ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07914829PERSOMAUpdated Nov 4, 2026

Personalized Dietary Feedback to Reduce Hepatic Steatosis in Patients With MASLD

An interventional study of Personalized Dietary Feedback and Generic Dietary Feedback in MASLD (Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease), MetALD and Steatotic Liver Disease, sponsored by Medical University of Vienna. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-04.

Sponsored by Medical University of Vienna · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 4, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
174
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and combined metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD) are common chronic liver diseases associated with metabolic dysfunction and an increased risk of liver-related and cardiovascular complications. Lifestyle modification, particularly dietary changes and increased physical activity, represents a cornerstone of treatment. However, general lifestyle recommendations are often insufficient to achieve sustained improvements.

This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to investigate whether personalized dietary and lifestyle feedback based on a structured questionnaire is more effective in reducing hepatic steatosis than generic lifestyle recommendations.

A total of 174 patients with MASLD or MetALD will be randomized 1:1 to receive either personalized or generic written feedback at baseline and after 2, 4, and 6 months. Changes in hepatic steatosis, assessed by the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), will be evaluated over a six-month period.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of personalized dietary and lifestyle feedback compared with generic recommendations in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) or metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD).

A total of 174 adult patients with MASLD or MetALD will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to an intervention group receiving individualized feedback based on a structured dietary and lifestyle questionnaire or a control group receiving standardized written recommendations.

Participants will complete the questionnaire at baseline and after 2, 4, and 6 months, followed by the corresponding written feedback. Clinical, anthropometric, laboratory, and non-invasive liver assessments, including vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), will be performed at baseline and after six months.

The primary objective is to compare hepatic steatosis between the two groups after six months, adjusting for baseline CAP values. Secondary objectives include assessing changes in body weight, metabolic parameters, liver stiffness, dietary habits, physical activity, and health-related quality of life.

The study aims to determine whether a simple, scalable, personalized feedback approach can improve lifestyle management in patients with MASLD or MetALD.

02

Conditions studied

  • MASLD (Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease)
  • MetALD
  • Steatotic Liver Disease

Keywords

  • MASLD
  • MetALD
  • SLD
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Vienna is the lead sponsor of 1,109 studies on the registry; 184 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-80 years.
  • Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) >248 dB/m.
  • Sufficient German language proficiency to independently complete the questionnaires.
  • Written to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other active chronic liver disease.
  • Significant alcohol consumption, defined as ≥50 g/day in women or ≥60 g/day in men.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus.
  • Initiation or dose modification of GLP-1 receptor agonists or other weight-modifying pharmacological therapies within the previous three months.
  • Planned bariatric surgery during study participation.
  • Severe or unstable medical condition that, in the investigator's judgment, may interfere with study participation or interpretation of study results.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
174 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Personalized Dietary Feedback

    Participants will receive personalized written dietary feedback based on their individual responses to a structured questionnaire. The feedback will include tailored recommendations regarding dietary habits. Updated personalized feedback will be provided at baseline and after 2, 4, and 6 months.

    Behavioral: Personalized Dietary Feedback

  • Active comparator
    Generic Dietary Feedback

    Participants will receive standardized written dietary recommendations independent of their individual questionnaire responses. Generic feedback will be provided at baseline and after 2, 4, and 6 months.

    Behavioral: Generic Dietary Feedback

Interventions

  • BehavioralPersonalized Dietary Feedback

    Participants receive individualized written dietary feedback based on their responses to a structured dietary questionnaire. The feedback includes an assessment of individual dietary habits, a visual representation of dietary patterns, and personalized recommendations to improve food choices and dietary quality. Updated feedback is provided at baseline and after 2, 4, and 6 months based on repeated questionnaire assessments.

  • BehavioralGeneric Dietary Feedback

    Participants receive standardized written dietary recommendations based on general nutritional guidelines. The information is identical for all participants in the control group and is not tailored to individual dietary habits or questionnaire responses. The same generic dietary information is provided at baseline and after 2, 4, and 6 months.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hepatic Steatosis at 6 Months, Assessed by Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) Using Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography (VCTE)

    Hepatic steatosis will be quantified using the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), measured in decibels per meter (dB/m) by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE). The outcome measure is the CAP value at 6 months. The between-group difference at 6 months will be evaluated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with baseline CAP included as a covariate. CAP is the only measurement reported for this outcome.

    Time frame: 6 months (baseline CAP used for adjustment).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Body Weight from Baseline to 6 Months

    Body weight will be measured in kilograms (kg). Change will be calculated as body weight at 6 months minus baseline body weight.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  2. Percentage Change in Body Weight from Baseline to 6 Months

    Percentage change in body weight will be calculated as \[(body weight at 6 months - baseline body weight) / baseline body weight\] × 100.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  3. Change in Waist Circumference from Baseline to 6 Months

    Waist circumference will be measured in centimeters (cm). Absolute change from baseline to 6 months will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  4. Change in Hip Circumference from Baseline to 6 Months

    Hip circumference will be measured in centimeters (cm). Absolute change from baseline to 6 months will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  5. Change in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) from Baseline to 6 Months

    Serum ALT will be measured in units per liter (U/L). Absolute change from baseline to 6 months will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  6. Change in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) from Baseline to 6 Months

    Serum AST will be measured in units per liter (U/L). Absolute change from baseline to 6 months will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  7. Change in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) from Baseline to 6 Months

    Serum GGT will be measured in units per liter (U/L). Absolute change from baseline to 6 months will be reported.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Patient data can be shared upon reasonable request and after fulfilling all legal and data protection requirements from the EU.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Dec 2028, 25 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 20, 2026
First posted
Nov 4, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Nov 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 4, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 4, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07914829
Collaborators
University of Vienna
Responsible party
Georg Semmler (MD PhD, Medical University of Vienna) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 4, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 4, 2026

Study contacts

Georg Semmler, MD PhD
Contact
georg.semmler@meduniwien.ac.at
+4314040047410

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion