ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07741929PPPUpdated Aug 3, 2026

Patient and Provider Perspectives on Genetic Risk Profiling

An observational study in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-03.

Sponsored by Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

A qualitative interview study exploring the patient and provider perspectives on the clinical utility of genetic risk profiling in routine clinical practice. The findings from the study may contribute towards future research and informing clinical practice.

Read the detailed description

Prostate cancer is the most prevalent cancer in men in the UK, however there are currently no formalised prostate cancer screening and risk management guidelines. Prostate cancer has a large heritable/genetic component and the combination of genetic alterations that a person inherits has a large influence on their risk. Genetic risk profiling can provide information on whether a person has a higher, average or lower genetic risk to develop prostate cancer. This can help to guide screening and management advice, with people at higher risk benefitting from increased surveillance and interventions, while sparing those at lower risk from unnecessary interventions. It can also provide guidance on potential treatments, prevention and reproductive risks and options. This can tailor and personalise healthcare for patients based on their risk, while also providing economic benefits to the healthcare system. Despite the benefits of genetic risk profiling, there are current concerns pertaining to the readiness for it's implementation into routine clinical practice given the lack of current risk management guidelines and uncertainty pertaining to actionability of results. Further research is essential to inform clinical practice.

This study will explore the perspectives of all stakeholders involved in the testing process, namely patients and healthcare providers who respectively receive and deliver genetic risk profiling results, to explore their viewpoints on the utility of genetic risk profiling in routine clinical practice. The research aims to explore current benefits, limitations, concerns and needs pertaining to genetic risk profiling which may contribute towards future research and clinical practice. Patients and providers who have received or delivered these results will be invited to participate in a once-off interview either at the Royal Marsden Hospital in Chelsea or Sutton or via video/telephone consultation. The research will be funded by the Royal Marsden Cancer Charity over 2 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Patients
  • Providers
  • Genetic Risk Profiling
  • Prostate Cancer
  • Clinical Utility
  • Perspectives
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

7,046 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,580 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 200 across 1,310 observational studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 273 studies on the registry; 53 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients who have undergone and received a genetic risk profiling result for prostate cancer and healthcare providers who have delivered a genetic risk profiling result for prostate cancer

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals assigned male at birth who are aged 18 and over and who have capacity to consent
  • Patients who have undergone genetic risk profiling for prostate cancer and have received their results
  • Individuals from diverse backgrounds (age, ethnicity, risk status, etc)
  • Healthcare providers who have delivered a genetic risk profiling result for prostate cancer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who lack capacity to consent
  • Individuals deemed unsuitable to recruit based on their poor performance status or current medical condition
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patient participants

    Diverse cohort of patients who have undergone genetic risk profiling and have received their results

    Other: Qualitative interview

  • Provider participants

    Healthcare providers who have delivered genetic risk profiling results to patients

    Other: Qualitative interview

Interventions

  • OtherQualitative interview

    Interview of participants to gain perspectives and experiences

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Data pertaining to the experiences and perspectives of healthcare providers and patients regarding the clinical utility of genetic risk profiling in routine clinical practice, using a qualitative (interview) thematic analysis approach.

    The study findings will provide data pertaining to the current experiences, perspectives, benefits, limitations and challenges patients and providers encounter when receiving and delivering genetic risk profiling results. The findings can help to highlight areas of concern which need to be addressed, improved and/or implemented prior to clinical implementation of genetic risk profiling into routine clinical care. The findings can also identify the educational, clinical and/or support needs and may also highlight aspects of clinical care which need to be improved or established (e.g. screening guidelines, resources, upskilled workforce) prior to the integration of genetic risk profiling into routine clinical practice. This will ensure that genetic risk profiling is relevant and feasible in terms of improving the clinical care and health seeking behaviours of patients.

    Time frame: January 2026 to August 2027

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • The Royal Marsden Hospital (Sutton and Chelsea)
    London, SM2 5PT, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Only if participants consent to future research / sharing of research data

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07741929
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 3, 2026
Start date
May 1, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 3, 2026

Study contacts

Tarryn Shaw, MSc
Contact
tarryn.shaw@rmh.nhs.uk
020 8661 3375
Elizabeth Bancroft, RN PhD
Contact
elizabeth.bancroft@rmh.nhs.uk
02087224483
Elizabeth Bancroft, RN PhD
principal investigator · The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust / The Institute of Cancer Research

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion