ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07815171LANCE-AFUpdated Sep 15, 2026

Lattice vs Pentaspline Comparative Evaluation in Persistent AF

An interventional study of Pulmonary vein isolation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Mitera Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 10 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by Mitera Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 77 studies in Atrial Fibrillation with a site in Greece — 11 open to participants now, 17 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Atrial Fibrillation · Greece.

Planned enrollment
32nd of 46
250 · median 780
Started
2027
the only one that year
No phase
20 of 77
5 open now
Primary completion
2030-03
later than 16 of 16 live
Registered
77th of 77
by date

Among the 77 studies in Atrial Fibrillation with a site in Greece, this one is the 32nd largest by planned enrollment of the 46 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2027, is one of 20 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 16 of the 16 other live ones, and was the 77th registered.

Atrial Fibrillation

4,009 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 960 are open to participants now.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Open to participants now

11 of the 77 studies in Atrial Fibrillation with a site in Greece are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

5 more — sign in →

All 11 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Greece have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Greece →

Who these studies take

Of the 611 Atrial Fibrillation studies recruiting now, 407 (67%) set no upper age limit and 43 (7%) stop at 75 or younger; 21 take children under 18; 43 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 77 studies in Atrial Fibrillation with a site in Greece, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

LANCE-AF is a prospective, multicenter, multinational, randomized, non-inferiority trial comparing two pulsed-field ablation catheter technologies-the Sphere-9 lattice-tip catheter and the FARAPULSE pentaspline catheter-in patients with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation.

In both treatment groups, atrial fibrillation ablation will be restricted to pulmonary vein isolation. Empirical left atrial substrate modification will not be permitted. An insertable cardiac rhythm monitor will be implanted during the index procedure to provide continuous rhythm monitoring for 12 months.

The primary objective is to determine whether ablation using the Sphere-9 catheter is non-inferior to ablation using the FARAPULSE catheter with respect to acute pulmonary vein isolation and freedom from treatment failure through 12 months. Secondary objectives include comparisons of procedural safety, postablation atrial arrhythmia burden, longest atrial arrhythmia episode, quality of life, and procedural efficiency.

Read the detailed description

Pulsed-field ablation is increasingly used for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, the comparative efficacy, safety, and procedural efficiency of the Sphere-9 lattice-tip catheter and the FARAPULSE pentaspline catheter have not been established in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, outcomes following a pulmonary-vein-isolation-only strategy in this population have not been adequately evaluated using continuous rhythm monitoring.

LANCE-AF is a prospective, multicenter, multinational, randomized, non-inferiority trial enrolling patients with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation. Eligible participants must have continuous atrial fibrillation lasting more than 7 but less than 365 days. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to pulmonary vein isolation using either the Sphere-9 lattice-tip catheter or the FARAPULSE pentaspline catheter.

All participants will undergo pulmonary vein isolation as the sole permitted atrial fibrillation ablation lesion set. Empirical left atrial substrate modification will not be permitted. Participants presenting in atrial fibrillation or another non-sinus rhythm will undergo cardioversion to sinus rhythm before ablation. Acute procedural success will be confirmed by demonstration of entrance block in all treated pulmonary veins at the end of the procedure. Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation is the only permitted non-pulmonary-vein lesion set and may be performed only in participants with documented typical atrial flutter. Catheter use for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation will follow the treatment-group-specific requirements defined in the protocol.

An insertable cardiac rhythm monitor will be implanted during the index procedure and will provide continuous rhythm monitoring throughout the study, with a 2-month postablation blanking period.

Participants will be followed for 12 months after the index ablation procedure, with continuous rhythm monitoring provided by the insertable cardiac monitor. Scheduled remote assessments will be performed at 30 days, at the end of the 2-month blanking period, and at 6 months. An in-person assessment will be performed at 12 months. Unscheduled assessments will be performed as clinically indicated.

The primary endpoint combines acute ablation success with freedom from treatment failure through 12 months. Treatment failure is defined as the occurrence of any of the following: insertable-cardiac-monitor-documented atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting at least 6 minutes; electrical or pharmacological cardioversion for an atrial arrhythmia; repeat atrial ablation; or protocol-defined use of a Class I or Class III antiarrhythmic drug. These events are assessed after the 2-month blanking period, except that any amiodarone use after the index ablation, including during the blanking period, constitutes treatment failure.

Secondary outcomes include a composite of prespecified device- and procedure-related adverse events, postablation atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia burden, the proportion of participants with an atrial arrhythmia burden below 0.1%, the duration of the longest atrial arrhythmia episode, time to first atrial arrhythmia episode, changes in quality of life assessed using the AFEQT and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires, total procedure time, left atrial dwell time, and fluoroscopy time and dose.

All insertable-cardiac-monitor-flagged episodes contributing to the efficacy endpoints will be reviewed by two independent adjudicators blinded to treatment assignment and catheter type. Disagreements will be referred to a third blinded adjudicator, with the majority determination considered final. Prespecified safety events will be reviewed by an independent Clinical Events Committee. An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board will provide external safety oversight. The primary non-inferiority analysis will be performed in both the Full Analysis Set and Per-Protocol populations using a non-inferiority margin of 10 percentage points.

03

Conditions studied

  • Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation
  • persistent atrial fibrillation
  • catheter ablation
  • pulsed field ablation
  • insertable loop recorder
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Symptomatic AF (EHRA symptom class ≥ II)
  • Documented persistent AF (continuous AF for > 7 days and \< 365 days), confirmed within 180 days of enrollment by either a 24-hour Holter recording showing continuous AF, or two ECGs from any regulatory-cleared rhythm monitoring device, taken at least 7 days apart, showing continuous AF
  • Patients considered eligible for catheter ablation (either /intolerant to ≥1 Class I/III AAD or presenting for ablation per clinical discretion)
  • Willing and capable of undergoing insertable loop recorder (ILR) implantation at the index procedure and maintaining the conditions required for automatic remote transmission throughout the 12-month study period
  • Willing and capable of participating in all follow-up assessments and testing associated with this clinical investigation at an approved clinical center

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Anatomical and procedural exclusions

  • Previous catheter or surgical ablation, except right-sided atrial ablation for supraventricular tachycardia or cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for atrial flutter
  • Severe left atrial enlargement: left atrial anteroposterior diameter ≥55 mm or LAVI >50 mL/m2
  • Left atrial or left atrial appendage (LA/LAA) thrombus
  • Prior pulmonary vein intervention, pulmonary vein stenting, or known severe pulmonary vein stenosis
  • Presence of an interatrial baffle, ASD/PFO closure device, or surgical patch that, in the investigator's judgment, precludes safe transseptal access Cardiovascular exclusions
  • (NYHA) functional class III or IV
  • Recent acute coronary syndrome, coronary revascularization, cardiac surgery, stroke, or within the preceding 90 days
  • Severe valvular heart disease or prosthetic heart valve/annuloplasty ring
  • History of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF).
  • Atrial fibrillation secondary to reversible non-cardiac causes. Other exclusions
  • Presence of an insertable cardiac device (pacemaker, ICD, CRT, or pre-existing non-study ILR)
  • or intolerance to therapeutic systemic anticoagulation
  • Documented baseline hemi-diaphragmatic paresis or paralysis
  • Inability, unwillingness, or anatomical contraindication (e.g., implant-site skin or soft-tissue pathology, prior radiation, or chest-wall deformity) to undergo ILR implantation
  • Severe renal impairment: \<30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or current/prior renal replacement therapy
  • Pregnancy or planned pregnancy during the 12-month trial window
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide or complete 12 months of trial follow-up
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Sphere-9

    In the Sphere-9 arm, only pulsed field applications will be used for point-by-point antral pulmonary vein isolation. Deployment of linear lesions along the right and left pulmonary vein carinas is strongly recommended in the absence of a common ostium, ensuring balanced anatomical lesion sets equivalent to the intrinsic carinal coverage achieved with the pentaspline catheter during superior and inferior vein deployments. To aim for contiguous lesions, an inter-lesion distance of 5 mm should be argeted and tissue contact should be confirmed using impedence measures and real time monitoring of the temperature rise in the appropriate graph. In patients with documented typical atrial flutter, cavotricuspid isthmus ablation will be performed with the Sphere-9 catheter using radiofrequency energy only.

    Procedure: Pulmonary vein isolation

  • Other
    Farapulse

    In the Farapulse arm, procedural guidance with three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping using OPAL HDx system with the FARAVIEW module is mandatory. Pulmonary vein isolation will be performed with a minimum of 8 applications per pulmonary vein (4 "basket"-configuration and 4 "flower"-configuration applications). Additional applications may be delivered at operator discretion to achieve entrance block and will be systematically recorded. In patients with documented typical atrial flutter, operators may perform cavotricuspid isthmus ablation using either the pentaspline catheter with standard precautions, including prophylactic nitroglycerin per institutional protocol, or a standard commercially approved focal ablation catheter, at operator discretion. Use of the Sphere-9 catheter in the Farapulse arm is prohibited.

    Procedure: Pulmonary vein isolation

Interventions

  • ProcedurePulmonary vein isolation

    The use of general anesthesia is mandatory for all study procedures. All patients presenting in a non-sinus rhythm will be cardioverted to sinus rhythm. Pulmonary vein isolation constitutes the sole permitted ablation lesion set for atrial fibrillation; empirical left atrial substrate modification is not allowed. Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation will be the only non-pulmonary vein isolation ablation permitted and must be strictly confined to patients with documented typical atrial flutter.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with acute ablation success and freedom from treatment failure.

    The primary endpoint will be the number of participants with acute ablation success (achievement of pulmonary vein isolation, confirmed by entrance block in all treated veins) and freedom from treatment failure through 12 months. Treatment failure is defined as the first occurrence of any of the following, assessed from the end of the 2-month blanking period onward, except for amiodarone use, which is assessed from the time of the index ablation: 1. Atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia recurrence lasting ≥ 6 minutes, as documented by the implantable loop recorder 2. Cardioversion (electrical or pharmacological) for atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia 3. Repeat ablation for atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia 4. Use of a Class I or Class III antiarrhythmic drug after the blanking period, or any amiodarone use at any time after the index ablation, including during the blanking period

    Time frame: From the index procedure to the end of the follow-up at 12 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with device- and procedure-related complications

    Number of participants experiencing at least on of the following pre-specified acute and chronic device- and procedure-related adverse events, per the recent AFib-ARC recommendations: stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, coronary spasm, myocardial infarction, cardiac tamponade, esophageal complications (atrio-esophageal and esophago-pericardial fistula or perforation), pulmonary vein stenosis, phrenic nerve injury with diaphragmatic paralysis persisting \> 6 months, vagal nerve injury, acute kidney injury, major bleeding, iatrogenic interatrial septal defect requiring closure, pericarditis, heart failure/pulmonary edema, and any device- or procedure-related death.

    Time frame: From the index procedure up to 30 days post intervention.

  2. Percentage of monitored time spent in atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia

    Atrial arrhythmia burden will be calculated from insertable cardiac monitor data as the total duration of adjudicated atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia episodes divided by the total analyzable monitoring time, expressed as a percentage. Burden will be calculated from the end of the 2-month blanking period until the earliest of 12 months, cardioversion, repeat ablation, or protocol-defined antiarrhythmic drug use and through the full 12-month follow-up period in a complementary uncensored analysis.

    Time frame: From the end of the 2-month blanking period through 12 months after ablation.

  3. Number of participants with an atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia burden below 0.1%

    Number of participants with insertable cardiac monitor-documented atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia burden below 0.1%. Burden is defined as the total duration of adjudicated atrial arrhythmia episodes divided by the total analyzable monitoring time. In the primary analysis, participants undergoing cardioversion, repeat ablation, or protocol-defined antiarrhythmic drug treatment before 12 months will be classified as not achieving an arrhythmia burden below 0.1%.

    Time frame: From the end of the 2-month blanking period through 12 months after ablation.

  4. Duration of the longest postablation atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia episode

    Duration of the longest adjudicated atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia episode recorded by the insertable cardiac monitor. The observation period will be censored at the first rhythm-altering intervention, defined as cardioversion, repeat ablation, or protocol-defined antiarrhythmic drug use.

    Time frame: From the end of the 2-month blanking period until the earliest rhythm-altering intervention or 12 months after ablation.

  5. Change from baseline in the EQ-5D-5L utility index at 12 months

    Change from baseline to 12 months in health-related quality of life measured using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire. Responses will be converted to a utility index using the prespecified applicable value set. Higher utility values indicate better health status. Change will be calculated as the 12-month value minus the baseline value; a positive change indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months after ablation.

  6. Change from baseline in the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life Total Score at 12 Months

    Change from baseline to 12 months in atrial fibrillation-specific quality of life measured using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life and fewer atrial fibrillation-related limitations. Change will be calculated as the 12-month score minus the baseline score; a positive change indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months after ablation.

  7. Total duration of the index ablation procedure

    Total duration of the index atrial fibrillation ablation procedure. Time required for implantation of the insertable cardiac monitor will not be included in the total procedure time.

    Time frame: During the index ablation procedure

  8. Left atrial catheter dwell time

    Total time that the procedural catheter remains within the left atrium during the index atrial fibrillation ablation procedure.

    Time frame: During the index ablation procedure.

  9. Total fluoroscopy time

    Total duration of fluoroscopy used during the index atrial fibrillation ablation procedure.

    Time frame: During the index ablation procedure.

  10. Total fluoroscopy radiation dose

    Total radiation dose delivered during the index atrial fibrillation ablation procedure.

    Time frame: During the index ablation procedure.

  11. Time to first atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia episode lasting at least 1 hour

    Time from the end of the 2-month blanking period to the first insertable-cardiac-monitor-documented and adjudicated atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia episode lasting at least 1 hour.

    Time frame: From the end of the 2-month blanking period through 12 months after ablation

  12. Time to first atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia episode lasting at least 6 hours

    Time from the end of the 2-month blanking period to the first insertable-cardiac-monitor-documented and adjudicated atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia episode lasting at least 6 hours.

    Time frame: From the end of the 2-month blanking period through 12 months after ablation

  13. Time to first atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia episode lasting at least 1 day

    Time from the end of the 2-month blanking period to the first insertable-cardiac-monitor-documented and adjudicated atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia episode lasting at least 1 day.

    Time frame: From the end of the 2-month blanking period through 12 months after ablation

  14. Time to first atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia episode lasting at least 7 days

    Time from the end of the 2-month blanking period to the first insertable-cardiac-monitor-documented and adjudicated atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia episode lasting at least 7 days.

    Time frame: From the end of the 2-month blanking period through 12 months after ablation

07

Study locations

10 sites
  • Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtriere, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université
    Paris, France
  • Department of Cardiology, Jean Monnet University
    Saint-Etienne, France
  • 1st Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokrateion Hospital
    Athens, Greece
  • 7th Cardiology Department, Hygeia Hospital
    Athens, Greece
  • 8th Cardiology Department, Hygeia Hospital
    Athens, Greece
    • Stylianos Tzeis, MD, PhD, FESC, FEHRA · Contactstzeis@otenet.gr · 0030302106869777
  • Heart Rhythm Center, IASO Hospital
    Athens, Greece
  • Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus Medical Center
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Cardiology Department, 12th of October University Hospital
    Madrid, Spain
  • Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitari, Politecnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
    Valencia, Spain
  • Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern
    Bern, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Mar 2027; primary completion for Mar 2030, 36 months later.

Of 795 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Atrial Fibrillation, half reached primary completion within 39 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 59. This study's planned 36 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,050 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 54.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 6, 2026
First posted
Sep 11, 2026
StartEst.
Mar 2027
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2030
CompletionEst.
Mar 2030
Last update
Sep 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07815171
Lead sponsor
Mitera Hospital
Responsible party
Stylianos Tzeis (Director of Cardiology Department, Mitera Hospital, Hygeia Group, Athens, Greece, Mitera Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 11, 2026
Start date
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Study contacts

Stylianos Tzeis, MD, PhD, FESC, FEHRA
Contact
steis@otenet.gr
+302106869777
Stylianos Tzeis
principal investigator · Cardiology Department, Mitera Hospital, Hygeia Group, Athens, Greece

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion