CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07763249Updated Aug 13, 2026

Comparison of Paravertebral Versus Epidural Block for Post-thoracotomy Pain Control

An interventional study of Continuous Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Continuous Thoracic Epidural Block in Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-13.

Sponsored by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized, assessor-blinded, non-inferiority clinical trial comparing continuous thoracic paravertebral block (BPV) versus continuous thoracic epidural block (BPD) for postoperative pain control in adult patients undergoing elective open thoracotomy with one-lung ventilation. The primary outcome is the mean pain intensity at rest assessed by the Numeric Verbal Scale (NVS 0-10) during the first 48 hours after surgery. A total of 80 participants will be randomized 1:1 at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. The study aims to determine whether BPV provides non-inferior analgesia compared to BPD, with a potential advantage of less hemodynamic interference and better postoperative mobilization.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, assessor-blinded, non-inferiority clinical trial conducted at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil, in adult patients undergoing elective open thoracotomy with one-lung ventilation. The objective is to compare the analgesic efficacy of continuous thoracic paravertebral block (BPV) versus continuous thoracic epidural block (BPD) for postoperative pain control during the first 48 hours after surgery.

Patients will be randomly allocated to two groups (40 per group). In the BPV group, the paravertebral catheter is inserted at the end of surgery under direct thoracoscopic vision (without ultrasound), using a bolus of ropivacaine 0.375% (15 mL fractionated) followed by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% at 0.10 mL/kg/h. In the BPD group, the epidural catheter is inserted at the beginning of surgery using the loss-of-resistance technique with the same bolus and infusion regimen. The target dermatomal level is T5-T7 (or T5-T9).

The primary outcome is the mean pain score at rest measured by the Numeric Verbal Scale (NVS 0-10) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include pain on movement, total opioid consumption (converted to morphine equivalents), block-related complications (hypotension, urinary retention, technical failure, motor block), clinically significant pulmonary and cardiovascular complications, length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction with analgesia.

Randomization is centralized using variable block sizes and sealed numbered envelopes. Outcome assessors are blinded to allocation. Both groups receive identical multimodal analgesia and a standardized rescue protocol. The sample size of 80 participants was calculated to demonstrate non-inferiority with a margin of 1 point on the NVS (expected SD = 1.5; 80% power; one-sided α = 0.025).

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of HCPA (Opinion No. 8.544.882; CAAE 98467026.8.0000.5327) and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and current Brazilian regulations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain

Keywords

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Thoracotomy
  • Acute Pain
  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Regional Anesthesia
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 years or older;
  • Elective thoracic surgeries requiring open thoracotomy;
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or lactation;
  • Urgent or emergency surgeries;
  • Contraindications to epidural catheter insertion or neuraxial anesthesia;
  • Infection at the proposed block site;
  • Patient refusal to undergo the study blocks;
  • Video-assisted thoracic surgeries;
  • Anticipated need for invasive mechanical ventilation in the postoperative period;
  • Chronic opioid use (daily use for more than 3 months of ≥10 mg oral morphine equivalent);
  • Severe vertebral deformities or previous thoracic spine surgery that prevent safe performance of the blocks;
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics, opioids, or study medications;
  • Body mass index > 35 kg/m²;
  • Advanced liver or kidney failure (Child-Pugh C or estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 50 mL/min/1.73 m²);
  • Severe cognitive impairment that prevents understanding of instructions or pain assessment.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Paravertebral Block Group

    Participants randomized to the continuous thoracic paravertebral block (BPV) group. At the end of surgery and before chest tube placement, a paravertebral catheter is inserted under direct thoracoscopic vision (without ultrasound) using a Tuohy needle. A bolus of ropivacaine 0.375% (15 mL, fractionated) is administered, followed by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% at 0.10 mL/kg/h. The target level is T5-T7 (or T5-T9). The catheter remains in place for at least 48 hours postoperatively.

    Procedure: Continuous Thoracic Paravertebral Block

  • Active comparator
    Epidural Block Group

    Participants randomized to the continuous thoracic epidural block (BPD) group. At the beginning of surgery, an epidural catheter is inserted at the thoracic level using the loss-of-resistance technique. A bolus of ropivacaine 0.375% (15 mL, fractionated) is administered, followed by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% at 0.10 mL/kg/h. The target level is T5-T7 (or T5-T9). The catheter remains in place for at least 48 hours postoperatively.

    Procedure: Continuous Thoracic Epidural Block

Interventions

  • ProcedureContinuous Thoracic Paravertebral Block

    Participants randomized to the continuous thoracic paravertebral block (BPV) group. At the end of surgery and before chest tube placement, a paravertebral catheter is inserted under direct thoracoscopic vision (without ultrasound) using a Tuohy needle. A bolus of ropivacaine 0.375% (15 mL, fractionated) is administered, followed by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% at 0.10 mL/kg/h. The target level is T5-T7 (or T5-T9). The catheter remains in place for at least 48 hours postoperatively.

  • ProcedureContinuous Thoracic Epidural Block

    Participants randomized to the continuous thoracic epidural block (BPD) group. At the beginning of surgery, an epidural catheter is inserted at the thoracic level using the loss-of-resistance technique. A bolus of ropivacaine 0.375% (15 mL, fractionated) is administered, followed by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% at 0.10 mL/kg/h. The target level is T5-T7 (or T5-T9). The catheter remains in place for at least 48 hours postoperatively.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean pain intensity at rest during the first 48 hours after surgery

    Mean of the pain scores at rest measured by the Numeric Verbal Scale (NVS 0-10) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. This composite measure is the primary endpoint for the non-inferiority comparison between continuous thoracic paravertebral block and continuous thoracic epidural block.

    Time frame: 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain on movement

    Pain intensity during movement (e.g., coughing, sitting, or walking) assessed by Numeric Verbal Scale (0-10) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively.

    Time frame: 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery

  2. Total opioid consumption in the first 48 hours

    Total opioid consumption (converted to intravenous morphine equivalents in mg) from the end of surgery until 48 hours postoperatively.

    Time frame: 0 to 48 hours after surgery

  3. Block-related complications

    Incidence of complications related to the regional blocks, including hypotension (systolic BP \< 100 mmHg or \>20% drop from baseline), urinary retention requiring catheterization, motor block (modified Bromage scale), and technical failure of the block.

    Time frame: During the first 48 hours after surgery

  4. Clinically significant pulmonary and cardiovascular complications

    Incidence of clinically significant pulmonary complications (e.g., atelectasis requiring intervention, pneumonia) and cardiovascular complications (e.g., arrhythmias requiring treatment, ischemic events) in the first 72 hours after surgery.

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours after surgery

  5. Length of hospital stay

    Total number of days from surgery until hospital discharge.

    Time frame: From surgery until hospital discharge (assessed up to 30 days)

  6. Patient satisfaction with analgesia

    Patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control assessed by a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied to 5 = very satisfied) at 48 hours after surgery.

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA)
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul (RS) 90410-000, Brazil
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Perumal-Pillay VA, Suleman F. Selection of essential medicines for South Africa - an analysis of in-depth interviews with national essential medicines list committee members. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 7;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1946-9. PubMed 28061899 ↗
  • Talmor D, Merkind V, Artru AA, Shapiro O, Geva D, Roytblat L, Shapira Y. Treatments to support blood pressure increases bleeding and/or decreases survival in a rat model of closed head trauma combined with uncontrolled hemorrhage. Anesth Analg. 1999 Oct;89(4):950-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199910000-00024. PubMed 10512270 ↗
  • Gupta T, Gupta SK, Sahni D. Anatomy of the tentorial segment of the trochlear nerve in reference to its preservation during surgery for skull base lesions. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014 Dec;36(10):967-71. doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1278-6. Epub 2014 Mar 13. PubMed 24623122 ↗
  • Weitzel NS. Anesthesia and airway surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Dec;16(4):181. doi: 10.1177/1089253212465019. No abstract available. PubMed 23235989 ↗
  • Bard RL, Gillespie BW, Patel H, Nicklas JM. Prognostic ability of resting periodic breathing and ventilatory variation in closely matched patients with heart failure. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):318-22. doi: 10.1097/01.HCR.0000336143.02064.0e. PubMed 18784542 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers. Only aggregated and de-identified results will be published. All data will be stored securely and confidentially in accordance with institutional policies and Brazilian data protection laws (LGPD).

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07763249
Lead sponsor
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 13, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 13, 2026

Study contacts

Cristiano F Andrade, MD, PhD
Contact
cfandrade@hcpa.edu.br
+55513359-6246
Andre P. Schmidt, MD, MSc, PhD
Contact
apschmidt@hcpa.edu.br
+5551996412212
Cristiano F Andrade, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion