ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07726888Updated Oct 20, 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis

An observational study in Ulcerative Colitis (Disorder) and Guselkumab, sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-20.

Sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
97
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In a real-world setting, this study systematically evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of guselkumab (GUS) in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), encompassing multi-dimensional outcomes including clinical remission, biochemical remission, endoscopic remission, histologic healing, and intestinal ultrasound changes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ulcerative Colitis (Disorder)
  • Guselkumab

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis
  • Guselkumab
  • efficacy and safety
  • real-world study
03

In context

Colitis, Ulcerative

1,853 studies on the registry are indexed under Colitis, Ulcerative; 472 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 97 is below the median of 198 across 551 observational studies indexed under Colitis, Ulcerative.

Browse Colitis, Ulcerative studies →

Lead sponsor

Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University is the lead sponsor of 137 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study employs a prospective consecutive enrollment design to include patients with moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis who are expected to receive guselkumab treatment at the study center based on clinical indications. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are as previously stated.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years.
  2. Diagnosis of ulcerative colitis is established based on clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, colonoscopy, radiological imaging (CT or ultrasound), and histopathological examination.
  3. Presence of moderate-to-severe disease activity, defined as a modified Mayo score (MMS) ≥ 5 points, accompanied by a rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) ≥ 1 and a Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) ≥ 2.
  4. Inadequate response or intolerance to at least one conventional therapy (5-aminosalicylates, , or ), as assessed by the investigator according to clinical practice.
  5. Based on the research cohort requirements, the GUS real-world cohort may include patients who are biologic-naive, have failed therapy, or have failed multiple lines of therapy.
  6. Availability of baseline data for disease activity assessment, including symptom scores (partial Mayo score or PRO2), endoscopic evaluation (MES), biochemical markers (C-reactive protein or fecal calprotectin), or imaging parameters (CT or intestinal ultrasonography).
  7. Patients enrolled in the prospective GUS cohort are required to provide written voluntarily.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with other intestinal diseases, such as Crohn's disease, intestinal tuberculosis, infectious colitis, ischemic colitis or other chronic intestinal inflammatory diseases;
  2. If there is an active intestinal infection, and the fecal culture or pathogen test shows positive within 8 weeks before the study (including Clostridium difficile, cytomegalovirus, etc.), and the re-examination turns negative without any signs of persistent infection, a re-evaluation can be conducted.
  3. Combined with severe infections, malignant tumors, severe liver and kidney dysfunction, or accompanied by active diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, sarcoidosis, and Graves' disease that may interfere with disease assessment
  4. Those who have undergone total colorectal resection or stoma surgery in the past and whose disease activity cannot be evaluated, or are expected to undergo major intestinal surgery during the study period;
  5. Has had a severe allergic reaction to monoclonal antibodies;
  6. During pregnancy or lactation (can be recorded as an independent cohort but not included in the primary analysis);
  7. Severe absence of baseline and follow-up data makes it impossible to determine efficacy or safety.
  8. Currently participating in other interventional clinical trials that may interfere with the results of this study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
97 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
48 Weeks
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Guselkumab treatment group

    Drug: Guselkumab

Interventions

  • All the patients receive GUS (IV) 200 mg induction therapy at weeks 0, 4, and 8, and who met the criteria for clinical symptom remission, biochemical remission, and improvement in intestinal ultrasound based on the clinical assessment at week 12, proceeded to receive GUS (SC) 100 mg every 8 weeks as maintenance therapy. Patients who did not meet the above criteria received GUS (SC) 200 mg every 4 weeks as maintenance therapy. At week 24, based on clinical and endoscopic evaluations, patients who achieved endoscopic remission were switched to GUS (SC) 100 mg every 8 weeks for maintenance, while those who did not achieve endoscopic remission continued to receive GUS (SC) 200 mg every 4 weeks for maintenance treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 48-week endoscopic remission

    Assessment was performed using the Mayo endoscopic subscore: endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in the Mayo endoscopic subscore by at least 1 point from baseline or a score of ≤1; endoscopic remission was defined as a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0. For patients who completed the 48-week treatment, endoscopic scores were evaluated, and the number/proportion of patients achieving endoscopic remission was calculated.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

  2. 48-week histological remission

    Investigators apply the Geboes score, and histological remission is defined as a Geboes score ≤ 2B.0. The Nancy Histological Index (NHI) is assessed concurrently, with histological remission defined as an NHI = 0 (indicating no active inflammation). Investigators performed histological scoring for patients who completed the 48-week treatment course and evaluated the number/proportion of patients achieving histological remission.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. 12-week clinical remission

    Clinical remission in UC is assessed using the partial Mayo score (pMayo) or PRO2. It's defined as either a pMayo score ≤ 2 with no individual subscore \> 1, or meeting the symptomatic remission criteria of PRO2 (indicating improvement in both stool frequency and rectal bleeding scores to the mild or normal range).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. 12-week biochemical remission

    1. CRP normalization (≤5 mg/L) or reduction by ≥50% from baseline. 2. Fecal calprotectin (FC) reduction to \<250 μg/g or reduction by ≥50% from baseline.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. 12-week intestinal ultrasound response

    Response to intestinal ultrasound (IUS) was defined as meeting both of the following criteria: 1) a decrease in bowel wall thickness (BWT) by ≥25% or a reduction of ≥1 mm from baseline; and 2) a reduction in blood flow signal (Limberg score) by ≥1 grade.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. 24-week and 48-week intestinal ultrasound response

    Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) remission was defined as meeting both of the following criteria: 1) bowel wall thickness (BWT) ≤ 3 mm; and 2) no detectable blood flow signal (Limberg grade 0).

    Time frame: 24 weeks; 48 weeks

  5. 24-week endoscopic response and remission

    Endoscopic response in UC was defined as a Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES) reduction of ≥1 point from baseline or a score of ≤1. Endoscopic remission was defined as an MES of 0.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  6. 24-week and 48-week Corticosteroid-free remission rate

    Corticosteroid-free remission, a core treatment target recommended by the STRIDE-II guidelines, reflects a patient's ability to maintain clinical remission without the aid of systemic glucocorticoids. It is defined as achieving clinical remission at the assessment timepoint without the use of oral or intravenous glucocorticoids for at least 12 weeks prior to assessment. The proportion of UC patients achieving corticosteroid-free remission was documented for evaluation of the sustainability and steroid-sparing capacity of the treatment.

    Time frame: 24 weeks; 48 weeks

  7. 48-week drug persistence rate

    Drug persistence rate is defined as the proportion of patients who continue to receive a given drug after initiation of treatment. It reflects the tolerability, adherence, and long-term benefit of the therapy, and serves as a core indicator in real-world evidence (RWE) studies. Patients who discontinue treatment due to objective non-medical reasons (e.g., relocation, change of healthcare system) may be excluded in sensitivity analyses.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

  8. Hospitalization and surgery rates at week 48

    1. Incidence of hospitalizations due to inadequate disease control and cumulative length of hospital stay. 2. Incidence and timing of intestinal resection or related surgeries performed due to disease activity or complications.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

  9. Impact of Prior Biologic Exposure on Efficacy

    The clinical, endoscopic, intestinal ultrasound (IUS), and biochemical improvements were compared between biologic-naïve patients and patients with prior biologic therapy failure or intolerance. This analysis was performed to determine whether previous biologic exposure influences treatment outcomes.

    Time frame: Efficacy comparisons were compared at all key study visits: baseline, week 12, week 24, and week 48.

  10. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBD-Q) scores at week 48

    1. A total score increase of ≥16 points from baseline is considered a clinically significant improvement. 2. Restoration to a normal or near-normal level (score ≥ 170) from an active disease state is considered achievement of quality of life remission.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

  11. Exploratory Study (Comparing the Efficacy of GUS and VDZ)

    Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who had previously received vedolizumab (VDZ) treatment and had complete baseline and follow-up data were retrospectively enrolled from the study center. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the effects of GUS and VDZ on multidimensional outcomes in moderate-to-severe UC in a real-world setting, including clinical response and remission, endoscopic remission, histological remission, and treatment persistence.

    Time frame: Efficacy comparisons were compared at all key study visits: baseline, week 12, week 24, and week 48

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ilvemark JFKF, Hansen T, Goodsall TM, Seidelin JB, Al-Farhan H, Allocca M, Begun J, Bryant RV, Carter D, Christensen B, Dubinsky MC, Gecse KB, Kucharzik T, Lu C, Maaser C, Maconi G, Nylund K, Palmela C, Wilson SR, Novak K, Wilkens R. Defining Transabdominal Intestinal Ultrasound Treatment Response and Remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Systematic Review and Expert Consensus Statement. J Crohns Colitis. 2022 May 10;16(4):554-580. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab173. PubMed 34614172 ↗
  • Kappelman MD, Adimadhyam S, Hou L, Wolfe AE, Smith S, Simon AL, Moyneur E, Reynolds JS, Toh S, Dobes A, Parlett LE, Haynes K, Selvan M, Ma Q, Nair V, Burris J, Dorand JE, Dawwas GK, Lewis JD, Long MD. Real-World Evidence Comparing Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab in Antitumor Necrosis Factor-Experienced Patients With Crohn's Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 1;118(4):674-684. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002068. Epub 2022 Nov 26. PubMed 36508681 ↗
  • Buisson A, Serrero M, Altwegg R, Guilmoteau T, Bouguen G, Nachury M, Amiot A, Vuitton L, Treton X, Caillo L, Pereira B, Fumery M. Real-World Comparison of the Effectiveness of Tofacitinib and Ustekinumab in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: The TORUS Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026 Apr;24(4):1141-1150. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2025.07.044. Epub 2025 Aug 18. PubMed 40835043 ↗
  • Rubin DT, Allegretti JR, Panes J, Shipitofsky N, Yarandi SS, Huang KG, Germinaro M, Wilson R, Zhang H, Johanns J, Feagan BG, Hisamatsu T, Lichtenstein GR, Bressler B, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Sands BE, Dignass A; QUASAR Study Group. Guselkumab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (QUASAR): phase 3 double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled induction and maintenance studies. Lancet. 2025 Jan 4;405(10472):33-49. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01927-5. Epub 2024 Dec 17. PubMed 39706209 ↗
  • Reich K, Armstrong AW, Foley P, Song M, Wasfi Y, Randazzo B, Li S, Shen YK, Gordon KB. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis with randomized withdrawal and retreatment: Results from the phase III, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled VOYAGE 2 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Mar;76(3):418-431. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.042. Epub 2017 Jan 2. PubMed 28057361 ↗
  • Blauvelt A, Papp KA, Griffiths CE, Randazzo B, Wasfi Y, Shen YK, Li S, Kimball AB. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the continuous treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: Results from the phase III, double-blinded, placebo- and active comparator-controlled VOYAGE 1 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Mar;76(3):405-417. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.041. Epub 2017 Jan 2. PubMed 28057360 ↗
  • Verstockt B, Salas A, Sands BE, Abraham C, Leibovitzh H, Neurath MF, Vande Casteele N; Alimentiv Translational Research Consortium (ATRC). IL-12 and IL-23 pathway inhibition in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jul;20(7):433-446. doi: 10.1038/s41575-023-00768-1. Epub 2023 Apr 17. PubMed 37069321 ↗
  • Kapizioni C, Desoki R, Lam D, Balendran K, Al-Sulais E, Subramanian S, Rimmer JE, De La Revilla Negro J, Pavey H, Pele L, Brooks J, Moran GW, Irving PM, Limdi JK, Lamb CA; UK IBD BioResource Investigators; Parkes M, Raine T. Biologic Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Real-World Comparative Effectiveness and Impact of Drug Sequencing in 13 222 Patients within the UK IBD BioResource. J Crohns Colitis. 2024 Jun 3;18(6):790-800. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad203. PubMed 38041850 ↗
  • Turner D, Ricciuto A, Lewis A, D'Amico F, Dhaliwal J, Griffiths AM, Bettenworth D, Sandborn WJ, Sands BE, Reinisch W, Scholmerich J, Bemelman W, Danese S, Mary JY, Rubin D, Colombel JF, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Dotan I, Abreu MT, Dignass A; International Organization for the Study of IBD. STRIDE-II: An Update on the Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE) Initiative of the International Organization for the Study of IBD (IOIBD): Determining Therapeutic Goals for Treat-to-Target strategies in IBD. Gastroenterology. 2021 Apr;160(5):1570-1583. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.12.031. Epub 2021 Feb 19. PubMed 33359090 ↗
  • Massironi S, Vigano C, Palermo A, Pirola L, Mulinacci G, Allocca M, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Danese S. Inflammation and malnutrition in inflammatory bowel disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jun;8(6):579-590. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00011-0. Epub 2023 Mar 15. PubMed 36933563 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 29 months after the start.

Of 188 non-industry observational studies under Colitis, Ulcerative, half reached primary completion within 51 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 30 and three quarters within 119. This study's planned 29 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 271 studies reached it within 47 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 90.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 21, 2026
First posted
Jul 24, 2026
StartActual
Jul 31, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Oct 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: date precision
1 update, last Oct 20, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 20, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: date precision

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07726888
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 24, 2026
Start date
Jul 31, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 20, 2026

Study contacts

Yi Jiang, Doctor of Medicine
Contact
wzjiangyi@yeah.net
+8613676715542
guolong Ma, Master of Medicine
Contact
maguolong2014@163.com
15868508303
Yi Jiang
principal investigator · Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion