An observational study in Sepsis and Critical Illness, sponsored by Trakya University. Recruiting at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-14.
Sponsored by Trakya University · Observational
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition caused by the body's overwhelming response to infection, and it remains a leading cause of death in intensive care units. Even when standard treatment targets such as blood pressure are met, blood flow to the small vessels of the skin and other tissues may remain impaired. This "hidden" poor perfusion may not be detected by routine monitoring, yet it may be linked to worse outcomes.
The perfusion index is a simple number obtained from the standard pulse oximeter already placed on a patient's finger. It reflects blood flow in the peripheral tissues, requires no additional procedure, and causes no discomfort.
This prospective observational cohort study will examine whether the perfusion index, and especially how it changes over the first 24 hours in the intensive care unit, can help predict death within 28 days in adults with sepsis or septic shock. Capillary refill time and skin mottling score will be recorded as additional bedside measures of peripheral perfusion.
No treatment will be changed for the purpose of this study, and no additional blood samples or invasive procedures will be performed. All care decisions remain with the treating team. Measurements will be taken at intensive care admission and at 6 and 24 hours. Participants will be followed for 28 days, with survival status also recorded at 90 days.
The study will be conducted at two centers. A prediction model will be developed in the first center and then tested, without modification, in patients enrolled at the second center.
Background and rationale
Sepsis and septic shock remain leading causes of intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Resuscitation is commonly guided by macrohemodynamic targets such as mean arterial pressure (MAP), urine output, and lactate clearance. However, restoration of macrocirculatory targets does not guarantee adequate microcirculatory perfusion. This macro-micro discordance, sometimes referred to as occult or hidden hypoperfusion, has been associated with progressive organ dysfunction and worse outcomes, yet it is not captured by routine monitoring.
The peripheral perfusion index (PI) is derived from the standard pulse oximetry waveform and represents the ratio of pulsatile to non-pulsatile signal. It is continuous, non-invasive, requires no additional equipment beyond routine monitoring, and reflects peripheral perfusion. Most available evidence has evaluated PI at a single time point, which may not capture the dynamic nature of resuscitation. Whether the trajectory of PI over the first 24 hours provides prognostic information beyond established severity scores has not been adequately established.
Objectives
Primary objective: to determine whether the trajectory of the peripheral perfusion index during the first 24 hours of ICU admission independently predicts 28-day all-cause mortality in adults with sepsis or septic shock.
Secondary objectives: (1) to quantify the incremental predictive value of PI trajectory when added to a reference model comprising SOFA score and arterial lactate; (2) to compare the discriminatory performance of PI, capillary refill time (CRT), skin mottling score, and lactate within the same cohort; (3) to define a macro-micro discordance phenotype (MAP at target despite persistently impaired peripheral perfusion) and evaluate its association with 28-day mortality; (4) to develop a TRIPOD-compliant prediction model and evaluate it in an independent center.
Study design and setting
Prospective, observational, two-center cohort study conducted in adult ICUs. This is a non-interventional study. All diagnostic and therapeutic decisions, including fluid administration, vasopressor titration, antimicrobial therapy, and organ support, are made exclusively by the treating clinical team according to institutional practice and current guidelines. No study-specific intervention, additional blood sampling, or invasive procedure is performed. PI values obtained for research purposes are not disclosed to the treating team, in order to prevent measurement-driven changes in management.
Population
Consecutive adults (≥18 years) meeting Sepsis-3 criteria for sepsis or septic shock, enrolled within the first 6 hours of ICU admission. Key exclusion criteria include conditions precluding valid peripheral perfusion measurement (severe peripheral arterial disease, limb ischemia or amputation, extensive edema or burns, local trauma, severe Raynaud phenomenon), ICU stay of 24 hours or longer at another facility prior to admission, anticipated withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment within 24 hours, pregnancy, persistent tremor or agitation precluding measurement, and concurrent enrollment in an interventional study. Each patient is enrolled only once, at the first eligible ICU admission (index admission). If a patient is readmitted to the ICU during follow-up, no new record is created and the patient remains a single observation unit; index marker measurements are not repeated at readmission.
Measurements and schedule
Peripheral perfusion is assessed at ICU admission (hour 0) and at 6 and 24 hours using a standardized bedside protocol. PI is measured with the patient supine, the limb at heart level, nail polish removed, after a 2-minute stabilization period; three consecutive readings are obtained from the right index finger (or a predefined alternative site) and averaged. CRT is measured using a standardized technique with firm pressure applied to the ventral surface of the index finger for 10 seconds using a glass slide, with the return of normal skin color timed; values above 3 seconds are considered abnormal. Skin mottling score (0-5) is assessed over the knee area. Arterial lactate is recorded at hours 0 and 24 from routine blood gas sampling, and lactate clearance is calculated. Contextual variables recorded concurrently with each measurement include MAP, norepinephrine-equivalent vasopressor dose, skin temperature, and sedation depth. Severity of illness is characterized using SOFA and APACHE II scores, and comorbidity burden using the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Time to first appropriate antimicrobial therapy, appropriateness of empirical therapy, and source control are recorded as treatment-related confounders. Inter-observer agreement for PI, CRT, and mottling score is assessed in a predefined subsample using duplicate measurements.
Outcomes
The primary outcome is 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes include ICU and in-hospital mortality, 90-day mortality, vasopressor-free days at day 28, duration of mechanical ventilation, new organ failure, shock reversal, and ICU and hospital length of stay. All outcomes are defined over a 28-day calendar window starting at enrollment rather than over the index ICU stay, and encompass all ICU episodes occurring within that window.
Sample size
The target sample size is approximately 400 prospectively enrolled patients, with a stopping rule of 400 patients or 100 deaths, whichever occurs first. This was derived using criteria for developing clinical prediction models, targeting approximately 15 events per candidate predictor with an assumed 28-day mortality of 25%, and is compatible with the sample required to detect a clinically meaningful difference in c-index between the reference model and the model incorporating PI trajectory.
Statistical analysis
The association between PI trajectory and 28-day mortality will be assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, with PI modeled both continuously (using restricted cubic splines to accommodate non-linearity) and dichotomized at a predefined threshold. Longitudinal PI behavior will be modeled using linear mixed-effects models. Incremental predictive value over the reference model (SOFA and lactate) will be evaluated using discrimination (Harrell c-index, time-dependent AUC, DeLong test), reclassification (continuous NRI, IDI), calibration (calibration slope and intercept, observed-to-expected ratio), and decision curve analysis. Missing data will be handled using multiple imputation by chained equations, with complete-case analysis as a sensitivity analysis. Model development will incorporate penalized regression and shrinkage, with internal validation by bootstrapping. Prespecified sensitivity analyses will adjust for vasopressor dose, temperature, antimicrobial timing and appropriateness, and source control. Patients who die before the 24-hour assessment are retained in the cohort and are not excluded; their deaths are counted as primary outcome events. Measurements not obtained because of death are treated as truncated by death rather than missing, and are not multiply imputed. Analyses involving trajectory-based variables are therefore conducted as a prespecified 24-hour landmark analysis restricted to patients alive at 24 hours, with follow-up starting at that landmark, whereas the primary analysis based on baseline measurements includes the entire cohort.
Development and validation centers
The prediction model will be developed in the cohort enrolled at the development center and subsequently evaluated, without any modification of model coefficients, in the cohort enrolled at the independent validation center. The assignment of centers to development and validation roles was defined prior to data collection and is not modified thereafter. External evaluation will report discrimination, calibration slope and intercept, observed-to-expected ratio, and clinical net benefit. Reporting will follow the TRIPOD statement, with STARD and STROBE as applicable.
2,416 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 541 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 150 across 1,162 observational studies indexed under Sepsis.
Browse Sepsis studies →Trakya University is the lead sponsor of 155 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Consecutive adults admitted to adult intensive care units with sepsis or septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria at two participating centers in Türkiye. Patients are screened and enrolled within the first 6 hours of intensive care unit admission. No sampling or selection beyond the eligibility criteria is applied; all consecutive eligible patients are approached during the enrollment period. Patients are enrolled irrespective of the source of admission (emergency department, hospital ward, operating room, or transfer from another facility), infection focus, or severity of illness at presentation.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
All-cause mortality at 28 days
Proportion of patients who die from any cause within 28 days of ICU admission. Vital status is ascertained through direct clinical follow-up during hospitalization and, for patients discharged before day 28, through hospital records or telephone contact.
Time frame: 28 days from ICU admission
All-cause mortality in the intensive care unit
Proportion of patients who die from any cause during their ICU stay.
Time frame: From ICU admission to ICU discharge, up to 90 days
All-cause in-hospital mortality
Proportion of patients who die from any cause before hospital discharge.
Time frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 90 days
All-cause mortality at 90 days
Proportion of patients who die from any cause within 90 days of ICU admission. Vital status of patients discharged before day 90 is ascertained through hospital records or telephone contact.
Time frame: 90 days from ICU admission
Vasopressor-free days at day 28
Number of days alive and free of any vasopressor support during the first 28 days after ICU admission. Patients who die within 28 days are assigned zero vasopressor-free days.
Time frame: 28 days from ICU admission
Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation
Total number of days of invasive mechanical ventilation during the 28-day follow-up window, summed across all ICU episodes including readmissions.
Time frame: 28 days from ICU admission
Development of new organ failure
Proportion of patients developing a new organ failure after enrollment, defined as an increase to a SOFA subscore of 3 or more in an organ system not already failing at baseline.
Time frame: 7 days from ICU admission
Shock reversal
Proportion of patients achieving shock reversal, defined as maintenance of mean arterial pressure at or above 65 mmHg for at least 24 consecutive hours without vasopressor support.
Time frame: 28 days from ICU admission
Intensive care unit length of stay (index stay)
Number of days from ICU admission to discharge from the index ICU stay. Days spent in the ICU during readmissions are not included in this measure; they are captured by the ICU-free days and ICU readmission outcomes.
Time frame: From ICU admission to discharge from the index ICU stay, up to 90 days
Hospital length of stay
Number of days from hospital admission to hospital discharge, including days spent in the intensive care unit.
Time frame: From hospital admission to hospital discharge, up to 90 days
ICU readmission within 28 days
Proportion of patients readmitted to the intensive care unit within 28 days of enrollment, after discharge from the index ICU stay.
Time frame: 28 days from ICU admission
ICU-free days at day 28
Number of days alive and outside the intensive care unit during the first 28 days after enrollment, counting all ICU episodes including readmissions. Patients who die within 28 days are assigned zero ICU-free days.
Time frame: 28 days from enrollment
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.