ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07804108MOSAIC-EPIUpdated Sep 4, 2026

Effect of Mosaic Art on Episiotomy Repair Skills, Anxiety, and Learning Attitudes in Midwifery Students

An interventional study of Mosaic Art Practice and Standard Episiotomy Repair Training in Education, Nursing and Midwifery Education, sponsored by Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-04.

Primary conditionAnxiety Disorders(the registry's first term)UnverifiedIs this wrong?The registry often attaches Anxiety Disorders to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it. No better condition is named, so the registry's term is kept.

Sponsored by Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
106
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of mosaic art in midwifery education on episiotomy repair performance, self-efficacy, and anxiety: a randomized controlled trial. Method/Data Collection Techniques: The study was planned in a two-parallel-group randomized controlled experimental design including pre-test and post-test measurements. The study will be conducted with third-year students studying in the Midwifery Department of the Faculty of Health Sciences at Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University during the fall semester of the 2026-2027 academic year. The sample size was calculated using the G*Power 3.1.9.7 program, and based on Cohen's effect size d=0.55, α=0.05, and 80% power, a total of 106 students were planned to be included in the study, with 53 students in each group. Participants will be assigned to intervention and control groups using a simple randomization method. The intervention group will receive structured mosaic art training for six weeks, with two sessions per week, while the control group will not receive any art-based application during this period. Following the intervention, both groups will receive theoretical and practical training in standard episiotomy repair. Data will be collected using the Participant Information Form, State Anxiety Scale (STAI-TX I), Episiotomy Self-Efficacy Scale, Attitudes Towards Learning Scale, and Episiotomy Repair Skill Assessment Form. Appropriate descriptive statistics and parametric or non-parametric comparison tests will be used in the analysis of the data, with a statistical significance level of p\<0.05. Expected Results: This research is expected to provide scientific evidence regarding the use of art-based teaching methods in midwifery education by revealing the effect of mosaic art application on midwifery students' episiotomy repair skills, self-efficacy, attitudes towards learning, and state anxiety levels. It is anticipated that the research results will contribute to the development of effective teaching strategies in psychomotor skills training and the strengthening of midwifery education programs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Education
  • Nursing
  • Midwifery Education
  • Midwifery

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Mosaic Art
  • Midwifery Students
  • Episiotomy Repair
  • Anxiety
  • imulation-Based Education
03

In context

Anxiety Disorders Unverified

7,201 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,682 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 106 is above the median of 80 across 6,057 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.

Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University is the lead sponsor of 198 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.

Compared within Anxiety Disorders, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being enrolled as a third-year student in the Department of Midwifery, Faculty of -Health Sciences, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, during the Fall -semester of the 2026-2027 academic year.
  • Volunteering to participate in the study.
  • Providing written .
  • Having no previous clinical practice experience in episiotomy repair.
  • Having no previous participation in a structured training program involving mosaic art or similar activities requiring fine motor skills.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having previous clinical practice experience in episiotomy repair.
  • Having previously participated in a structured mosaic art training program or a similar structured program requiring fine motor skills.
  • Having a condition that prevents participation in the mosaic art activities or episiotomy repair simulation practice.
  • Declining or withdrawing consent to participate in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
106 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mosaic Art Group

    Participants in this group will receive the planned mosaic art intervention before episiotomy repair training. The mosaic art program will be conducted for 6 weeks, with two 45-minute sessions per week. Following the intervention, participants will receive the standard theoretical and practical episiotomy repair training.

    Behavioral: Mosaic Art Practice · Behavioral: Standard Episiotomy Repair Training

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Participants in the control group will not receive the mosaic art intervention. They will receive the same standard theoretical and practical episiotomy repair training as the intervention group

    Behavioral: Standard Episiotomy Repair Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralMosaic Art Practice

    Participants assigned to the intervention group will participate in a structured mosaic art program for six weeks before episiotomy repair training. The program will consist of two 45-minute sessions per week (12 sessions in total). Participants will engage in mosaic art activities requiring coordinated hand and finger movements and fine motor control. After completion of the mosaic art program, participants will receive the same theoretical and practical episiotomy repair training provided to the control group.

  • BehavioralStandard Episiotomy Repair Training

    Participants will receive standardized theoretical and practical episiotomy repair training. The training will include 2 hours of theoretical instruction and 6 hours of practical training using a silicone episiotomy repair model. The same standardized episiotomy repair training will be provided to participants in both study groups.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Episiotomy Self-Efficacy

    Episiotomy self-efficacy will be assessed using the Episiotomy Self-Efficacy Scale developed by Yolcu et al. (2025). The scale consists of 17 items across four subdimensions: cognitive (5 items), affective (5 items), motivation (3 items), and psychomotor (4 items). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). There are no reverse-scored items. The total score ranges from 17 to 85, with higher scores indicating greater episiotomy self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Immediately before and immediately after the episiotomy repair training

  2. Episiotomy Repair Skill Performance

    Episiotomy repair skill performance will be assessed using the Episiotomy Repair Skill Assessment Form developed by the researchers based on the relevant literature and expert review. The form consists of 20 procedural steps assessing the performance of

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. State Anxiety (STAI Form TX-I)

    State anxiety will be assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, State Anxiety Form (STAI Form TX-I). The scale consists of 20 items rated on a 4-point scale. Total scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating higher levels of state anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention

  2. Attitudes Toward Learning

    Attitudes toward learning will be assessed using the Attitudes Toward Learning Scale developed by Kara (2010). The scale consists of 40 items and four subdimensions: Nature of Learning (7 items), Anxiety About Learning (13 items), Expectations About Learning (9 items), and Openness to Learning (11 items). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). Eleven negatively worded items are reverse scored. Higher scores indicate more positive attitudes toward learning.

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Dec 2026, 3 months later.

Of 3,836 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Anxiety Disorders, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 28. This study's planned 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,938 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 28.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 27, 2026
First posted
Sep 4, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 28, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2026
Last update
Sep 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07804108
Responsible party
Mine Gokduman Keles (Assistant Professor, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 4, 2026
Start date
Sep 28, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 4, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion