ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07747584Updated Aug 5, 2026

Effect of Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Postoperative Pain Control in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study

An interventional study of Bupivacaine and Standard Perioperative Analgesia in Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Allied Hospital Faisalabad. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-05.

Sponsored by Allied Hospital Faisalabad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
166
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Brief Summary

Postoperative pain remains a common problem after laparoscopic abdominal surgery despite the minimally invasive nature of these procedures. Pain mainly arises from the trocar insertion sites, tissue manipulation, and the effects of pneumoperitoneum. Although systemic analgesics are routinely used, they may not provide adequate pain relief and can be associated with adverse effects.

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether pre-incisional infiltration of bupivacaine at laparoscopic trocar insertion sites reduces postoperative pain compared with standard care without local anesthetic infiltration. A total of 166 adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery will be randomly assigned to receive either local bupivacaine infiltration before skin incision or no local anesthetic infiltration. All participants will receive the same standard perioperative care and postoperative analgesic regimen.

The primary outcome is postoperative pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include the time to first rescue analgesic, total opioid consumption within the first 24 hours, and overall postoperative pain control. The results of this study may help determine whether local bupivacaine infiltration is an effective, simple, and low-cost addition to multimodal analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

Read the detailed description

Detailed Description

Laparoscopic abdominal surgery is widely performed because it is associated with reduced surgical trauma, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery compared with open procedures. Despite these advantages, postoperative pain remains a significant concern. Pain after laparoscopy is multifactorial, resulting from trocar insertion, tissue manipulation, and pneumoperitoneum. Although multimodal analgesia is routinely employed, optimal management of trocar-site pain remains uncertain.

Local infiltration of surgical incision sites with long-acting local anesthetics such as bupivacaine has been proposed as a simple and inexpensive method of reducing postoperative pain and opioid requirements. However, published randomized trials have reported inconsistent findings regarding the magnitude of benefit, and variations in infiltration technique, timing, and dosage have limited the establishment of standardized recommendations. Additional prospective randomized studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention in different clinical settings.

This single-center prospective randomized controlled trial will be conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Allied Hospital, Faisalabad. Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either pre-incisional infiltration of diluted bupivacaine at planned trocar insertion sites or no local anesthetic infiltration. All participants will receive the institution's standard perioperative management and postoperative analgesic protocol.

The study aims to determine whether pre-incisional local bupivacaine infiltration provides superior postoperative pain control during the first 24 hours after laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while opioid consumption and time to first rescue analgesia will be evaluated as secondary measures of analgesic efficacy. The findings may help clarify the role of local anesthetic infiltration as part of multimodal postoperative pain management and contribute evidence to guide clinical practice in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Laparoscopic Surgery
  • Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery
  • Bupivacaine
  • Local Anesthetic Infiltration
  • Trocar Site Infiltration
  • Multimodal Analgesia
  • Visual Analog Scale
  • Opioid Consumption
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,230 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 166 is above the median of 75 across 4,821 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Allied Hospital Faisalabad is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged 18 to 60 years. Scheduled for elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery (e.g., cholecystectomy, appendectomy, or hernia repair).

(ASA) physical status I or II. Able to understand and use the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain assessment. Willing and able to provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Intraoperative conversion to open laparotomy. Known allergy, , or to bupivacaine or other amide local anesthetics.

Pregnancy or breastfeeding. History of chronic pain syndromes or regular use of opioid or non-opioid analgesics before surgery.

History of substance abuse or severe psychiatric disorders that may affect pain perception.

Local skin infection at the planned trocar insertion sites.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
166 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bupivacaine Infiltration Plus Standard Care

    Participants undergoing elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery will receive pre-incisional infiltration of 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine diluted with 20 mL of normal saline (final concentration 0.25%). The solution will be equally infiltrated into the planned trocar insertion sites before skin incision in addition to standard perioperative care.

    Drug: Bupivacaine · Other: Standard Perioperative Analgesia

  • Active comparator
    Standard Care

    Participants undergoing elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery will receive standard perioperative care and postoperative analgesia without local bupivacaine infiltration at the trocar insertion sites.

    Other: Standard Perioperative Analgesia

Interventions

  • Bupivacaine 0.5% (5 mg/mL), 20 mL diluted with 20 mL of normal saline to achieve a final concentration of 0.25% (40 mL total volume). The solution will be infiltrated equally into the planned laparoscopic trocar insertion sites before skin incision.

  • OtherStandard Perioperative Analgesia

    Standard perioperative analgesia according to the institutional protocol, including intravenous paracetamol 1 g every 8 hours and intravenous tramadol 50 mg administered as rescue analgesia for patients with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score ≥4 during the first 24 hours after surgery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity

    Postoperative pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10), comparing the experimental and control groups during the first 24 hours after laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

    Time frame: At 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to First Rescue Analgesia

    Time elapsed from completion of surgery to the first administration of rescue opioid analgesia.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery

  2. Total Opioid Consumption

    Total cumulative opioid dose administered as rescue analgesia during the first 24 hours after laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nakngam N, Wasinghon P, Ratanakaew A. Bupivacaine Local Infiltration at Trocar Insertion Sites after Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. 2024;107(3):185-190. DOI: 10.35755/jmedassocthai.2024.3.13955
  • Gluck O, Barber E, Feldstein O, Tal O, Kerner R, Keidar R, Wolfson I, Ginath S, Bar J, Sagiv R. The effect of subcutaneous and intraperitoneal anesthesia on post laparoscopic pain: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 8;11(1):81. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80130-6. PubMed 33420214 ↗
  • Einarsson JI, Sun J, Orav J, Young AE. Local analgesia in laparoscopy: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;104(6):1335-9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000146283.90934.fd. PubMed 15572499 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because this is a single-center, investigator-initiated academic study. The study protocol does not include provisions for public sharing of de-identified participant-level data, and data sharing has not been approved by the sponsoring institution or ethics committee.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2026; primary completion for Jan 2027, 5 months later.

Of 2,089 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,102 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 31, 2026
First posted
Aug 5, 2026
StartEst.
Aug 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2027
CompletionEst.
Jan 2027
Last update
Aug 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07747584
Lead sponsor
Allied Hospital Faisalabad
Responsible party
Jawad Qamar (Postgraduate resident, Allied Hospital Faisalabad) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 5, 2026
Start date
Aug 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 5, 2026

Study contacts

Jawad Qamar, MBBS
Contact
jawadqamar22@gmail.com
+923060403567
Muhammad Akram, MBBS, FCPS General Surgery
study chair · Department of General Surgery, Allied Hospital, Faisalabad, Pakistan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Bupivacaine

Start the discussion