An interventional study of Preprocedural ultrasound level identification and Landmark palpation level identification in Cesarean Section (MeSH: D002585), Anesthesia, Spinal (MeSH: D000775) and Hypotension (MeSH: D007022), sponsored by Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-27.
Sponsored by Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
This study compares two methods of identifying the correct intervertebral level before performing spinal anesthesia in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery.
In current practice, anesthesiologists locate the puncture site by feeling anatomical landmarks on the lower back (palpation of Tuffier's line). Ultrasound imaging offers an alternative in which the spine is scanned and the intended level is marked on the skin before the needle is inserted. It is not yet clear whether this additional step improves the success of the procedure or affects the mother's blood pressure and heart rate after the block.
Sixty pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. In one group, the puncture level will be determined by preprocedural ultrasound marking; in the other, by conventional landmark palpation. All other aspects of anesthetic care, including drug doses, will be identical in both groups.
The main outcome is the proportion of patients in whom the subarachnoid space is entered successfully at the first attempt with a single skin puncture, producing a block adequate for surgery. Additional outcomes include the number of needle passes, procedure duration, changes in maternal blood pressure and heart rate, vasopressor requirement, sensory block level, and complications such as headache or back pain within 24 hours after surgery.
Detailed Description - teknik açıklama, 32.000 karakter sınırı var. Brief Summary'de olmayan yöntem detayları buraya girer. Metin:
Background and Rationale
Spinal anesthesia is the technique of choice for elective cesarean delivery. The intended puncture site is conventionally identified by palpating Tuffier's line, an imaginary line joining the iliac crests, which is assumed to cross the L4 vertebral body or the L4-L5 interspace. Anatomical studies and imaging data have shown that this assumption is unreliable, particularly in pregnancy, where lumbar lordosis, soft tissue changes and altered pelvic tilt shift the landmark cephalad in a substantial proportion of women. Levels selected by palpation are therefore frequently one or more interspaces higher than intended.
Preprocedural ultrasound allows direct visualization of the sacrum and the lumbar interlaminar spaces, and the selected level can be marked on the skin before needle insertion. Whether the improvement in level accuracy translates into clinically meaningful differences in technical success and maternal hemodynamic response has not been established consistently in the obstetric population.
Study Design
This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, single-center trial conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Health Practice and Research Hospital.
Sixty ASA II-III women aged 18-45 years with singleton pregnancies scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia will be enrolled after written informed consent. Randomization will be performed using computer-generated block randomization with an allocation ratio of 1:1 (30 per group).
Interventions
Ultrasound group: Before the procedure, the lumbar spine will be scanned with a low-frequency curvilinear probe in the patient's sitting position. The sacrum will be identified in the paramedian sagittal oblique plane and interspaces counted cephalad. The target interspace will be marked on the skin, and the transverse midline plane will be used to confirm the midline. Spinal anesthesia will then be performed at the marked level.
Palpation group: The puncture level will be determined by palpation of Tuffier's line according to standard clinical practice, without ultrasound assistance.
In both groups, spinal anesthesia will be performed with the patient seated, using a midline approach and a pencil-point spinal needle. Hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl will be administered as a single dose, calculated according to the Harten table based on maternal height. A maximum of three puncture attempts is permitted; if unsuccessful, the case will be managed at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist and recorded as a failure of the allocated technique.
After completion of the block, and without any modification of clinical management, ultrasonography will be used in both groups purely for observational purposes to verify the intervertebral level at which the dural puncture was performed. This exploratory assessment allows quantification of level accuracy in both arms.
Measurements
Baseline maternal characteristics (age, height, weight, body mass index, gestational age, ASA class, parity) will be recorded. Procedure-related variables include the number of skin punctures, number of needle redirections, and procedure duration measured from needle-skin contact to visualization of cerebrospinal fluid.
Non-invasive blood pressure and heart rate will be recorded at baseline and every 3 minutes thereafter until delivery and subsequently until the end of surgery. Hypotension is defined as a mean arterial pressure below 65 mmHg or a decrease of 20% or more from the baseline value, and will be treated with intravenous ephedrine according to institutional protocol; total ephedrine dose will be recorded.
Sensory block level will be assessed bilaterally at 10 and 15 minutes after intrathecal injection. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting, paresthesia during needle insertion, bloody tap, incomplete block, requirement for supplemental analgesia, and conversion to general anesthesia will be documented. Patients will be assessed at 24 hours postoperatively for post-dural puncture headache, back pain, and satisfaction using a visual analogue scale.
Sample Size
The sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1, based on success rates reported by Li et al. (2019). For the comparison of proportions between two independent groups using Fisher's exact test, with a significance level of 0.05, power of 0.80, and an effect size of h = 0.79, a minimum of 30 participants per group is required, giving a total of 60 participants.
Statistical Analysis
Distribution of continuous variables will be assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test and visual methods. Normally distributed data will be presented as mean ± standard deviation and non-normally distributed data as median with interquartile range. Between-group comparisons will use the independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, and the chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Changes in hemodynamic parameters over time will be analyzed using repeated measures analysis (mixed model or repeated measures ANOVA, according to assumption checks). Statistical significance will be accepted at p \< 0.05. Analyses will primarily follow the intention-to-treat principle, and missing data will be reported.
885 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypotension; 195 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 66 is below the median of 87 across 590 interventional studies indexed under Hypotension.
Browse Hypotension studies →Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University is the lead sponsor of 198 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
ASA physical status
The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
BMI (body mass index)
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Preprocedural ultrasound scanning of the lumbar spine in the sitting position with a low-frequency curvilinear probe. The sacrum is identified in the paramedian sagittal oblique plane, interspaces are counted cephalad, and the target interspace is marked on the skin. Spinal anesthesia is then performed at the marked level.
Procedure: Preprocedural ultrasound level identification
Puncture level determined by palpation of Tuffier's line according to standard clinical practice, without ultrasound assistance. Spinal anesthesia is performed at the palpated level.
Procedure: Landmark palpation level identification
Ultrasound-assisted identification and skin marking of the target intervertebral level before spinal needle insertion. Spinal anesthesia is performed with the patient seated, using a midline approach and a pencil-point spinal needle, with hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl dosed according to the Harten table based on maternal height. A maximum of three puncture attempts is permitted.
Identification of the target intervertebral level by palpation of Tuffier's line. Spinal anesthesia is performed with the patient seated, using a midline approach and a pencil-point spinal needle, with hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl dosed according to the Harten table based on maternal height. A maximum of three puncture attempts is permitted.
First-attempt success rate
Successful dural puncture (CSF flow) with a single skin puncture at the selected level, with adequate surgical block and no need for supplemental analgesia or GA.
Time frame: During spinal procedure (up to 30 minutes)
Number of skin punctures and needle redirections
Number of skin punctures and number of needle redirections required to achieve dural puncture
Time frame: During the spinal procedure, up to 30 minutes
Procedure duration
Time from needle-skin contact to visualization of cerebrospinal fluid
Time frame: During the spinal procedure, up to 30 minutes
Incidence of hypotension
Mean arterial pressure below 65 mmHg or a decrease of 20% or more from baseline
Time frame: From intrathecal injection to end of surgery, up to 90 minutes
Total ephedrine dose
Time frame: From intrathecal injection to end of surgery, up to 90 minutes
Sensory block level
Assessed bilaterally by pinprick
Time frame: 10 and 15 minutes after intrathecal injection
Incidence of nausea and vomiting
Time frame: Intraoperative period, up to 90 minutes
Incidence of paresthesia during needle insertion
Time frame: During the spinal procedure, up to 30 minutes
Incidence of bloody tap
Time frame: During the spinal procedure, up to 30 minutes
Incidence of incomplete block requiring supplemental analgesia or conversion to general anesthesia
Time frame: Intraoperative period, up to 90 minutes
Incidence of post-dural puncture headache
Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery
Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be made publicly available. De-identified data supporting the published results may be provided by the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to approval by the institutional ethics committee and in accordance with national data protection legislation.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University →