ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07809022TANAMIUpdated Sep 9, 2026

Temporary Tear Duct Filling With Hyaluronic Acid Gel and Assessment of Dry Eye Disease (DED) After Bilateral Cataract Surgery

A Phase 4 interventional study of LACRIFILL® Canalicular Gel administration and Sham lacrimal canalicular procedure in Dry Eye, Dry Eye Disease (DED) and Dry Eye Sensation After Cataract Surgery, sponsored by Medical University of Vienna. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Sponsored by Medical University of Vienna · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 24 studies in Dry Eye Syndromes by Medical University of Vienna — 2 open to participants now, 2 under way, none of them phase 3. Dry Eye Syndromes · Medical University of Vienna.

Planned enrollment
16th of 22
25 · median 40
Started
2026
the only one that year
Phase 4
9 of 24
1 open now
Registered
24th of 24
by date

Among the 24 studies in Dry Eye Syndromes by Medical University of Vienna, this one is the 16th largest by planned enrollment of the 22 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2026, is one of 9 in phase 4, and was the 24th registered.

Dry Eye Syndromes

1,367 studies on the registry are indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes; 208 are open to participants now.

Browse Dry Eye Syndromes studies →

Open to participants now

2 of the 24 studies in Dry Eye Syndromes by Medical University of Vienna are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 2 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 116 Dry Eye Syndromes studies recruiting now, 73 (63%) set no upper age limit and 24 (21%) stop at 75 or younger; 7 take children under 18; 29 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 45 Years to 99 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 24 studies in Dry Eye Syndromes by Medical University of Vienna, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Dry eye disease can occur or worsen after cataract surgery and may cause ocular discomfort and reduced visual quality. Standard treatment commonly includes artificial tear eye drops, which provide temporary lubrication. Temporary occlusion of the tear drainage system may offer an alternative approach by increasing tear retention and improving tear film stability.

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, inter-eye study will evaluate the use of LACRIFILL® Canalicular Gel, a crosslinked hyaluronic acid gel placed in the tear drainage system, in patients who have undergone bilateral cataract surgery. Treatment allocation will be randomized at the eye level within each participant. One eye will be assigned to treatment with LACRIFILL®, while the fellow eye will serve as the control and receive standard care with artificial tear eye drops.

The study will compare the development and severity of dry eye disease between the randomized treatment and control eyes. The main outcome will be tear production measured by the Schirmer Test 1 one month after treatment. Additional assessments will include tear film stability, ocular surface findings, anterior segment imaging, visual quality, dry eye symptoms, use of artificial tears, and treatment-related safety outcomes during a three-month follow-up period.

03

Conditions studied

  • Dry Eye
  • Dry Eye Disease (DED)
  • Dry Eye Sensation After Cataract Surgery

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • dry eye disease
  • hyaluronic acid
  • lacrimal plug
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Uncomplicated bilateral cataract surgery for age-related cataract within the last 2-7 days
  • Implantation of the same type of lens in both eyes (diopters may differ).
  • Age 45-99 years
  • Willingness to complete the study
  • Signed form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral cataract due to a different cause
  • Retinal findings affecting quality of life or visual acuity in any eye
  • History of uncontrolled glaucoma in any eye (defined as intraocular pressure ≥ 25 mmHg despite treatment with anti-glaucoma mediation)
  • Active or suspected ocular or periocular infection in the study eye.
  • Vitreous hemorrhage or history of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment or macular hole in the study eye.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
25 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    LACRIFILL® Canalicular Gel Lacrimal Occlusion

    Within each participant, one eye will be randomly assigned to receive a single intracanalicular administration of LACRIFILL® Canalicular Gel into the lower canaliculus. The intervention is intended to provide temporary occlusion of the lacrimal drainage system and thereby reduce tear drainage and increase tear retention. The fellow eye will serve as the control eye.

    Device: LACRIFILL® Canalicular Gel administration

  • Sham comparator
    Lacrimal Irrigation

    The fellow eye of each participant will undergo lacrimal irrigation as a sham procedure. No LACRIFILL® Canalicular Gel will be administered to the control eye. The control eye will otherwise receive standard postoperative care, including artificial tear supplementation, according to standard clinical practice.

    Procedure: Sham lacrimal canalicular procedure

Interventions

  • DeviceLACRIFILL® Canalicular Gel administration

    LACRIFILL® Canalicular Gel is a crosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogel administered intracanalicularly into the lower canaliculus. Approximately 0.2 mL is administered as a single application to the randomized treatment eye to achieve temporary occlusion of the lacrimal drainage system.

  • ProcedureSham lacrimal canalicular procedure

    Lacrimal irrigation performed as a sham procedure in the control eye without administration of LACRIFILL® Canalicular Gel or temporary canalicular occlusion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Inter-eye difference in Schirmer Test 1 at month 1

    Difference in Schirmer Test I tear production between the Lacrifill-treated eye and the contralateral standard-of-care eye at 1 month after cataract surgery. Schirmer Test I measures tear production as the length of wetting of a standardized filter paper strip over 5 minutes, expressed in millimeters (mm). Values for each eye range from 0 to 35 mm, with higher values indicating greater tear production. The inter-eye difference is calculated as the Schirmer Test I value in the Lacrifill-treated eye minus the value in the standard-of-care eye, resulting in a possible range of -35 to +35 mm. Positive values indicate greater tear production in the Lacrifill-treated eye.

    Time frame: 1 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Inter-eye difference in Schirmers Test 1 at month 3

    Difference in Schirmer Test I tear production between the Lacrifill-treated eye and the contralateral standard-of-care eye at 3 month after cataract surgery. Schirmer Test I measures tear production as the length of wetting of a standardized filter paper strip over 5 minutes, expressed in millimeters (mm). Values for each eye range from 0 to 35 mm, with higher values indicating greater tear production. The inter-eye difference is calculated as the Schirmer Test I value in the Lacrifill-treated eye minus the value in the standard-of-care eye, resulting in a possible range of -35 to +35 mm. Positive values indicate greater tear production in the Lacrifill-treated eye.

    Time frame: 3 Months

  2. Inter-eye difference in Oxford grading at month 1 and months 3

    Difference in ocular surface staining between the Lacrifill-treated eye and the contralateral standard-of-care eye at 1 and 3 months after cataract surgery, assessed using the Oxford Scheme for Ocular Surface Staining. The Oxford score ranges from 0 to 5 for each eye, with higher scores indicating greater ocular surface staining and therefore a worse outcome. The inter-eye difference is calculated as the Oxford score in the Lacrifill-treated eye minus the score in the standard-of-care eye, resulting in a possible range of -5 to +5. Negative values indicate less ocular surface staining, and therefore a better outcome, in the Lacrifill-treated eye.

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months

  3. Inter-eye difference in tear break up time (TBUT) at month 1 and 3

    Difference in Tear Film Break-Up Time (TBUT) between the Lacrifill-treated eye and the contralateral standard-of-care eye at 1 and 3 months after cataract surgery. TBUT is measured in seconds and represents the time between a complete blink and the first appearance of a break in the tear film. Higher TBUT values indicate greater tear film stability and therefore a better outcome. The inter-eye difference is calculated as the TBUT in the Lacrifill-treated eye minus the TBUT in the standard-of-care eye; positive values indicate greater tear film stability in the Lacrifill-treated eye.

    Time frame: 1 month; 3 months

  4. Non-invasive tear break-up time measured with the MS-39 at Months 1 and 3

    Tear film stability will be assessed using the first non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) measured with the MS-39 anterior segment analyzer (CSO, Florence, Italy). The integrated Placido disk-based tear film analysis detects the time from the last blink to the first detected disruption of the tear film. NIBUT is recorded in seconds. Higher values indicate greater tear film stability and therefore a better outcome. Measurements will be performed separately in the Lacrifill-treated eye and the contralateral sham-treated eye.

    Time frame: 1 month; 3 months

  5. Halo/glare size measured with the Real Artificial Lens Vision (RALV) system

    Halo/glare size will be quantitatively assessed using the Real Artificial Lens Vision (RALV) halo/glare test. Participants view a central white light source while optotypes are presented at decreasing radial distances from the light source. Halo/glare size is recorded as angular extent in milliradians (mrad). Higher values indicate a larger halo/glare phenomenon and therefore greater visual disturbance. Measurements will be performed separately for the Lacrifill-treated eye and the contralateral sham-treated eye.

    Time frame: 1 month and 3 months

  6. Outcomes of questionnaires

    Report of the dry eye disease questionnaires (OSDI and SPEED) and the National Eye Institute Visual function questionnaire 25 at month 1 and 3

    Time frame: 1 month; 3 months

  7. Number of applied artifical tear drops

    Self-reported number of average applications of artificial tear drops per eye per day.

    Time frame: 3 months

  8. Incidence of adverse events and device- or procedure-related adverse events

    Incidence, nature, severity, and relationship to the investigational device and/or procedure of adverse events, including serious adverse events and serious adverse device effects.

    Time frame: 3 months

  9. Inter-eye difference in visual quality assessment

    Difference in Visual quality assessment measured by Refractive Artificial Lens Vision (RALV) at month 1 and 3

    Time frame: 1 month; 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Oct 2027, 12 months later.

Of 84 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Dry Eye Syndromes, half reached primary completion within 13 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 28. This study's planned 12 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 112 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 31, 2026
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Sep 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07809022
Responsible party
Gregor Reiter (Ap.Prof. PD. DDr. BA, MSc,, Medical University of Vienna) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
Start date
Sep 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion