ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07806435CessataEl'ansiUpdated Sep 8, 2026

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Music Therapy on Anxiety Levels in Patients With Advanced Cancer Hospitalized in a Palliative Care Unit

An interventional study of depression management and Kigonki in Music Therapy, Palliative Care and Cancer, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-08.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A music therapy intervention can be either receptive or active. In both cases, somatic effects have been observed, with a direct impact on respiratory, cardiac and hemodynamic parameters, as well as psychological effects, creating a relationship of support, accompaniment and listening to the person. An intervention protocol using Kigonki has been developed and validated by the University Diploma in Music Therapy team at Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3 University (DUMM3). Studies on music therapy in palliative care have been published, but there is still a need for large controlled studies assessing the prolonged effect of a standardized intervention. This randomized clinical is designed for patients with terminal cancer pathology, hospitalized in palliative care units and with anxiety and depression scores both above 11 on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD). The primary endpoint is change in anxiety score. Patients included in the experimental arm will be offered the above-mentioned protocol with 3 weekly sessions of receptive music therapy with Kigonki for 2 weeks, after drawing up an intervention plan. Anxiety/depression levels will be measured before and 30 minutes after each session, as well as one week after the last session. Patients in the reference arm will have their anxiety/depression level monitored 3 times a week. In both arms, the study will be terminated at the end of the last protocol evaluation (i.e., at 3 weeks). If anxiety worsens (score rises by 2 points), a music therapy intervention similar to that performed for patients of the experimental arm may be proposed to patients of the reference arm. This project requires the participation of 84 patients, which seems feasible at the inter-regional level in 7 centers over 18 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Music Therapy
  • Palliative Care
  • Cancer
  • Anxiety

Keywords

  • anxiety
  • Music therapy
  • palliative care
  • cancer
03

In context

Neoplasms

10,822 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,324 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 84 is above the median of 60 across 7,704 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens is the lead sponsor of 586 studies on the registry; 185 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years
  • Patient hospitalized in palliative care unit for oncological pathology
  • Presenting an anxiety score > 46 (according to the STAI-Y State scale)
  • Whose subsequent hospitalization is estimated to last more than three weeks
  • No deafness likely to interfere with a receptive music therapy session (no difficulty in understanding whispered speech).
  • Affiliated with a social security scheme
  • Have signed the consent form for the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Deafness without hearing aids
  • Patients under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Not affiliated to a social security scheme
  • Patient with an aversion to the sounds produced by the Kigonki
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
84 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group without music therapy

    * Management of anxiety, pain, and depression according to the usual pharmacological and non-pharmacological practices of each center. * Assessment of PANAS questionnaire, TSAI test, digital scale measurement, physiological constants (pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate) 3 times a week for 2 weeks, then 7 days after the last of these 6 assessments. * Evaluation of quality of life at last assessment

    Other: depression management · Other: questionnaire

  • Experimental
    Music therapy group

    * Management of anxiety, pain, and depression according to the usual pharmacological and non-pharmacological practices of each center. * Six 30-minute sessions of receptive ISM with Kigonki according to study protocol * Assessment of the PANAS questionnaire, TSAI test, digital scale measurement, physiological constants (pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate) 3 times a week for 2 weeks, then 7 days after the last of these 6 assessments. Tri-weekly assessments will be repeated 30 minutes after each ISM session. \- Evaluation of quality of life at last assessment

    Other: depression management · Other: Kigonki · Other: questionnaire

Interventions

  • Otherdepression management

    \- Management of anxiety, pain, and depression according to the usual pharmacological and non-pharmacological practices of each center.

  • OtherKigonki

    Six 30-minute sessions of receptive ISM with Kigonki according to study protocol

  • Otherquestionnaire

    Assessment of PANAS questionnaire, TSAI test, digital scale measurement, physiological constants (pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate) 3 times a week for 2 weeks, then 7 days after the last of these 6 assessments.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. change in anxiety score obtained using the STAI-Y State scale

    The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), specifically Form Y (STAI-Y), stands as one of the most widely utilized self-report measures in psychological and medical research for the quantitative assessment of anxiety. The STAI-Y operationalizes the psychological construct of anxiety as having two independent dimensions, each measured by 20 items for a total of 40 items in the complete inventory. State Anxiety (A-State) is defined as a transient emotional response characterized by immediate, subjective feelings of tension, apprehension, worry, and physiological activation of the autonomic nervous system. Respondents assess their feelings "right now, at this moment" using a 4-point intensity scale. In contrast, Trait Anxiety (A-Trait) refers to stable individual differences in anxiety proneness. Individuals scoring high in A-Trait are predisposed to perceive a broader range of situations as threatening and are likely to react to these situations with elevated A-State responses. A-Trait

    Time frame: 1 week

  2. change in anxiety score obtained using the STAI-Y State scale

    The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), specifically Form Y (STAI-Y), stands as one of the most widely utilized self-report measures in psychological and medical research for the quantitative assessment of anxiety. The STAI-Y operationalizes the psychological construct of anxiety as having two independent dimensions, each measured by 20 items for a total of 40 items in the complete inventory. State Anxiety (A-State) is defined as a transient emotional response characterized by immediate, subjective feelings of tension, apprehension, worry, and physiological activation of the autonomic nervous system. Respondents assess their feelings "right now, at this moment" using a 4-point intensity scale. In contrast, Trait Anxiety (A-Trait) refers to stable individual differences in anxiety proneness. Individuals scoring high in A-Trait are predisposed to perceive a broader range of situations as threatening and are likely to react to these situations with elevated A-State responses. A-Trait

    Time frame: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. PANAS questionnaire (Positive and Negative Affect Scale)

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the session

  2. Variations in scores of the STAI-Y ETAT scale

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the session

  3. pulse variation

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the session

  4. BP variation

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the session

  5. respiratory rate

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the session

  6. PANAS questionnaire (Positive and Negative Affect Scale)

    Time frame: one week after the 6th session

  7. Variations in scores of the STAI-Y ETAT scale

    Time frame: one week after the 6th session

  8. pulse variation

    Time frame: one week after the 6th session

  9. BP variation

    Time frame: one week after the 6th session

  10. respiratory rate

    Time frame: one week after the 6th session

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHRU Amiens
    Amiens, 80480, France
    • Brassaint, MD · Principal investigator
    • Anne VANBESIEN, MD · Principal investigator
    • Sophie RIVENQ, MD · Principal investigator
    • Isabelle QUENTIN, MD · Principal investigator
    • Laurence BIRKUI, MD · Principal investigator
    • MEROT, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Apr 2028, 18 months later.

Of 1,983 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 52. This study's planned 18 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,058 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 52.

Neoplasms covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 21, 2026
First posted
Sep 8, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2028
CompletionEst.
Apr 2028
Last update
Sep 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07806435
Collaborators
Centre Hospitalier de Bethune, Centre Hospitalier de Douai, Hospital of Lens, GHPSO site de Senlis, CH de Compiegne, Centre Hospitalier de Beauvais
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 8, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 8, 2026

Study contacts

Julie Oncle, MD
Contact
Oncle.julie@chu-amiens.fr
33+03 22 45 64 43

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion