ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07733206IFC-sepsisUpdated Jul 29, 2026

Validation of a Capillary Leak Index During Septic Shock, Based on Haemoglobin Level Variations Induced by Fluid Resuscitation. A Pilot Study.

An interventional study of TEST GROUP: A standardised fluid bolus of 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight using Ringer's lactate will be administered in septic shock patients. and CONTROL GROUP: A standardised fluid bolus of 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight using Ringer's lactate will be administered in non-septic postoperative patients. in Sepsis, sponsored by University Hospital Center of Martinique. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Martinique. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-29.

Primary conditionShock, SepticRegistry: SepsisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Sepsis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Shock, Septic
Why
  1. The study's title name Shock, Septic, a narrower term within Sepsis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own title. Of 46 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 72% were exactly right and 89% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 4% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University Hospital Center of Martinique · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to validate a simple and reproducible index of capillary leak (CLI) in septic shock, based on haemoglobin (Hb) variation induced by standardised fluid resuscitation. To achieve this, the correlation between CLI and biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction-angiopoietin-2 and syndecan-1-will be assessed in both septic and non-septic shock patients. CLI may contribute to the individualisation of fluid management in patients with septic shock.

Read the detailed description

Septic shock is characterised by systemic inflammation leading to endothelial dysfunction and increased capillary permeability. This results in intravascular hypovolaemia and interstitial oedema, contributing to tissue hypoperfusion and organ failure. Despite the prognostic implications, bedside assessment of capillary leak remains difficult, with no simple or standardised method available. Fluid resuscitation is the first-line therapy for circulatory failure in septic shock, but excessive fluid administration has been associated with increased mortality. Recent trials investigating restrictive fluid strategies have failed to show a survival benefit, likely due to the lack of patient stratification based on the severity of capillary leak. A bedside marker could guide personalised fluid and vasopressor therapy.

A standardised fluid bolus (8 ml/kg of ideal body weight, Ringer's lactate) will be administered in both septic and non-septic shock patients. Haemoglobin levels will be measured before and after infusion, and the CLI will be calculated as (Hb pre - Hb post) / Hb pre * 100. Bioimpedance analysis will be used to estimate extracellular water in selected patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sepsis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Septic shock
  • capillary leak
  • endothelial dysfunction
  • angiopoietin-2
  • syndecan-1
  • fluid resuscitation
  • haemoglobin variation
  • extracellular water
  • bio-impedance
03

In context

Shock, Septic Reclassified

1,078 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Septic; 232 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 79 across 636 interventional studies indexed under Shock, Septic.

Browse Shock, Septic studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Center of Martinique is the lead sponsor of 79 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Compared within Shock, Septic, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Sepsis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Test group (septic shock patients):
  • Adults admitted to the general ICU within 24 hours with a diagnosis of septic shock
  • Eligible for blood sampling during daytime hours

Control group (non septic shock patients):

  • Adults admitted to the postoperative ICU within 24 hours after surgery
  • Need for fluid resuscitation
  • Eligible for blood sampling during daytime hours
  • Patients with an arterial catheter in place as part of their care

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Clarkson's disease (idiopathic capillary leak syndrome)
  • Pre-existing extracellular fluid overload (e.g., cirrhosis, decompensated heart failure, nephrotic syndrome, chronic kidney disease on or awaiting dialysis)
  • Active bleeding or hemolysis
  • Receiving ECMO
  • Ongoing renal replacement therapy during the intervention
  • Blood transfusion within one hour before the intervention
  • Change in vasopressor or inotrope dose within 30 minutes before the intervention
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TEST GROUP

    Septic shock patients receiving standardised fluid resuscitation, with CLI computation, biomarker analysis (angiopoietin-2 and syndecan-1), and extracellular water evaluation using bioimpedance.

    Other: TEST GROUP: A standardised fluid bolus of 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight using Ringer's lactate will be administered in septic shock patients.

  • Other
    Control group:

    Postoperative patients undergoing standardised fluid resuscitation, CLI computation and biomarker analysis (angiopoietin-2 and syndecan-1)

    Other: CONTROL GROUP: A standardised fluid bolus of 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight using Ringer's lactate will be administered in non-septic postoperative patients.

Interventions

  • OtherTEST GROUP: A standardised fluid bolus of 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight using Ringer's lactate will be administered in septic shock patients.

    A standardised fluid bolus of 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight using Ringer's lactate will be administered in septic shock patients. Haemoglobin levels will be measured before and after the infusion, and CLI will be calculated using the following formula: CLI = (Hb pre - Hb post) / Hb pre \* 100 In selected patients, extracellular water volume will be estimated using bioimpedance analysis.

  • OtherCONTROL GROUP: A standardised fluid bolus of 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight using Ringer's lactate will be administered in non-septic postoperative patients.

    Description: A standardised fluid bolus of 8 mL/kg of ideal body weight using Ringer's lactate will be administered in non-septic postoperative patients. Haemoglobin levels will be measured before and after the infusion, and CLI will be calculated using the following formula: CLI = (Hb pre - Hb post) / Hb pre \* 100

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Correlation coefficient between CLI and serum levels of angiopoietin-2 and syndecan-1 at inclusion (Day 0) and on Day 3 in patients with septic shock.

    Correlation coefficient between CLI and serum levels of angiopoietin-2 and syndecan-1 at inclusion (Day 0) and on Day 3 in patients with septic shock.

    Time frame: 04 DAYS

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation coefficient between CLI at Day 0 and extracellular water accumulation from Day 0 to Day 3, assessed by bioimpedance, in patients with septic shock

    Correlation coefficient between CLI at Day 0 and extracellular water accumulation from Day 0 to Day 3, assessed by bioimpedance, in patients with septic shock

    Time frame: 04 DAYS

  2. Difference in CLI at Day 0 between patients with septic shock and those without.

    Difference in CLI at Day 0 between patients with septic shock and those without.

    Time frame: 01 DAY

  3. Odds ratio (95% CI) for the association between 30-day mortality and CLI measured at Day 0 in patients with septic shock.

    Odds ratio (95% CI) for the association between 30-day mortality and CLI measured at Day 0 in patients with septic shock.

    Time frame: 30 DAYS

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHUM
    Fort-de-France, Martinique 97261, Martinique
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Oct 2028, 25 months later.

Of 164 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Shock, Septic, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 25 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 172 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 21, 2026
First posted
Jul 29, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 15, 2028
CompletionEst.
Oct 15, 2028
Last update
Jul 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07733206
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Center of Martinique
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 29, 2026
Start date
Sep 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 15, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 15, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2026

Study contacts

SARAH-PRESCILLIA JOSEPH, MSC
Contact
SARAH-PRESCILLIA.JOSEPG@CHU6MARTINIQUE.FR
0596592696 ext. +596
PATRICK ROYER, DR
principal investigator · CHU MARTINIQUE

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion