older undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. Potentially eligible patients are screened before surgery. Patients are screened for eligibility during pre-admission testing and are approached for study participation. On the day of surgery, patients are reassessed for eligibility before randomization to confirm that eligibility criteria are still met. Patients who performed oral hygiene less than four hours before induction are excluded before randomization.

Eligible participants are randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group using a REDCap-based randomization tool. Participants in the intervention group undergo supervised oral hygiene immediately before induction of anesthesia, consisting of 3 minutes of tongue and tooth brushing and 1 minute of chlorhexidine gargling. Participants in the control group receive standard clinical care without additional preoperative oral hygiene measures. All other perioperative procedures, including anesthetic management, airway management, surgical care, and postoperative treatment, are at the discretion of the treating anesthesiologist and independent of study participation.

Bacterial load is assessed using swab-based microbiological sampling at predefined time points. Samples are collected from the oral cavity, pharynx, and trachea to describe perioperative bacterial contamination and its development over time. The perioperative tracheal bacterial load is sampled at 30-minute intervals.

Sample handling and microbiological processing follow a standardized operating procedure. This includes uniform transport conditions, timely laboratory processing, neutralization of residual antiseptic activity, serial dilution, plating on appropriate culture media, aerobic incubation, and quantitative colony counting. Samples from both study groups are processed identically to minimize systematic bias and allow reliable comparison of bacterial load. Additional assessments include the intraoperative course of tracheal bacterial load, tracheal bacterial load before extubation, oral bacterial load approximately 24 hours after surgery, and qualitative microbiological characterization of detected bacteria. Adverse events are evaluated after the intervention and anesthesia.

The study aims to provide insight into early perioperative bacterial transmission during airway management and to evaluate whether a simple, low-risk preoperative oral hygiene intervention can influence bacterial contamination of the trachea under general anesthesia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bacterial Transmission
  • Intubation Intratracheal
  • Chlorhexidine

Keywords

  • anesthesia, general
  • oral hygiene
  • bacterial load
  • oropharyngeal
  • respiratory mucosa
  • chlorhexidine
  • tracheal intubation
  • mouth rinsing
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Ulm is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 60 years
  • Elective surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation
  • Expected duration of surgery ≥ 2 hours
  • Ability to provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic antibiotic therapy within 7 days before surgery
  • Planned postoperative systemic antibiotic therapy
  • Known or allergy to chlorhexidine
  • Pneumonia or respiratory infection within 7 days before surgery
  • Inability to perform the study intervention as intended
  • Preoperative oral hygiene on the day of surgery, less than four hours prior to induction of the general anesthesia
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard of care

    Standard clinical care without additional preoperative oral hygiene or oral decontamination measures before induction of general anesthesia.

  • Active comparator
    Preoperative oral decontamination with chlorhexidine & tooth & tongue brushing

    Supervised preoperative oral decontamination immediately before induction of general anesthesia using chlorhexidine for 1 minute \& tooth/tongue brushing for 3 minutes

    Procedure: Preoperative oral decontamination with chlorhexidine

Interventions

  • ProcedurePreoperative oral decontamination with chlorhexidine

    The intervention consists of supervised preoperative oral decontamination performed in the operating room holding/ induction area immediately before induction of general anesthesia. Participants brush their teeth and tongue for 3 minutes, followed by a rinse with chlorhexidine oral antiseptic solution for 1 minute. The intervention is performed right before endotracheal intubation. All other perioperative procedures are at the discretion of the anesthesiologist in the room.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in tracheal bacterial load at 2 hours after anesthesia induction

    The primary outcome is the change in tracheal bacterial load, defined through tracheal swab obtained 2 hours after induction of anesthesia.

    Time frame: At 2 hours after induction and intubation

  2. Change in oral bacterial load

    The co-primary outcome is the peri-interventional change in oral bacterial load due to the oral hygiene measures obtained through oral swabs immediately before endotracheal intubation.

    Time frame: Immediately before endotracheal intubation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intraoperative development of tracheal bacterial load

    This secondary outcome assesses the intraoperative development of tracheal bacterial load during the surgery. Serial tracheal samples are collected every 30 minutes until extubation.

    Time frame: Every 30 minutes intraoperatively from endotracheal intubation until washout of anesthesia prior to extubation.

  2. Change of tracheal bacterial load immediately before extubation

    This secondary outcome assesses the tracheal bacterial load immediately before extubation.

    Time frame: Immediately before extubation.

  3. Change of oral bacterial load 24 hours postoperatively

    This secondary outcome assesses the change in oral bacterial load obtained 24 (± 2) hours after surgery.

    Time frame: Approximately 24 hours postoperatively, with a tolerance of ±2 hours.

  4. Qualitative microbiological characterization of bacteria detected in tracheal samples

    Descriptive analysis of colony forming bacteria that were obtained through tracheal swabs.

    Time frame: Tracheal swabs are obtained from right after intubation until extubation. For the primary outcome all samples are plated. If Colony Forming Units (CFU) occur on those within 48 hours, characterization will be performed.

  5. Safety events related to the oral hygiene intervention

    This secondary outcome assesses safety events potentially related to the preoperative oral hygiene intervention, including oral mucosal irritation, discomfort, intolerance of the mouth rinse, or other adverse events.

    Time frame: From the start of the oral hygiene intervention until approximately 24 hours postoperatively.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Naumova EA, Weber L, Pankratz V, Czenskowski V, Arnold WH. Bacterial viability in oral biofilm after tooth brushing with amine fluoride or sodium fluoride. Arch Oral Biol. 2019 Jan;97:91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 17. PubMed 30368202 ↗
  • Shuai Y, Wang X, Chen S, Huang T, Wang Z, Zhang Y. Preoperative oral hygiene treatment reduces bacterial transport and colonization during intubation for orthopedic surgery. J Oral Sci. 2024;66(2):134-138. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.23-0425. PubMed 38631883 ↗
  • Okochi M, Nomura S, Kaga C, Honda H. Peptide array-based screening of human mesenchymal stem cell-adhesive peptides derived from fibronectin type III domain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008 Jun 20;371(1):85-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.04.019. Epub 2008 Apr 14. PubMed 18413142 ↗
  • Pneumatikos IA, Dragoumanis CK, Bouros DE. Ventilator-associated pneumonia or endotracheal tube-associated pneumonia? An approach to the pathogenesis and preventive strategies emphasizing the importance of endotracheal tube. Anesthesiology. 2009 Mar;110(3):673-80. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819868e0. PubMed 19212256 ↗
  • Fourrier F, Duvivier B, Boutigny H, Roussel-Delvallez M, Chopin C. Colonization of dental plaque: a source of nosocomial infections in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb;26(2):301-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199802000-00032. PubMed 9468169 ↗
  • Scannapieco FA, Stewart EM, Mylotte JM. Colonization of dental plaque by respiratory pathogens in medical intensive care patients. Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun;20(6):740-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199206000-00007. PubMed 1597025 ↗
  • Cozowicz C, Zhong H, Reisinger L, Illescas A, Giannakis P, Liu J, Poeran JV, Memtsoudis SG. Inpatient Cost of Complications after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. Anesthesiology. 2026 Mar 1;144(3):611-621. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005856. Epub 2025 Nov 20. PubMed 41264388 ↗
  • Martin CT, Gao Y, Pugely AJ. Incidence And Risk Factors For 30-Day Readmissions After Hip Fracture Surgery. Iowa Orthop J. 2016;36:155-60. PubMed 27528853 ↗
  • Hui S, Fowler AJ, Cashmore RMJ, Fisher TJ, Schlautmann J, Body S, Lan-Pak-Kee V, Webb M, Kyriakides M, Ng JY, Chisvo NS, Pearse RM, Abbott TEF. Routine postoperative noninvasive respiratory support and pneumonia after elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Feb;128(2):363-374. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.047. Epub 2021 Dec 13. PubMed 34916050 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jun 2026; primary completion for Oct 2026, 4 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 27, 2026
First posted
Jun 25, 2026
StartEst.
Jun 20, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
May 1, 2027
Last update
Jun 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07669064
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Ulm
Responsible party
Manfred Blobner (Principal Investigator, Professor of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Ulm) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 25, 2026
Start date
Jun 20, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 25, 2026

Study contacts

Béla-Simon Paschold, M.D.
Contact
bela-simon.paschold@uniklinik-ulm.de
+49-731-50060390
Physician on Duty
Contact
+49-731-50060043

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion