ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07800390SCREENUpdated Sep 2, 2026

proState Cancer Health Education to pRomote Early sreENing Uptake (SCREEN): A Pilot Randomised Control Trial

An interventional study of proState Cancer awareness education to pRomote Early screENing uptake and Control group in Anxiety, Prostate Cancer and Health Education, sponsored by Teesside University. Not yet recruiting. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-02.

Primary conditionProstatic NeoplasmsRegistry: Anxiety DisordersReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Anxiety Disorders — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Prostatic Neoplasms
Why
  1. The registry often attaches Anxiety Disorders to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Prostatic Neoplasms.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Teesside University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
74
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Prostate cancer is an issue of significant public health concern. Yet in low- and middle-income countries like Nigeria, men are adversely affected due to factors including poor early prostate cancer screening uptake. Yet a gap remains in addressing this urgent problem. The proposed study seeks to pilot the feasibility and acceptability of a novel co-produced workshop intervention called "proState Cancer awareness education to pRomote Early screENing uptake (SCREEN) with men who are not or partially up to date with their screening. The SCREEN intervention is designed to raise awareness of prostate cancer, its symptoms, implications for late screening, the benefits of early screening, avenues for screening uptake, and also addressing anxiety related to screening uptake. The SCREEN intervention is low-intensity and lasts approximately two hours. The proposed study also aims to pilot and test the instrument to determine its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, including the mechanism by which the intervention might work.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety
  • Prostate Cancer
  • Health Education
  • Screening and Brief Interventions
  • Screening
  • Wellbeing

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Prostate cancer screening
  • Health education workshop
  • anxiety
  • Early screening uptake
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms Reclassified

7,046 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,580 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 74 is above the median of 60 across 5,348 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Teesside University is the lead sponsor of 55 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Compared within Prostatic Neoplasms, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Anxiety Disorders. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men aged between age 18 years and 79 who are not or partially up to date with prostate cancer
  • Able to provide full consent for their participation.
  • Able to speak the English Language. Able to take part in the intervention and are available for the intervention assessment at baseline and end of intervention.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 18 years
  • Unable to consent.
  • Currently undergoing severe mental health treatment.
  • Unable to speak the English language
  • not meeting the inclusion criteria.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
74 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    proState Cancer awareness education to pRomote Early screENing uptake (SCREEN)

    2 hour worksop session to foster awareness and encourage screening uptake

    Behavioral: proState Cancer awareness education to pRomote Early screENing uptake

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    The control group will receive intervention as usual. This may be in the form of existing prostate cancer screening information provided in hospitals, media and health centres.

    Other: Control group

Interventions

  • BehavioralproState Cancer awareness education to pRomote Early screENing uptake

    The SCREEN intervention is designed to raise awareness of prostate cancer, its symptoms, implications for late screening, the benefits of early screening, avenues for screening uptake, and also addressing anxiety related to screening uptake. The SCREEN intervention is low-intensity and lasts approximately two hours.

  • OtherControl group

    Existing information provided by health care provider, including media around prostate cancer.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Service Satisfaction Scale

    A five item scale that can be used to assess and measure satisfaction, acceptability and quality of the intervention. Higher score denote positive outcomes and acceptability. Lower score denotes poor satisfaction and acceptability.

    Time frame: At the end of intervention (day 2)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)

    The GAD-7 is a seven item scale for screening, measuring and assessing the severity of generalised anxiety disorder. Scores of 5, 10, and 15 are taken as the cut-off points for mild, moderate and severe anxiety, respectively.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1) and at the end of intervention (day 2)]

  2. Oslo Social Support Scale (OSSS-3)

    The scale is a 3-item self-reported measure designed for assessing and measuring the level of social support. The sum score ranges from 3 to 14, with high values representing strong levels and low values representing poor levels of social support as indicated as follows: a) 3-8 poor social support, b) 9-11 moderate social support, c) 12-14 strong social support.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1) and at the end of intervention (day 2)

  3. European Quality of Life Scale EQ-5D-5L

    The EQ-5D-5L is a 5 item scale designed to aid assessment of the generic quality of life. In the EQ-5D-5L, each dimension has five response levels: no problems (Level 1); slight (Level 2); moderate (Level 3); severe (Level 4); and extreme problems (Level 5). There are 3,125 possible health states defined by combining one level from each dimension, ranging from 11111 (full health) to 55555 (worst health).

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1) and at the end of intervention (day 2)

  4. Knowledge of prostate cancer and screening scale

    14 item scale that measures knowledge of Prostate Cancer (PC). The 14 items on the PC knowledge scale is scored according to whether or not the participants responded correctly to each question, and the total number of correct responses will be calculated ranging from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating higher PC knowledge.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1) and at the end of intervention (day 2)]

  5. Beliefs around prostate cancer and screening intention scale

    A 5-item scale that measure beliefs around prostate cancer and intention to engage in screening. Score range from 0-25 with lower score denoting strong willingness to engage in early screening uptake.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1) and at the end of intervention (day 2)

  6. Intention to test for prostate cancer scale

    The scale assesses the intention to take a PSA test among men when this test is: (i) offered by a doctor or (ii) based on the men's own initiative. It also predicts which attitudes (beliefs, outcomes), subjective norms (opinions of significant others, own motivation) and perceived control (obstacles, facilitating factors) are the most important for taking a PSA test. Lower total scores mean a stronger and more determined intention to undergo prostate cancer screening. Higher scores indicate low or absent readiness to complete the test.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1) and at the end of intervention (day 2)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rawla P. Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer. World J Oncol. 2019 Apr;10(2):63-89. doi: 10.14740/wjon1191. Epub 2019 Apr 20. PubMed 31068988 ↗
  • Dozie INS, Chukwuocha UM, Innocent DC, Dozie UW, Chukwuemeka PS. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and risk factors of prostate cancer in Nigeria. BMC Cancer. 2025 Nov 26;25(1):1932. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-15358-4. PubMed 41299322 ↗
  • Abdus-Salam AA, Jimoh MA, Folasire AM, Ntekim AI, Ojo OT, Ehiedu CG, Yusuf SA, Takure AO, Akinlade BI, Idowu OK, Oladeji AA, Sarimiye FO, Adenipekun AA. Sociodemographic and clinicopathologic characteristics of patients treated with high dose rate prostate brachytherapy in Nigeria. Ecancermedicalscience. 2024 Aug 14;18:1740. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1740. eCollection 2024. PubMed 39421165 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data supporting this study cannot be made available due to the sensitive nature and ethical reasons on confidentiality.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07800390
Lead sponsor
Teesside University
Collaborators
Jos University Teaching Hospital, University of Manchester
Responsible party
Tarela Ike (Senior Lecturer, Teesside University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 2, 2026
Start date
Sep 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 2, 2026

Study contacts

Tarela J Ike, Dr
Contact
T.ike@tees.ac.uk
0164234231
Dung E Jidong, PhD
Contact
Dung.jidong@manchester.ac.uk

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion