ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07774832CAM-PPROMUpdated Aug 19, 2026

Novel Use of Central Venous Pressure (CVP) Set With McDonald Cerclage Technique for Amnioinfusion in Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes Improves Amniotic Fluid Index and Neonatal Outcomes

An interventional study of CVP-Set Amnioinfusion With McDonald Cerclage and Conventional transabdominal amnioinfusion in PROM, Preterm (Pregnancy), sponsored by Herlambang Herlambang. Completed at 1 site in Indonesia. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Sponsored by Herlambang Herlambang · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 years 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2021, registered Aug 2026).

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Non-randomized
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This prospective, two-arm, non-randomized comparative interventional study evaluated the effectiveness of amnioinfusion using a central venous pressure (CVP) set compared with conventional transabdominal amnioinfusion in pregnant women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) complicated by severe oligohydramnios.

A total of 40 pregnant women with singleton pregnancies, PPROM at 24-26 weeks of gestation, and an amniotic fluid index (AFI) of less than 2 cm were enrolled. Participants were allocated to either the CVP-set amnioinfusion group or the conventional transabdominal amnioinfusion group according to procedural feasibility and operator availability. Both groups underwent amnioinfusion followed by cervical cerclage.

In the conventional group, amnioinfusion was performed transabdominally under ultrasound guidance. In the intervention group, a CVP set was used to allow controlled and sustained intra-amniotic fluid administration through a single access site. Maternal and fetal conditions were monitored during and after the procedure, and participants were followed with repeated clinical and ultrasonographic assessments.

The primary outcome was the change in AFI following the intervention. Secondary outcomes included gestational age at delivery, neonatal birth weight, Apgar scores, maternal length of hospital stay, and procedural outcomes. The study aimed to determine whether CVP-set amnioinfusion could provide better restoration and maintenance of amniotic fluid volume and improve pregnancy and neonatal outcomes compared with conventional transabdominal amnioinfusion.

Read the detailed description

This study was conducted to evaluate a novel approach to amnioinfusion in pregnant women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) complicated by severe oligohydramnios. The intervention used a central venous pressure (CVP) set to provide controlled and sustained transabdominal amnioinfusion through a single access site, with the aim of restoring and maintaining amniotic fluid volume while reducing the need for repeated puncture.

The study used a prospective, two-arm, non-randomized comparative interventional design. A total of 40 pregnant women with singleton pregnancies, PPROM between 24 and 26 weeks of gestation, and an amniotic fluid index (AFI) of less than 2 cm were enrolled. Participants were allocated to either the CVP-set amnioinfusion group or the conventional transabdominal amnioinfusion group according to procedural feasibility and operator availability. Both groups underwent amnioinfusion followed by cervical cerclage.

In the conventional amnioinfusion group, the procedure was performed transabdominally under sterile conditions and ultrasound guidance. In the intervention group, a CVP set was inserted into the intra-amniotic cavity to permit controlled and sustained infusion. Maternal condition, uterine activity, fetal well-being, and amniotic fluid volume were monitored during and after the procedure. Participants were subsequently followed with serial clinical and ultrasonographic assessments.

The primary outcome was the increase in AFI following the intervention. Secondary outcomes included gestational age at delivery, neonatal birth weight, Apgar scores, maternal length of hospital stay, procedural feasibility, maternal tolerance, and complications. The study was designed to determine whether CVP-set amnioinfusion could improve restoration and maintenance of amniotic fluid volume and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes compared with conventional transabdominal amnioinfusion.

02

Conditions studied

  • PROM, Preterm (Pregnancy)
03

In context

Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture

100 studies on the registry are indexed under Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 150 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture.

Browse Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Herlambang Herlambang as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Singleton pregnancy.
  • Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) at 24-26 weeks of gestation.
  • Oligohydramnios with an amniotic fluid index (AFI) \<2 cm.
  • Provided to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of uterine contractions.
  • Clinical or laboratory signs of intrauterine infection.
  • Pregnancy complications requiring immediate termination of pregnancy, including hypertension, preeclampsia, HELLP syndrome, or other significant maternal conditions.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CVP-Set Amnioinfusion

    Participants received transabdominal amnioinfusion using a central venous pressure (CVP) set under ultrasound guidance. The CVP set was maintained to allow controlled and sustained intra-amniotic fluid administration through a single access site. Cervical cerclage was performed following the amnioinfusion procedure.

    Procedure: CVP-Set Amnioinfusion With McDonald Cerclage

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Transabdominal Amnioinfusion

    Participants received conventional transabdominal amnioinfusion under sterile conditions and ultrasound guidance, followed by cervical cerclage. This arm served as the active comparator for evaluating the effectiveness of CVP-set amnioinfusion.

    Procedure: Conventional transabdominal amnioinfusion

Interventions

  • ProcedureCVP-Set Amnioinfusion With McDonald Cerclage

    CVP-Set Amnioinfusion With McDonald Cerclage

  • ProcedureConventional transabdominal amnioinfusion

    Conventional transabdominal amnioinfusion was performed under sterile conditions and ultrasound guidance

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Amniotic Fluid Index (AFI)

    Change in amniotic fluid index (AFI), measured in centimeters by ultrasonography, from baseline before amnioinfusion to the post-intervention assessment. The change in AFI was compared between the CVP-set amnioinfusion and conventional transabdominal amnioinfusion groups.

    Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours after amnioinfusion

  2. maternal length of hospital stay.

    Duration of maternal hospitalization associated with the amnioinfusion procedure, measured in days.

    Time frame: From the amnioinfusion procedure until hospital discharge, up to 5 days

  3. Gestational Age at Delivery

    Gestational age at the time of delivery, measured in weeks of gestation.

    Time frame: At delivery, up to approximately 34 weeks of gestation

  4. Intrauterine fetal weight

    Estimated intrauterine fetal weight before the amnioinfusion procedure, measured in grams.

    Time frame: Before the amnioinfusion procedure

  5. Neonatal birth at weight

    Neonatal birth weight measured immediately after delivery, expressed in grams.

    Time frame: At birth

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Fkik Unja Rsud Mattaher Jambi
    Jambi City, Jambi 36361, Indonesia
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2021 to primary completion in Nov 2024, 46 months.

Of 23 interventional studies with no phase under Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 62. This study's 46 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 12, 2026
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
StartActual
Jan 10, 2021
Primary completionActual
Nov 10, 2024
CompletionActual
Nov 10, 2024
Last update
Aug 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07774832
Lead sponsor
Herlambang Herlambang
Responsible party
Herlambang Herlambang (Assoc. Prof. Dr., Universitas Jambi) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 19, 2026
Start date
Jan 10, 2021
Primary completion
Nov 10, 2024
Completion
Nov 10, 2024
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion