ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07903532TB-NETUpdated Oct 29, 2026

Multicenter Study for External Validation of the TB-NET Score

An observational study in Tumor Burden and Neuroendocrine (NE) Tumors, sponsored by Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz. Recruiting at 11 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-29.

Sponsored by Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Updated Oct 29, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
400
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a retrospective, observational, multicenter study aiming to externally validate the TB-NET Score in an independent cohort of patients with advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) or lung carcinoids. The primary objective is to validate the prognostic value of the TB-NET Score for progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives include the evaluation of overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), grade 3-4 adverse events, biochemical and functional imaging correlates, and the potential additional prognostic value of tumor growth rate (TGR).

Read the detailed description

This is a retrospective, observational, multicenter study designed to externally validate the TB-NET Score in an independent cohort of patients with advanced well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.

Eligible patients will include adults with histologically confirmed advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) or typical or atypical lung carcinoids who have received systemic therapy. GEP-NETs may be grade 1, 2, or 3, provided that well-differentiated morphology is confirmed. Patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas will be excluded.

The primary objective is to externally validate the prognostic value of the TB-NET Score for progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives include the assessment of overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), grade 3-4 adverse events, biochemical and functional imaging correlates, and evaluation of whether tumor growth rate (TGR) provides additional prognostic information for PFS.

A minimum of 200 patients is planned, with no predefined maximum sample size. Clinical, pathological, radiological, treatment, and outcome data will be retrospectively collected by participating centers and entered into a centrally coordinated electronic data capture system. Statistical analyses will be performed centrally by the Gastrointestinal Tumors Unit at Fundación Jiménez Díaz.

Only pseudonymized data will be shared for the purposes of the study. Data transfers between participating centers and the Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD) will be governed by appropriate data transfer agreements when required. The study has received approval from the Research Ethics Committee of Fundación Jiménez Díaz.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tumor Burden
  • Neuroendocrine (NE) Tumors

Keywords

  • Tumor Burden
  • Neuroendocrine Tumors
03

In context

Neoplasms

10,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,324 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 200 across 2,638 observational studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz is the lead sponsor of 76 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with histologically confirmed well differentiated advanced GEP-NETs or Lung Carcinoids starting any line of systemic therapy.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients with confirmed well differentiated advanced GEP-NETs or Lung Carcinoids starting any .
  • Grade 1, 2 or 3 if well-differentiated morphology for GEP-NETs. Typical or Atypical Lung Carcinoids.
  • At least one target lesion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Neuroendocrine Carcinomas.
  • Patients with no target lesions (according to 1.1 criteria).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients With Advanced Well-Differentiated NETs

    Adult patients with histologically confirmed well differentiated advanced GEP-NETs or Lung Carcinoids starting any line of systemic therapy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    Progression-free survival, defined as the time from treatment initiation to documented disease progression. Patients without documented progression at the end of follow-up will be censored at the date of the last follow-up without progression.

    Time frame: From treatment initiation until the first documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 120 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    Response rate defined by RECIST 1.1

    Time frame: From treatment initiation until disease progression or the last tumor response assessment, assessed up to 120 months.

  2. Overall Survival (OS)

    The time from treatment initiation to death; patients alive at the end of follow up will be censored at the time of last follow up.

    Time frame: From treatment initiation until death from any cause or last follow-up, assessed up to 120 months.

Other outcomes

  1. Incidence of Grade 3-4 Adverse Events According to CTCAE

    The proportion of patients experiencing at least one Grade 3 or 4 adverse event during treatment, assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Grade 3 adverse events are defined as severe, and Grade 4 adverse events as life-threatening.

    Time frame: From treatment initiation until treatment discontinuation or the last available safety assessment, assessed up to 120 months.

  2. Correlation of Chromogranin A, 5-HIAA, and Neuron-Specific Enolase Levels With TB-NET Score

    The association between baseline biochemical marker levels, including chromogranin A (CgA), 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and tumor burden assessed using the TB-NET Score will be evaluated. Correlations will be analyzed separately for each biomarker using appropriate statistical methods.

    Time frame: At baseline, prior to treatment initiation.

  3. Percentage of Patients With Positive Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT According to TB-NET Score Risk Group

    The percentage of patients with positive baseline fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) will be calculated separately for the low-risk (TB-NET Score 1-2) and high-risk (TB-NET Score ≥3) groups. Imaging positivity will be assessed as a binary variable (positive versus negative) based on the imaging report. Only patients with available baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT results will be included. Unit of Measure: Percentage of patients.

    Time frame: At baseline, prior to treatment initiation.

  4. Incremental Prognostic Value of Tumor Growth Rate at 3 and 6 Months for Progression-Free Survival

    The incremental prognostic value of tumor growth rate (TGR), assessed at 3 and 6 months after treatment initiation, will be evaluated for progression-free survival (PFS). TGR will be calculated using serial radiological tumor measurements and expressed as percentage tumor growth per month. Separate landmark analyses at 3 and 6 months will assess the association between TGR and subsequent PFS using Cox proportional hazards regression models, comparing the TB-NET Score alone with the TB-NET Score plus TGR.

    Time frame: TGR assessed at 3 and 6 months after treatment initiation; subsequent PFS assessed from each landmark until disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, up to 120 months after treatment initiation.

  5. Percentage of Patients With Positive Baseline 68Ga-SSTR PET/CT According to TB-NET Score Risk Group

    The percentage of patients with positive baseline gallium-68-labeled somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-SSTR PET/CT) will be calculated separately for the low-risk (TB-NET Score 1-2) and high-risk (TB-NET Score ≥3) groups. Imaging positivity will be assessed as a binary variable (positive versus negative) based on the imaging report. Only patients with available baseline 68Ga-SSTR PET/CT results will be included. Unit of Measure: Percentage of patients.

    Time frame: At baseline, prior to treatment initiation.

  6. Percentage of Patients With Positive Baseline Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy According to TB-NET Score Risk Group

    The percentage of patients with positive baseline somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (OctreoScan) will be calculated separately for the low-risk (TB-NET Score 1-2) and high-risk (TB-NET Score ≥3) groups. Imaging positivity will be assessed as a binary variable (positive versus negative) based on the imaging report. Only patients with available baseline OctreoScan results will be included. Unit of Measure: Percentage of patients.

    Time frame: At baseline, prior to treatment initiation.

07

Study locations

11 of 11 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 29, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 29, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07903532
Lead sponsor
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz
Collaborators
University of Lausanne Hospitals, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, Hacettepe University, UMC Utrecht, Instituto Alexander Fleming, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, University Hospital in Krakow, Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Skane University Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Uppsala University Hospital, Dermatologische Klinik MIT Poliklinik-Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Beaujon Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, Hospital Sirio-Libanes, Ospedale San Raffaele
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 29, 2026
Start date
May 12, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 29, 2026

Study contacts

Angela Lamarca, MD, PhD
Contact
angela.lamarca@quironsalud.es
+34 915504800 ext. 3146
Diego Fernández, MD
Contact
diego.fernandezr@quironsalud.es
+34 636284882
Angela Lamarca, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion