ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07777796Updated Sep 16, 2026

Inhaled vs Intranasal Corticosteroids for Chronic Cough in Upper Airway Cough Syndrome

An interventional study of Budesonide (400μg/d) and Mometasone Furoate 50mcg Nasal Spray in Chronic Cough (CC), Upper Airway Cough Syndrome and Chronic Rhinitis, sponsored by Silesian University of Medicine. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-16.

Sponsored by Silesian University of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2022, registered Aug 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic cough - a cough lasting eight weeks or longer - is one of the most common reasons people see a lung specialist. It can disturb sleep, make conversation difficult, and reduce quality of life.

In many people, chronic cough occurs together with nose and sinus symptoms such as a blocked or runny nose, mucus dripping down the back of the throat, facial pain, or a reduced sense of smell. This combination is often called upper airway cough syndrome. Doctors commonly treat it with a steroid medicine given either as an inhaler breathed into the lungs or as a spray into the nose. Both are approved, widely used medicines, and treatment guidelines mention both. However, no study has directly compared the two to see whether one relieves cough better than the other, so doctors have little evidence to guide the choice.

This study compares the two treatments directly in adults who have chronic cough together with nose or sinus symptoms. Participants are assigned by chance, like flipping a coin, to one of two groups:

an inhaled steroid (budesonide), breathed in twice a day, or a steroid nasal spray (mometasone furoate), sprayed into each nostril twice a day.

Participants use their assigned treatment for 4 weeks and then return to the clinic. At each visit they rate how severe their cough is by marking a line on a 100-millimetre scale, and they fill in a questionnaire about how the cough affects their daily life.

Participants whose cough has cleared up after 4 weeks finish the study at that point. Those whose cough has not cleared up continue for another 4 weeks: people in the inhaler group carry on with the same inhaler, while people in the nasal spray group continue the spray and also start the inhaler. Everyone who continues returns for a final visit at 8 weeks.

The main question is whether the inhaled steroid reduces cough severity more than the nasal spray after 4 weeks of treatment. The study also looks at cough-related quality of life, and at what happens after treatment is adjusted at 4 weeks.

The study takes place at a single outpatient lung clinic in Katowice, Poland. Both medicines are given at their usual approved doses, and participants are otherwise cared for as in routine practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Cough (CC)
  • Upper Airway Cough Syndrome
  • Chronic Rhinitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • chronic cough
  • Upper airway cough syndrome
  • inhaled corticosteroids
  • intranasal corticosteroids
03

In context

Chronic Cough

142 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Cough; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 56 is close to the median of 60 across 104 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Cough.

Browse Chronic Cough studies →

Lead sponsor

Silesian University of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with chronic cough and signs of chronic upper airway disease

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Symptoms of an acute respiratory tract infection within 4 weeks prior to enrolment.
  • Diagnosis of any active chronic respiratory disease.
  • Diagnosis of other cause of chronic cough.
  • Use of (oral, intranasal, inhaled, intravenous) within 3 months prior to enrolment.
  • Chronic use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors within 1 month prior to enrolment.
  • Smoking of tobacco products within 6 months prior to enrolment
  • Pregnancy.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Inhaled corticosteroids group

    Participants receive inhaled budesonide 400 µg per dose, two doses twice daily (800 µg per administration; 1600 µg total daily), for 4 weeks. Cough severity is assessed at the 4-week visit. Participants reaching a Visual Analog Scale score of 10 mm or lower are classified as having achieved cough resolution and complete the study at this point. Participants not reaching this threshold continue inhaled budesonide unchanged at the same dose for a further 4 weeks, to a total of 8 weeks, with a final assessment at week 8.

    Drug: Budesonide (400μg/d)

  • Experimental
    Intranasal(+inhaled) corticosteroids group

    Participants receive intranasal mometasone furoate 50 µg per dose, two doses into each nostril twice daily (100 µg per nostril per administration; 400 µg total daily), for 4 weeks. Cough severity is assessed at the 4-week visit. Participants reaching a Visual Analog Scale score of 10 mm or lower are classified as having achieved cough resolution and complete the study at this point. Participants not reaching this threshold continue intranasal mometasone furoate at the same dose with inhaled budesonide 400 µg per dose, two doses twice daily, added for a further 4 weeks, to a total of 8 weeks, with a final assessment at week 8. Beyond week 4 this arm therefore receives combined intranasal and inhaled corticosteroid therapy rather than intranasal monotherapy.

    Drug: Budesonide (400μg/d) · Drug: Mometasone Furoate 50mcg Nasal Spray

Interventions

  • DrugBudesonide (400μg/d)

    Drug page: Budesonide

    Inhaled budesonide 400 µg per dose, two doses twice daily (800 µg per administration; 1600 µg total daily), administered by inhaler. In the inhaled corticosteroid arm it is given from randomization as monotherapy for 4 weeks, and continued unchanged at the same dose for a further 4 weeks in participants who have not achieved cough resolution. In the intranasal corticosteroid arm it is added to ongoing intranasal mometasone furoate at week 4 in participants who have not achieved cough resolution, and given for 4 weeks. Maximum total duration of exposure is 8 weeks.

  • Intranasal mometasone furoate 50 µg per dose, two doses into each nostril twice daily (100 µg per nostril per administration; 400 µg total daily), administered by nasal spray. Given from randomization for 4 weeks. Participants who have not achieved cough resolution at 4 weeks continue it at the same dose for a further 4 weeks with inhaled budesonide added. Maximum total duration of exposure is 8 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in cough severity measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 4 weeks

    Cough severity is self-rated by the participant on a 100-mm visual analog scale ranging from 0 mm ("no cough") to 100 mm ("worst cough"); higher scores indicate more severe cough. The 4-week score is compared between arms by analysis of covariance with the baseline VAS score as covariate, and reported as an adjusted between-group difference with a 95% confidence interval.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in cough severity measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 8 weeks

    Cough severity self-rated on the 100-mm VAS (0 mm = no cough, 100 mm = worst cough; higher scores indicate more severe cough), analysed by the same ANCOVA model as the primary outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 8

  2. Change from baseline in cough-related quality of life measured by Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) total score

    The LCQ is a 19-item self-completed questionnaire assessing the impact of cough over the previous 2 weeks across three domains (physical, psychological, social). Each item is scored 1 to 7; the total score is the sum of the three domain means and ranges from 3 to 21, with higher scores indicating better cough-related quality of life. An improvement of 1.3 points is the published minimal important difference.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

  3. Proportion of participants achieving therapeutic success

    Therapeutic success is defined as a reduction from baseline of 30 mm or more on the 100-mm cough severity VAS, corresponding to the published minimal clinically important difference. Compared between arms with Fisher's exact test and reported as a risk difference with a 95% confidence interval. Exploratory.

    Time frame: 4 weeks and 8 weeks

  4. Proportion of participants achieving cough resolution

    Cough resolution is defined as a cough severity VAS score of 10 mm or lower. Participants meeting this threshold at 4 weeks complete the study at that visit. Compared between arms with Fisher's exact test and reported as a risk difference with a 95% confidence interval. Exploratory.

    Time frame: 4 weeks and 8 weeks

  5. Change from baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) domain scores

    LCQ physical (8 items), psychological (7 items) and social (4 items) domain scores, each expressed as the mean of its constituent items on a 1 to 7 scale, with higher scores indicating better cough-related quality of life. Published minimal important differences are 0.8 (physical), 0.9 (psychological) and 0.8 (social).

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Centre of the Medical University of Silesia
    Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship 40-635, Poland
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2022 to primary completion in Jul 2026, 48 months.

Of 20 interventional studies with no phase under Chronic Cough, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 48. This study's 48 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 17, 2026
First posted
Aug 20, 2026
StartActual
Jul 1, 2022
Primary completionActual
Jul 30, 2026
CompletionActual
Jul 30, 2026
Last update
Sep 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07777796
Lead sponsor
Silesian University of Medicine
Responsible party
Maciej Ogonowski (Mr, Silesian University of Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 20, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2026
Completion
Jul 30, 2026
Last update
Sep 16, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Mometasone Furoate

Start the discussion