ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07734168Updated Jul 29, 2026

Effect of Trunk Stabilization on Pronated Feet

An interventional study of trunk stabilization exercise and pronated foot posture exercise in Pes Planus and Pronated Foot, sponsored by Kafrelsheikh University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-29.

Sponsored by Kafrelsheikh University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2025, registered Jul 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

the purpose of this study is to investigate The effect Trunk stabilization on dynamic balance and foot function of pronated foot posture.

Read the detailed description

Pronation is the simultaneous calcaneal eversion with foot abduction and dorsiflexion. The range of motion (ROM) for subtalar joint during pronation was around 5 ° to 10°. Pronation is important for stabilization in standing and walking, but excessive ROM for this motion can lead to over pronation.

Foot pronation is a natural movement, necessary for the normal development of gait, since it contributes to the absorption of the ground reaction forces .

However, overpronation causes the collapse of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot, thus causing more tension in certain muscles of the foot and leg, i.e., posterior tibialis. Pronated feet present rearfoot eversion and dorsiflexion with abduction of the forefoot in a static position, and in addition, have a strong relationship with the medial longitudinal arch (MLA). It is suggested that maintaining the integrity of the MLA can prevent numerous musculoskeletal injuries .

Pronated foot posture is common in adulthood, with a prevalence of around 21%, and it may be related to deformities of the first ray of the foot, such as the hallux valgus. Furthermore, this biomechanical alteration can also affect other areas, such as the knee .Thus, pronation influences the time and intensity of lumbopelvic muscle activation, giving rise to low back pain or other dysfunctions at that level.

There are several methods to treat the pronated foot, such as custom foot orthoses, external modifications of the footwear, exercises to strength the muscles involved or even surgery .Strength exercises are a highly recommended method in the treatment of childhood flat foot, since muscle enhancement plays very important role in the development of the lower limbs in the growth of the child. The lack of treatment can often lead to short- and long-term problems with deformities in adolescence and adulthood .

In adults, exercising the intrinsic foot musculature (short-foot exercises) has been shown to be effective in reducing the height of the internal arch or pronation in healthy subjects and sportspersons .Recently Pabón-Carrasco et al. demonstrated that foot posture could be modified with shot foot exercises, with a decrease in navicular drop measurements.

The main Intrinsic foot muscles (IFMs) are abductor hallucis (ABH), flexor digitorum brevis (FDB) and quadratus plantae (QP). Their principal function is to provide foot stability and flexibility for shock absorption ; improve dynamic alignment; stiffen the foot arches and stimulate proprioceptors on the sole of the feet . IFMs are also categorised as active subsystems in the foot core system and play an important role in static posture and dynamic activities .

Hence, strengthening of the IFM is logical as a possible intervention to help prevent pronation-related injuries. Common methods used to strengthen the IFM have previously involved toe-flexion exercises (e.g. towel crunches or marble pickups). However, Isolation of the IFM using the short-feet exercise could potentially be a more effective method to reinforce the MLA.

The muscle thicknesses and cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of the abductor hallucis (AbH), flexor hallucis brevis (FHB), flexor hallucis longus (FHL), and flexor digitorum longus (FDL) change in feet with reduced MLA ,under weight-bearing conditions. (4).

The core trunk musculature is comprised of abdominals, paraspinal, hip joint muscles and pelvic floor muscles. Co-contraction of transverses abdominis and multifidus is essential for the stability of the spine in static and dynamic balance. During inspiration, the diaphragm creates intra-abdominal pressure which creates spinal stability. This intra-abdominal pressure activates pelvic floor muscles and eccentrically abdominals to provide spinal stabilization and posture is improved .

02

Conditions studied

  • Pes Planus
  • Pronated Foot

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pronated foot posture
03

In context

Flatfoot

173 studies on the registry are indexed under Flatfoot; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 40 across 122 interventional studies indexed under Flatfoot.

Browse Flatfoot studies →

Lead sponsor

Kafrelsheikh University is the lead sponsor of 294 studies on the registry; 114 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subject's age ranged from 18-25 years (35)
  2. Subjects had bilateral pronated feet posture according to navicular drop test (20)
  3. (MBI) ranged from 18.5 to 24.9 kg/ m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Rigid structure foot deformity
  2. Acute lower extremity injuries or fractures
  3. History of lower limb or foot surgery
  4. Severe foot pain interfering with exercise performance
  5. Any neurological deficit affecting balance.
  6. Inflammatory arthropathy ( e.g. rheumatoid arthritis )
  7. Any medication can affect the balance.
  8. Current pregnancy
  9. Cardiovascular or respiratory disorders
  10. Cellulitis
  11. Diabetes.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Trunk stabilization exercise

    a participants recieve Trunk stabilization exercise and pronated foot exercise

    Behavioral: trunk stabilization exercise · Behavioral: pronated foot posture exercise

  • Active comparator
    control pronated foot posture

    A participant receives a pronated foot exercise

    Behavioral: pronated foot posture exercise

Interventions

  • Behavioraltrunk stabilization exercise

    An Exprimental group receive trunk stabilixation and pronated foot exercise

  • Behavioralpronated foot posture exercise

    participants recieve a conventional exercise program for pronated foot posture

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. dynamic balance

    dynamic balance will be assessed using balance check 363 system , lower sway values indicate better balance

    Time frame: baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

  2. Foot function index

    Foot function will be assessed using Foot Function Index ( FFI ). The total score range from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating worse pain , distability , and activity limitation

    Time frame: baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Physical Therapy , Kafrelsheikh University
    KafrelSheikh, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2025 to primary completion in Jan 2026, 2 months.

Of 89 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Flatfoot, half reached primary completion within 7 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 2 and three quarters within 15. This study's 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 89 studies reached it within 7 months; a quarter within 2 and three quarters within 15.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 21, 2026
First posted
Jul 29, 2026
StartActual
Nov 25, 2025
Primary completionActual
Jan 28, 2026
CompletionActual
Feb 28, 2026
Last update
Jul 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07734168
Responsible party
Nada Fathi Farrag Abdellah (Demonstrator, Kafrelsheikh University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 29, 2026
Start date
Nov 25, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 28, 2026
Completion
Feb 28, 2026
Last update
Jul 29, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion