ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07821060CronoNutriBiomUpdated Sep 15, 2026

Developing Microbiome and Dietary Strategies Based on Chrono-nutrition for Targeting ADHD

An interventional study of Circadian fasting in ADHD and ADHD - Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity, sponsored by Spanish National Research Council. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by Spanish National Research Council · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2024, registered Apr 2026).

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 42 studies in Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity with a site in Spain — 5 open to participants now, 8 under way, none of them phase 3. Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity · Spain.

Planned enrollment
28th of 36
60 · median 153
Started
2024
with 3 others
No phase
18 of 42
4 open now
Registered
42nd of 42
by date

Among the 42 studies in Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity with a site in Spain, this one is the 28th largest by planned enrollment of the 36 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 4 that started in 2024, is one of 18 with no phase, and was the 42nd registered.

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

1,817 studies on the registry are indexed under Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; 295 are open to participants now.

Browse Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity studies →

Open to participants now

5 of the 42 studies in Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity with a site in Spain are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 5 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Spain have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Spain →

Who these studies take

Of the 201 Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity studies recruiting now, 27 (13%) set no upper age limit and 169 (84%) stop at 75 or younger; 141 take children under 18; 55 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 65 Years · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 42 studies in Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity with a site in Spain, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Study objectives This project seeks to understand how an intervention based on time-restricted eating (ChronoFeeding or CF) can improve quality of life, behavior, sleep, and gut health in adults with ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder) who have alterations in their circadian rhythms. It will also study how this intervention affects biological markers, such as microbiota (gut and saliva bacteria), inflammation, and oxidative stress, in both humans and animal models.

Methodology A randomized controlled pilot study will be conducted with 60 adults diagnosed with ADHD, aged between 18 and 65, who have extended eating habits (more than 14 hours a day) and sleep problems. People with chronic diseases, recent use of antibiotics (\< 6 months), or supplements that affect metabolism or sleep will be excluded.

Participants will be divided into two groups:

  • Control group: will continue with their usual eating habits.
  • CF group: will reduce their eating window to 10 hours (breakfast between 9:30-10:00 a.m. and dinner between 7:30-8:00 p.m.), without changing what or how much they eat.

For 12 weeks, adherence to the schedule will be assessed using food diaries and validated questionnaires on dietary habits. Clinical analyses will be performed before and after the intervention, including weight, sleep quality (measured using diaries), and psychological scales to assess symptoms of ADHD, anxiety, depression, and quality of life.

Fasting blood samples will also be taken to analyze metabolic, hormonal, and inflammation markers. Factors such as the menstrual cycle, stress, environment, and medical history will be studied to better understand the effects of the intervention.

Read the detailed description

Study Rationale Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental condition that often persists into adulthood and is associated with a wide range of comorbidities, including mood disorders, metabolic dysfunction, and sleep disturbances. Adult ADHD remains underdiagnosed and undertreated, with current pharmacological therapies showing limited long-term efficacy and frequent side effects. Emerging evidence suggests that circadian misalignment and irregular eating patterns may exacerbate ADHD symptoms and reduce treatment responsiveness.

This study investigates the hypothesis that aligning food intake with circadian rhythms-through a dietary strategy known as circadian fasting (CF)-can improve clinical outcomes in adults with ADHD. The intervention is non-invasive, non-pharmacological, and designed to modulate gut microbiota and circadian markers, potentially offering a novel therapeutic approach.

Study Objectives The primary objective is to evaluate the impact of a 12-week circadian fasting protocol on cognitive and behavioral symptoms, sleep quality, circadian rhythmicity, and quality of life in adults diagnosed with ADHD. Secondary objectives include assessing changes in serum and salivary biomarkers, gut and oral microbiota composition and function, and exploring mechanistic pathways through animal and in vitro models.

Study Design This is a randomized controlled pilot trial involving 60/60 adult participants diagnosed or not with ADHD. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a control group maintaining their habitual eating patterns or an intervention group following a time-restricted eating schedule (10-hour window from 9:30-10:00 AM to 7:30-8:00 PM). No restrictions will be placed on diet composition or caloric intake.

Clinical assessments will be conducted at baseline and post-intervention, including validated scales for ADHD symptoms, impulsivity, sleep quality, emotional well-being, and quality of life. Actigraphy devices will be used to monitor sleep and activity cycles. Blood and saliva samples will be collected for biochemical and microbiota analysis.

Microbiota and Biomarker Analysis Saliva and fecal samples will be collected at multiple time points to evaluate microbial rhythmicity and composition. Next-generation sequencing and metabolomics will be employed to identify microbial taxa and functional profiles associated with ADHD and CF intervention. Salivary cortisol and melatonin levels will be measured to assess circadian alignment.

Mechanistic Studies Complementary animal studies using the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) model of ADHD will assess the effects of CF on behavior, cognition, neuroinflammation, neurotransmission, and gut microbiota rhythmicity. Germ-free mice will be colonized with microbiota from ADHD patients pre- and post-intervention to evaluate causality.

In vitro studies will utilize a human enteric nervous system (ENS) co-culture model to investigate the impact of ADHD-associated microbiota and CF-modulated microbiota on intestinal barrier function, oxidative stress, immune response, and neuronal activation.

03

Conditions studied

  • ADHD
  • ADHD - Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity

Keywords

  • Crononutrition
  • Microbiome
  • Mental Health
  • ADHD
  • Dietary patterns
  • Gut-brain
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants aged between 18 and 65, with a usual eating period of 14 hours, no or moderate alcohol consumption, no constipation, no chronic or genetic diseases other than ADHD. No consumption of antibiotics, prebiotics, or probiotics during the last three months

Exclusion criteria: Participants who regularly consume antidiabetics, , beta-blockers, adrenergic stimulants, laxatives, medications, or supplements known to affect sleep, circadian rhythms, or metabolism.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control - Control

    Healthy participants continuing their usual diet

  • Experimental
    Control - Fasting

    Behavioral - Healthy participants assigned to the fasting intervention.

    Behavioral: Circadian fasting

  • No intervention
    ADHD - Control

    Participants with ADHD continuing their usual diet

  • Experimental
    ADHD - Fasting

    Behavioral - Participants with ADHD assigned to the circadian fasting intervention

    Behavioral: Circadian fasting

Interventions

  • BehavioralCircadian fasting

    12 consecutive weeks of circadian fasting consisting in 10/12-hour eating window and 14/12-hour fasting

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Adult ADHD Quality of Life (AAQoL) total score

    The Adult ADHD Quality of Life (AAQoL) questionnaire assesses the impact of adult ADHD on a patient's life. AAQoL is a validated 29-item self-report instrument. Item responses are recorded on a 5-point Likert scale and transformed to a total score ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the poorest quality of life (greatest impairment) and 100 represents the best quality of life (least impairment). Higher scores indicate better quality of life and less ADHD-related impairment. Comparison between mean change from baseline to 12 weeks in the AAQoL total score will be conducted for TRF (10-hour eating window) and control arms; analysis: between-group difference in mean change (ANCOVA adjusted for baseline score, age, sex).

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (end of intervention)

  2. Change in sleep efficiency assessed by daily sleep diary

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in sleep efficiency (%), assessed using a daily sleep diary. Sleep efficiency is calculated as the percentage of total sleep time divided by total time spent in bed and multiplied by 100. Higher values indicate greater sleep efficiency. The outcome will be analyzed as the between-group difference in mean change from baseline to week 12 between the TRF (10-hour eating window) and control groups.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (end of intervention)

  3. Change in total sleep duration assessed by daily sleep diary

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in total sleep duration (hours/night), assessed using a daily sleep diary. Total sleep duration is defined as the total number of hours slept per night. The outcome will be analyzed as the between-group difference in mean change from baseline to Week 12 between the TRF (10-hour eating window) and control groups.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (end of intervention)

  4. Change in Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS) Total Score

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS) Total Score. The CAARS is a validated questionnaire used to assess the severity of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in adults, including inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. Scores are reported as T-scores, with higher scores indicating greater ADHD symptom severity and lower scores indicating fewer symptoms. Scale: T-score \<60: within normal range T-score 60-64: mildly elevated T-score 65-69: moderately elevated T-score ≥70: markedly elevated and clinically significant. The outcome will be analyzed as the between-group difference in mean change from baseline to Week 12 between the TRF (10-hour eating window) and control groups.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (end of intervention)

  5. Change in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score. The ADHD-RS-IV is a validated clinician-administered rating scale used to assess the severity of ADHD symptoms. Total scores range from 0 to 54, with higher scores indicating greater ADHD symptom severity and lower scores indicating fewer symptoms. The outcome will be analyzed as the between-group difference in mean change from baseline to week 12 between the TRF (10-hour eating window) and control groups.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (end of intervention)

  6. Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Global Score

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Global Score. The PSQI is a validated self-reported measure of subjective sleep quality and consists of 19 self-rated items that generate seven component scores (subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction). The seven component scores are summed to yield a Global PSQI Score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores indicate better sleep quality and higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. The outcome will be analyzed as the between-group difference in mean change from baseline to Week 12 between the TRF (10-hour eating window) and control groups.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (end of intervention)

  7. Change in mid-sleep on free days corrected for sleep debt (MSFsc) derived from the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ)

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in mid-sleep on free days corrected for sleep debt accumulated on workdays (MSFsc), derived from responses to the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ). MSFsc is a validated indicator of chronotype and circadian timing and is expressed as clock time (hours:minutes). Earlier MSFsc values indicate greater morning preference, whereas later MSFsc values indicate greater evening preference. The outcome will be analyzed as the between-group difference in mean change from baseline to week 12 between the TRF (10-hour eating window) and control groups.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (end of intervention)

  8. Change in salivary cortisol concentration

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in salivary cortisol concentration (µg/dL) measured from saliva samples collected at four predefined time points during the day (8am, 12pm, 4pm, 8pm). Salivary cortisol concentration will be quantified to assess changes in diurnal cortisol secretion patterns. Reference values will be obtained from literature for non-ADHD and ADHD groups.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (end of intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Barratt Impulsiveness Scale Version 11 (BIS-11) Total Score

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale Version 11 (BIS-11) Total Score. The BIS-11 is a validated self-report questionnaire that assesses impulsivity. Total scores range from 30 to 120 points, with higher scores indicating greater impulsivity and lower scores indicating lower impulsivity. The outcome will be analyzed as the between-group difference in mean change from baseline to week 12 between the TRF (10-hour eating window) and control groups.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (end of intervention)

  2. Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at week 12

    Clinical improvement at week 12 assessed using the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale, a clinician-rated measure of overall change in clinical status relative to baseline. The CGI-I score ranges from 1 to 7, where 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = Much worse, 7 = Very much worse. Clinical status will be evaluated by comparing CGI-I scores between intervention and non-intervention groups at the specified assessment time point. Lower CGI-I scores indicate greater clinical improvement relative to baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (end of intervention)

  3. Proportion of participants achieving ≥80% adherence to the assigned intervention

    Percentage of participants achieving at least 80% adherence to the assigned intervention over the 12-week study period, assessed using participant adherence logs, digital monitoring records, and investigator review.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (end of intervention)

  4. Change in relative abundance of selected gut microbial taxa assessed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in the relative abundance (%) of predefined bacterial genera, assessed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing of stool samples. Relative abundance represents the proportion of sequencing reads assigned to each taxon.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12 (end of intervention)

  5. Change in gut microbial alpha diversity assessed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in gut microbial alpha diversity, assessed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing of stool samples. Alpha diversity will be quantified using the Shannon Diversity Index (unitless), a measure of within-sample microbial diversity. Higher values indicate greater microbial diversity.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (end of intervention)

  6. Change in gut microbial beta diversity assessed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing

    Change from baseline to week 12 in gut microbial beta diversity, assessed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing of stool samples. Beta diversity will be evaluated using a distance-based metric (e.g., Bray-Curtis dissimilarity; unitless) to characterize differences in overall microbial community composition between samples.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12 (end of intervention)

  7. Change in fecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in fecal short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations (µmol/g stool), measured in stool samples. SCFAs may include acetate, propionate, and butyrate.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12 (end of intervention)

  8. Changes in fecal calprotectin

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in fecal calprotectin concentration (µg/g). The primary analysis will compare the change from baseline to week 12 between the TRF (10-hour eating window) and control groups.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12 (end of intervention)

  9. Changes in serum lipid profile biomarkers

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in serum lipid biomarkers measured by clinical laboratory assays, including: Total cholesterol (mg/dL); HDL cholesterol (mg/dL); LDL cholesterol (mg/dL); VLDL cholesterol (mg/dL); Triglycerides (mg/dL)

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (end of intervention)

  10. Change in serum corticotropin (ACTH) concentration

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in serum corticotropin (ACTH) levels (pg/mL) measured using standard clinical laboratory methods.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (end of intervention)

  11. Changes in serum protein biomarkers

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in serum protein biomarkers measured by clinical laboratory assays, including: Albumin (g/dL) and Total protein (g/dL)

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (end of intervention)

  12. Change in serum IL6

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in serum IL6 concentration (pg/mL) using standard clinical laboratory methods.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (end of intervention)

  13. Changes in serum electrolyte biomarkers

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in serum electrolyte biomarkers measured using standard clinical laboratory methods. Biomarkers will be analyzed individually and reported in their respective units and include: Sodium (mEq/L) Potassium (mEq/L) Chloride (mEq/L)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12 (end of intervention)

  14. Change in body weight

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in body weight (kg) measured using a calibrated scale. Lower values indicate weight loss, whereas higher values indicate weight gain relative to baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks (end of intervention)

  15. Changes in Body Mass Index

    Mean change from baseline to week 12 in Body Mass Index (BMI), calculated as body weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m²).

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12 (end of intervention)

  16. Change in Transepithelial Electrical Resistance (TEER)

    Change in intestinal barrier integrity assessed by transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) in in vitro models following exposure to intervention-derived fecal samples. TEER is expressed in Ω·cm², with higher values indicating greater epithelial barrier integrity.

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Iata-Csic
    Paterna, Valencia 46980, Spain
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the dataset contains sensitive clinical, behavioral, and biological information that could risk participant re-identification. Only aggregated, anonymized summary results will be made publicly available in scientific publications and repositories in accordance with applicable data protection regulations and ethics committee requirements.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 33 months after the start.

Of 480 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 33 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 511 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 21, 2026
First posted
Sep 15, 2026
StartActual
Mar 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2027
Last update
Sep 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07821060
Lead sponsor
Spanish National Research Council
Collaborators
Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology, National Research Council, State Research Agency, Spain
Responsible party
Marta Arroyo Calatayud (Senior researcher at IATA-CSIC, Spanish National Research Council) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 15, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion