ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06230653MEMORYUpdated Jan 30, 2024

Mechanomyography Reloaded? A Randomized Prospective Agreement Study

An observational study in Neuromuscular Blockade, sponsored by University Hospital Ulm. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-30.

Sponsored by University Hospital Ulm · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2024, 2 years 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Neuromuscular monitoring is used to evaluate neuromuscular function intraoperatively and to ensure complete neuromuscular recovery at the end of anaesthesia. Therefore, the lack of reliable neuromuscular monitoring devices that are not cumbersome to use is a major shortcoming for anaesthesia. A recently developed mechanomyography (MMG) device may meet these partially unmet needs due to its measurement of the patient's contractile force instead of its surrogates (i.e., acceleration, velocity), including the response to physiologically relevant tetanic stimulation. However, it is unclear whether the reliability of the newly developed MMG device is similar to or better than the currently available gold standard of neuromuscular monitoring based on electromyography (EMG).

Read the detailed description

The MEMORY trial is a randomized clinical agreement study which will prospectively enrol thirty ASA 1 or 2 patients ≥ 18 years scheduled for non-cardiac surgery requiring general anaesthesia and neuromuscular blockade for optimisation of surgical conditions. The patient's neuromuscular function is measured on one hand with MMG and the other hand with EMG in a randomised fashion. Additionally, randomisation will be stratified the domination of one hand.

In the MEMORY trial we will test the hypothesis, that a newly developed MMG sensor provides not less reliable measurements of neuromuscular function compared to EMG in adult patients. Reliability includes agreement, precision, and the absence of staircase phenomenon and idiosyncratic responses to train-of-four (TOF) stimulation. In addition, we will explore if measurement of tetanic fade will provide more precise information about complete neuromuscular recovery than the current standard of TOF ratio >0.9.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neuromuscular Blockade

Keywords

  • Mechanomyography
  • Neuromuscular Blockade
  • Electromyography
  • Tetanic fading
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Ulm is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The MEMORY trial is a randomized clinical agreement study which will prospectively enrol adult ASA 1 or 2 patients scheduled for non-cardiac surgery requiring general anaesthesia and neuromuscular blockade for optimisation of surgical conditions.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • age ≥ 18 years
  • ASA \< 3
  • scheduled for non-cardiac surgery requiring general anaesthesia and neuromuscular blockade for optimisation of surgical conditions
  • positioning during surgery with intraoperative access to both arms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • allergy to muscle relaxants and reversal agents
  • neuromuscular disease
  • procedure is scheduled outside the operating room
  • need of endotracheal intubation prior to surgery
  • need of rapid sequence induction
  • pregnancy, breastfeeding or 30 days postpartum
  • surgical procedure or examination findings which are a for a supraglottic airway device
  • employee of the investigator or study site directly involved in this study or other studies under the direction of the investigator or study site
  • family member of the investigator
  • custodial accommodation
  • alcohol or drug abuse
  • patients with preceding injuries impairing muscle or nerve function of the arm
  • Participation in other studies with drugs or devices within 4 weeks prior to screening or missing agreement not to participate in any other study at the same time or within a period of one month after the MEMORY study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • MMG on dominant arm

    Mechanomyography-device will be examined on the dominant arm.

  • MMG on non-dominant arm

    Mechanomyography-device will be examined on the non-dominant arm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Precision of the Mechanomyography

    Measured by the repeatability coefficient at baseline and at complete neuromuscular recovery

    Time frame: intraoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Agreement of the TOF ratio between Electromyography and Mechanomyography

    Agreement of the TOF ratio at 7 predefined TOF ratios: 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9

    Time frame: intraoperative

  2. Confirmation of handling and precision of Mechanomyography sensor

    Investigation of baseline stability (i.e., no staircase phenomenon of the first twitch response and the TOF ratio), occurrence and magnitude of idiosyncratic TOF ratio \> 1.0 during baseline measurement, repeatability of the TOF ratio during recovery from a rocuronium induced neuromuscular blockade, and sensitivity of the TOF ratio to changing the hand position during baseline measurements.

    Time frame: intraoperative

Other outcomes

  1. Tetanic fade

    Measurement of the tetanic fading at baseline, at a TOF ratio of 0.9 measured by EMG, at a TOF ratio of 0.95 measured by EMG, and 5 min after a bolus of 2 mg/kg sugammadex

    Time frame: intraoperative

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 30, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06230653
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Ulm
Responsible party
Manfred Blobner (Principal Investigator, University Hospital Ulm) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 30, 2024
Start date
Jan 22, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 30, 2024

Study contacts

Anna Scholze
Contact
anna.scholze@tum.de
00498941408974
Manfred Blobner, MD PhD
principal investigator · Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion