CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07574762CAN-ARDUpdated May 8, 2026

Total Knee Arthroplasty With Personalized Implantation: Computer Navigation-Assisted Surgery Versus Robotic-Assisted Surgery

An interventional study of Robotic-Arm Assisted Surgery (RA) and Computer-Assisted Navigation (CAN) in Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-08.

Sponsored by Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2026, registered Apr 2026).
  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Title: Personalized Total Knee Arthroplasty: Computer-Assisted Navigation vs. Robotic Assistance (CAN-ARD).

Summary:

Knee osteoarthritis is frequently treated with Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). However, approximately 20% of patients remain dissatisfied following the procedure. This study aims to compare two surgical assistance technologies designed to improve prosthetic placement accuracy: Computer-Assisted Navigation (CAN) and Robotic-Arm Assistance (RA).

The primary objective is to determine if there is a significant difference in functional outcomes and the "forgotten joint" sensation (measured by the Forgotten Joint Score - FJS) between patients operated on with robotic assistance versus those with traditional navigation at 3, 12, and 24 months post-surgery. The study's hypothesis is that there is no major clinical difference between these two techniques when applied within a personalized alignment strategy.

Read the detailed description

Background and Rationale:

Personalized alignment in total knee arthroplasty combines the restoration of the patient's unique anatomy (restricted kinematic alignment) with joint stability. While computer-assisted navigation has been successfully used since 2003 to plan and control implant positioning, robotic assistance is gaining popularity due to its ability to perform more precise bone cuts using a haptic robotic arm. This study seeks to investigate whether this technical gain in precision translates into a real clinical benefit for the patient in terms of satisfaction and joint perception.

Study Design:

This is an interventional, prospective, randomized, single-center study. A total of 140 patients (70 per group) will be enrolled.

Interventions:

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the following two arms:

Navigation Group: TKA implantation (Attune® CR) guided by an intraoperative computer navigation system.

Robotic Group: TKA implantation using a robotic-arm-assisted system (a motorized saw linked to the navigation software).

Follow-up and Evaluations:

Patients will be followed for 24 months. Evaluations will include:

Primary Endpoint: Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) at 3, 12, and 24 months.

Secondary Endpoints: Satisfaction and functional scores (KOOS, SKV, Net Promoter Score), range of motion measurements, operative time, and monitoring of any complications.

Target Population:

Adults (≥ 18 years) scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, with no history of major bone surgery on the affected limb.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Robotic
  • Navigation
  • Arthroplasty
  • Osteoarthritis
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 582 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 140 is above the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon is the lead sponsor of 26 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient providing written informed consent according to regulatory requirements
  • Male or female patients aged ≥18 years
  • Patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis
  • Use of Attune® prosthesis with posterior cruciate ligament retention (CR) and patellar resurfacing

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of ligament reconstruction
  • Previous fracture or bone surgery (osteotomy) of the ipsilateral femur or tibia (except hip or ankle surgery)
  • Preoperative knee stiffness with flexion contracture >15° or flexion \<90°
  • Individuals deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • Patients not affiliated with a social security system
  • Patients unable to understand French
  • Patients with cognitive impairment
  • Patients whose place of residence makes close clinical follow-up impossible -- Women of childbearing potential without effective contraception
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Robotic

    Patients undergoing Prosthetic knee arthroplasty under robotic assistance

    Device: Robotic-Arm Assisted Surgery (RA)

  • Active comparator
    Navigation

    Patients undergoing Prosthetic knee arthroplasty under navigation assistance

    Device: Computer-Assisted Navigation (CAN)

Interventions

  • DeviceRobotic-Arm Assisted Surgery (RA)

    Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) performed using a robotic-arm-assisted system connected to navigation software. Like the navigation group, this arm utilizes the personalized alignment strategy and the Attune® CR prosthesis. Instead of manual cutting guides, the surgeon manipulates a robotic arm equipped with a motorized saw to perform the bone cuts according to the pre-planned digital model. This technology is intended to increase the precision of bone resections.

  • DeviceComputer-Assisted Navigation (CAN)

    Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) performed using an intraoperative computer navigation system. The procedure follows a personalized alignment strategy (restricted kinematic alignment combined with joint stability). After creating a digital model of the knee and mapping anatomical landmarks, the navigation system assists the surgeon in manually positioning the bone cutting guides. The primary implant used is the Attune® CR (Cruciate-Retaining) prosthesis with patellar resurfacing.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Forgotten Joint Score (FJS).

    Assessment of the patient's ability to forget the artificial joint in daily life. Minimum score: 0, Maximum score: 100. A higher score indicates a better outcome (the patient is less aware of the prosthetic joint)

    Time frame: 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).

    Evaluation of the patient's opinion about their knee and associated problems. Minimum score: 0, Maximum score: 100. A higher score represents a better outcome.

    Time frame: 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

  2. Self Knee Value (SKV).

    Patient's subjective assessment of their knee as a percentage of a normal knee. Scale: 0% to 100%. A higher percentage represents a better outcome.

    Time frame: 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

  3. Net Promoter Score (NPS)

    A single-question survey used to measure patient satisfaction and their willingness to recommend the surgical procedure to others. The score is calculated based on responses to a single question on a scale of 0 to 10 (where 0 is "not at all likely" and 10 is "extremely likely"). Respondents are grouped as Promoters (9-10), Passives (7-8), or Detractors (0-6). The final NPS is calculated by subtracting the percentage of Detractors from the percentage of Promoters, resulting in a score ranging from -100 to +100. A higher score indicates higher patient satisfaction

    Time frame: 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

  4. Active Range of Motion.

    Measurement of the active flexibility (extension and flexion) of the operated knee using a goniometer. Measured in degrees

    Time frame: Preoperatively, and at 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively.

  5. Operative Time

    Total duration of the surgical procedure, measured from the initial skin incision to the completion of skin closure.

    Time frame: During the surgical procedure (Day 0).

  6. Incidence of Surgical and Postoperative Adverse Events.

    Documentation of complications including:Intraoperative: Technology-related issues or interruption of surgical assistance. Postoperative: Revision surgery, manipulation under anesthesia, or implant loosening.

    Time frame: Through 24 months postoperatively.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Groupe hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon
    Paris, Paris 75020, France
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Clark TC, Schmidt FH. Robot-Assisted Navigation versus Computer-Assisted Navigation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Efficiency and Accuracy. ISRN Orthop. 2013 Jun 24;2013:794827. doi: 10.1155/2013/794827. eCollection 2013. PubMed 24967115 ↗
  • Geng X, Zheng Y, Li Y, Zhao M, Liu Y, Li Z, Cai H, Zhang M, Yan X, Sun Z, Lv X, Guo F, Li F, Tian H. Early Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Robotic-arm-assisted versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Orthop Surg. 2024 Nov;16(11):2732-2740. doi: 10.1111/os.14196. Epub 2024 Aug 12. PubMed 39135273 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07574762
Lead sponsor
Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 8, 2026
Start date
Jan 26, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 26, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
May 8, 2026

Study contacts

Younes KERROUMI, Clinical Research Physician
Contact
ykerroumi@hopital-dcss.org
+33144643384

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion