ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07775001Updated Aug 19, 2026

Dopamine Versus Epinephrine for Pediatric Fluid-Refractory Hypotensive Septic Shock

An interventional study of Epinephrine and dopamine in Septic Shock, sponsored by Nishtar Medical University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Sponsored by Nishtar Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2026, registered Aug 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized clinical trial was conducted to compare dopamine with epinephrine as the first vasoactive treatment in children aged 2 to 12 years with fluid-refractory hypotensive septic shock. Children who remained hypotensive with signs of poor tissue perfusion after receiving standardized intravenous fluid resuscitation were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either dopamine or epinephrine. The study was designed to determine whether epinephrine resulted in a higher rate of shock reversal within the first 60 minutes after starting vasoactive treatment compared with dopamine. Shock reversal was assessed using improvement in age-appropriate blood pressure, capillary refill, peripheral circulation, mental status, and urine output.

A total of 66 children were included, with 33 participants assigned to each treatment group. Epinephrine was administered at doses ranging from 0.1 to 0.3 microgram/kg/minute, while dopamine was administered at doses ranging from 10 to 20 microgram/kg/minute according to a predefined escalation schedule. In addition to shock reversal within one hour, the study compared sustained hemodynamic stability, the requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation within 24 hours, and in-hospital mortality between the two treatment groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Septic Shock

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pediatric Septic Shock
  • Fluid-Refractory Septic Shock;
  • Hypotensive Septic Shock
  • Pediatric Sepsis
  • Dopamine
  • Epinephrine
03

In context

Shock, Septic

1,078 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Septic; 232 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 66 is below the median of 79 across 636 interventional studies indexed under Shock, Septic.

Browse Shock, Septic studies →

Lead sponsor

Nishtar Medical University is the lead sponsor of 29 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 2 to 12 years, of either sex, presenting to the Pediatric Emergency Department or Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
  • Suspected or proven infection, supported by a documented clinical focus of infection or microbiological evidence.
  • Fluid- hypotensive septic shock .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Shock not meeting the operational definition of fluid- hypotensive septic shock after standardized fluid resuscitation.
  • Receipt of any vasoactive infusion, including dopamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, dobutamine, or equivalent, before eligibility confirmation and randomization.
  • Known cyanotic congenital heart disease, significant structural heart disease with hemodynamic compromise, or documented cardiomyopathy.
  • Primary arrhythmic instability requiring antiarrhythmic therapy at presentation.
  • Anaphylaxis, acute hemorrhage, major trauma, or obstructive shock, such as tension pneumothorax or cardiac tamponade, as the primary cause of hypotension.
  • Clinical indication for an alternative initial vasoactive strategy mandated by the treating team at screening, including predominant warm vasodilatory shock requiring norepinephrine as therapy.
  • Documented limitation of care orders, including do-not-resuscitate status, or anticipated withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy at presentation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Epinephrine Group

    Participants received epinephrine as the first-line vasoactive agent for fluid-refractory hypotensive septic shock. Epinephrine was initiated at 0.1 microgram/kg/minute and increased according to the predefined protocol if shock reversal was not achieved. All participants also received standard sepsis management according to institutional practice.

    Drug: Epinephrine

  • Active comparator
    Dopamine Group

    Participants received dopamine as the first-line vasoactive agent for fluid-refractory hypotensive septic shock. Dopamine was initiated at 10 microgram/kg/minute and increased according to the predefined protocol if shock reversal was not achieved. All participants also received standard sepsis management according to institutional practice.

    Drug: dopamine

Interventions

  • Epinephrine infusion was initiated at 0.1 microgram/kg/minute through peripheral, intraosseous, or central vascular access. If shock reversal criteria were not achieved, the dose was increased to 0.2 microgram/kg/minute at 15 minutes and to 0.3 microgram/kg/minute at 30 minutes. The maximum study dose during the first-hour assessment period was 0.3 microgram/kg/minute.

  • Dopamine infusion was initiated at 10 microgram/kg/minute through peripheral, intraosseous, or central vascular access. If shock reversal criteria were not achieved, the dose was increased to 15 microgram/kg/minute at 15 minutes and to 20 microgram/kg/minute at 30 minutes. The maximum study dose during the first-hour assessment period was 20 microgram/kg/minute.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Shock Reversal Within 60 Minutes

    Shock reversal was defined as achievement of all prespecified criteria simultaneously: systolic blood pressure at or above the age-specific threshold, capillary refill time ≤2 seconds, warm extremities with palpable peripheral pulses, mental status improved to Alert on the AVPU scale, and urine output ≥1 mL/kg/hour during the first hour after initiation of the randomized vasoactive infusion. The outcome was recorded as achieved or not achieved.

    Time frame: 60 minutes after initiation of the randomized vasoactive infusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sustained Hemodynamic Stability Following Shock Reversal

    Sustained hemodynamic stability was defined as continuous maintenance of the shock reversal criteria for at least 120 minutes after the first documented shock reversal, without addition of a second vasoactive infusion, increase in the vasoactive dose above the dose at which shock reversal was achieved, or recurrence of hypotension below the age-specific systolic blood pressure threshold. The outcome was recorded as achieved or not achieved.

    Time frame: 120 minutes after the first documented shock reversal

  2. Requirement for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Within 24 Hours

    Requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation was defined as endotracheal intubation followed by initiation of positive-pressure mechanical ventilation during the prespecified observation period. The outcome was recorded as occurred or not occurred.

    Time frame: within 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 6 months after the start.

Of 164 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Shock, Septic, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 172 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 15, 2026
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
StartActual
Feb 18, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 17, 2026
CompletionEst.
Sep 17, 2026
Last update
Aug 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07775001
Lead sponsor
Nishtar Medical University
Responsible party
Shazia Parveen (Principal Investigator, Nishtar Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
Start date
Feb 18, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 17, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 17, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Study contacts

Maryam Sana
principal investigator · Nishtar Hospital Multan

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Epinephrine

Start the discussion