ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07716072SPRINTUpdated Jul 21, 2026

Home Play-based Intervention for Parents and Infants

An interventional study of SPRINT Intervention and Waitlist Protocol in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Autism Spectrum Disorder and Premature Birth, sponsored by Nanyang Technological University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Singapore. Open to participants aged 9 Months to 15 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-21.

Sponsored by Nanyang Technological University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
9 Months to 15 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a 12-week home-based intervention (Sociometric Play-based Remediation of Individual Neurodevelopmental Trajectories (SPRINT)) helps support parenting and the development of infants aged 7 - 15 months (at the time they join the study) who were born preterm and/or have a higher family risk of developmental conditions, such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and/or global developmental delay (GDD). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does taking part in the SPRINT intervention help parents develop parenting skills?
  • Does taking part in the SPRINT intervention improve infant's thinking skills and/or socio-emotional development?

Researchers will compare families who receive the SPRINT intervention with families in a waitlist control group to see whether the intervention leads to greater improvements in parents and their children.

Participants will:

  • Complete questionnaires and in-person assessments, before and after the 12-week period.
  • Be assigned to either the SPRINT intervention or a waitlist control group and complete the assigned activities for 12 weeks.
  • Use the SPRINT app, which provides information, guidance and activities for either the SPRINT intervention or waitlist control group.
Read the detailed description

This study evaluates the efficacy of SPRINT, a 12-week, home-based, parent-delivered intervention developed to promote parenting and early development in infants at increased risk of neurodevelopmental difficulties. Existing early interventions have demonstrated benefits for parent and child outcomes but often require delivery by trained practitioners and substantial time commitments, which may limit accessibility and scalability for families requiring timely support. To address this limitation, SPRINT was developed as an age-appropriate, home-deliverable intervention that can be implemented during infancy to support both parent and child.

This study is a two-arm, parallel, waitlist-controlled interventional trial involving approximately 120 parent-infant dyads. All participants will complete online questionnaires and attend laboratory visits at both pre-intervention (T1) and post-intervention (T2). During these visits, participants will complete tasks assessing executive function (EF), emotional processing, socio-emotional (SE) functioning, cognitive development, and parent-child interactions. Physiological and neurophysiological measures, including electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocardiography (ECG), may be collected during the study. Audiovisual recordings will also be obtained to characterise parent-infant interactions, facial expressions, posture and vocal behaviour.

Following completion of the questionnaires and visits at T1, participants will be pseudorandomised to either the SPRINT intervention or waitlist control group (N = 60 per group, sufficient to detect a medium effect size with .80 power, alpha = .05, including 10% attrition), with allocation balanced according to variables such as child age, sex, risk category, developmental needs (e.g., from ASQ-SE, IBQ-R and lab-based EF tasks score), and/or previous treatments received to minimise imbalance between groups. Participants in the SPRINT intervention group will complete the 12-week SPRINT programme, while those in the waitlist control group will complete the brief app-based activities designed to maintain engagement without providing structured developmental training. Within the SPRINT intervention group, participants will be further allocated to either an EF or SE track based on developmental needs identified.

Primary analyses will compare changes over time between the SPRINT intervention and waitlist control groups. Relevant characteristics may be included as covariates where appropriate to account for individual differences and explore variability in treatment responses.

02

Conditions studied

  • Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Premature Birth
  • Global Developmental Delay

Keywords

  • Intervention
  • At-Risk Cohort
  • Play-based
  • Home
  • Social Emotional
  • Executive Function
  • Emotional Regulation
03

In context

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

1,817 studies on the registry are indexed under Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; 296 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 71 across 1,437 interventional studies indexed under Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity.

Browse Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity studies →

Lead sponsor

Nanyang Technological University is the lead sponsor of 52 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
9 Months to 15 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

All participants must satisfy the following criteria:

  • Parent(s) must have access to the internet via a computer, laptop or phone.
  • Parent (s) with adequate English comprehension skills to participate in the study tasks and provide consent

Participants will be included if they meet either of the following criteria:

- Parent(s) with infants who are identified as having increased familial risk of ASD, ADHD, GDD, related neurodevelopmental disorders or premature birth outcomes. Prematurity is defined as being born before 37 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants will be excluded if they meet the following criteria:

  • Parent(s) and infants with brain injury, severe motor or sensory impairments (e.g., visual or hearing) that would render them unable to participate in the tasks
  • Parent(s) diagnosed to have impaired intellectual functioning or mental capacity.
  • Infants with an identified genetic, metabolic, syndromic, or progressive neurological disorder (e.g., epilepsy, Down or Rett Syndrome, Tuberous Sclerosis, Neurofibromatosis, Fragile X Syndrome), including vascular risk factors
  • Parent (s) with current or pre-existing diagnosed psychological conditions.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SPRINT Intervention Group

    Participants pseudorandomised to this arm following completion of the pre-intervention (T1) assessments will receive the 12-week SPRINT intervention and complete the post-intervention (T2) assessments.

    Behavioral: SPRINT Intervention

  • Active comparator
    Waitlist Control Group

    Participants pseudorandomised to this arm following completion of the pre-intervention (T1) assessments will complete the 12-week waitlist control activities and the post-intervention (T2) assessments. Participants will also be offered the opportunity to receive the SPRINT intervention later.

    Other: Waitlist Protocol

Interventions

  • BehavioralSPRINT Intervention

    The SPRINT intervention is a 12-week, home-based, parent-delivered programme designed to promote responsive caregiving, parental and child executive function, emotion regulation, and child's socio-emotional development. The intervention is delivered via the SPRINT app and comprises six concurrent modules: (A) Awareness, (B) Bond, (C) Cognition, (D) Decode, (E) Emotions, and (F) Fun. On average, participants are expected to engage with programme activities for approximately 25 minutes per day. Automated reminders are provided to support adherence, and participant engagement and responses are monitored throughout the intervention. During the intervention period, home visits will also be conducted to provide study devices, programme orientation, training, and technical support. Brief parent-child play interaction recordings collected during these visits may also be used for analysis and to facilitate module content.

  • OtherWaitlist Protocol

    Participants will complete brief app-based activities during the 12-week waitlist period using the study devices provided. These activities are designed to maintain participant engagement without providing structured training targeting cognitive or socio-emotional skills, and involve simple visual or sensory interactions (e.g., tapping tasks or basic touch-based activities). The app will also send reminders, and activity completion will be logged.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Parenting Behaviours

    Parenting Behaviours will be assessed using three validated questionnaires: the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale Revised (PSOC-R) (Gilmore \& Cuskelly, 2024), the Emotional Availability Self-Report (EA-SR) (Biringen et al., 2002), and the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ) (Luyten et al., 2017). Together, these instruments assess complementary dimensions of parenting, including parental competence, emotional attunement and the capacity to understand and reflect on their child's mental states. Analyses may consider each measure individually and/or as a composite measure, where appropriate. Higher scores indicate more positive parenting behaviours on the respective measures. Change from pre- to post-intervention will be assessed.

    Time frame: Pre-Intervention (T1) and, immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention/control period, Post-Intervention (T2)

  2. Child Executive Function

    This outcome measure is applicable only to participants allocated to the Executive Functioning (EF) Track in Module F. Children's EF will be assessed using age-appropriate tasks including the A-not-B task (Piaget \& Cook, 1954) and Snack/Object Delay Task. These tasks assess complementary components of EF, including working memory, inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility. Outcomes may be examined using individual task performance and/or a composite EF score, where appropriate. Higher scores indicate better EF on the respective tasks, where applicable. Change from pre- to post-intervention will be assessed.

    Time frame: Pre-Intervention (T1) and, immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention/control period, Post-Intervention (T2)

  3. Child Socio-emotional Competencies

    This outcome measure is applicable only to participants allocated to the Socio-Emotional (SE) Track in Module F. Children's SE will be assessed using the Ages \& Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional (ASQ-SE-2) (Squires et al., 2009), a validated caregiver-reported screening tool. The ASQ-SE-2 assesses complementary domains of SE development, including self-regulation, compliance, communication, adaptive functioning, autonomy, affect, and interaction with people. Higher scores indicate greater SE difficulties, with reductions in scores reflecting improvements in SE competence following the intervention. Change from pre- to post-intervention will be assessed.

    Time frame: Pre-Intervention (T1) and, immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention/control period, Post-Intervention (T2)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adult Wellbeing

    Parental wellbeing will be assessed using a set of validated self-report questionnaires: the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (Cohen, Kamarck, \& Mermelstein, 1983), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (Spielberger, 1989), the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS) (Lovibond \& Lovibond, 1995), the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) (Diener et al., 1985), the Affect Valuation Index (AVI) (Tsai \& Knutson, 2001), and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) (Diener et al., 2010). Together, these instruments assess complementary dimensions of parental wellbeing, including perceived stress, anxiety, mood, life satisfaction, and states of positive and negative affect. Analyses may consider each measure individually and/or as a composite measure, where appropriate. Change from pre- to post-intervention will be assessed.

    Time frame: Pre-Intervention (T1) and, immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention/control period, Post-Intervention (T2)

  2. Adult Emotional Regulation

    Emotional regulation will be assessed using three validated self-report measures: the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ) (Chadwick et al., 2008), the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) (Baer et al., 2006), and the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) (Gross \& John, 2003). Together, these instruments assess complementary aspects of emotional regulation, including mindfulness, reappraisal and suppression. Analysis may consider each measure individually and/or as a composite measure, where appropriate. Change from pre- to post-intervention will be assessed.

    Time frame: Pre-Intervention (T1) and, immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention/control period, Post-Intervention (T2)

  3. Adult Executive Function

    Adult EF will be assessed using validated self-report measure and a battery of standardized tasks. Everyday EF will be measured using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition-Adult (BRIEF-2A) (Roth et al., 2024). Task-based EF will be assessed using the Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift (IED), Inquisit Stop Signal Task (SST), Multitasking Test (MTT), and Spatial Working Memory (SWM) task from CANTAB (Langley, Sahakian, \& Robbins, 2023). Together, these measures assess complementary aspects of EF. Analyses may consider each measure individually and/or as composite measures, where appropriate. Change from pre- to post-intervention will be assessed.

    Time frame: Pre-Intervention (T1) and, immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention/control period, Post-Intervention (T2)

  4. Child Cognitive Development

    Children's cognitive development will be assessed using the cognitive subscale of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley) (Bayley \& Aylward, 2019), a standardized administration measuring early cognitive functioning. The Bayley Cognitive Scale assesses key domains including attention, memory, problem-solving, and early concept formation. Higher scores indicate more advanced cognitive development. Change from pre- to post-intervention will be assessed.

    Time frame: Pre-Intervention (T1) and, immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention/control period, Post-Intervention (T2)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • NTU EMPOWER Centre
    Singapore, 308232, Singapore
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tsai, J. L., & Knutson, B. (2001). Affect Valuation Index (AVI). Unpublished measure, Stanford University.
  • Squires, J., Bricker, D., & Twombly, E. (2009). Ages & Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional (2nd ed.). Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
  • Spielberger, C. D. (1989). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: Bibliography (2nd ed.). Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Rothbart, M. K. (1981). Measurement of temperament in infancy. Child Development, 52, 569-578.
  • Piaget, J., & Cook, M. T. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books.
  • Luyten P, Mayes LC, Nijssens L, Fonagy P. The parental reflective functioning questionnaire: Development and preliminary validation. PLoS One. 2017 May 4;12(5):e0176218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176218. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28472162 ↗
  • Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd ed.). Psychology Foundation.
  • Langley, C., Sahakian, B., & Robbins, T. (2023). Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). In G. J. Boyle, Y. Stern, D. J. Stein, B. J. Sahakian, C. J. Golden, T. M. Lee, & S. A. Chen (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of psychology, health and medicine (Vol. 0, pp. 435-468). SAGE Publications.
  • Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):348-62. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348. PubMed 12916575 ↗
  • Gilmore L, Cuskelly M. The Parenting Sense of Competence scale: Updating a classic. Child Care Health Dev. 2024 Jan;50(1):e13173. doi: 10.1111/cch.13173. Epub 2023 Oct 9. PubMed 37812533 ↗
  • Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143-156.
  • Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13. PubMed 16367493 ↗
  • Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available. PubMed 6668417 ↗
  • Chadwick P, Hember M, Symes J, Peters E, Kuipers E, Dagnan D. Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ). Br J Clin Psychol. 2008 Nov;47(Pt 4):451-5. doi: 10.1348/014466508X314891. Epub 2008 Jun 20. PubMed 18573227 ↗
  • Biringen Z, Robinson JL, Emde RN. Appendix A: the emotional availability scales (2nd ed.; an abridged infancy/Early Childhood version). Attach Hum Dev. 2000 Sep;2(2):251-70. doi: 10.1080/14616730050085617. No abstract available. PubMed 11707915 ↗
  • Bayley, N., & Aylward, G. P. (2019). Bayley scales of infant and toddler development (4th ed.). Pearson.
  • Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, Toney L. Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment. 2006 Mar;13(1):27-45. doi: 10.1177/1073191105283504. PubMed 16443717 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Any data shared as part of this study will be fully anonymised to ensure that no individual participants can be identified, and will require specific consent from participants for their data to be shared beyond the study team for other research purposes.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jul 2026; primary completion for Mar 2029, 32 months later.

Of 479 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 32 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 510 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 13, 2026
First posted
Jul 21, 2026
StartEst.
Jul 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2029
CompletionEst.
Mar 2030
Last update
Jul 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07716072
Lead sponsor
Nanyang Technological University
Collaborators
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Institute for Human Development and Potential (IHDP), Singapore
Responsible party
Victoria Leong (Professor, Nanyang Technological University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 21, 2026
Start date
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 21, 2026

Study contacts

Victoria Leong
Contact
victorialeong@ntu.edu.sg
+65 6514 1052

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion