ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07770139Updated Aug 18, 2026

Telerehabilitation-Based Yoga Versus Yoga-Pranayama in University Students

An interventional study of Yoga-Pranayama and Exercise in Muscle Aches, Stress and Neck Disorders, sponsored by Istanbul Gelisim University. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-18.

Sponsored by Istanbul Gelisim University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
55
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will compare two online exercise programs for university students: yoga alone and yoga combined with breathing exercises called pranayama. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups and will attend online sessions three times a week for four weeks.

The study will examine whether these programs reduce anxiety and improve the mechanical properties of the neck muscles. Muscle tone, stiffness, and elasticity will be measured using the MyotonPRO device. Anxiety and neck-related problems will also be assessed before and after the program.

The study will also investigate whether adding pranayama breathing exercises provides greater benefits than yoga alone.

Read the detailed description

The university years are a period characterized by increased stress and anxiety due to academic pressure, concerns about the future, and social transitions. These psychological burdens may negatively affect physical health by altering muscle tone and elasticity through the autonomic nervous system. While yoga improves physical flexibility and body awareness, pranayama (breath control) promotes relaxation by activating the parasympathetic nervous system. Although the individual benefits of these interventions are well established, the effects of their combination on objective physiological parameters, such as muscle elasticity, remain insufficiently investigated. Furthermore, for a population highly integrated with technology, telerehabilitation offers a critical alternative by improving accessibility and cost-effectiveness. However, evidence-based studies comparing telerehabilitation-delivered yoga interventions with combined yoga-pranayama programs are limited. Therefore, this study aims to compare the effects of telerehabilitation-based yoga and combined yoga-pranayama interventions on stress, anxiety, and muscle elastic properties in university students. The findings are expected to contribute to the physiotherapy literature by providing evidence for holistic and digitally delivered intervention models.

Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups using a simple randomization method: a yoga group and a yoga-pranayama group. The intervention will last four weeks, with sessions conducted three times per week. The yoga group will participate in 30-minute exercise sessions, whereas the yoga-pranayama group will receive 40-minute sessions consisting of 30 minutes of yoga followed by 10 minutes of pranayama.

The yoga-pranayama intervention will include yoga exercises targeting mobility and flexibility in combination with diaphragmatic breathing and alternate nostril breathing techniques. The yoga group will perform diaphragmatic breathing, thoracic expansion exercises, and postural correction exercises, including scapular retraction, chin tuck, and core activation.

Muscle mechanical properties will be assessed using a Myoton device. Stress and anxiety levels will be evaluated using the State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-I), and neck-related functional status will be assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). All outcome measures will be collected before and after the intervention.

The data will be analyzed using appropriate statistical methods to determine within-group and between-group differences. This study is expected to clarify the effects of telerehabilitation-based yoga interventions on the psychological and physical health of university students and to determine the additional benefits of incorporating pranayama techniques.

Objective:

The primary objective of this study is to comparatively evaluate the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation-based yoga program and a conventional yoga-pranayama combination on psychometric outcomes (stress and anxiety) and biomechanical outcomes (muscle elasticity and mechanical properties) in university students.

Methods This study is designed as a randomized controlled trial to investigate the effects of telerehabilitation-based yoga and yoga-pranayama interventions in university students. The study population will consist of healthy young adults enrolled at a university. The sample will include volunteers who meet the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the required sample size will be determined by an a priori power analysis (α = 0.05, power = 0.80). Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two groups using a simple randomization method.

Muscle mechanical properties will be assessed using the MyotonPRO device. Anxiety levels will be evaluated using the State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-I), and neck-related functional status will be assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI).

Muscle mechanical properties will be measured objectively and non-invasively using the MyotonPRO device. Measurements will be performed on the upper trapezius and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles in the cervical region.

During the assessments, participants will be positioned comfortably in either a supine or seated position according to a standardized protocol. Measurement sites will be identified using anatomical landmarks, and all measurements will be obtained from the same locations for each participant. For the upper trapezius muscle, the midpoint between the acromion and the spinous process of the C7 vertebra will be used as the reference point. For the sternocleidomastoid muscle, measurements will be taken from the midpoint of the muscle belly where it is most prominent.

At each measurement site, the probe of the MyotonPRO device will be positioned perpendicular to the skin surface, and a brief mechanical impulse will be applied to record the viscoelastic properties of the muscle. Participants will be instructed to remain completely relaxed during the measurements. Multiple measurements will be obtained at each site, and the average value will be used for analysis.

The recorded muscle mechanical parameters will include muscle tone (Hz), stiffness (N/m), and elasticity (logarithmic decrement). To ensure measurement reliability, all assessments will be performed by the same trained researcher under standardized environmental conditions.

All outcome assessments will be conducted by a researcher who has received standardized training in the measurement procedures. The telerehabilitation interventions will be delivered through an online platform, whereas all outcome assessments will be performed face-to-face.

The interventions will be administered three times per week for four weeks. Participants in the yoga group will complete a 30-minute exercise session, whereas those in the yoga-pranayama group will receive a 40-minute intervention consisting of 30 minutes of yoga followed by 10 minutes of pranayama.

Statistical analyses will be performed using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests depending on data distribution. Paired statistical tests will be used for within-group comparisons, while independent-sample tests will be used for between-group comparisons. Statistical significance will be set at p \< 0.05.

To minimize bias, participants will be randomly allocated to intervention groups, the outcome assessor will be blinded to group allocation, and all measurement procedures will be standardized. In addition, participants will be monitored regularly throughout the study to minimize missing data.

Sample Size The sample size was calculated using G*Power version 3.1 based on an a priori power analysis. A repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with a group × time interaction was used for the calculation. Based on previous studies evaluating cervical muscle viscoelastic properties using the MyotonPRO device, a moderate effect size (f = 0.30) was assumed. The significance level was set at α = 0.05, with a statistical power of 1 - β = 0.95. The analysis indicated that a minimum sample size of 44 participants was required. Considering a potential 20% dropout rate, a total of 52-56 participants will be recruited.

Inclusion Criteria

  • University students aged 18-30 years
  • Sedentary or lightly physically active individuals
  • Ability to participate in online intervention sessions
  • Willingness to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosed psychiatric disorders
  • Current use of psychotropic medications
  • Acute musculoskeletal injury
  • Advanced experience in yoga or meditation

Literature Summary:

The literature confirms that the university years represent one of the most stressful periods in an individual's life. Academic demands and social adaptation continuously stimulate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, resulting in sustained cortisol secretion. These endocrine changes trigger a protective increase in musculoskeletal tension, leading to increased muscle stiffness, reduced biomechanical elasticity, and the development of myofascial pain. Yoga and pranayama are well-established somatic interventions that regulate autonomic nervous system function. Evidence suggests that yoga enhances parasympathetic activity through vagal stimulation, while pranayama (breathing control) techniques reduce anxiety symptoms by modulating amygdala activity. At the physiological level, yoga improves tissue hydration and muscle elasticity by optimizing collagen fiber alignment through static stretching and isometric contractions.

Following the COVID-19 pandemic, digitalization in healthcare has accelerated, making telerehabilitation an important alternative because of its accessibility and cost-effectiveness. Previous studies have demonstrated that remotely supervised exercise programs can achieve clinical outcomes comparable to those of face-to-face interventions. For university students, who generally possess a high level of digital literacy, telerehabilitation represents a promising approach for improving adherence to therapeutic interventions. Although existing studies have primarily focused on the psychological benefits of yoga, its effects on objective biomechanical parameters, such as muscle elasticity, have received comparatively little attention. Furthermore, evidence comparing telerehabilitation-based yoga with combined yoga-pranayama protocols remains limited. Therefore, the present study aims to address this gap by investigating the effectiveness of digital mind-body interventions on both psychological and biomechanical outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Muscle Aches
  • Stress
  • Neck Disorders
  • Students

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • students
  • muscle pain
  • stress
  • breathing
  • neck disorders
03

In context

Myalgia

256 studies on the registry are indexed under Myalgia; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 55 is above the median of 44 across 216 interventional studies indexed under Myalgia.

Browse Myalgia studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul Gelisim University is the lead sponsor of 64 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • University students aged 18-30 years
  • Sedentary or lightly physically active individuals
  • Ability to participate in online intervention sessions
  • Willingness to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed psychiatric disorders
  • Current use of psychotropic medications
  • Acute musculoskeletal injury
  • Advanced experience in yoga or meditation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
55 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Yoga

    The interventions will be administered three times per week for four weeks. Participants in the yoga group will complete a 30-minute exercise session.

    Other: Exercise

  • Experimental
    Yoga-Pranayama

    Those in the yoga-pranayama group will receive a 40-minute intervention consisting of 30 minutes of yoga followed by 10 minutes of pranayama.

    Other: Yoga-Pranayama

Interventions

  • OtherYoga-Pranayama

    The interventions will be administered three times per week for four weeks. Participants in the yoga group will complete a 30-minute exercise session, whereas those in the yoga-pranayama group will receive a 40-minute intervention consisting of 30 minutes of yoga followed by 10 minutes of pranayama.

    Also known as: Exercise, Breathing Exercise

  • OtherExercise

    The interventions will be administered three times per week for four weeks. Participants in the yoga group will complete a 30-minute exercise session.

    Also known as: Yoga

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Muscle Tone (Hz)

    Muscle mechanical properties will be measured objectively and non-invasively using the MyotonPRO device. Measurements will be performed on the upper trapezius and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles in the cervical region. During the assessments, participants will be positioned comfortably in either a supine or seated position according to a standardized protocol. Measurement sites will be identified using anatomical landmarks, and all measurements will be obtained from the same locations for each participant. For the upper trapezius muscle, the midpoint between the acromion and the spinous process of the C7 vertebra will be used as the reference point. For the sternocleidomastoid muscle, measurements will be taken from the midpoint of the muscle belly where it is most prominent. Oscillation Frequency \[Hz\] characterizes the intrinsic tension of biological soft tissues on the cellular level. The Oscillation Frequency of a muscle in its contracted state characterizes state of tension.

    Time frame: During enrollment and after 4 week intervention.

  2. Muscle Stiffness (N/m)

    Muscle mechanical properties will be measured objectively and non-invasively using the MyotonPRO device. Measurements will be performed on the upper trapezius and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles in the cervical region. During the assessments, participants will be positioned comfortably in either a supine or seated position according to a standardized protocol. Measurement sites will be identified using anatomical landmarks, and all measurements will be obtained from the same locations for each participant. For the upper trapezius muscle, the midpoint between the acromion and the spinous process of the C7 vertebra will be used as the reference point. For the sternocleidomastoid muscle, measurements will be taken from the midpoint of the muscle belly where it is most prominent. Dynamic Stiffness \[N/m\] characterizes the resistance of biological soft tissues to a force of deformation. The inverse of stiffness is compliance.

    Time frame: During enrollment and after 4 week intervention.

  3. Muscle Elasticity (Logarithmic Decrement)

    Muscle mechanical properties will be measured objectively and non-invasively using the MyotonPRO device. Measurements will be performed on the upper trapezius and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles in the cervical region. During the assessments, participants will be positioned comfortably in either a supine or seated position according to a standardized protocol. Measurement sites will be identified using anatomical landmarks, and all measurements will be obtained from the same locations for each participant. For the upper trapezius muscle, the midpoint between the acromion and the spinous process of the C7 vertebra will be used as the reference point. For the sternocleidomastoid muscle, measurements will be taken from the midpoint of the muscle belly where it is most prominent. The decrement of natural tissue oscillation serves as an inverse indicator of elastic behavior, where a higher decrement corresponds to lower elasticity. Logarithmic Decrement \[relative unit\]

    Time frame: During enrollment and after 4 week intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. State Trait Anxiety Inventory

    State anxiety will be assessed using the State Anxiety subscale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-State). The questionnaire consists of 20 items scored on a 4-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater levels of state anxiety.

    Time frame: During enrollment (baseline) and after the 4-week intervention.

  2. Neck Disability

    Neck-related disability will be evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). The NDI consists of 10 items assessing pain and functional limitations in daily activities. Total scores range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater disability.

    Time frame: During enrollment (baseline) and after the 4-week intervention.

  3. Chest Expansion Measurement

    Chest expansion will be assessed using a non-elastic measuring tape at the axillary, xiphoid, and subcostal levels. Measurements will be recorded during maximal inspiration and maximal expiration, and chest expansion will be calculated as the difference between inspiratory and expiratory circumferences. Greater values indicate better thoracic mobility.

    Time frame: During enrollment (baseline) and after the 4-week intervention.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Uebelacker LA, Broughton MK. Yoga for Depression and Anxiety: A Review of Published Research and Implications for Healthcare Providers. R I Med J (2013). 2016 Mar 1;99(3):20-2. PubMed 26929966 ↗
  • Pascoe MC, Thompson DR, Ski CF. Yoga, mindfulness-based stress reduction and stress-related physiological measures: A meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017 Dec;86:152-168. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 30. PubMed 28963884 ↗
  • Gothe NP, Khan I, Hayes J, Erlenbach E, Damoiseaux JS. Yoga Effects on Brain Health: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature. Brain Plast. 2019 Dec 26;5(1):105-122. doi: 10.3233/BPL-190084. PubMed 31970064 ↗
  • Sengupta P. Health Impacts of Yoga and Pranayama: A State-of-the-Art Review. Int J Prev Med. 2012 Jul;3(7):444-58. PubMed 22891145 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2026; primary completion for Oct 2026, 2 months later.

Of 101 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Myalgia, half reached primary completion within 8 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 16. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 111 studies reached it within 8 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 16.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 20, 2026
First posted
Aug 18, 2026
StartEst.
Aug 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 30, 2026
Last update
Aug 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07770139
Lead sponsor
Istanbul Gelisim University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 18, 2026
Start date
Aug 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 18, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion