ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07791706Updated Aug 28, 2026

Application Based Behavior Nudging Active Breaks Versus Conventional Ergonomic Education for Thoracic Mobility and Neck Pain in Office Workers

An interventional study of App Based Behavior Nudging Active Breaks and Conventional Ergonomic Education and Exercise in Neck Pain Musculoskeletal, sponsored by Riphah International University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 25 Weeks to 50 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-28.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Weeks to 50 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 123 studies in Neck Pain by Riphah International University — 31 open to participants now, 31 under way, none of them phase 3. Neck Pain · Riphah International University.

Planned enrollment
11th of 117
64 · median 40
Started
2026
with 13 others
No phase
117 of 123
31 open now
Primary completion
2026-11
later than 26 of 30 live
Registered
120th of 123
by date

Among the 123 studies in Neck Pain by Riphah International University, this one is the 11th largest by planned enrollment of the 117 interventional ones, is one of 14 that started in 2026, is one of 117 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 26 of the 30 other live ones, and was the 120th registered.

By phase

123 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study117 · 31 open
Observational6 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2018; this study’s year is marked. 14 started in 2026.

Size and results

Median enrollment 40 across the 117 interventional studies, 114 across the 6 observational. Of the 86 that completed or were terminated, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 123 studies in Neck Pain by Riphah International University, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study is about neck pain and upper-back movement in office workers. Sitting for long hours and working on computers can contribute to neck and upper-back discomfort.

The study will compare two approaches:

App-Based Active Breaks: An app will remind participants to take 1 minute movement breaks during their workday.

Conventional Approach: Participants will receive ergonomic advice and exercises to do twice a day.

The exercises include simple movements for the upper back, shoulders, and neck.

Participants will be assessed for neck pain, neck disability, upper-back movement, muscle endurance, and work-related difficulties before and after the program.

The active program will last 6 weeks, followed by a final assessment in week 8.

Participation is voluntary, and participants can withdraw at any time. Their personal information will be kept confidential.

The study aims to find out whether taking short, regular movement breaks with app reminders can help reduce neck pain and improve upper-back movement in office workers.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to compare app based behavior nudging active breaks with conventional ergonomic education and exercise for office workers experiencing non specific neck and upper back pain. Prolonged sitting, computer use, static postures, and repetitive neck movements can contribute to neck discomfort and reduced upper back mobility. The study focuses on whether regular short movement breaks can help improve these problems.

A total of 64 office workers will participate in the study and will be randomly divided into two groups, with 32 participants in each group. The study will be conducted in corporate offices in Islamabad. Participants will be assessed for neck pain, neck related disability, work limitations, deep neck muscle endurance, and thoracic spine mobility.

Both groups will receive a 15 minute ergonomic education session covering appropriate sitting posture, monitor height, keyboard and mouse placement, and back support. Both groups will also be taught four mobility exercises: seated thoracic extension mobilization, scapular wall slides, and seated thoracic rotation mobilization.

The app based group will receive reminders approximately 7-8 times during each workday for six weeks. Each reminder will prompt participants to take a one minute active break and perform the prescribed mobility exercises. The app will also provide visual reminders and progress features to encourage regular participation. Weekly monitoring and therapist feedback will be provided to support correct exercise performance and adherence.

The conventional group will perform the same mobility exercises twice daily, in the morning and afternoon, without app reminders. They will receive written or electronic instructions about posture, movement safety, and monitoring discomfort, along with weekly self reports of exercise completion and discomfort.

After six weeks, there will be a one week period without supervised sessions or reminders. In week eight, participants will undergo a final assessment. The researchers will compare changes in neck pain, neck disability, thoracic mobility, deep neck muscle endurance, work limitations, and adherence between the two groups. Participant feedback about the intervention will also be collected.

The study is designed as a single-blinded, two-arm randomized controlled trial. Data will be analyzed using appropriate statistical tests depending on the distribution of the data, with analysis performed using SPSS version 29.

The study is intended to determine whether app based reminders combined with short active breaks can provide a practical approach for improving neck pain, neck related disability, thoracic mobility, work productivity, and adherence among office workers.

03

Conditions studied

  • Neck Pain Musculoskeletal

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Neck Pain; Thoracic Mobility; Office Workers; Active Breaks; Behavior Nudging; Mobile App; Ergonomic Education; Exercise Adherence
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Weeks to 50 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 25-50 years, employed in call-center or IT support roles for ≥30 hours per week.

    • Sub-acute or chronic non-specific neck and upper thoracic pain
    • Neck Disability Index (NDI) score ≥10/50 indicating mild to moderate disability.
    • Access to a smartphone compatible with the intervention app
    • Able to understand and follow app prompts in English/Urdu.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Specific neck pathology (cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy, fracture, , infection, or inflammatory disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis).
  • Post-surgical conditions of the cervical or thoracic spine or shoulder within the past 6 months.
  • Severe thoracic kyphosis, scoliosis, or other structural spinal deformities interfering with movement assessment.
  • Pregnancy or conditions contraindicating light mobility exercises (e.g., vertigo, uncontrolled hypertension).
  • Ongoing structured physiotherapy or chiropractic management for neck or upper back pain.
  • Planned leave exceeding 2 consecutive weeks during the trial period.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
64 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    App Based Behavior Nudging Active Breaks

    Participants will receive app reminders 7-8 times during the workday for six weeks to take one minute active breaks and perform the prescribed mobility exercises.

    Behavioral: App Based Behavior Nudging Active Breaks

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Ergonomic Education and Exercise

    Participants will perform the prescribed mobility exercises twice daily, in the morning and afternoon, without app reminders. They will also receive ergonomic guidance on posture, movement safety, and pain monitoring.

    Behavioral: Conventional Ergonomic Education and Exercise

Interventions

  • BehavioralApp Based Behavior Nudging Active Breaks

    Participants will receive app reminders 7-8 times during the workday for six weeks to perform one-minute active breaks using the prescribed mobility exercises. The app will include visual reminders and progress streaks

  • BehavioralConventional Ergonomic Education and Exercise

    Participants will receive ergonomic education and perform the prescribed mobility exercises twice daily, in the morning and afternoon, without app reminders. They will also receive guidance on posture, movement safety, and pain monitoring.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Exercise Adherence

    Adherence to the prescribed active breaks and mobility exercises, assessed using the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale and app based activity logs.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2026; primary completion for Nov 2026, 3 months later.

Of 763 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neck Pain, half reached primary completion within 7 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15. This study's planned 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 772 studies reached it within 7 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 25, 2026
First posted
Aug 28, 2026
StartEst.
Aug 17, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 17, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 17, 2026
Last update
Aug 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07791706
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 28, 2026
Start date
Aug 17, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 17, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 17, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 28, 2026

Study contacts

Maryam Kundi
Contact
maryam.kundi@riphah.edu.pk
+923405754453
Tayyeba Gul, Ms OMPT
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion