ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07756437BLUT-DNAUpdated Aug 10, 2026

Validation of a Circulating Tumor DNA Blood Test in Muscle-Invasive Bladder and Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer

An observational study in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC), Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma and Urothelial Carcinoma (UC), sponsored by AZ Sint-Lucas Gent. Recruiting at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-10.

Sponsored by AZ Sint-Lucas Gent · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
70
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 38 studies in Carcinoma, Transitional Cell with a site in Belgium — 5 open to participants now, 12 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Carcinoma, Transitional Cell · Belgium.

Started
2025
the only one that year
Observational
2 of 38
1 open now
Primary completion
2027-09
later than 9 of 11 live
Registered
38th of 38
by date

Among the 38 studies in Carcinoma, Transitional Cell with a site in Belgium, this one is the only one that started in 2025, is one of 2 observational ones, reaches primary completion later than 9 of the 11 other live ones, and was the 38th registered.

Carcinoma, Transitional Cell

633 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; 181 are open to participants now.

Browse Carcinoma, Transitional Cell studies →

Open to participants now

5 of the 38 studies in Carcinoma, Transitional Cell with a site in Belgium are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 5 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Belgium have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Belgium →

Who these studies take

Of the 147 Carcinoma, Transitional Cell studies recruiting now, 121 (82%) set no upper age limit and 11 (7%) stop at 75 or younger; 4 take children under 18; 8 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 38 studies in Carcinoma, Transitional Cell with a site in Belgium, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This prospective observational study evaluates a blood-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) test in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer or upper tract urothelial cancer. ctDNA consists of small fragments of tumor DNA that can sometimes be detected in the blood.

In this study, DNA from tumor tissue obtained during routine diagnostic or surgical procedures will be analyzed to identify tumor-specific mutations. Blood samples collected during routine clinical care will then be tested to determine whether the same mutations can be detected in plasma ctDNA.

The main purpose is to assess how well the internally developed ctDNA assay detects tumor-specific mutations compared with tumor tissue sequencing. The study will also explore whether ctDNA results after treatment are associated with recurrence or remission during two years of follow-up, and whether changes in ctDNA levels during treatment are associated with pathological response.

This study does not assign participants to a treatment and does not require additional blood draws beyond routine care. Treating physicians will remain blinded to ctDNA results during the study, so the test results will not influence clinical decisions.

Read the detailed description

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer and muscle-invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma are associated with a relevant risk of recurrence or progression after treatment. Current follow-up mainly relies on imaging, pathology, and clinical assessment. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may provide additional information on tumor burden, minimal residual disease, and treatment response, but clinical implementation remains limited by cost, logistics, and the need for local assay validation.

This study evaluates an internally developed, tumor-informed ctDNA workflow in patients treated at AZ Sint-Lucas Gent. Tumor DNA will be extracted from available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue, such as tissue obtained during transurethral resection of bladder tumor, upper tract biopsy, nephro-ureterectomy, cystectomy, or biopsy of metastatic disease. Targeted next-generation sequencing will be used to identify patient-specific somatic mutations in the tumor tissue.

When tumor-specific mutations are identified, matched plasma samples collected during routine clinical care will be analyzed for the same mutations. Cell-free DNA will be extracted from plasma and ctDNA detection will be performed using a tumor-informed approach, primarily by digital droplet PCR for known tumor-specific mutations. Mutations that cannot be assessed by digital droplet PCR may be further evaluated using next-generation sequencing.

Blood samples will be obtained only as part of routine diagnostic, staging, treatment, or follow-up blood draws. The study does not assign participants to a specific treatment and does not require additional study-specific therapeutic interventions. Patients will receive standard clinical care according to institutional practice.

Treating physicians will remain blinded to the ctDNA results during the study. The ctDNA results are investigational and will not guide treatment decisions during the study period. Clinical, pathological, treatment, molecular, and follow-up data will be collected to assess the performance of the assay and to explore associations between ctDNA status, treatment response, recurrence, progression, and remission over two years of follow-up.

The study is intended to support internal validation of a local ctDNA assay and to determine whether this approach may be feasible for future integration into clinical workflows for urothelial cancer monitoring.

03

Conditions studied

  • Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC)
  • Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
  • Urothelial Carcinoma (UC)

Keywords

  • Circulating Tumor DNA
  • ctDNA
  • Liquid biopsy
  • Tumor-Informed Sequencing
  • Minimal Residual Disease
  • MRD
  • Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
  • Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
  • Urothelial carcinoma
  • Next-Generation Sequencing
  • NGS
  • Recurrence Monitoring
  • Treatment response
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer or suspected muscle-invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated at AZ Sint-Lucas Gent. Participants must have available tumor tissue for DNA extraction and matched plasma samples obtained during routine clinical care.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • confirmed muscle-invasive bladder cancer or suspected muscle-invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma, stage T2 or higher.
  • Availability of tumor tissue from transurethral resection of bladder tumor, ureteroscopic , biopsy of a lesion, or nephroureterectomy for DNA extraction.
  • Written provided.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- Concurrent active diagnosed within the past 5 years.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic Performance of Plasma ctDNA for Detecting Tumor-Specific Mutations

    Concordance between tumor-specific somatic mutations identified in tumor tissue and the same mutations detected in matched plasma-derived ctDNA. Diagnostic performance of the internally developed ctDNA assay will be assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, with tumor tissue sequencing as the reference standard.

    Time frame: From enrollment until completion of tumor tissue sequencing and matched plasma ctDNA analysis, up to 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Association Between Post-Treatment ctDNA Positivity and Disease Recurrence or Progression

    Association between ctDNA positivity after surgery or radiotherapy, with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic treatment, and disease recurrence or progression during the first two years of follow-up.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years after surgery or radiotherapy

  2. Association Between Post-Treatment ctDNA Negativity and Disease Remission

    Association between ctDNA negativity after surgery or radiotherapy, with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic treatment, and absence of disease recurrence or progression during the first two years of follow-up.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years after surgery or radiotherapy

  3. Association Between Preoperative ctDNA Negativity and Pathological T0 Status

    Association between ctDNA negativity before surgery, with or without neoadjuvant systemic treatment, and pathological T0 status on the cystectomy specimen.

    Time frame: At cystectomy

  4. Association Between Quantitative ctDNA Decrease During Neoadjuvant Therapy and Pathological Downstaging

    Association between a quantitative decrease in ctDNA levels during neoadjuvant therapy and favorable pathological response, defined as tumor downstaging at cystectomy.

    Time frame: From start of neoadjuvant therapy until cystectomy, up to 6 months

  5. Time Difference Between ctDNA Rise and Imaging-Detected Disease Relapse

    Assessment of whether disease relapse after curative treatment is detected earlier by a rise in ctDNA than by standard imaging studies. The time difference will be measured in months. The protocol lists one primary endpoint and five secondary endpoints, including diagnostic performance, recurrence/remission within two years, pT0 status, pathological downstaging, and earlier relapse detection by ctDNA.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years after curative treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Carrasco R, Ingelmo-Torres M, Gomez A, Trullas R, Roldan FL, Ajami T, Moreno D, Rodriguez-Carunchio L, Alcaraz A, Izquierdo L, Mengual L. Cell-Free DNA as a Prognostic Biomarker for Monitoring Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 3;23(19):11732. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911732. PubMed 36233035 ↗
  • Lindskrog SV, Birkenkamp-Demtroder K, Nordentoft I, Laliotis G, Lamy P, Christensen E, Renner D, Andreasen TG, Lange N, Sharma S, ElNaggar AC, Liu MC, Sethi H, Aleshin A, Agerbaek M, Jensen JB, Dyrskjot L. Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Insights from Biological Analysis and Extended Clinical Follow-up. Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Dec 1;29(23):4797-4807. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-1860. PubMed 37782315 ↗
  • Nordentoft I, Lindskrog SV, Birkenkamp-Demtroder K, Gonzalez S, Kuzman M, Levatic J, Glavas D, Ptashkin R, Smadbeck J, Afterman D, Lauterman T, Cohen Y, Donenhirsh Z, Tavassoly I, Alon U, Frydendahl A, Rasmussen MH, Andersen CL, Lamy P, Knudsen M, Polak P, Zviran A, Oklander B, Agerbaek M, Jensen JB, Dyrskjot L. Whole-genome Mutational Analysis for Tumor-informed Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2024 Oct;86(4):301-311. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.05.014. Epub 2024 May 29. PubMed 38811314 ↗
  • Powles T, Assaf ZJ, Degaonkar V, Grivas P, Hussain M, Oudard S, Gschwend JE, Albers P, Castellano D, Nishiyama H, Daneshmand S, Sharma S, Sethi H, Aleshin A, Shi Y, Davarpanah N, Carter C, Bellmunt J, Mariathasan S. Updated Overall Survival by Circulating Tumor DNA Status from the Phase 3 IMvigor010 Trial: Adjuvant Atezolizumab Versus Observation in Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2024 Feb;85(2):114-122. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.06.007. Epub 2023 Jul 26. PubMed 37500339 ↗
  • Crupi E, de Padua TC, Marandino L, Raggi D, Dyrskjot L, Spiess PE, Sonpavde GP, Kamat AM, Necchi A. Circulating tumor DNA as a Predictive and Prognostic Biomarker in the Perioperative Treatment of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Feb;7(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.05.012. Epub 2023 Jun 15. PubMed 37330413 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No individual participant data are planned to be shared. The study includes sensitive clinical and molecular data, including tumor sequencing and plasma ctDNA results. Aggregate study results may be published, and additional data sharing may be considered only in anonymized form and subject to applicable ethics, legal, and institutional approvals.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2027, 22 months after the start.

Of 60 observational studies under Carcinoma, Transitional Cell, half reached primary completion within 56 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 27. This study's planned 22 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 5, 2026
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
StartActual
Nov 7, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2029
Last update
Aug 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07756437
Lead sponsor
AZ Sint-Lucas Gent
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
Start date
Nov 7, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 10, 2026

Study contacts

Jeroen Van Besien, MD
Contact
Secretariaat.Urologie@AZSTLUCAS.BE
003292246650

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion