ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07928804Updated Nov 10, 2026

Effects of IASTM and Kinesiology Taping on Mechanical Neck Pain in University Students

An interventional study of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) and Kinesiology Taping in Mechanical Neck Pain, sponsored by Biruni University. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by Biruni University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 10, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of the Graston Technique (instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization, IASTM) and kinesiology taping on pain intensity, cervical range of motion, and neck-related disability in university students with chronic mechanical neck pain.

A total of 60 students aged 18-25 years with mechanical neck pain lasting at least three months will participate in the study. Participants will be randomly assigned to three groups: Graston Technique, kinesiology taping, or control, with 20 participants in each group.

The Graston group will receive instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization twice weekly for 12 weeks, while the kinesiology taping group will receive taping once weekly for 12 weeks. Both groups will also receive postural education and static stretching exercises. The control group will receive only postural education and static stretching exercises.

Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), cervical range of motion using a universal goniometer, and neck-related disability using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). All outcomes will be assessed at baseline, week 6, and week 12.

The study aims to determine whether either intervention provides additional benefits beyond postural education and stretching exercises in managing chronic mechanical neck pain among university students.

Read the detailed description

**Background and Rationale**

Chronic mechanical neck pain is a common musculoskeletal condition among university students, particularly those enrolled in health sciences programs. Prolonged studying, sustained cervical flexion, static postures, extensive use of digital devices, and academic stress may contribute to neck pain and associated functional limitations. Effective, accessible, and non-pharmacological treatment approaches are therefore important for managing neck pain in this population.

Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM), including the Graston Technique, is a manual therapy approach that uses specially designed instruments to apply controlled mechanical stimulation to soft tissues. Previous studies suggest that IASTM may improve pain intensity, soft tissue mobility, cervical range of motion, and functional outcomes in individuals with mechanical neck pain.

Kinesiology taping is another non-invasive physiotherapy intervention commonly used to support musculoskeletal function and pain management. It may provide sensory feedback, improve movement awareness, and contribute to pain reduction and functional improvement.

Although both interventions have been investigated separately, evidence directly comparing their effects in university students with chronic mechanical neck pain remains limited.

**Study Objective**

The primary objective of this study is to compare the effects of the Graston Technique and kinesiology taping on pain intensity, cervical range of motion, and neck-related disability in university students with chronic mechanical neck pain.

**Study Design**

This study is designed as a three-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial involving 60 university students aged 18-25 years.

Eligible participants will have localized mechanical neck pain lasting at least three months and a baseline pain intensity of at least 3/10 on the Visual Analog Scale.

Participants will be randomly allocated to three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio using block randomization. The randomization sequence will be generated by an independent researcher who is not directly involved in delivering the interventions. Group assignments will be concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes until allocation.

**Interventions**

Group A: Graston Technique / IASTM

Participants will receive instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization twice weekly for 12 weeks. The treatment will target the cervical soft tissues, upper trapezius, and levator scapulae muscles bilaterally. Treatment will be performed using controlled sweeping techniques with tolerable pressure. Participants will also receive standardized postural education and static stretching exercises.

Group B: Kinesiology Taping

Participants will receive kinesiology taping once weekly for 12 weeks. The tape will be applied to the cervical region and associated muscles, including the upper trapezius and/or levator scapulae, according to the treatment protocol. The tape will remain in place for approximately 3-4 days following each application. Participants will also receive standardized postural education and static stretching exercises.

Group C: Control

Participants in the control group will receive standardized postural education and static stretching exercises without Graston Technique or kinesiology taping.

The exercise program provided to all three groups will include cervical retraction, chin-tuck exercises, scapular retraction, and static stretching of the cervical musculature.

**Outcome Assessments**

Clinical outcomes will include pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), cervical range of motion measured using a universal goniometer, and neck-related disability assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI).

All outcomes will be assessed at three time points:

  • Baseline (T0): Before the initiation of the interventions.
  • Week 6 (T1): Mid-intervention assessment.
  • Week 12 (T2): Post-intervention assessment.

The repeated assessments will allow examination of changes over time and comparisons of treatment effects among the three groups.

**Expected Contribution**

This study will provide comparative evidence regarding the effectiveness of two commonly used non-pharmacological physiotherapy interventions for chronic mechanical neck pain in university students. The findings may contribute to clinical decision-making and the development of accessible physiotherapy management strategies for this population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mechanical Neck Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • IASTM
  • Kinesiology Taping
  • Cervical Range of Motion
  • Neck Disability Index
  • Mechanical Neck Pain
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,360 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 299 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 50 across 1,116 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Biruni University is the lead sponsor of 180 studies on the registry; 45 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • University students aged 18-25 years enrolled in the Faculty of Health Sciences.
  • Chronic mechanical neck pain localized to the cervical and/or periscapular region for at least three months.
  • Neck pain intensity of at least 3/10 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), equivalent to at least 30 mm on a 100-mm VAS.
  • Tenderness and/or trigger points in the upper trapezius and/or levator scapulae muscles.
  • Regular participation in academic activities.
  • Daily use of digital devices, including computers, smartphones, or tablets, for at least two hours.
  • Willingness to participate voluntarily and provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute or subacute neck pain lasting less than three months.
  • Specific cervical spine pathology, including cervical disc herniation, cervical myelopathy, or spinal instability.
  • Cervical radiculopathy, paresthesia, neurological deficits, or other neurological disorders affecting the cervical region.
  • History of cervical spine surgery.
  • Vertebrobasilar insufficiency.
  • Rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or other inflammatory rheumatic diseases.
  • Bleeding disorders or current use of anticoagulant medications.
  • Systemic diseases that may interfere with treatment or outcome assessment.
  • Active skin lesions, infections, dermatological conditions, or significant skin sensitivity in the treatment area.
  • Known allergy to kinesiology tape or adhesive materials.
  • Inability to complete the assessment procedures or intervention program.
  • Refusal or inability to provide written .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    IASTM Group

    Participants in this group will receive instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) twice weekly for 12 weeks (24 sessions). The intervention will be applied bilaterally to the cervical soft tissues, upper trapezius, and levator scapulae muscles using specially designed instruments and controlled sweeping techniques at a tolerable pressure. Participants will also receive standardized postural education and static stretching exercises, including cervical retraction, chin-tuck exercises, scapular retraction, and stretching of the cervical musculature. Clinical outcomes will be assessed at baseline, week 6, and week 12.

    Procedure: Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) · Behavioral: Postural Education and Stretching Exercises

  • Experimental
    Kinesiology Taping Group

    Participants in this group will receive kinesiology taping once weekly for 12 weeks (12 applications). The tape will be applied to the cervical region, upper trapezius, and/or levator scapulae muscles using appropriate tension to provide muscular and postural support. Each application will remain in place for 3 days. Participants will also receive standardized postural education and static stretching exercises, including cervical retraction, chin-tuck exercises, scapular retraction, and stretching of the cervical musculature. Clinical outcomes will be assessed at baseline, week 6, and week 12.

    Procedure: Kinesiology Taping · Behavioral: Postural Education and Stretching Exercises

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Participants in the control group will receive standardized postural education and static stretching exercises for 12 weeks without instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) or kinesiology taping. The exercise program will include cervical retraction, chin-tuck exercises, scapular retraction, and stretching of the cervical musculature. Exercises will be performed according to individual tolerance without increasing pain. Clinical outcomes will be assessed at baseline, week 6, and week 12.

    Behavioral: Postural Education and Stretching Exercises

Interventions

  • ProcedureInstrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM)

    Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) will be applied twice weekly for 12 weeks, totaling 24 sessions. The intervention will target the cervical soft tissues, upper trapezius, and levator scapulae muscles bilaterally. Participants will be positioned comfortably in a seated position with appropriate head and upper extremity support. Following skin preparation and application of a suitable lubricant, controlled sweeping techniques will be performed along the direction of muscle fibers using specially designed instruments at a tolerable pressure. Treatment intensity will be adjusted according to participant tolerance, and the procedure will be discontinued if adverse reactions occur.

  • ProcedureKinesiology Taping

    Kinesiology taping will be applied once weekly for 12 weeks, totaling 12 applications. The intervention will target the cervical region, upper trapezius, and/or levator scapulae muscles. The tape will be applied using appropriate tension to provide muscular and postural support. Each application will remain in place for approximately 3-4 days. Before application, the skin will be examined for wounds, irritation, dermatological conditions, or adhesive allergies. Participants will be instructed to remove the tape and inform the researcher if itching, redness, burning, or discomfort occurs.

  • BehavioralPostural Education and Stretching Exercises

    All participants will receive a standardized postural education and exercise program throughout the 12-week intervention period. Postural education will focus on maintaining appropriate cervical alignment and reducing prolonged static postures during academic activities and digital device use. The exercise program will include cervical retraction, chin-tuck exercises, scapular retraction, and static stretching of the cervical musculature. Exercises will be adjusted according to individual tolerance and performed without increasing pain. The same educational and exercise components will be provided to all three study groups.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Neck pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 10-cm scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. Changes in VAS scores from baseline to weeks 6 and 12 will be evaluated to compare the effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM), kinesiology taping, and control interventions. The primary comparison will be the change from baseline to week 12.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    Neck-related disability will be assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), a 10-item questionnaire evaluating the impact of neck pain on daily activities. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 50. Higher scores indicate greater disability. Changes in NDI scores from baseline to weeks 6 and 12 will be evaluated to compare functional improvements among the three intervention groups.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  2. Cervical Range of Motion (ROM)

    Active cervical range of motion will be measured in degrees using a universal goniometer. Cervical flexion, extension, right and left lateral flexion, and right and left rotation will be assessed. Changes in cervical mobility from baseline to weeks 6 and 12 will be evaluated to compare improvements among the three intervention groups. Greater range of motion generally indicates improved cervical mobility. Time Frame:

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

07

Study locations

1 site
  • İstanbul Bilgi University
    Kadıköy, 34440, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hu Q, Liu Y, Yin S, Zou H, Shi H, Zhu F. Effects of Kinesio Taping on Neck Pain: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain Ther. 2024 Oct;13(5):1031-1046. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00635-0. Epub 2024 Jul 22. PubMed 39039345 ↗
  • Shewail F, Abdelmajeed S, Farouk M, Abdelmegeed M. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization versus myofascial release therapy in treatment of chronic neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jun 3;24(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06540-5. PubMed 37270471 ↗
  • Unuvar BS, Gercek H, Aytar A, Aytar A. Immediate Effects of Kinesio Tape and Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Pain and Proprioception in Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Chiropr Med. 2024 Sep;23(3):93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.006. Epub 2024 Oct 9. PubMed 39670200 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 3 months after the start.

Of 763 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neck Pain, half reached primary completion within 7 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15. This study's planned 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 772 studies reached it within 7 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 4, 2026
First posted
Nov 10, 2026
StartActual
Nov 4, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 16, 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 23, 2027
Last update
Nov 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07928804
Lead sponsor
Biruni University
Responsible party
alyildirim (Lecturer, PhD, Bahçeşehir University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 10, 2026
Start date
Nov 4, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 16, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 23, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion