ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07673861CURTAINUpdated Jun 29, 2026

Clinical Utility of ctDNA in Detecting Resistance Mechanisms and Delivering Precision Medicine to Cancer Patients

An interventional study of Marsden360 ctDNA test and GTAB review in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) and Colorectal Cancer, sponsored by Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-29.

Sponsored by Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2025, registered Nov 2025).
  • Started May 2025; still recruiting 1 year 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

ctDNA stands for circulating tumour DNA. As ctDNA is released by tumour cells into the blood stream, taking a blood sample and analysing it for ctDNA, can provide a lot of useful information about a patient's cancer. In certain situations, ctDNA can be used to screen for or detect cancer early, to aid clinical decisions about which treatment to give a patient, to provide information about if a cancer has become resistant to treatment, or provide information about how much cancer may be left after treatment (residual disease).

The aim of this trial is to establish the clinical utility of implementing ctDNA testing in cancer patients with a view to enhance the delivery of personalised care within the National Health Service in the United Kingdom (UK).

One hundred patients will be recruited, with 20 from each of the following cancer types:

  • Non-small cell lung cancer
  • Gastrointestinal stromal tumours
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Biliary tract cancer
  • Ovarian cancer.

Patients must be aged 18 or over, must have had progressive disease whilst receiving anti-cancer treatment, and must be being treated at The Royal Marsden.

Patients will have a blood sample taken and analysed using the Marsden360 ctDNA test. The results of the test will be looked at by The Royal Marsden Genomic Tissue Advisory Board (GTAB), and for each individual patient, the GTAB will determine if having a ctDNA test helped to personalise their care by:

  • Aiding the identification of a genomically-matched standard of care therapy
  • Aiding the identification of a genomically-matched clinical trial (based in the UK)
  • Offering additional prognostic information not otherwise available through standard of care testing
  • Negating the need for a tissue biopsy.
02

Conditions studied

  • Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Biliary Tract Cancer
  • Ovarian Cancer
03

In context

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

7,620 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; 1,838 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 62 across 6,019 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung.

Browse Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung studies →

Lead sponsor

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 273 studies on the registry; 53 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

All cohorts:

  • Age ≥18 years old
  • Ability to provide written
  • Presence of or unresectable disease
  • Being reviewed and treated through medical oncology service at Royal Marsden Hospital

Cohort 1: Locally Advanced/Metastatic NSCLC

  • Oncogene-addicted NSCLC (i.e. ESCAT Tier 1 oncogenic drivers: EGFR/ALK/ROS1/RET/MET/BRAF/NTRK//KRAS), AND
  • Progressive disease on targeted therapy (any line) within the 6 weeks prior to consent

Cohort 2: Locally Advanced/Metastatic GIST

  • Locally advanced/metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST), AND
  • Progressive disease on targeted therapy (any line) within the 6 weeks prior to consent

Cohort 3: Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

  • Metastatic colorectal cancer, left sided, RAS wild type, HER2 any status, AND
  • If HER2 negative or unknown: progressive disease on systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) with an anti-EGFR agent (e.g. cetuximab) within the 6 weeks prior to consent
  • If HER2 positive: progressive disease on systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) +/- an anti-EGFR agent within the 6 weeks prior to consent

Cohort 4: Locally Advanced/Metastatic BTC

  • Identified targetable mutation (IDH1 mutation/HER2 amplification/FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement/NTRK fusion/BRAF V600E mutation/MMR deficiency [dMMR]), AND
  • Progressive disease on targeted therapy (any line) demonstrated within the 6 weeks prior to consent

Cohort 5: Advanced/Metastatic ovarian cancer

  • Diagnosis of advanced/metastatic high-grade ovarian cancer, AND
  • Known BRCA status, AND
  • Progressive disease on a PARP-inhibitor (with or without bevacizumab) following platinum-based therapy in the 1st line maintenance setting, within the 6 weeks prior to consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

All cohorts:

  • Medically unstable to commit to sampling required for the study
  • performance status ≥3
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

HER2

HER2 is a protein, made from the ERBB2 gene, that drives the growth of some cancers. A study may look for a level of the protein, extra copies of the gene, or a particular change in it.

In breast cancer, protein tests are read as HER2-positive, HER2-low or HER2-negative; other cancers use their own rules. Check which test result the study requires.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Patients who have had progressive disease on therapy within the 6 weeks prior to consent

    Diagnostic Test: Marsden360 ctDNA test and GTAB review

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testMarsden360 ctDNA test and GTAB review

    Participant blood samples will analysed using the Marsden360 ctDNA test. Results will subsequently be reviewed by the Royal Marsden Genomic Tumour Advisory Board (GTAB). The GTAB will use the results of the test to try to identify a genomically-matched standard of care therapy, to identify a genomically-matched clinical trial (based in the UK), to offer additional prognositc information not otherwise available through standard of case, or determine if the need for a tissue biopsy is negated.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The number (%) of patients in whom ctDNA result was deemed to be clinically useful at the time of progression on prior line of therapy

    This is a composite outcome measure, where the results of ctDNA testing performed at the time of progressive disease led to at least one of the following (to be determined by the GTAB): * Identification of a genomically-matched SOC therapy, or * Identification of a genomically-matched clinical trial (based in the UK), or * Offered additional prognostic information not otherwise available through SOC, or * Negated the need for a tissue biopsy

    Time frame: From the date of enrolment plus 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patients in whom ctDNA result identified a genomically-matched SOC therapy

    The number (%) of patients in whom ctDNA result identified a genomically-matched SOC therapy

    Time frame: From the date of enrolment plus 6 weeks

  2. Patients in whom ctDNA result identified a genomically-matched clinical trial (based in the UK)

    The number (%) of patients in whom ctDNA result identified a genomically-matched clinical trial (based in the UK)

    Time frame: From the date of enrolment plus 6 weeks

  3. Patients in whom ctDNA result offered additional prognostic information not otherwise available through SOC testing

    The number (%) of patients in whom ctDNA result offered additional prognostic information not otherwise available through SOC testing

    Time frame: From the date of enrolment plus 6 weeks

  4. Patients in whom ctDNA result negated need for tissue biopsy

    The number (%) of patients in whom ctDNA result negated need for tissue biopsy

    Time frame: From the date of enrolment plus 6 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Number of, and name of, resistance mutations pertinent to each cohort

    The number (absolute value) of, and name of, resistance mutations that occur in at least 10% of participants in each cohort

    Time frame: From the date of enrolment plus 6 weeks

  2. Association of allelic frequency in ctDNA with tumour burden in all cohorts

    The correlation of allelic frequency in ctDNA with tumour burden in all cohorts

    Time frame: From the date of enrolment plus 6 weeks

  3. Number of, and name of, genomic aberrations associated with therapy class in each cohort that are associated with poorer response rates and shorter PFS

    The number (absolute value) of, and name of, genomic aberrations associated with therapy class in each cohort that are associated with poorer response rates and shorter PFS

    Time frame: From the date of enrolment plus 18 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Currently there are no plans to share individual participant data. This will be considered by the trial team, and updated in future if required.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 19 months after the start.

Of 343 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, half reached primary completion within 52 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 98. This study's planned 19 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 359 studies reached it within 51 months; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 97.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 19, 2025
First posted
Jun 29, 2026
StartActual
May 23, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
Jun 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07673861
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 29, 2026
Start date
May 23, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 29, 2026

Study contacts

Rebecca Brooks
Contact
rebecca.brooks@rmh.nhs.uk
+44 208 642 6011
Simon Connolly
Contact
simon.connolly@rmh.nhs.uk
+44 208 642 6011
Sanjay Popat, BSc, MBBS, PhD
principal investigator · Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion