ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07747779CU BYPASS-DJBUpdated Aug 6, 2026

Comparison of Hormonal Response to a Mixed-Meal Tolerance Test After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With Duodenojejunal Bypass in Patients With Super Morbid Obesity

An interventional study of Sleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in Bariatric Surgery, Hormonal Response and Post Bariatric Hypoglycemia, sponsored by Chulalongkorn University. Recruiting at 1 site in Thailand. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-06.

Sponsored by Chulalongkorn University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2024, registered Jul 2026).
  • Started Aug 2024; still recruiting 2 years 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Obesity is a major global health problem. Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment, leading to substantial weight loss and improvement in obesity-related comorbidities. The most commonly performed procedures are Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). LRYGB is typically selected for patients with a BMI exceeding 50 kg/m2. Recently, LSG with duodenojejunal bypass (LSG-DJB) has been introduced. To date, no randomized controlled trial has compared LRYGB and LSG-DJB in patients with super morbid obesity, particularly regarding postoperative hormonal responses. This study aims to address this gap. If LSG-DJB results in a lower incidence of post-bariatric hypoglycemia than LRYGB, it would support its clinical benefit. Evaluation of GLP-1, GIP, glucagon, and insulin responses will clarify mechanisms underlying weight loss and postprandial glycemic changes.

Read the detailed description

Novel bariatric surgical techniques have been developed under the concept of "Sleeve-Plus" procedures, which combine sleeve gastrectomy with intestinal bypass to achieve the metabolic benefits of bypass surgery, including reduced nutrient absorption, while potentially minimizing postoperative complications. Several variations of the Sleeve-Plus procedure have been developed, with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal bypass (LSG-DJB) being one of the most widely adopted techniques developed in Asia. Previous studies have demonstrated that LSG-DJB is comparable to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in terms of weight loss, glycemic control, and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities. However, to date, no studies have evaluated changes in gastrointestinal hormone responses following LSG-DJB. This study aims to provide evidence regarding the hormonal changes associated with LSG-DJB compared with the standard laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedure. Investigators hypothesize that LSG-DJB may be associated with a lower incidence of post-bariatric hypoglycemia compared with LRYGB, while offering a less technically complex surgical procedure and potentially reducing the risk of other postoperative complications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bariatric Surgery
  • Hormonal Response
  • Post Bariatric Hypoglycemia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Bariatric Surgery
  • Hormonal Response
  • Post bariatric hypoglycemia
03

In context

Hypoglycemia

706 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypoglycemia; 94 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 32 is above the median of 28 across 534 interventional studies indexed under Hypoglycemia.

Browse Hypoglycemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Chulalongkorn University is the lead sponsor of 322 studies on the registry; 66 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with an indication for bariatric surgery
  • 50-60 kg/m2
  • Patients who are motivated to lose weight but have not achieved successful weight reduction despite optimal medical therapy and exercise under physician supervision

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with diabetes mellitus
  • Patients with severe comorbid conditions that contraindicate surgery, such as advanced heart disease or chronic kidney failure
  • Patients with a history of previous bariatric surgery
  • Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease to medical therapy, large hiatal hernia, or endoscopic findings of reflux esophagitis grade C or D, or Barrett esophagus
  • Patients with psychiatric disorders that impair eating behavior control
  • Patients with a history of pancreatitis, pancreatic disease, or inflammatory bowel disease
  • Patients who have used or GLP-1 receptor agonists within the past 2 months
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
32 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal bypass

    Sleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal bypass is a surgical technique in which the greater curvature of the stomach is resected and separated from the lesser curvature and antrum, reducing the gastric volume to approximately 80-150 mL (about 20% of the original capacity) using a 32-36 Fr bougie. Subsequently, the biliopancreatic limb is created by transecting the small intestine approximately 50-100 cm distal to the duodenojejunal (DJ) junction. A Roux (alimentary) limb measuring 150-200 cm in length is then constructed, followed by the creation of a duodenojejunostomy.

    Procedure: Sleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal bypass

  • Active comparator
    Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

    Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a surgical technique in which the stomach is reduced to a small pouch with a volume of approximately 15-50 mL. The jejunum is then transected 40-50 cm distal to the duodenojejunal (DJ) junction and anastomosed to the gastric pouch to create the Roux (alimentary) limb, which is typically 75-150 cm in length. Finally, a jejunojejunostomy is performed to reconnect the small intestine.

    Procedure: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Interventions

  • ProcedureSleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal bypass

    Novel bariatric procedure

  • ProcedureRoux-en-Y gastric bypass

    Standard bariatric procedure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hormonal response

    To compare the hormonal responses following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal bypass (LSG-DJB) using a mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) in patients with super morbid obesity

    Time frame: Post-operative 6-24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Post-bariatric hypoglycemia

    To compare the occurrence of postprandial hypoglycemia following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal bypass (LSG-DJB) using a mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) in patients with super morbid obesity.

    Time frame: Post-operative 6-24 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
    Pathum Wan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
    Recruiting
    • Primploy Greeviroj, M.D., M.Sc. · Contactprimploy.gre@chulahospital.org · 66917142555
    • Patchaya Boonchaya-anant, M.D. · ContactPatchaya.B@chula.ac.th · 66814416460
    • Patchaya Boonchaya-anant, M.D. · Principal investigator
    • Primploy Greeviroj, M.D., M.Sc. · Sub investigator
    • Natnicha Houngngam, M.Sc. · Sub investigator
    • Pattharasai Kachornvitaya, M.D. · Sub investigator
    • Suthep Udomsawaengsup, M.D. · Sub investigator
    • Prangareeya Santisitthanon, B.Sc. · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Goldfine AB, Mun EC, Devine E, Bernier R, Baz-Hecht M, Jones DB, Schneider BE, Holst JJ, Patti ME. Patients with neuroglycopenia after gastric bypass surgery have exaggerated incretin and insulin secretory responses to a mixed meal. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Dec;92(12):4678-85. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-0918. Epub 2007 Sep 25. PubMed 17895322 ↗
  • Praveen Raj P, Kumaravel R, Chandramaliteeswaran C, Rajpandian S, Palanivelu C. Is laparoscopic duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve an effective alternative to Roux en Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients: preliminary results of a randomized trial. Obes Surg. 2012 Mar;22(3):422-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0507-x. PubMed 21870050 ↗
  • Seki Y, Kasama K, Haruta H, Watanabe A, Yokoyama R, Porciuncula JP, Umezawa A, Kurokawa Y. Five-Year-Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with Duodenojejunal Bypass for Weight Loss and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Obes Surg. 2017 Mar;27(3):795-801. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2372-0. PubMed 27644433 ↗
  • Kasama K, Tagaya N, Kanehira E, Oshiro T, Seki Y, Kinouchi M, Umezawa A, Negishi Y, Kurokawa Y. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal bypass: technique and preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2009 Oct;19(10):1341-5. doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-9873-z. Epub 2009 Jul 21. PubMed 19626382 ↗
  • Huang CK, Goel R, Tai CM, Yen YC, Gohil VD, Chen XY. Novel metabolic surgery for type II diabetes mellitus: loop duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Dec;23(6):481-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182950111. PubMed 24300921 ↗
  • Uno K, Seki Y, Kasama K, Wakamatsu K, Umezawa A, Yanaga K, Kurokawa Y. A Comparison of the Bariatric Procedures that Are Performed in the Treatment of Super Morbid Obesity. Obes Surg. 2017 Oct;27(10):2537-2545. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2685-7. PubMed 28451928 ↗
  • Lee CJ, Clark JM, Egan JM, Carlson OD, Schweitzer M, Langan S, Brown T. Comparison of Hormonal Response to a Mixed-Meal Challenge in Hypoglycemia After Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Gastric Bypass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Sep 28;107(10):e4159-e4166. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac455. PubMed 35914520 ↗
  • English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Brethauer SA, Mattar SG, Rosenthal RJ, Morton JM. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States in 2016. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Mar;14(3):259-263. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.12.013. Epub 2017 Dec 16. PubMed 29370995 ↗
  • Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt JL, Gospodarevskaya E, Loveman E, Baxter L, Clegg AJ. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13(41):1-190, 215-357, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta13410. PubMed 19726018 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 35 months after the start.

Of 169 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hypoglycemia, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 33. This study's planned 35 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 175 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 33.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 31, 2026
First posted
Aug 5, 2026
StartActual
Aug 8, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jul 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 31, 2027
Last update
Aug 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07747779
Collaborators
Ratchadapiseksompotch Research Fund
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 5, 2026
Start date
Aug 8, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 6, 2026

Study contacts

Primploy Greeviroj, M.D., M.Sc.
Contact
primploy.gre@chulahospital.org
+66917142555
Patchaya Boonchaya-anant, M.D.
principal investigator · King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion