An observational study in TB - Tuberculosis, Silicosis and Occupational Exposure, sponsored by Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia. Completed at 1 site in Zambia. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-06.
Sponsored by Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia · Observational
The study was designed as a descriptive cross-sectional survey conducted between February and October 2022. Senior management officials were targeted because of their role in workplace policy and oversight. The sample was drawn from companies registered under the Zambia Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ZACCI), focusing on those with known silica dust exposure. Each company was asked to provide one or two senior officials to participate. A total of 118 individuals completed the survey.
Data collection was carried out using a self-administered electronic questionnaire developed in line with WHO recommendations for TB KAP surveys. The questionnaire contained 28 mandatory closed-ended questions: 7 on knowledge, 8 on attitudes, and 13 on practices (with 5 practice questions excluded from scoring as they were programmatic). Responses were validated by three medical doctors, and scoring was based on correct answers. Knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were categorized into "poor" or "good" using mean or median cutoffs depending on distribution. Logistic regression was applied to explore associations between participant characteristics and KAP outcomes.
Tuberculosis (TB) continues to pose a significant global health burden, particularly among individuals in the economically productive age group of 15-64 years. In Zambia, 85% of TB cases occur in this demographic, underscoring the dual public health and socio-economic impact. The risk is compounded in industries with high exposure to crystalline silica dust, such as mining, construction, drilling, cement, brick, tile, glass, and ceramics manufacturing. Prolonged inhalation of silica dust can lead to silicosis, a condition that increases the risk of TB three to four times compared to individuals without silicosis. Even without silicosis, silica exposure alone elevates TB risk. Poor workplace conditions, including overcrowding and inadequate ventilation, further exacerbate transmission risks.
Recognizing these occupational hazards, the study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of senior management officials in companies with high silica exposure. These officials play a critical role in shaping workplace policies and interventions, making their understanding and attitudes toward TB prevention and management essential for effective workplace health strategies.
The research was conducted as a descriptive cross-sectional study between February and October 2022 in Lusaka and Southern provinces of Zambia. These provinces were selected due to their concentration of industries associated with silica dust exposure. The study focused on senior management officials, defined as either the most senior staff in an organization or heads of divisions/departments, given their influence on workplace health policies.
The sample population was drawn from the Zambia Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ZACCI), an umbrella organization representing businesses across all sectors. ZACCI advocates for workplace legislation and a conducive business environment. Companies known to produce silica dust were identified under categories including mining, construction, cement manufacturing, brick and tile manufacturing, and glass and ceramic manufacturing. The sampling frame included 1 mining company, 73 construction companies, 1 cement company, 9 brick/tile companies, and 10 glass/ceramic companies.
Each company was asked to nominate at least one senior official to complete the questionnaire, with a maximum of two responses per company. This ensured representation across industries while maintaining focus on individuals with policy-making authority.
Data were collected using a multiple-choice electronic questionnaire developed in accordance with WHO guidelines for TB KAP surveys. The questionnaire was self-administered in English via Google Forms and contained 28 mandatory closed-ended questions:
Responses were validated by three medical doctors. A response was considered correct if at least two doctors agreed. This ensured accuracy and minimized bias in scoring. Responses marked as "don't know," "not sure," or "other" were treated neutrally with a score of 0. Ambiguous "other" responses were excluded from analysis.
Survey responses were stored on Google Forms, downloaded into a CSV file, and imported into Python (version 3.8) for recoding. The dataset was then analyzed using STATA (version 18.5). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant characteristics and categorical variables.
A scoring system was applied:
199 studies on the registry are indexed under Latent Tuberculosis; 48 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 118 is below the median of 260 across 82 observational studies indexed under Latent Tuberculosis.
Browse Latent Tuberculosis studies →Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
The sample population was drawn from the Zambia Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ZACCI), an umbrella organization representing businesses across all sectors. ZACCI advocates for workplace legislation and a conducive business environment. Companies known to produce silica dust were identified under categories including mining, construction, cement manufacturing, brick and tile manufacturing, and glass and ceramic manufacturing. The sampling frame included 1 mining company, 73 construction companies, 1 cement company, 9 brick/tile companies, and 10 glass/ceramic companies.
Each company was asked to nominate at least one senior official to complete the questionnaire, with a maximum of two responses per company. This ensured representation across industries while maintaining focus on individuals with policy-making authority.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Categories including mining, construction, cement manufacturing, brick and tile manufacturing, and glass and ceramic manufacturing.
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) scores related to tuberculosis among senior management of manufacturing, construction, and mining companies associated with exposure to silica dust.
Descriptive Cross - sectional study
Time frame: Conducted between February 2022 to October 2022
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Feb 2022 to primary completion in Oct 2022, 8 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia