An interventional study of program for the detection, referral, and psychoeducation in adolescents in Anxiety, Depression Disorder and Bullying, sponsored by Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.
Sponsored by Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Adolescence is a critical developmental stage during which many mental health problems first emerge. However, a large proportion of these issues go undetected and untreated. Globally, approximately one in seven adolescents experiences mental health difficulties, with increasing trends observed in recent years. Schools offer an important setting for early detection and intervention, yet existing programmes often lack structure or scalability. The MENTOR programme (MENtal Health Tracking, Outreach and Referral) was designed to identify adolescents under psychological distress in educational settings and offer tiered support including psychoeducation, self-help tools, and referral to mental health services when needed.
This is a prospective, longitudinal, multicentre study that will be implemented in eight educational centres in Spain, including secondary schools, sixth-form colleges, and vocational training centres. Adolescents and young adults will be invited to participate voluntarily. At baseline and at each trimester, participants will complete validated mental health screening tools assessing common conditions such as anxiety, depression, and emotional dysregulation. Based on results, participants will be assigned to one of several support pathways: access to digital self-help materials, small-group interventions, or referral to school-based or external mental health professionals. Follow-up assessments will measure changes in symptomatology, engagement with self-care tools, and help-seeking behaviour. Quantitative data will be analysed to assess feasibility, adherence, and effectiveness of the intervention over time, and conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis This protocol aims to improve adolescent mental health through a school-based, digitally delivered screening and intervention programme. By evaluating feasibility and acceptance across eight educational centres, the study seeks to generate real-time data on prevalent mental health issues, promote awareness and self-care, and facilitate early professional intervention. If effective, the programme could support scalable, tiered prevention strategies in educational settings, contributing to reduced rates of anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, eating disorders, and addictions. Its implementation may also improve resource allocation, reduce wait times, and inform future health policies for longitudinal mental health monitoring from childhood. Findings will contribute to the development of accessible, evidence-based models for adolescent mental health promotion and early intervention.
The primary objective of this study is to implement and evaluate the effectiveness of a academic-based mental health promotion and prevention programme-MENTOR (MENtal Health Tracking, Outreach and Referral)-for adolescents and young adults in educational settings. The programme seeks to identify students experiencing psychological distress and provide them with appropriate support, including self-help tools, psychoeducational resources, and referral pathways to professional mental health services when needed.This is longitudinal, prospective, single-group (COMPROBAR), multicenter exploratory study will be conducted across four hospitals: Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Rey Juan Carlos University Hospital, Infanta Elena University Hospital, and Villalba General University Hospital. Participants will be recruited from eight educational centres, two centres from the catchment area of each hospital. All secondary education, sixth form, and vocational training centres within the respective catchment areas were invited to participate in the study, from which eight centres were ultimately selected Our participants will be students from the selected groups within each participating educational centre. There will be no limit to the number of participants that can be included within this design. A formal sample size calculation has not been performed, as this is an implementation study intended to assess the feasibility of this type of programme. All consenting participants during the study period will be included. Inclusion criteria are:
Participants will be excluded if they are unable to understand and sign the informed consent or assent for any reason.Once centres determine the groups and the number of participating students, relevant documentation (informed consent and anonymisation codes) will be provided. School management will contact parents to provide a summarised explanation of the project (either through a written information sheet or a meeting, depending on the centre's preference) and request their participation, along with signing informed consent or assent forms. Following the completion of the online psychological evaluation, students and their families will receive access-via an individual code-to a secure online platform. This platform hosts self-help resources tailored to each participant's psychometric profile results Materials include age-appropriate texts, audio files, videos, and exercises, primarily sourced from Stay Healthy, an educational programme developed by the Quirón health group and currently used by over 30,000 students through its virtual learning environment. Additional resources specifically developed for this study will also be integrated. Based on the aggregated results at each school, further in-person or online workshops and psychoeducational sessions will be designed to address the most prominent mental health needs identified in each cohort. Once students have completed the online questionnaire tailored to their age and submitted their answers, they will be granted access to self-help and self-care resources specific to their results. These materials include educational content, testimonial videos, interactive exercises, games, and recommended readings, which students can engage with voluntarily in their own time. The aim is to foster self-awareness and promote proactive mental health care. Based on questionnaire results, educational centres will be offered customised workshops, talks or school days dedicated to addressing prevalent issues. If necessary, A mental health consultation, either virtual or in-person, will be coordinated with one of the four collaborating hospitals
57 studies on the registry are indexed under Bullying; 9 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 436 is above the median of 228 across 51 interventional studies indexed under Bullying.
Browse Bullying studies →Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz is the lead sponsor of 76 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.
Compared within Bullying, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Anxiety Disorders. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
interventions will include digital and non digital resourcews for mental health prevention, detection and promotion
Other: program for the detection, referral, and psychoeducation in adolescents
the collaborative model it establishes between schools and mental health professionals, which can enhance coordination and promote early intervention. The longitudinal assessment enables an effectiveness analysis, and the use of digital tools for screening and self-care makes the program more accessible and engaging for adolescents. Moreover, enabling direct access to professional support without going through the full traditional referral pathway may reduce waiting times and prevent symptom escalation. The online component makes it more accessible and engaging
Also known as: Psychological intervention
Intervention Effectiveness: Rate of Treatment Continuation and Case Detection
Percentage of participants actively in treatment post-intervention among those who were either already in treatment at baseline or were newly identified cases discovered during the intervention.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-intervention
Feasibility: Student Informed Consent Rate
Calculated as the percentage of eligible students providing written assent (or consent for those aged 18 and older) relative to the total number of eligible students in participating classes. Metric/Unit: Percentage of participants
Time frame: From initial recruitment through study enrollment (Up to 4 weeks)
Feasibility: Assessment Completion Rate
Percentage of enrolled students completing all required baseline and post-intervention study assessments relative to total enrolled students per class. Metric/Unit: Percentage of participants
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (Week 8)
Acceptability: Teacher Satisfaction Rating
Teacher acceptability assessed using a (1-5) Likert scale post-intervention items (1-5; 1 = "Not satisfied at all," 5 = "Very satisfied") Unit of Measure: Units on a scale
Time frame: 2 years
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz