ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07808515Updated Oct 30, 2026

A Study Comparing Cemiplimab-based Treatments for Adult Participants With Locally Advanced Basal Cell Skin Cancer (laBCC)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Cemiplimab and Vidutolimod in Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma, sponsored by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-30.

Primary conditionCarcinoma, Basal CellRegistry: Skin NeoplasmsReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Skin Neoplasms — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Carcinoma, Basal Cell
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Carcinoma, Basal Cell, a narrower term within Skin Neoplasms.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 30, 2026Start date movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
135
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will test an experimental Regeneron drug called cemiplimab ("study drug") given alone or in combination with other anti-cancer drugs ("combination treatment") to see if they can help treat laBCC.

The study is looking at:

  • What side effects cemiplimab, alone or in a combination treatment, might cause
  • How well cemiplimab, alone or in a combination treatment, works
  • How cemiplimab, alone or in a combination treatment could affect the immune system, which can help researchers understand why cemiplimab, alone or in a combination treatment, works better in some participants than others
02

Conditions studied

  • Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • BCC
  • laBCC
  • Skin Cancer
  • Non-melanoma skin cancer
  • Surgically unresectable
  • Unsuitable for radiotherapy
  • Inoperable Basal Cell Carcinoma
  • Recurrent Basal Cell Carcinoma
  • Cutaneous Basal Cell Carcinoma
  • Keratinocyte Carcinoma
  • High-Risk Basal Cell Carcinoma
03

In context

Carcinoma, Basal Cell Reclassified

389 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Basal Cell; 69 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 135 is above the median of 50 across 272 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Basal Cell.

Browse Carcinoma, Basal Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 411 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Of its 125 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 79 (63%) have results posted.

Compared within Carcinoma, Basal Cell, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Skin Neoplasms. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologic confirmation of BCC by local board-certified pathologist, as described in the protocol
  2. At least one lesion that is measurable by study criteria, defined as ≥ 1cm in at least one dimension, as assessed by radiology and/or digital medical photography, as described in the protocol
  3. The treating physician must document that the participant is not appropriate for curative-intent surgery or curative-intent radiation
  4. The treating physician must document that the participant does not wish to receive a hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HHI) or is not a candidate for an HHI
  5. (ECOG) performance status ≤ 1

Subsequent Therapy Arm - specific inclusion criteria:

  1. Documentation of histopathologic diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma - NOT necessary
  2. Submission of tumor or blood for exploratory correlative research - NOT necessary

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. disease to lymph node(s) or distant site(s) (Note: involvement of lymph node due to direct invasion from overlying cutaneous BCC is still considered laBCC, and is not excluded)
  2. History or current evidence of significant cardiovascular disease, as described in the protocol
  3. Exposure to any prior systemic therapy (eg, HHI or an ) or locally injectable agent for laBCC, as described in the protocol
  4. Current participation OR past participation in another trial in which an investigational intervention (eg, drug, vaccine, invasive device) was administered within 4 weeks before planned first dose of study intervention in this clinical trial.

Subsequent Therapy Arm - specific exclusion criteria:

1. Receipt of any anti-cancer therapy (including HHIs, radiation, surgery, or other systemic therapy) for BCC, AFTER treatment on Arms A, B, or C.

NOTE: Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

PD-1, PD-L1 and checkpoint inhibitors

PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are proteins that act as brakes on the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab, block them so the immune system can attack a cancer.

PD-L1 can also be measured in a tumour sample. Some scores count stained tumour cells only (TPS); others also count certain immune cells (CPS). The study names the score and the minimum it uses.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
135 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm A

    Drug: Cemiplimab

  • Experimental
    Arm B

    Drug: Cemiplimab · Drug: Vidutolimod

  • Experimental
    Arm C

    Drug: Cemiplimab · Drug: Fianlimab

  • Experimental
    Subsequent Therapy Arm

    Drug: Cemiplimab · Drug: Vidutolimod · Drug: Fianlimab

Interventions

  • Administered per the protocol

    Also known as: Libtayo®, REGN2810

  • Administered per the protocol

    Also known as: CMP001

  • Administered per the protocol

    Also known as: REGN3767

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Objective Response Rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR) per Composite Response Criteria

    Composite Response Criteria integrates radiology findings \[Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1\] and external lesion assessments from digital photography \[modified World Health Organization (WHO) criteria\].

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of Response (DOR) by BICR per Composite Response Criteria

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

  2. Time to Response (TTR) by BICR per Composite Response Criteria

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

  3. Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) by BICR per composite Response Criteria

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

  4. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by BICR per Composite Response Criteria

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

  5. Objective Response by investigator review per Composite Response Criteria

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

  6. DOR by investigator review per Composite Response Criteria

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

  7. TTR by investigator review per Composite Response Criteria

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

  8. Complete Response (CR) by investigator review per Composite Response Criteria

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

  9. PFS by investigator review per Composite Response Criteria

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

  10. Occurrence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

  11. Severity of TEAEs

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All Individual Patient Data (IPD) that underlie publicly available results will be considered for sharing

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: When Regeneron has: received marketing authorization from major health authorities (e.g., FDA, European Medicines Agency (EMA), Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), etc.) for the product and indication or has globally discontinued development of the product for all indications on or after April 2020 and has no plans for future development made the study results publicly available (e.g., scientific publication, scientific conference, clinical trial registry) the legal authority to share the data, and ensured the ability to protect participant privacy.

Access criteria: Qualified researchers can submit a proposal for access to individual patient or aggregate level data from a Regeneron-sponsored clinical trial through Vivli. Regeneron's Independent Research Request Evaluation Criteria can be found at: https://www.regeneron.com/sites/default/files/Regeneron-External-Data-Sharing-Policy-and-Independent-Research-Request-Evaluation-Criteria.pdf

Data sharing details ↗ · vivli.org

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Nov 2030, 48 months later.

Of 43 phase 2 interventional studies under Carcinoma, Basal Cell, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 67. This study's planned 48 months is close to that.

Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Oct 2026 → Nov 2026, on Oct 30, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 1, 2026
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 13, 2026was Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 13, 2030
CompletionEst.
Nov 13, 2030
Last update
Oct 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Start date
Oct 15, 2026→Nov 13, 2026
Oct 30, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 30, 2026
    Start date Oct 15, 2026→Nov 13, 2026
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07808515
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
Start date
Nov 13, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 13, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 13, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 30, 2026

Study contacts

Clinical Trials Administrator
Contact
clinicaltrials@regeneron.com
844-734-6643
Clinical Trial Management
study director · Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cemiplimab

Start the discussion