ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07755462SYNDESMOSEUpdated Aug 26, 2026

Stability of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis With or Without Fixation of Posterior Fragments in Bimalleolar Fractures

An interventional study of Surgical management of bimalleolar ankle fractures with osteosynthesis of the posterior fragments. and Surgical management of bimalleolar ankle fractures without osteosynthesis of the posterior fragments in Ankle Fractures and Osteoarthritis, Ankle, sponsored by Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-26.

Sponsored by Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2025, registered Aug 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background and Rationale:

Injury to the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures is a major prognostic factor for the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. The syndesmosis is frequently involved when posterior tibial marginal fragments are fractured. Intraoperative stability testing determines whether a trans-syndesmotic device (screws, endobutton, or plate) is required. However, trans-syndesmotic devices carry risks such as malreduction, hardware removal, and infection. Anatomical fixation of posterior tibial fragments is hypothesized to restore syndesmotic stability, thereby reducing the reliance on trans-syndesmotic implants. Objective and Hypothesis:

The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the rate of trans-syndesmotic stabilization device usage between patients undergoing osteosynthesis of posterior marginal fragments and those managed without posterior fragment osteosynthesis. The hypothesis is that syndesmotic stability (defined as non-use of a trans-syndesmotic device intraoperatively) will be significantly higher in the posterior fragment fixation group. Study Design:

Multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-arm parallel-group trial conducted at two orthopedic trauma centers (Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon and Hôpital Lariboisière).

Read the detailed description

Study Flow and Procedures:

Screening and Randomization: Eligible patients presenting with recent bimalleolar ankle fractures (\< 3 weeks) involving the posterior marginal fragment and syndesmosis (Bartoníček types 2, 3, or 4) are identified in the emergency/trauma department. Following written informed consent, participants are randomized into Group 1 (posterior marginal fragment osteosynthesis) or Group 2 (no posterior fragment osteosynthesis).

Preoperative Assessment: Comparative bilateral ankle X-rays and CT scans to confirm fracture classification and baseline metrics (fragment thickness > 2 mm, height > 6 mm).

Intraoperative Phase: Surgical management of the bimalleolar fracture according to assigned group. Intraoperative stress testing of the syndesmosis is performed to evaluate stability and record the necessity of trans-syndesmotic device placement.

Postoperative Follow-up: Day 1 to Week 6: Comparative bilateral CT scan to evaluate fragment and syndesmosis reduction. 3 Months \& 12 Months: Clinical follow-up visits including comparative weight-bearing X-rays, evaluation of AOFAS score, and patient-reported questionnaires (MOXFQ, SF-12).

Postoperative complications (infections, neuropathic pain, fibular pain, flexor hallucis longus tendonitis) are systematically recorded throughout the 12-month follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ankle Fractures
  • Osteoarthritis, Ankle

Keywords

  • Tibiofibular Syndesmosis
  • Bimalleolar Fracture
  • Posterior Marginal Fragment
  • Trans-syndesmotic Fixation
  • Bartoníček Classification
03

In context

Ankle Fractures

202 studies on the registry are indexed under Ankle Fractures; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 90 across 150 interventional studies indexed under Ankle Fractures.

Browse Ankle Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient informed and written consent obtained
  • Male or female participants aged 18 years or older
  • Recent first-time ankle fracture (\< 3 weeks prior to inclusion) involving the posterior marginal fragment and syndesmosis (Bartoníček 2, 3, or 4) confirmed on preoperative CT scan
  • Fractured posterior marginal fragment with thickness > 2 mm and height > 6 mm in the sagittal plane on preoperative CT scan

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical to surgery as assessed by the investigator based on risk-benefit evaluation
  • High Tscherne grade soft-tissue injury score
  • Recent lower-extremity surgery within the past 3 months
  • Recurrent ankle fracture on the same side
  • Patient deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative order
  • Patient not affiliated with or beneficiary of a national social security scheme
  • Patient unable to understand spoken or written French
  • Patient whose geographical residence is incompatible with close in-person study follow-up
  • Adult patient unable or unfit to give
  • Woman of not using effective
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group 1: with osteosynthesis of the posterior marginal fragments.

    Procedure: Surgical management of bimalleolar ankle fractures with osteosynthesis of the posterior fragments.

  • Active comparator
    Group 2: without osteosynthesis of the posterior marginal fragments

    Procedure: Surgical management of bimalleolar ankle fractures without osteosynthesis of the posterior fragments

Interventions

  • ProcedureSurgical management of bimalleolar ankle fractures with osteosynthesis of the posterior fragments.

    Surgical management of bimalleolar ankle fractures with osteosynthesis of the posterior fragments

  • ProcedureSurgical management of bimalleolar ankle fractures without osteosynthesis of the posterior fragments

    Surgical management of bimalleolar ankle fractures without osteosynthesis of the posterior fragments.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Intraoperative Trans-Syndesmotic Stabilization Device Use

    Proportion of patients requiring the intraoperative placement of a trans-syndesmotic stabilization device (such as a screw, endobutton, or plate) to achieve syndesmotic stability, as assessed during surgery following stress testing.

    Time frame: ntraoperative (Day 0)

Secondary outcomes

  1. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score

    Clinical and functional assessment score combining pain, function, and alignment. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points, where 0 represents severe disability/pain and 100 represents optimal function and no pain. Higher scores indicate better clinical outcome.

    Time frame: 3 months and 12 months postoperatively

  2. Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) Total Score

    Patient-reported outcome measure assessing foot/ankle pain, walking/standing difficulties, and social interaction. The metric is converted to a score ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 represents no symptoms/best health state and 100 represents severe impairment. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.

    Time frame: 3 months and 12 months postoperatively

  3. Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical and Mental Component Summary Scores

    Patient-reported general health survey generating a Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. Norm-based scores range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health status.

    Time frame: 3 months and 12 months postoperatively

  4. Postoperative Posterior Marginal Fragment and Syndesmosis Anatomical Alignment by CT Scann

    Assessment of posterior marginal fragment and syndesmosis anatomical alignment (measuring fibular rotation, anterior and posterior tibiofibular distances, and anteroposterior translation) evaluated on postoperative CT scans.

    Time frame: Between Postoperative Day 1 and Week 6

  5. Radiographic Parameters of Syndesmosis Alignment on Weight-Bearing X-rays

    Radiographic assessment of syndesmotic anatomical alignment and joint space congruence on weight-bearing comparative X-rays, including medial clear space, tibiofibular clear space, tibiofibular overlap, and fibular length.

    Time frame: 3 months and 12 months postoperatively

  6. Incidence of Postoperative Complications

    Proportion of patients experiencing surgery-related complications, including surgical site infections, neuropathic pain, fibular pain, or flexor hallucis longus pain.

    Time frame: Through 12 months postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tourne Y, Molinier F, Andrieu M, Porta J, Barbier G. Diagnosis and treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis lesions. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Dec;105(8S):S275-S286. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.014. Epub 2019 Oct 5. PubMed 31594732 ↗
  • Ray R, Koohnejad N, Clement ND, Keenan GF. Ankle fractures with syndesmotic stabilisation are associated with a high rate of secondary osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Apr;25(2):180-185. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 28. PubMed 29409288 ↗
  • Pogliacomi F, De Filippo M, Casalini D, Longhi A, Tacci F, Perotta R, Pagnini F, Tocco S, Ceccarelli F. Acute syndesmotic injuries in ankle fractures: From diagnosis to treatment and current concepts. World J Orthop. 2021 May 18;12(5):270-291. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i5.270. eCollection 2021 May 18. PubMed 34055585 ↗
  • van den Bekerom MP. Diagnosing syndesmotic instability in ankle fractures. World J Orthop. 2011 Jul 18;2(7):51-6. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v2.i7.51. PubMed 22474636 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2028, 36 months after the start.

Of 69 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Ankle Fractures, half reached primary completion within 44 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 61. This study's planned 36 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 72 studies reached it within 45 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 61.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 5, 2026
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
StartActual
Sep 22, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2028
CompletionEst.
Sep 2029
Last update
Aug 26, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07755462
Lead sponsor
Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
Start date
Sep 22, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 26, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion