ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07793526Updated Aug 28, 2026

Back on Track: Evaluation of an Occupational Reintegration Protocol for Employees With Musculoskeletal Disorders

An observational study in Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs), sponsored by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc. Recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-28.

Sponsored by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
140
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of the Back on Track study is to evaluate a computer-assisted reintegration protocol for musculoskeletal disorders of a major occupational health service in the Netherlands on its (cost-)effectiveness and conduct a process evaluation. The computer-assisted reintegration protocol aims to reduce sick leave duration and sick-leave associated costs, with the intention to mitigate the impact of sick leave for both employee and employer. Furthermore, this study might provide valuable insights for the improvement of reintegration guidance for workers with musculoskeletal disorders in general.

Read the detailed description

The objective of the Back on Track study is to evaluate a computer-assisted reintegration protocol for musculoskeletal disorders of a major occupational health service in the Netherlands on its (cost-)effectiveness and conduct a process evaluation. This protocol is characterized by an evidence-based, early, intensive and multidisciplinary approach. A non-randomized controlled study will compare employees on sick leave due to musculoskeletal complaints who are at high risk of long-term sick leave and receive care based on the computer-assisted reintegration protocol (n = 70) with employees receiving usual care (n = 70). The primary outcome will be time until full return to work. Secondary outcomes will include time until partial return to work , full and partial return to work (yes/no), way of return to work (at the own job/company, with our without adjustments), work ability, work productivity, pain, self-reported health and health-related quality of life. Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires at baseline and after three, six, nine and 12 months. Furthermore, data will be obtained from the occupational health service's register. Alongside the effectiveness study, economic and process evaluations will be conducted.

02

Conditions studied

  • Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs)
03

In context

Musculoskeletal Diseases

752 studies on the registry are indexed under Musculoskeletal Diseases; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 140 is above the median of 120 across 207 observational studies indexed under Musculoskeletal Diseases.

Browse Musculoskeletal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc is the lead sponsor of 305 studies on the registry; 84 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Employees on sick leave due to musculoskeletal complaints receiving return-to-work guidance by a major occupational health service in The Netherlands

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-65 years
  • Self-reported musculoskeletal complaints as primary reason for sick leave
  • High risk of long-term sick leave

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Musculoskeletal complaints due to pregnancy
  • Retirement within one year
  • Sick leave duration of >18 days
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Intervention: the computer-assisted reintegration protocol for musculoskeletal disorders

    Employees on sick leave due to musculoskeletal complaints receiving return-to-work guidance according to the computer-assisted reintegration protocol

    Other: The computer-assisted reintegration protocol for musculoskeletal disorders

  • Control: usual care

    Employees on sick leave due to musculoskeletal complaints receiving return-to-work guidance according to usual care.

Interventions

  • OtherThe computer-assisted reintegration protocol for musculoskeletal disorders

    The computer-assisted reintegration protocol for musculoskeletal disorders provides an operationalization of the NVAB-guidelines of 'Low Back Pain and Radicular Syndrome' (Luites et al., 2020) and 'Complaints of Arm, Neck and Shoulder' (Elders et al., 2014) and the Dutch Gatekeeper Act. It is designed for occupational health professionals that are involved in the reintegration process of employees on high risk for long term sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. It starts from the third week of sick leave until the employee has returned, for a maximum of two years. The central themes of the protocol are an evidence-based, early, intensive and a multidisciplinary approach.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time until full RTW

    The number of days from start sick leave until full RTW for at least 28 days.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), after 3 months (T1), after 6 months (T2), after 9 months (T3), after 12 months (T4).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time until partial return to work

    The number of days from start sick leave until partly RTW.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), after 3 months (T1), after 6 months (T2), after 9 months (T3), after 12 months (T4).

  2. Full return to work

    Whether a participant fully returned to work for at least 28 days at the end of follow-up period (yes/no).

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), after 3 months (T1), after 6 months (T2), after 9 months (T3), after 12 months (T4).

  3. Partial return to work

    Whether a participant partial returned to work at the end of follow-up period (yes/no).

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), after 3 months (T1), after 6 months (T2), after 9 months (T3), after 12 months (T4).

  4. Way of returning to work

    The way a participant returned to work (at the own job/company, with our without adjustments).

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), after 3 months (T1), after 6 months (T2), after 9 months (T3), after 12 months (T4).

  5. Current work ability

    Measured with the first question of the Work Ability Index (Tuomi et al., 1998)

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), after 3 months (T1), after 6 months (T2), after 9 months (T3), after 12 months (T4).

  6. Presenteeism

    Presenteeism will be assessed using adapted items based on the iMTA Productivity Costs Questionnaire (iPCQ) (Bouwmans et al., 2015).

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), after 3 months (T1), after 6 months (T2), after 9 months (T3), after 12 months (T4).

  7. Pain

    The average pain score in the past week measured with a Numeric Rating Score (Hawker et al., 2011)

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), after 3 months (T1), after 6 months (T2), after 9 months (T3), after 12 months (T4).

  8. Self-reported health

    Measured on a Visual Analogue Scale of the EQ-5D-5L (Herdman et al., 2011)

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), after 3 months (T1), after 6 months (T2), after 9 months (T3), after 12 months (T4).

  9. Health-related quality of life

    A combination of five domains (mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/gloom) measured with the EQ-5D-5L (Herdman et al., 2011)

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), after 3 months (T1), after 6 months (T2), after 9 months (T3), after 12 months (T4).

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Arbo Unie
    Utrecht, Netherlands
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07793526
Collaborators
Arbo Unie
Responsible party
Jantine Maarleveld (PhD Student, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 28, 2026
Start date
Jul 29, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 28, 2026

Study contacts

Jantine Maarleveld
Contact
j.maarleveld@amsterdamumc.nl
+31625684599
Han Anema
study chair · Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion