ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07919548Pubic PainUpdated Nov 5, 2026

Effects of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training and a Modified Lumbopelvic Belt on Pain, Kinesiophobia, and Functional Status in Pregnant Women With Symphysis Pubis Pain

An interventional study of educational program and modified lumbopelvic belt in Symphysis Pubis Dysfunction, Pregnancy and Pregnancy Complication, sponsored by Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2026, registered Oct 2026).
  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Updated Nov 5, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of pelvic floor muscle training and a modified lumbopelvic belt on pain, kinesiophobia, and functional status in pregnant women with symphysis pubis pain.Although the power analysis yielded a relatively small minimum sample size, the target sample size was increased to account for potential loss to follow-up and missing data, as may occur in clinical research. Accordingly, the study was planned to include at least 30 pregnant women in the final analysis, and 40 pregnant women will be recruited to allow for potential attrition and withdrawal.

Read the detailed description

The reported prevalence of symphysis pubis dysfunction (SPD) during pregnancy varies across the literature. Data from the general population indicate that SPD affects approximately 3-8% of pregnant women. The incidence of symphysis pubis diastasis, a more severe clinical condition, has been reported across a wide range, from 1 in 300 to 1 in 30,000 pregnancies. However, recent studies report that the prevalence of SPD may exceed 30% among pregnant women with pelvic pain. This variability may be attributed to differences in diagnostic criteria, assessment methods, and sample characteristics.

02

Conditions studied

  • Symphysis Pubis Dysfunction
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Complication

Keywords

  • pregnancy
  • orthosis
  • Pelvic Floor Muscle Training
  • Symphysis Pubis Dysfunction
03

In context

Pelvic Girdle Pain

63 studies on the registry are indexed under Pelvic Girdle Pain; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 15 is below the median of 53 across 45 interventional studies indexed under Pelvic Girdle Pain.

Browse Pelvic Girdle Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University is the lead sponsor of 198 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Participants must:

  • Be pregnant and aged 18-40 years.
  • Have experienced pubic symphysis pain for at least 2 weeks, with pain more severe than any accompanying posterior pelvic pain.
  • Have positive findings on at least two of the following tests: pubic symphysis palpation, modified Trendelenburg test, and active straight leg raise test.
  • Provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Participants will be excluded for:

  • High-risk pregnancy or a medical to pelvic support belt use.
  • Serious systemic bone disease or a history of serious lumbar or pelvic trauma.
  • Current systemic use or active pelvic treatment/orthosis.
  • Neurological or cognitive conditions that prevent clinical testing or participation in the exercise program.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
15 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Symphysis Pubis Dysfunction group

    The first group will be designated as the intervention group and will receive comprehensive physiotherapy education in conjunction with the use of a modified lumbopelvic belt. As part of a structured education program, participants will receive pelvic floor muscle training and diaphragmatic breathing training, as well as guidance on protective and symptom-relieving modifications to activities of daily living and relevant ergonomic and behavioral recommendations.

    Other: modified lumbopelvic belt

  • Active comparator
    control group

    The second group will be designated as the comparison group and will receive an educational program that includes pelvic floor muscle training, diaphragmatic breathing training, modifications to activities of daily living, and protective strategies. No belt will be used in this group.

    Other: educational program

Interventions

  • Othereducational program

    educational program that includes pelvic floor muscle training, diaphragmatic breathing training, modifications to activities of daily living, and protective strategies

  • Othermodified lumbopelvic belt

    intervention group and will receive comprehensive physiotherapy education in conjunction with the use of a modified lumbopelvic belt.As part of a structured education program, participants will receive pelvic floor muscle training and diaphragmatic breathing training, as well as guidance on protective and symptom-relieving modifications to activities of daily living and relevant ergonomic and behavioral recommendations.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. VAS pain assesment

    Pain intensity will be assessed using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10. A score of 0 indicates no pain, whereas a score of 10 indicates unbearable pain. The VAS is widely used to assess pain intensity. Pain intensity will be classified as mild (1-4), moderate (5-7), or severe (8-10). Pain in the lower back, back, and pelvic girdle will be assessed separately during activity, at rest, and during sleep at night.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

  2. Pain threshold measurement (algometer)

    An algometer has long been used to measure soft-tissue pain associated with trigger points (11). An algometer will be used to assess the pressure pain threshold. The device has a blunt, non-sharp probe with a contact surface area of 1 cm². Pressure will be applied perpendicular to the midpoint of the muscle. Before the procedure, participants will be informed about the assessment and instructed to report when they first feel pain as the pressure is gradually increased. Measurements will be taken with the participant in a supine position. The pressure value at which the participant first experiences pain will be recorded as the pain threshold. Three measurements will be taken at 1-minute intervals, and the mean will be calculated (12). The assessment will be performed by applying pressure over the pubic symphysis.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

  3. Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ)

    The PGQ was developed by Stuge et al. (13). It is a condition-specific measure for assessing activity limitations and symptoms in individuals with pelvic girdle pain. It was developed for use in pregnant and postpartum individuals with pelvic girdle pain and can be used in both research and clinical practice. Its Turkish validity and reliability were established by Yelvar et al.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    The ODI is a questionnaire developed specifically for individuals with low back pain to assess the degree of functional limitation in daily life. Its Turkish version has been tested for validity and reliability. It consists of 10 items addressing pain, personal care, lifting, standing, walking, sitting, traveling, sexual activity, and social life. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, with 0 representing the best level of function and 5 the worst

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

  2. Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)

    The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia was used to assess the severity of kinesiophobia in pregnant women. The TSK is a 17-item scale developed to measure fear of movement or reinjury. The original scale was developed by Miller, Kori, and Todd in 1991.The scale uses a four-point Likert response format: strongly disagree = 1, disagree = 2, agree = 3, and strongly agree = 4. To calculate the total score, items 4, 8, 12, and 16 are reverse-scored, and all item scores are summed. The total score ranges from 17 to 68, with higher scores indicating greater kinesiophobia.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

  3. World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF)

    The WHOQOL-BREF is a multidimensional self-report measure developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) to assess quality of life from a biopsychosocial perspective. A shorter version of the original WHOQOL-100, it was published in 1998. The WHOQOL-BREF consists of 26 items covering four domains of quality of life: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. Each item uses a five-point Likert scale to assess the respondent's perception of their quality of life over the previous two weeks. Scores are calculated separately for each domain and converted to a scale ranging from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better quality of life. The WHOQOL-BREF enables comprehensive assessment of quality of life in both the general population and specific patient groups. It is widely used as a valid and reliable measure in health, psychology, rehabilitation, and public health research.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi hastanesi
    Kahramanmaraş, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07919548
Responsible party
Asiya Uzun (Assistant Proffesor, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 20, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Asiya Uzun, Asisstant Proffesor
Contact
asiyauzun@ksu.edu.tr
+90(344) 300-2621

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion