ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07823660Updated Sep 16, 2026

Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

An interventional study of Cardio-Oncology Exercise Rehabilitation Program in Breast Cancer, sponsored by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-16.

Sponsored by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2025, registered Jul 2026).
  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 350 studies in Breast Neoplasms with a site in Brazil — 52 open to participants now, 111 under way, 61 of them phase 3. Breast Neoplasms · Brazil.

Planned enrollment
276th of 308
30 · median 250
Started
2025
with 22 others
No phase
78 of 350
13 open now
Primary completion
2027-08
later than 73 of 110 live
Registered
350th of 350
by date

Among the 350 studies in Breast Neoplasms with a site in Brazil, this one is the 276th largest by planned enrollment of the 308 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 23 that started in 2025, is one of 78 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 73 of the 110 other live ones, and was the 350th registered.

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Open to participants now

52 of the 350 studies in Breast Neoplasms with a site in Brazil are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

46 more — sign in →

All 52 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Brazil have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Brazil →

Who these studies take

Of the 2,400 Breast Neoplasms studies recruiting now, 1,572 (66%) set no upper age limit and 591 (25%) stop at 75 or younger; 103 take children under 18; 214 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 65 Years · female · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 350 studies in Breast Neoplasms with a site in Brazil, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy among women in Brazil, and Porto Alegre (Rio Grande do Sul) has one of the highest incidence rates in women under 50, with 165.5 cases per 100,000 women aged 40-49. Advances in cancer biology, treatment, and supportive care have improved outcomes, leading to increased survivorship. Regular physical exercise has been shown to be an effective strategy in both the prevention and management of breast cancer, and during chemotherapy, physical activity may reduce fatigue, improve quality of life, and increase cardiorespiratory fitness.

This randomized clinical trial will enroll women diagnosed with breast cancer indicated for neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. The study aims to characterize the clinical profile of these patients with respect to cardiovascular and functional effects of chemotherapy, and to evaluate an integrated cardio-oncology rehabilitation approach.

The investigators expect to identify the clinical profile of breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and establish associations with the study variables, as well as to assess the effect of a standardized exercise program on the cardiovascular and musculoskeletal systems and quality of life. Based on these results, the study aims to propose a complementary rehabilitation program, to be offered within the public health system, alongside pharmacological treatment during and after completion of the chemotherapy cycle.

Read the detailed description

Breast cancer (BC) is highly prevalent worldwide, and in Brazil, particularly in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS), it is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality from malignant neoplasms among women. Five-year survival rates exceed 80% in developed countries, whereas in Brazil there is considerable variation across regions and cities. Studies indicate that Porto Alegre, the capital of RS, has one of the highest incidence rates of breast cancer among women under 50 years of age, with 165.5 cases per 100,000 women aged 40 to 49 years.

Several risk factors are associated with the development of breast cancer, including family history of the disease, use of oral contraceptives, obesity, and alcohol consumption. Notably, obesity and alcohol consumption differentially increase the risk of specific molecular subtypes of breast cancer. In addition, physical inactivity and elevated body mass index (BMI) are significant risk factors for breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Although chemotherapy is essential in oncologic treatment, it is associated with adverse effects on the cardiovascular system. Advances in pharmacologic therapy, together with a greater understanding of disease mechanisms, have led to increased survival and improved health-related well-being among cancer patients. However, this increased survival is accompanied by greater exposure to cardiovascular risk factors and clinically unfavorable outcomes, such as cardiotoxicity caused by chemotherapeutic agents.

Cardiotoxicity, classified as acute, subacute, or chronic, is generally assessed based on changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Nevertheless, there is no universally accepted conceptual definition of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity; definitions vary according to study design, etiology, epidemiology, and prevention strategies.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is used in up to 27% of breast cancer cases. The mechanisms underlying cardiotoxicity and the progression of cardiac dysfunction over time may be explained by: (1) increased myocardial oxidative stress; (2) disruption of mitochondrial calcium homeostasis; (3) impairment of mitochondrial energy metabolism; (4) degradation of ultrastructural proteins; (5) direct DNA damage via inhibition of topoisomerase 2β; and (6) direct cytotoxic effects on cardiac progenitor cells, reducing the heart's reparative capacity following myocardial injury.

Clinical diagnosis of cardiotoxicity cannot be limited to a simple measurement of LVEF. Evidence highlights the importance of evaluating additional outcomes beyond structural changes and reduced LVEF, including cardiac arrhythmias, coronary artery disease, blood biomarkers, and vascular function.

Cardiotoxicity and Vascular Function Endothelial cells are characterized by heterogeneous structure and function, with phenotypic variation according to their location in different organs, tissues, or blood vessel types. Positioned at the interface between blood and tissue, the endothelium plays a key role in the cardiovascular system, including regulation of vascular tone, synthesis and secretion of signaling molecules, and control of hemostasis, coagulation, inflammatory response, and atherogenesis.

Chemotherapeutic agents are generally administered via the systemic circulation. As a result, endothelial cells are among the first to be affected by these drugs, even before cardiac tissue itself. Vascular endothelial health is progressively compromised, with endothelial cells becoming increasingly vulnerable to inflammatory stressors, generation of reactive oxygen species, and reduced nitric oxide bioavailability - factors that directly contribute to the development and progression of atherosclerotic disease.

In addition to inflammatory markers and adhesion molecules, endothelial function can be assessed using brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), a technique first developed in 1992. This non-invasive method measures brachial artery diameter before and after forearm ischemia induced by inflating a cuff on the distal portion of the arm; FMD is expressed as the percentage increase in brachial artery diameter following release of the ischemic stimulus (reactive hyperemia). This vasodilation is mediated by endothelial release of nitric oxide in response to arterial wall shear stress.

Nagy et al. evaluated 22 patients with a clinical diagnosis of lymphoma treated with doxorubicin (DOX), measuring FMD before and after (at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours) chemotherapy administration. The study's main finding was a significant reduction in FMD values (9.9±4.4% vs. 6.1±4.6%, P\<0.02). In the same line of research, other findings established significant associations between baseline FMD values and changes in LVEF at 3 months (r = 0.433; p = 0.044) and at 6 months (r = 0.581; p = 0.023) among patients who developed cardiotoxicity following anthracycline treatment. Based on these results, the authors suggest that FMD assessment may play an important role as a risk-stratification tool and an early marker of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity.

Breast Cancer and Physical Exercise As noted above, several risk factors are associated with the development of breast cancer, including family history, use of oral contraceptives, obesity, and alcohol consumption, with obesity and alcohol consumption differentially increasing the risk of specific molecular BC subtypes. Physical inactivity and elevated BMI are also significant risk factors for breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Regular physical exercise has been shown to be an effective strategy in both the prevention and management of breast cancer. During chemotherapy treatment, physical activity may reduce fatigue, improve quality of life, and increase cardiorespiratory fitness. Studies indicate that supervised exercise programs combining aerobic and resistance training are particularly effective in reducing fatigue among women undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy.

After completion of chemotherapy, continued engagement in physical exercise remains equally beneficial. Evidence suggests that regular physical activity is associated with lower all-cause and breast-cancer-specific mortality among survivors. In addition, exercise interventions have been shown to improve self-reported cognitive function, physical fitness, fatigue, and quality of life, and to reduce depressive symptoms in breast cancer patients exposed to chemotherapy.

Given this context, this project proposes to study the clinical profile of women diagnosed with breast cancer with respect to the effects of chemotherapy treatment and the implementation of a physical exercise program on the cardiovascular system and functional capacity, through an integrated cardio-oncology rehabilitation approach, in patients treated within the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS), cared for at a university hospital or referred from the RS public health network.

Hypotheses Null Hypothesis (H0): In women diagnosed with breast cancer, chemotherapy treatment does not produce statistically significant changes in the following clinical and laboratory outcomes: vascular function (assessed by flow-mediated dilation or ankle-brachial index); cardiac function (assessed by echocardiography or other complementary tests); functional capacity (assessed by the six-minute walk test or VO2 consumption); and inflammatory, endothelial, and cardiovascular biomarkers.

Alternative Hypothesis (H1): In women diagnosed with breast cancer, chemotherapy treatment produces statistically significant changes in the following clinical and laboratory outcomes: reduced vascular function; impaired cardiac function; decreased functional capacity; and altered levels of inflammatory, endothelial, and cardiovascular biomarkers.

03

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Chemotherapy
  • Cardio-oncology rehabilitation
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Diagnosis of breast cancer
  2. Indicated for chemotherapy treatment
  3. Cardiovascularly stable
  4. Cleared for physical exercise
  5. Willing to participate in the study
  6. Physically able to perform the assessments and training sessions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any decompensated disease that would compromise the ability to perform the training sessions
  2. Prior diagnosis of ischemic heart disease
  3. Prior diagnosis of valvular heart disease
  4. Prior diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias
  5. Myocarditis within the past 6 months
  6. History of heart failure
  7. \<55% prior to initiation of chemotherapy
  8. Musculoskeletal disorders that limit the ability to perform the exercises
  9. Diagnosis of peripheral arterial occlusive disease within the past 6 months
  10. Ankle-brachial index \<0.4
  11. Cognitive impairment that would compromise understanding of study procedures or participation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Exercise Training Group

    Participants will undergo a cardio-oncology rehabilitation program with supervised exercise training sessions twice weekly at HCPA's Physical Rehabilitation Service (SFR). Assessments will be performed at baseline and at 3 and 6 months.

    Behavioral: Cardio-Oncology Exercise Rehabilitation Program

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Participants will receive general health and nutritional guidance at the baseline assessment and will maintain usual care, without a structured exercise program. Assessments will be performed at baseline and at 3 and 6 months, following the same schedule as the intervention group.

Interventions

  • BehavioralCardio-Oncology Exercise Rehabilitation Program

    Structured, individualized exercise training sessions held twice weekly at HCPA's Physical Rehabilitation Service (SFR), aimed at mitigating chemotherapy-related cardiovascular and functional impairment in breast cancer patients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)

    Left ventricular systolic function assessed by transthoracic echocardiography with strain analysis

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  2. Incidence of Cardiotoxicity

    Development of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction, including asymptomatic/subclinical cases, defined by relative decline in global longitudinal strain (GLS) on echocardiography.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  3. Change in Electrocardiographic Abnormalities and Arrhythmias

    ECG findings assessed as part of the echocardiographic evaluation. The ECG will be assessed for the following parameters: heart rate, cardiac rhythm (to identify arrhythmias), PR interval, QRS complex duration and morphology, QT/QTc interval, and ST-segment/T-wave changes.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  4. Change in Resting Blood Pressure

    Measured before cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  5. Change in Blood Pressure During Exercise

    Measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  6. Change in Resting Heart Rate

    Measured before cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  7. Change in Heart Rate During Exercise

    Measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  8. Change in Peak Oxygen Consumption (VO2 Peak)

    Measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  9. Fatigue Pictogram (Mota, Pimenta, Fitch, 2009)

    This pictorial instrument assesses fatigue intensity and fatigue interference with usual activities, each rated on a scale from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate worse outcomes (greater fatigue intensity and greater interference with activities, respectively).

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months

  10. Modified Borg CR-10 Scale (Category-Ratio 10)

    This scale ranges from 0 (no exertion/dyspnea at all) to 10 (maximal/very, very severe exertion or dyspnea), where higher scores indicate worse perceived exertion or breathlessness.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Troponin

    Blood biomarker (troponin)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  2. Change in BNP/NT-proBNP

    Blood biomarker (BNP/NT-proBNP)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  3. Change in High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP)

    Blood biomarker (hs-CRP)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  4. Change in TNF-alpha

    TNF-alpha

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  5. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Breast Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-BR23)

    This is a supplementary, disease-specific module used alongside the EORTC QLQ-C30. All scales and single-item measures are scored from 0 to 100 after linear transformation, following the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual scoring algorithm. For the functional scales (Body Image, Sexual Functioning, Sexual Enjoyment, Future Perspective), higher scores indicate better functioning (better outcome). For the symptom scales/items (Systemic Therapy Side Effects, Breast Symptoms, Arm Symptoms, Upset by Hair Loss), higher scores indicate greater symptom burden (worse outcome)."

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  6. Change in Lean Body Mass

    Bioelectrical impedance analysis

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  7. Change in Body Fat

    Bioelectrical impedance analysis

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  8. Change in Muscle Mass Index

    Bioelectrical impedance analysis

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  9. Change in Hand Grip Strength

    Bilateral hand grip strength assessed by dynamometry

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  10. Rehabilitation Program Adherence

    Percentage of prescribed exercise sessions attended

    Time frame: Throughout the 6-month study period

  11. Reduction in Cardiovascular Adverse Events During Treatment

    Number of adverse events during treatment

    Time frame: Throughout the 6-month study period

  12. Change in Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI)

    Doppler ultrasound ankle-brachial index

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Renaud P, Blondin JP. The stress of Stroop performance: physiological and emotional responses to color-word interference, task pacing, and pacing speed. Int J Psychophysiol. 1997 Sep;27(2):87-97. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(97)00049-4. PubMed 9342640 ↗
  • MacLeod CM. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163. No abstract available. PubMed 2034749 ↗
  • Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD; Writing Group on the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction; Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Jaffe AS, Katus HA, Apple FS, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, Chaitman BA, Clemmensen PM, Johanson P, Hod H, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Bonow RO, Pinto F, Gibbons RJ, Fox KA, Atar D, Newby LK, Galvani M, Hamm CW, Uretsky BF, Steg PG, Wijns W, Bassand JP, Menasche P, Ravkilde J, Ohman EM, Antman EM, Wallentin LC, Armstrong PW, Simoons ML, Januzzi JL, Nieminen MS, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G, Luepker RV, Fortmann SP, Rosamond WD, Levy D, Wood D, Smith SC, Hu D, Lopez-Sendon JL, Robertson RM, Weaver D, Tendera M, Bove AA, Parkhomenko AN, Vasilieva EJ, Mendis S; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2551-67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184. Epub 2012 Aug 24. No abstract available. PubMed 22922414 ↗
  • Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996 Jun;29(6):602-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:63.0.CO;2-L. PubMed 8773720 ↗
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O'Neal L, McLeod L, Delacqua G, Delacqua F, Kirby J, Duda SN; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9. PubMed 31078660 ↗
  • Do J, Cho Y, Jeon J. Effects of a 4-week multimodal rehabilitation program on quality of life, cardiopulmonary function, and fatigue in breast cancer patients. J Breast Cancer. 2015 Mar;18(1):87-96. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2015.18.1.87. Epub 2015 Mar 27. PubMed 25834616 ↗
  • Koevoets EW, Schagen SB, de Ruiter MB, Geerlings MI, Witlox L, van der Wall E, Stuiver MM, Sonke GS, Velthuis MJ, Jobsen JJ, Menke-Pluijmers MBE, Goker E, van der Pol CC, Bos MEMM, Tick LW, van Holsteijn NA, van der Palen J, May AM, Monninkhof EM; PAM study group. Effect of physical exercise on cognitive function after chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial (PAM study). Breast Cancer Res. 2022 May 26;24(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13058-022-01530-2. PubMed 35619188 ↗
  • Spei ME, Samoli E, Bravi F, La Vecchia C, Bamia C, Benetou V. Physical activity in breast cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis on overall and breast cancer survival. Breast. 2019 Apr;44:144-152. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 12. PubMed 30780085 ↗
  • Medeiros Torres D, Jorge Koifman R, da Silva Santos S. Impact on fatigue of different types of physical exercise during adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jun;30(6):4651-4662. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06809-w. Epub 2022 Jan 22. PubMed 35064331 ↗
  • Joaquim A, Leao I, Antunes P, Capela A, Viamonte S, Alves AJ, Helguero LA, Macedo A. Impact of physical exercise programs in breast cancer survivors on health-related quality of life, physical fitness, and body composition: Evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 9;12:955505. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.955505. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36568235 ↗
  • Nagy L, Szabo F, Ivanyi J, Nemeth L, Kovacs GL, Palatka J, Tarjan J, Toth K, Roth E. A method for detection of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: Flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2001 Summer;6(2):87-92. PubMed 20428269 ↗
  • Thijssen DHJ, Bruno RM, van Mil ACCM, Holder SM, Faita F, Greyling A, Zock PL, Taddei S, Deanfield JE, Luscher T, Green DJ, Ghiadoni L. Expert consensus and evidence-based recommendations for the assessment of flow-mediated dilation in humans. Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 7;40(30):2534-2547. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz350. PubMed 31211361 ↗
  • Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Gooch VM, Spiegelhalter DJ, Miller OI, Sullivan ID, Lloyd JK, Deanfield JE. Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet. 1992 Nov 7;340(8828):1111-5. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)93147-f. PubMed 1359209 ↗
  • Luu AZ, Chowdhury B, Al-Omran M, Teoh H, Hess DA, Verma S. Role of Endothelium in Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiomyopathy. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2018 Dec 31;3(6):861-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.06.005. eCollection 2018 Dec. PubMed 30623145 ↗
  • Mitry MA, Edwards JG. Doxorubicin induced heart failure: Phenotype and molecular mechanisms. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2016 Mar;10:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.11.004. PubMed 27213178 ↗
  • Simionescu M. Implications of early structural-functional changes in the endothelium for vascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007 Feb;27(2):266-74. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000253884.13901.e4. Epub 2006 Nov 30. PubMed 17138941 ↗
  • Curigliano G, Cardinale D, Dent S, Criscitiello C, Aseyev O, Lenihan D, Cipolla CM. Cardiotoxicity of anticancer treatments: Epidemiology, detection, and management. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jul;66(4):309-25. doi: 10.3322/caac.21341. Epub 2016 Feb 26. PubMed 26919165 ↗
  • Chung R, Ghosh AK, Banerjee A. Cardiotoxicity: precision medicine with imprecise definitions. Open Heart. 2018 Jul 25;5(2):e000774. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000774. eCollection 2018. No abstract available. PubMed 30094034 ↗
  • Monsuez JJ, Charniot JC, Vignat N, Artigou JY. Cardiac side-effects of cancer chemotherapy. Int J Cardiol. 2010 Sep 24;144(1):3-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 Apr 18. PubMed 20399520 ↗
  • Yeh ET, Tong AT, Lenihan DJ, Yusuf SW, Swafford J, Champion C, Durand JB, Gibbs H, Zafarmand AA, Ewer MS. Cardiovascular complications of cancer therapy: diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management. Circulation. 2004 Jun 29;109(25):3122-31. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000133187.74800.B9. PubMed 15226229 ↗
  • Borghesan DH, Agnolo CM, Gravena AA, Demitto Mde O, Lopes TC, Carvalho MD, Pelloso SM. Risk Factors for Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women in Brazil. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(7):3587-93. PubMed 27510013 ↗
  • Gomes KAL, de Araujo Jeronimo AF, Guimaraes CMC, de Oliveira Ramos R, Dos Santos Andrade LS, Weller M. Risk factors for breast cancer and their association with molecular subtypes in a population of Northeast Brazil. Cancer Epidemiol. 2022 Jun;78:102166. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102166. Epub 2022 Apr 26. PubMed 35486969 ↗
  • Santos Sda S, Melo LR, Koifman RJ, Koifman S. Breast cancer incidence and mortality in women under 50 years of age in Brazil. Cad Saude Publica. 2013 Nov;29(11):2230-40. doi: 10.1590/0102-311x00030713. PubMed 24233038 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The study protocol establishes that participant data confidentiality and privacy will be maintained in accordance with Brazilian data protection regulations (LGPD, Law No. 13,709/2018) and national research ethics resolutions (CNS 466/2012, CNS 510/2016), with no provision in the approved protocol or informed consent form for sharing individual participant data with external researchers.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2027, 20 months after the start.

Of 2,661 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 66. This study's planned 20 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,771 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 66.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 29, 2026
First posted
Sep 16, 2026
StartActual
Dec 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 2027
Last update
Sep 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07823660
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 16, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 16, 2026

Study contacts

Rosane M Nery, PhD
Contact
rnery@hcpa.edu.br
+55 51 33597634
Rosane M Nery, PhD
principal investigator · Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion