ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07734922Updated Jul 29, 2026

High-Intensity Laser Therapy and Physiotherapy for Bone Health in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Trial

An interventional study of High-Intensity Laser Therapy and Sham Laser in Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal and Osteopenia, sponsored by Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Romania. Open to female participants aged 50 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-29.

Sponsored by Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if adding high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) to a physiotherapy programme helps bone health in women after menopause who have low bone density (osteopenia or osteoporosis). It also looks at safety and quality of life.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does adding high-intensity laser therapy change a blood marker of bone formation called P1NP? Does adding high-intensity laser therapy improve participants' quality of life? Researchers will compare a group that gets physiotherapy plus real laser therapy with a group that gets physiotherapy plus a sham laser (a look-alike treatment that gives no real laser energy). This shows if the laser itself makes a difference.

Participants will:

Do the same physiotherapy programme, 3 times a week for 4 weeks Get either real or sham laser therapy at each session Give blood samples before and after treatment to measure the bone marker Fill in two quality-of-life questionnaires before and after treatment Have one bone density scan (DXA) at the start to check they can take part

Read the detailed description

Bone loss accelerates after menopause because of the decline in oestrogen, raising the risk of progression from osteopenia to osteoporosis and of fractures. Current medication options are largely preventive and have limitations. High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) combined with physiotherapy is a non-invasive physical treatment that may stimulate bone formation with a favourable safety profile, but robust evidence in postmenopausal bone health is limited.

This is a randomised, double-blind, placebo (sham)-controlled, parallel-group interventional trial with two equal arms. A standardised physiotherapy programme is delivered identically in both arms as a background co-intervention, so the comparison isolates the added effect of active HILT versus sham.

Randomisation uses permuted blocks of four with 1:1 allocation, concealed with sealed opaque envelopes. Participants, the physiotherapist, the outcome assessor and the statistician are all blinded to allocation.

Intervention parameters: pulsed HILT in the near-infrared spectrum, 7 W, 5 J/cm², applied over the lumbar region (L1-L5) with a scanning handpiece for approximately 150 seconds per session, three sessions per week for four weeks. The sham arm follows an identical procedure with a device that delivers no therapeutic laser energy.

The bone-formation marker P1NP is measured in peripheral blood by ELISA (ng/mL). To avoid the confounding effect of acute exercise on bone turnover markers, the post-treatment sample is collected 72 hours (minimum 48 hours) after the last physiotherapy session, before any further physical activity, and all samples are analysed in a single batch.

Analyses follow the intention-to-treat principle on all randomised participants, with a per-protocol analysis as a supportive check. For each measure, the change from baseline is compared between arms using parametric or non-parametric tests as appropriate, with results reported as effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals. Safety is monitored throughout the treatment sessions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
  • Osteopenia

Keywords

  • High-Intensity Laser Therapy
  • Laser Therapy
  • Exercise Therapy
  • Physical Therapy Modalities
  • Bone Remodeling
  • Bone Density
  • Procollagen Type I N-Terminal Propeptide
  • Menopause
  • Quality of Life
03

In context

Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal

334 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 119 across 264 interventional studies indexed under Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal.

Browse Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal studies →

Lead sponsor

Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy is the lead sponsor of 56 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

women Osteopenia or osteoporosis diagnosed by DXA (T-score below -1.0) Age 50 to 70 years (BMI) between 18.5 and 30 Provides written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

History of fractures Use of agents that may interfere with bone metabolism (e.g., bisphosphonates, , hormone therapy) Severe comorbidities or decompensation of pre-existing conditions Recent physiotherapy (within the past 3 months) Rheumatologic diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus) High-dose calcium or vitamin D supplementation to laser therapy (cancer, active bleeding or bleeding disorders, acute infections, photosensitivity, pregnancy, implanted electronic devices, or other conditions that could interfere with laser treatment)

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High-Intensity Laser Therapy + Physiotherapy

    Participants receive a standardised physiotherapy programme plus active high-intensity laser therapy (HILT). HILT is pulsed near-infrared laser, 7 W, 5 J/cm², applied over the lumbar spine (L1-L5) with a scanning handpiece for about 150 seconds per session, three sessions per week for four weeks (12 sessions total).

    Device: High-Intensity Laser Therapy · Behavioral: Standardised Physiotherapy Programme

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Laser + Physiotherapy

    Participants receive the same standardised physiotherapy programme plus a sham laser. The sham device looks and operates identically to the active laser but delivers no therapeutic energy. It follows the same schedule: about 150 seconds per session over the lumbar spine (L1-L5), three sessions per week for four weeks (12 sessions total).

    Device: Sham Laser · Behavioral: Standardised Physiotherapy Programme

Interventions

  • DeviceHigh-Intensity Laser Therapy

    Pulsed near-infrared laser, 7 W, 5 J/cm², applied over the lumbar spine (L1-L5) with a scanning handpiece for about 150 seconds per session, three sessions per week for four weeks (12 sessions total). Delivered in the experimental arm only.

    Also known as: HILT

  • DeviceSham Laser

    A sham device identical in appearance and operation to the active laser but delivering no therapeutic energy. Applied on the same schedule: about 150 seconds per session over the lumbar spine (L1-L5), three sessions per week for four weeks. Delivered in the control arm only, to preserve blinding

    Also known as: Placebo laser

  • BehavioralStandardised Physiotherapy Programme

    A standardised physiotherapy (exercise) programme delivered identically in both arms as a background co-intervention. The programme is the same in content, frequency and duration for all participants, so the comparison isolates the added effect of the active laser versus sham.

    Also known as: Kinesiotherapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP)

    P1NP is a marker of bone formation, measured in peripheral blood by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and reported in ng/mL. The post-intervention sample is collected 72 hours (minimum 48 hours) after the last physiotherapy session, before any further physical activity, and all samples are analysed in a single batch.

    Time frame: Baseline and end of the 4-week intervention

  2. Change from baseline in health-related quality of life (Short Form-36, SF-36)

    SF-36 is a general health-related quality-of-life questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline and end of the 4-week intervention

  3. Change from baseline in osteoporosis-specific quality of life (Qualeffo-41)

    Qualeffo-41 is a quality-of-life questionnaire specific to osteoporosis. Total scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate poorer quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline and end of the 4-week intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with adverse events

    Adverse events are monitored throughout the treatment sessions and recorded by type, severity and relationship to the intervention.

    Time frame: Throughout the 4-week treatment period

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinical Rehabilitation Hospital
    Cluj-Napoca, Cluj 400347, Romania
    • Viorela Mihaela Ciortea, MD, PhD · Contactviorela.ciortea@umfcluj.ro · +40 264 207 021
    • Titus Vari, MD · Principal investigator
    • Viorela Mihaela Ciortea, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Coroleuca R, Filipoiu FM, Cherecheanu AP, Enyedi M, Bucsan R, Bostan M, Coroleuca CA, Ladea L, Vrinceanu D, Moraru OE, Iancu R. Laser Scanning Morphometric Measurements of the Main Orbital Communications in Dry Human Skulls. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 29;14(19):2168. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192168. PubMed 39410572 ↗
  • Fallahnezhad S, Jajarmi V, Shahnavaz S, Amini A, Ghoreishi SK, Kazemi M, Chien S, Bayat M. Improvement in viability and mineralization of osteoporotic bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell through combined application of photobiomodulation therapy and oxytocin. Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Apr;35(3):557-566. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02848-8. Epub 2019 Aug 9. PubMed 31399862 ↗
  • Lee DO, Hong YH, Cho MK, Choi YS, Chun S, Chung YJ, Hong SH, Hwang KR, Kim J, Kim H, Lee DY, Lee SR, Park HT, Seo SK, Shin JH, Song JY, Yi KW, Paik H, Lee JY. The 2024 Guidelines for Osteoporosis - Korean Society of Menopause: Part I. J Menopausal Med. 2024 Apr;30(1):1-23. doi: 10.6118/jmm.24000. No abstract available. PubMed 38714490 ↗
  • Abo Elyazed TI, Al-Azab IM, Abd El-Hakim AAE, Elkady SM, Afifi RMM, Obaya HE. Effect of high-intensity laser therapy versus shockwave therapy on selected outcome measures in osteoporotic long-term hemiparetic patients: a randomized control trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Sep 2;18(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04141-5. PubMed 37660042 ↗
  • Alayat MSM, Abdel-Kafy EM, Thabet AAM, Abdel-Malek AS, Ali TH, Header EA. Long-Term Effect of Pulsed Nd-YAG Laser Combined with Exercise on Bone Mineral Density in Men with Osteopenia or Osteoporosis: 1 Year of Follow-Up. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018 Feb;36(2):105-111. doi: 10.1089/pho.2017.4328. Epub 2017 Oct 25. PubMed 29068756 ↗
  • Macedo P, Cavalcante A, Fernandes S, Salustiano M, Lima M, Jerez-Roig J, Camara S. Association between menopausal status and physical function: A systematic review protocol. PLoS One. 2023 Jan 24;18(1):e0280786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280786. eCollection 2023. PubMed 36693069 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jul 2026; primary completion for Jan 2027, 6 months later.

Of 47 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 34. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 50 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 34.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 24, 2026
First posted
Jul 29, 2026
StartEst.
Jul 27, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 28, 2027
Last update
Jul 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07734922
Lead sponsor
Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Responsible party
Viorela Mihaela Ciortea (Conf. Dr. Viorela Mihaela Ciortea, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 29, 2026
Start date
Jul 27, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2026

Study contacts

Titus Vari, MD
Contact
titus.vari@elearn.umfcluj.ro
+40 743 081 588

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion